They weren't bashing Mexicans - they were bashing illegal aliens. The fact that a criminal with a Mexican sounding name is assumed to be here illegally is a tribute to the lawlessness of the sanctuary state you seem to be so freaking proud of.
 August 25, 2015 at 11:55pm
She wouldn’t answer either… Not a bad strategy though
[-1] August 25, 2015 at 11:54pm
Have you actually read the 14th Amendment?
[-11] August 25, 2015 at 11:53pm
Read the 14th amendment christos… Sucks but you’re wrong
What Supreme Court decision settled this issue? Oh, I see, there isn't one. Sucks but your answer is as bogus.
 August 25, 2015 at 11:51pm
Your comparing Cruz to a liberal is lame… And the 14th amendment unfortunately does allow for anchor babies. Go read it.
I do agree Cruz wasn’t at his best there, but that doesn’t make him a liberal.
 August 25, 2015 at 11:48pm
Megan Kelly was definitely asking a gotcha question there… I don’t like it.
However, Cruz should be ready for that stuff regardless of who he’s sitting with. He should have had a response already prepared for that question. Minor mistake on his part but a mistake non the less…
No. Cruz is right. That question is a distraction from solving the problem. It is a gotcha question the answer to which he would pounded over no matter which way he answered. Cruz is right. There a dozen things or more you do first before you ever get to talking about deportation. Those dozen things can solve the problem without deporting families. Therefore it is a stupid question in which Cruz is famed is he does damned if he doesn't. He is right to refuse to play her game.
That wasn't a gotcha question.
It was a follow up question.
And as Bush should have been prepared for questions about Iraq,
ALL GOP contenders should be prepared to answer ALL questions
on the topic they are discussing.
It can't be all SOUND BITE 24/7.
That won't get you in the White House
 August 25, 2015 at 4:51pm
ModerateRepublican: they are saying there is no “state religion.” That’s a good thing. Everyone can choose their own religion or lack thereof.
That’s very different than saying religion has no influence on our government. All of those men you listed followed Ben Franklin’s call to never let congress start a session without prayer for example. Hence the reason Congress follows that unsaid rule to the day.
 July 21, 2015 at 12:32am
Trump has changed parties about 5 times, supported the Clintons, flip flopped abortion, supported a wealth tax, was a Dem as recently as 2009, voted for the president, hates Obamacare, but in the same breath says healthcare is a right… But people think he’s a conservative because of what he says this week on the border… Makes total sense…
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED. THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T GIVE THEM THE AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER ANYTHING TO DO WITH MARRIAGE.
Ok. Then you and those that think like you should organize to separate govt from church marriages.
Feel free to seek govt policy / law where... Want to get married in a church and NOT have that union recognized in ANY way by govt. ... Go for it. Fight for that.
Seek out policy that offers that when a cpuple gets married via a religious entity / church they do NOT receive ANY of the privileges / rights afforded committed couples UNLESS they separately petition the govt for such. So such privileges as: Healthcare decisions, property decisions, anything to do with possible children... ALL those govt recognized rights and privileged related to marriage will need to be separately petitioned for from govt.
I'm fine with that.
@zappa, or one could have a notary at the religious ceremony certifying a civil contract and powers of attorney. But other than that its something I agree with. Get government out of private lives.
Yep, this is more big-government nonsense. When government eff's something up, the solution is always MORE government in stead of LESS.
How about we just refer to it as MARRIAGE now...
 June 25, 2015 at 5:40pm
She obviously knows what she did is wrong and is willing to accept the consequences. All she is saying is she doesn’t need to public to dog pile on her. I think that’s fair.
but what about her dog piling on miley cyrus not even a month ago?
What did she do wrong?
If you want your life to be private, and that privacy respected, don't put it out there by blogging, Facebooking or any other Socila Media. I love her Mom, but apparently she didn't ever explain the 'facts of life' to Bristol. I would like to know why she didn't marry the Medal of Honor winner. Not sure why being married before disqualified him, unless he is currently married. He obviously wasn't bothered by the fact that she had a child from a previous relationship. Again, if she wants her privacy respected, she needs to just go away quietly..
It is fair, but I have to wonder, why does this two-times single mother get a pass from conservatives but others don't? Some of you say the most horrible things about single mothers.
There is no wrong anymore... is there?? :o/
I agree and wouldn’t it be nice if those who are judging her would share that judgement with welfare broodmares across the country? The difference between Bristol and them is that they don’t care if they are or are not “doing something wrong.” It’s turned out to be a pretty nice money-maker for them. They don’t need to hound the baby daddies to support their kids. Uncle Sugar Daddy has got the taxpayers out here to do that. I would suspect that the majority of people on here who are trashing her are liberal hypocrites who gladly dole out money to support welfare mothers.
 April 19, 2015 at 3:29am
Ahcma… Mark doesn’t believe the audience is stupid… That’s like saying did you know the sky was blue?
 April 16, 2015 at 7:33pm
This isn’t a political article you nitwits… Enjoy life outside of that world for a moment. Not that this article is actually joyful….
The kid was in total fear. Suck to be him in prison.
Way to rip scripture from context man. That passage has nothing to do with this story. You need to watch this video, so that perhaps you will stop spreading misinformation about God's word.
Perhaps if CAf didn't use the outdated/antiquated KJV, there would be better understanding.
"but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."
That translation, which is CURRENT English (US) usage, gives a different light. Stumble. But the meaning is spiritual stumbling, not physical as in this Blaze story.
DUMP KJV ALREADY, people!
"The people of Samaria must bear the consequences of their guilt because they rebelled against their God. They will be killed by an invading army, their little ones dashed to death against the ground, their pregnant women ripped open by swords." Hosea 13:16 NLT
 March 10, 2015 at 6:26pm
He didn’t get into bed with them Irish… read the article
Exactly! Don't call me a racist, but did anyone notice "black thug", other losers standing around but NOT helping the teacher. Folks, this is what this world is coming to. I'm sure home life is non existent? No Daddy, I'm sure too. Just sayin.........
Not necessarily but it is illegal for cops to also try to confiscate cell phones when your recording them but cops will break and literally kill you over cell phi e footage you have of them. Whether you are black or white!