User Profile: CAmom

Member Since: September 05, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] October 22, 2016 at 2:37pm

    Nope – not the Russians, Grover. Patriotic Americans.

  • [17] September 3, 2016 at 3:18pm

    What the frack? You’re just throwing a bunch of current “trigger words” out there. Please do explain HOW Milo is a “Right Wing Neo-Fascist with racist underpinnings.” and while you’re at it what in the WORLD that even means.

  • [1] July 25, 2016 at 4:11pm

    “Politico admitted that one of its reporters made …………………a “mistake” ……………………….in sending an article to a Democratic National Committee staffer before it was published,” (additional dots mine)


    “per agreement”

    Can I have a show of hands – who believes this was a SINGLE mistake?

  • [12] July 24, 2016 at 12:38pm

    So, essentially, “Pay no attention to that dead body, because the person who pointed out that the body is, indeed dead, is someone ‘our people’ are supposed to hate! See, you’re not supposed to LISTEN to anyone other than US! Look! Someone who violated a safe space and doesn’t believe weather is worse than isis!”

    Responses (1) +
  • July 19, 2016 at 3:15am

    Gee – and this from the man who had Cindy Sheehan on his show numerous times and tried to encourage her to run for office…..

    Dumped her as soon as she started going after 0bama, though…..

  • [8] July 18, 2016 at 12:03pm

    Google – Unpack that, please. Why DO black people kill black people?
    Criminals ARE held to the same standard as cops in that murder is murder. If a cop murders someone, there is no “get out of jail free” card. The cop IS in a position of authority, however, and has the authority to act as such – in order to keep the peace. That means arresting people and using the force necessary to maintain order.

    The groups trying to prevent crime in predominantly black neighborhoods are not doing such a bang-up job. When you look at Chicago, for example – to date there have been 2218 shootings, 336 of them fatal. There were 7 police involved shootings, 4 of them fatal. Yet the riots are about the 7, and the 2218 are ignored. You can see why that’s a question.

    And finally, what ~IS ~ BLM about?

  • [19] July 16, 2016 at 7:05pm

    I think it’s going to be castro, too. She’s got to see the problem with two women – no way that would get her the most votes. She is above everything a politician with one goal – whoever gets her there is who she’s going to back, and she’d run over chelsea if it got her closer to the White House.

  • [7] May 31, 2016 at 7:43pm

    Except sirius didn’t suspend air America when randi rhodes actually DID threaten GWB, and they ran ads for a movie showing the assasination of GWB, and they didn’t cancel Mike Malloy’s sirius channel when he asked when seal team 6 was going to “drop in on George W Bush”? So it sounds a little hollow when they protest based on their concern for ““Comments……may be reasonably construed by some to have been advocating harm…”

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] April 14, 2016 at 1:51am

    Do these people not know they’re in AMERICA? Where the language and culture and society and systems and foods are AMERICAN? If they want “their own tongue, their own foods”, they might need to go to their own country. I’m just so sick of being accused of being something I’m not – of all the isms. I have no problem sharing my country but don’t come in and grab everything, throw it to the ground and say it’s not enough, and then demand we redesign everything to suit you. smh

  • [7] April 12, 2016 at 1:23pm

    The statement was: “every young American should give a year of service to the country” whether that be through the military or through working in the non-profit space.

    I agree with you, that not all “youth” should be in the military – I don’t know that I’d want my children relying on some of them for safety…..but certainly there are other tasks which need doing, neighborhoods which need cleaning, etc -

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] March 31, 2016 at 2:52pm

    Oh, heaven forbid she be “re-traumatized” with the fake story she perpetrated which ruined the lives of all the young men she falsely accused of heinous deeds in public, which got them kicked out, fired, ostracized and generally – oh, what’s the word I’m searching for – TRAUMATIZED by her LIES. Kind of a life-lesson there, chickadee. You lie, you pay. I have ZERO sympathy for her. I don’t care if she didn’t have a bicycle or nice clothes or enough food or even parents growing up. Neither did I. It’s not a license to be a miserable excuse for a human. My open letter to her: Own your stuff, apologize for your hideous behavior, make some changes and create your own life the way you created that fake story. It’s about the same amount of energy, and it’s healthier for everyone. Now get on it.

