User Profile: CafeConservative


Member Since: May 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [20] September 17, 2015 at 8:19pm

    Not just that but after a couple of elections of insisting on not saying who he’s rooting for, he’s now trying to advocate (get us to vote) for obvious progressives. Has anyone else noticed how he’s openly jumped on the progressive train after becoming a “libertarian?”

    He’s no conservative and he’s no libertarian. Either someone has gotten to him, he’s abusing substances again, or he’s just another progressive out to gain power and make money off of others.

  • [1] September 15, 2015 at 10:35pm

    Where is the ACLU tracking anti-church activity? Oh, they aren’t? Yeah, I’m sure they’re honest in what they’re dealing. Thanks but no thanks.

    “our number … is close to the estimates of Muslim deaths when our Christian country invaded Iraq to overthrow Saddam” You missed the cute little part where the overwhelming number of those deaths were sectarian, Muslim on Muslim killings. Damn if you’re not a ret**d.

  • September 15, 2015 at 9:22pm

    Sorry for the duplicate

  • [-4] September 15, 2015 at 7:10pm

    “Who do you think ALLAH is?” Which Allah? Not all Allahs are the same.

    Not that I don’t share the same contempt for the Muslim Allah, but Allah is simply the Arabic word for God. Christian Arabs use Allah in reference to God (they have other words for things like “Our Father” from the Lord’s Prayer – Abana or أبانا) and if you go to any online Bible that has Arabic versions ( for example), you can see Allah used for yourself.

    Gen 1 – In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
    Gen 1 in Arabic (read right to left) – فِي البَدءِ خَلَقَ ***اللهُ*** السَّماواتِ وَالأرْضَ. (Allah appears between the asterisks)

    You can match that up against a the Wikipedia page for “Allah” or a Google search and selecting the images tab. Most of the time, the name is written in calligraphy or stylized but it shouldn’t be hard to see what appears in the Bible in Arabic is the same word used by Muslims for their god.

  • [12] September 6, 2015 at 9:37am

    The Bible makes it abundantly clear that charity is a personal responsibility and not a government one. Keep trying. You’re batting .000 so far.

  • [8] September 6, 2015 at 9:36am

    Yawn @ personal attacks

  • [2] September 6, 2015 at 9:35am

    Jizya is a tax. Perhaps you mean taqiyya (lying).

  • [-7] August 30, 2015 at 12:06pm

    Regardless of what colors are there or not there (only liberals care about colors unless it goes against the narrative like all the blacks out murdering people then skin color doesn’t matter) it comes down to the values represented by the march. If you’re butthurt over a certain demographic not being represented, ask that demographic why it is so vehemently opposed to the values of the march not those marching for something positive. You pretend the issue is racism, and that’s a possibility. So ask, or aks, those absent why they are so racist and would rather not march for positive values just because it’s not being led by race baiters.

    BTW, Good post Justice.

  • [3] August 9, 2015 at 2:21pm

    Hooknose? Racist much?

  • [11] August 9, 2015 at 2:16pm

    You typed 158 words. 12, or 7.5%, were “Strumpet.” Another significant percentage was the repetitive use of rape/sexual predator.

    Conclusion: You have no argument just an irrational, juvenile, emotional, unhealthy, and obsessive fixation with Trump.

  • [2] June 25, 2015 at 7:47pm

    Jesus didn’t intend divorces to be easy. Perhaps there was some conviction that was making these words hard to hear.

    “And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”

    I can’t emphasize enough that I don’t know your situation and the divorce may have been for good cause but I usually find that those who have heartburn with such unoffensive phrases also have some other deeper issues.

  • [4] June 25, 2015 at 6:28pm

    I like your response Blest. Instead of admitting that you were definitively speaking about something you were completely ignorant of and admitting how wrong you were, you instead move the goal posts with your comment, “Then why not just say it the way Jesus said it? You seem to be grasping at translation straws.”

    “Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: …”
    “But Jesus answered them, “You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God.”
    And the other examples alluded to above by AYFKM..

    It’s clear to anyone that Jesus used many techniques to communicate to His audiences. Sometimes it was in parables, others it was exact quotations, others were paraphrases, and others were simply His own words.

    And as Paul stated, “But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped.

    Perhaps you should give reading the Bible a go before trying to speak on what it does and does not say.

  • May 31, 2015 at 11:36am

    I wonder if her family is Mormon. I wonder if those who made the decision are Mormon.

    If her family is not Mormon and the administrators are, I could see it being a petty religious thing. As irrational as the decision was, I can’t think of any other scenario that makes sense.

