User Profile: california_red


Member Since: September 29, 2010


  • July 31, 2014 at 6:27pm

    I bet $1 the Police superintendent doesn’t personally appear on site at all Chicago shootings.

  • [3] June 6, 2014 at 6:42pm

    its like the George Bush mockery and derangement syndrome never happened.

  • [1] May 13, 2014 at 2:17pm

    seems righteous. God calls some of these men to get Gulfstream private jets. To spread the word of course.

  • February 21, 2014 at 5:05pm

    protect and serve baby. While I applaud the efforts of most police and support their role, we have become a nation with so many laws that any one of us is guilty of something at some point in the day. We need less laws and we need better scrutiny of police officers so their power has some checks and balances.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 18, 2014 at 7:07pm

    Pretty easy to compare the Mercedes and Toyota plants that are thriving in the south with the dead models of the UAW Detroit plants. But no way can this vote be based on the terrible performance of the unions. Racism, Hitler, look a squirrel.

  • February 11, 2014 at 7:43pm

    Blaze readers need to have some discretion with their outrage. 1) Bring a valentine or treat for the entire class is the standard rule for all schools since forever. 2) don’t put names on them policy makes it really easy to distribute the cards when the time comes. No need for the teachers to match names for KINDERGARTNERS.

    Blaze discredits itself with some of the things the readers get worked up over.

  • November 3, 2013 at 8:18am

    We need to counter the stupid notion that existing coverages were “crappy”. I’m 42 year old guy with a vasectomy. Don’t need pregnancy coverage. I haven’t drank in 15 years. Don’t need substance abuse coverage. I believe that insurance should cover major medical situations. Don’t need $30 check ups. In short, it is crappy that I can’t pick coverage to suit my needs. It I scrappy that the statists get to decide what is best for me.

  • October 29, 2013 at 2:01pm

    surprised they didn’t get arrested on Bart or in SF for the bazooka and guns.

  • October 23, 2013 at 5:31pm

    love the people that say “if parents had raised these children right….this never would have happened.” That attitude is so unrealistic.

    Underage drinking has been going on since the day minors were prohibited from drinking. It is a challenge for “good” parents and “bad” alike. If you raised a kid that grew to be 21 without ever drinking, kudos to you. You are in the minority, and you are probably delusional. The rest of us have to try to raise kids that overall make good decisions, learn from (hopefully small) mistakes, and grow up to be responsible adults. We live in a society that promotes drinking and partying. Most high school kids experiment. Doesn’t mean they are bad kids, and it doesn’t mean they are bad parents. The world is not as cut and dry as some people around here like to make it out to be.

    As for the decision whether to involve the police or not, that seems to be an honest debate with obvious pro’s and con’s to each side.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 29, 2013 at 11:15am

    1) The reason doesn’t have me shaking my head in disbelief because the second amendment is under attack.
    2) Imagine the outrage in the media if a CC processor decided not work with a company because they performed abortions, or performed gay marriages. I’m sure that would be couched as a violation of constitutionally protected civil rights.
    3) End of the day, this CC processor has the right to choose who they do business with. if they don’t want gun business, then someone who does can step in and take their place.

  • September 25, 2013 at 9:36pm

    The blaze’s commentaries level of discourse is about as intelligent as apes in a zoo. Editors take note of what popular science have done recently, because I’m starting to be embarrassed by this sites readers. I like Glenn and agree with many of his views, but you people are such a disgrace to intelligent discussion.

    Responses (4) +
  • September 25, 2013 at 9:32pm

    Tea party patriots are about liberty and limited government. A real conservative would leave this issue to the states. You can’t claim to speak for the tea party with your bigotry.
    start your own theocratic party if you want to be guided by the bible or your own personal mores, but you are no tea party patriot.

  • September 22, 2013 at 2:11pm

    I’m with Ted. I no longer consider myself a Republican. Im a tea party libertarian. The GOP will get no money or support from me from this point forward.

  • September 22, 2013 at 2:03pm

    Anybody that doesn’t know this band doesn’t follow modern music. There is a whole world that exists outside the realm of your experience. Blaze readers are narrow minded. Personally I don’t love this band, but I am definitely aware of a top selling Grammy winning act. Blaze readers more and more like wnd readers every day.

  • September 21, 2013 at 10:41am

    So what. The blaze and it’s readers can get worked up over some truly irrelevant things. Free market means some businesses will fail. That doesn’t always mean liberal cause, conspiracy, or government meddling. California is a tough place to do business.

    Responses (4) +
  • September 18, 2013 at 3:38pm

    solution: concealed carry. Carrier is protected, Nobody is alarmed.

  • September 18, 2013 at 1:46pm

    zero tolerance….for common sense. Keep in mind, the more power we cede to bureaucrats and unelected mini-tyrants, the less room there is for rational discretion and reasonable enforcement. These people live and breath to enforce the rules no matter the consequence.

  • August 27, 2013 at 6:06pm

    hey, at least all the progressives will now realize that President Bush was in the right all along. Obviously thats the conclusion to make when you have a rush to war in the face of WMD’s in the middle east.

  • July 25, 2013 at 6:18pm

    seems like my choice when voting is socially conservative big government statist vs. socially liberally bog-government statist. I hate this dichotomy.

  • July 17, 2013 at 6:34pm

    “the White House offering protection to a private citizen and his family would be unusual in a case like this”

    And I’d venture to say that it would be unusual for the DOJ to put a national call out to see what kind of dirt they can get on an individual US citizen.

Restoring Love