  • [19] March 28, 2016 at 4:51pm

    You misunderstand – it’s not about a movie or a restaurant. It’s about the religious beliefs of the person providing the service. Take, for example the Christian bakers. They never refused service to gay couples. They were actually familiar with the couple who sued them, and had served them many times. It was the ceremony and the significance of the ceremony which was the issue. Just as some people feel a religious calling to dress more conservatively. Would you require they wear a bikini to work? Honestly, this is not brain surgery. How is it that so many can’t conceive that discrimination is a two way street? Are these Christians not being told they do not have religious freedom when they’re forced to go against their beliefs? Are they not being told they don’t have the right to free speech when they’re told they cannot voice their deeply held convictions?

    I am so appalled at the left I can barely speak half the time. This country is so rapidly turning into something out of a nightmare I can’t even believe it.

  • [9] March 28, 2016 at 4:37pm

    The Bill reads:
    30 All individuals who are ministers of the gospel or clerics or religious practitioners
    31 ordained or authorized to solemnize marriages, perform rites, or administer sacraments
    32 according to the usages of the denomination shall be free to solemnize any marriage,
    33 perform any rite, or administer any sacrament or to decline to do the same, in their
    34 discretion, in the exercise of their rights to free exercise of religion under the Constitution
    35 of this state or of the United States.
    Here’s the link….

    It’s pretty narrow.

  • [1] March 27, 2016 at 12:17pm

    Unless she worked for free on this movie, it’s just more liberal posturing. Crowdfunding, tearful interviews, proclamations of the “good” they are doing – honestly, do no liberals ever take an honest look at themselves? Is it a good thing to shed light on the practice? Yes. Is it going to stop trafficking? Of course not. And it’s certainly not limited to “other” countries – my nephew is a police officer in just ONE American city, and he works on a task force addressing young American girls being trafficked here in this country. How about hollywood look to our own problems for once, help out our own citizens. No, that would require them to actually question their own knee-jerk beliefs.–339689272.html

  • [439] March 14, 2016 at 11:21pm

    THANK YOU for using their names. Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods should never be forgotten.
    Monica Lewinsky’s ex boyfriend’s wife’s name should never be uttered again.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] March 14, 2016 at 11:11pm

    I agree they didn’t divide the ingredients by the number of uses of each jar – but it’s still crazy pricey. I loosely figured it out – 1 oz is 6 teaspoon and there are some jars that are only 3 ounces – 2 tablespoons is an ounce, etc – so the smoothie adds up by the time you add up all the ridiculous ingredients. Still, not $200

  • [1] February 29, 2016 at 11:31am

    That song WAS moving. I am a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, and I was teary. What bothers me, though, is the attitude of the hashtag. #saveourgirls didn’t save anyone, a song doesn’t stop rape or assault, “raising awareness” doesn’t move people to action. I can remember when a family friend, a judge – was told about my abuse, his response was that he “didn’t want to get involved” – and that is still the majority response. A song isn’t going to change that. I see a mental picture of joe biden and the administration wiping their hands saying “Well, we’ve solved another one – sexual assault taken care of. Put that in the ‘win’ column.”

    The truth is, that was just a song. Abuse still happens, rape still happens, ignorance still reigns and people give lip service but they still don’t really care. Morals will change that. Our culture can help to change that. Self-defense can help, too – although not usually for the children who are victims.

    But until people care about the morals of our leaders and our society – when they stop believing the convenient lie that taking what belongs to someone else is somehow moral and right -or that God is some cartoon, invented for the less ‘evolved’ ~ we will still find ourselves staring back at people who have had EVERYTHING stolen from them.

  • [1] February 12, 2016 at 7:49pm

    It’s not a “fear” of immigration – it’s a concern about ILLEGAL immigration. We either have borders and sovereignty or we don’t. Laws and the Constitution either matter or they don’t. The amount of melanin really has nothing to do with it.

    And the “people on your side” don’t give a damn about anything except their own power – and that’s why they want illegals to vote. Because political survival is and will always be the driving factor in promoting illegal immigration and immigrants.

  • [13] February 2, 2016 at 12:14pm

    Don’t forget, people are “children” until 26 now – so I’d say orphan. Although you can’t differentiate between male and female anymore either, so I guess it COULD be a widow…. Huh. Well, either way, you’re a racist. And islamaphopbic. And probably a gun-toting bible clinger. Obvi.

  • [18] January 25, 2016 at 12:32pm

    I don’t usually agree with banning words, but in the case of her favorite candidate, I’d make an exception. Let’s all agree we will NEVER use the word “President” when describing hillary.

123 To page: Go