  • May 25, 2015 at 10:59pm

    “Though I was unable to view the video, due to the crummy site that is the Blaze, I doubt, not just anyone, including trained, off duty professional police officers viciously attacked the bikers as you propose.”

    Glad you can derive the information you need by not watching the video. I’d link you tens of videos of professional police officers acting in such a manner but you probably wouldn’t be able to view and make assumptions anyways.

    “You, Café, are off base on this one.”
    Says the person who can’t even see the video but will readily tell people they’re way off base based on pure assumption.

  • May 25, 2015 at 1:14pm

    So let me get this staight, if you shoot someone with a Super Soaker, they should be able to tackle you to the ground and repeatedly scream “I’ll break your ******* arm” while wrenching said person’s arm behind their back?

    The dudes with the water guns were d***s but it seems the “professionals” here were even greater d***s and abusing their police authorities. Had anyone else performed such abusive “arrests” after getting shot with Super Soakers the “arresters” and not the “arrestees” would have been going to jail and getting sued.

  • [-1] May 14, 2015 at 11:41pm

    “And yet you accused snoop of lying when he quoted your comment. You are in such a hurry to bash the church given to us by Jesus that you don’t even remember when you spew untruths.”

    And in your rush to blindly hold to your religion and play favorites (which Jesus condemned), you actually ignore his comment and the words he attributed to me when I call him a liar.

    “Roger that Café, finally we agree on something.
    Salvation is NOT by faith alone”

    “Did you not know that ALL of your comments can be accessed on the Blaze obviously not. Oops.”
    This has nothing to do with search as you originally acknowledged “snoop … when he quoted your comment.” The comment is right there. It precedes his comment. It required no search of my entire history.

    Fun how you project onto me your very own desperation. You’re so desperate to affirm your fellow Catholic that you’ll throw spaghetti on the wall to see what sticks. He commented on a specific post. He attributed to that post something I neither said nor implied in that specific post. He lied plain and simple. You supported him in that lie plain and simple. You used deceit by trying to imply he had search my comments and found something.

    Neither of you can deal honestly and that is the face of Catholicism not only here but throughout your religion’s history.

  • [-1] May 14, 2015 at 11:13pm

    “We may be talking about two different things.

    As a Christian, I do not require someone to repent in order to find forgiveness in my heart.” Yep, because you are ignorant of God’s Word and instead rely on Catholicism to guide. You and your religion replace God’s Words and ideas with your own but pretend that you’re still following God.

    “The wellness of my own soul requires forgiveness and mercy FREELY given by me.”
    You and your religion don’t determine the wellness of your soul, God does. But again, His Word is foreign to you. Catholic teaching is all that matters.

    “However, Good Catholics believe when one confesses sin to God, one must repent and to resolve to avoid that sin again! Then we dare to ask for forgiveness.”
    Too bad that’s not what God directed.

    “So, yes, in our Sacrament of Reconciliation, repentance is necessary.”
    Twist it however you will to justify ignoring His Word.

    But specifically, the Pope’s vocation is not to judge as if he were God. He should reach out in Christian mission to those MOST IN NEED OF GOD’S MERCY.”
    Thus inquisitions and burnings.

    “Remember, Jesus did not come for the righteous, but for those steeped in sin.” And demanded repentance or He turned his back on them just as we were likewise told to do. Read His Word.

    “Hate the sin . . not the sinner!” “Engage and evangelize the sinner, and do not leave them simmering in their own errors.”
    Read up on pearls and dogs and knocking dust from your feet.

  • [-1] May 14, 2015 at 11:06pm

    “Since the first written reference to the “Catholic Church” dates back to 107AD and was written by the man who actually succeeded Peter as Bishop of Antioch. More than likely, he was ordained by Peter himself.”

    Except the language Ignatius wrote it in was a language that didn’t have capital letters. The Nicene Creed, written a couple hundred years later, wrote “catholic church” and not “Catholic Church” until the Catholics got their hand on it and tried to revise history again, the original language lacked capitalization, a concept foreign to westerners without training in old languages.

  • [-1] May 14, 2015 at 10:57pm

    Yet you were unable to show a single example of that.

    Pathetic and desperate. In short, Catholic.

  • [-1] May 14, 2015 at 10:56pm

    “Still knows zip about the church Jesus gave us. Pray for those who have been given the truth but refuse to believe it. And special prayers for those too arrogant to hear it.”

    Catholic projection would be so cute in its naivete if it weren’t so tragically dangerous to the souls of those projecting.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love