“Well, Sargeking, aside from the fact that there’s no hyphen in American Muslim, all that hyphenated crap started as a way for people to assert their American identity, not their othernesss. A hundred years ago Americans of foreign descent were just called Italians, Irish, Chiinamen, etc. They started calling themselves Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans as a way to remind the rest of us that they were just as much Americans as we were.”
Aside from the fact that it’s not 100 years ago and we don’t call Americans of X descent X race, you’re right. Aside from that fact you’re right.
 November 8, 2015 at 1:02pm
His boss completely destabilized the ME (Libya, Yemen, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, etc.) and he has the nerve to say this.
Prior to his assignment as SecDef, Carter was a seemingly decent guy. Got to sit in a couple of telecons where he was being briefed and he genuinely seemed to have the DoD’s interests in mind. Since becoming SecDef, he’s gone full politician.
 November 5, 2015 at 6:35pm
He went from supposed conservative to supposed libertarian but it seems pretty obvious that he’s been on the path to liberalism for quite a long time.
[-1] November 4, 2015 at 8:23pm
While the Dems may be exploiting it, the Republicans are the ones that let them get away with it. I expect the Dems to be slimy, not the Republicans.
 November 3, 2015 at 6:51pm
“Who the hell is in charge of that asylum anyway?”
 October 31, 2015 at 11:58am
“Dana is hot…Dunham is NOT!”
While true, more importantly, Dana is intelligent, articulate, and wise…Dunham is none of those.
 October 31, 2015 at 11:49am
Catholics advocate for “Church tradition” while turning a blind eye to Scripture at every point. This “Church” promotes tradition but just never seems to be able to get past its gay and pedophilic priests.
Tell me, which part of the Holy Spirit is promoting that “tradition?” Because whether you like it or not, those gay and pedophilic priests 1) did not last by simply hiding in the shadows but thrived because the “Church” shielded them from justice and 2) they share in the same exact “apostolic” succession as the most revered members of the “Church.”
Anyone with an ounce of discernment knows, the “Church” is definitely not the same Bride (Jesus’ Church) described in the Bible. One is soiled and is more fit to be the bride of Satan and the other is the Bride, selected by Jesus and composed of members He selects, unsoiled and unstained by corruption and sin.
“So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God. You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: “‘This people honors me with their lips,
but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’” – Jesus
Doctrines and commandments of men such as disallowing priestly marriage when the Word says, “Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher, …”
If you need further evidence read the examples, read the Bible and see the examples of tradition provided.
 October 9, 2015 at 5:07pm
Even less impressive is the “researcher” is a homosexual himself and openly so. The school’s “research” page contains an official looking seal with three gender symbols (traditional male and female with a third combined symbol).
I found problems with research from UCSB’s Palm Center led by a homosexual there. I’m getting the feeling these “researchers” are more akin to propaganda specialists.
 September 17, 2015 at 8:19pm
Not just that but after a couple of elections of insisting on not saying who he’s rooting for, he’s now trying to advocate (get us to vote) for obvious progressives. Has anyone else noticed how he’s openly jumped on the progressive train after becoming a “libertarian?”
He’s no conservative and he’s no libertarian. Either someone has gotten to him, he’s abusing substances again, or he’s just another progressive out to gain power and make money off of others.
 September 15, 2015 at 10:35pm
Where is the ACLU tracking anti-church activity? Oh, they aren’t? Yeah, I’m sure they’re honest in what they’re dealing. Thanks but no thanks.
“our number … is close to the estimates of Muslim deaths when our Christian country invaded Iraq to overthrow Saddam” You missed the cute little part where the overwhelming number of those deaths were sectarian, Muslim on Muslim killings. Damn if you’re not a ret**d.
September 15, 2015 at 9:22pm
Sorry for the duplicate
[-4] September 15, 2015 at 7:10pm
“Who do you think ALLAH is?” Which Allah? Not all Allahs are the same.
Not that I don’t share the same contempt for the Muslim Allah, but Allah is simply the Arabic word for God. Christian Arabs use Allah in reference to God (they have other words for things like “Our Father” from the Lord’s Prayer – Abana or أبانا) and if you go to any online Bible that has Arabic versions (biblegateway.com for example), you can see Allah used for yourself.
Gen 1 – In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Gen 1 in Arabic (read right to left) – فِي البَدءِ خَلَقَ ***اللهُ*** السَّماواتِ وَالأرْضَ. (Allah appears between the asterisks)
You can match that up against a the Wikipedia page for “Allah” or a Google search and selecting the images tab. Most of the time, the name is written in calligraphy or stylized but it shouldn’t be hard to see what appears in the Bible in Arabic is the same word used by Muslims for their god.
 September 6, 2015 at 9:37am
The Bible makes it abundantly clear that charity is a personal responsibility and not a government one. Keep trying. You’re batting .000 so far.
 September 6, 2015 at 9:36am
Yawn @ personal attacks
 September 6, 2015 at 9:35am
Jizya is a tax. Perhaps you mean taqiyya (lying).
[-7] August 30, 2015 at 12:06pm
Regardless of what colors are there or not there (only liberals care about colors unless it goes against the narrative like all the blacks out murdering people then skin color doesn’t matter) it comes down to the values represented by the march. If you’re butthurt over a certain demographic not being represented, ask that demographic why it is so vehemently opposed to the values of the march not those marching for something positive. You pretend the issue is racism, and that’s a possibility. So ask, or aks, those absent why they are so racist and would rather not march for positive values just because it’s not being led by race baiters.