Because they are FAIR & BALANCED! LOL, Giggle, Snort...Notice how they are all jumping on the "Ban the Confederate Flag"? When I saw Geraldo on Hannity weeping nd whining and Hannity letting him get away with it I just about vomited.
June 26, 2015 at 9:28am
CafeConservtive doesn’t know what he’s talking about; he’s referring to Mat 5:32. Each time Jesus mentions ‘put away’ the word is apoluo. In Mat 5:32 that word divorced is apoluo, release or put away, which isn’t divorce. The men were telling the wives to leave the house without following through w/the 2nd step, handing her divorce papers. Cafe is also assuming you were ‘under conviction’ i.e. wrong or sinned. In Isiah 54:5 God tells Israel He’s their husband; in Jeremiah 3:8 God put away & divorced Israel cos she committed adultery by worshiping idols. God is a divorcee, therefore you weren’t under conviction. Jesus said God hates putting away cos it caused people to sin. Naturally He doesn’t like marriages to end, but when bad things happen we should follow His example & go through the steps so finalize it, so there can be healing, forgiveness, & new beginnings.
June 25, 2015 at 10:19am
yawn (changes channel)
 June 24, 2015 at 9:38am
shaving and soaking; had a good laugh but stay on subject. From what I’ve read the results are inconclusive, and being gay doesn’t make one an expert in genetics. If it were in our DNA then there wouldn’t be any ex-gays, and there would be a lot less heterosexuals and the world’s population wouldn’t be 7+ billion. If it were in our DNA, hetero would be abnormal. I have a learning disability; it’s in my DNA, runs rampant in my family. My mom and siblings have it to a certain degree, some less noticeable than others. My son inherited it. It wasn’t a choice and neither of us have suddenly become ex-disability. Instead of looking to science look to Jesus the Healer. He knows more about this than any of us. Ask and He’ll answer. Seek and you’ll find. But if you can’t handle the Truth then keep living the way you are. But stop telling us to shut up and sit down cos we’re just beginning to fight back. With God for us, no one can be against us!
June 23, 2015 at 9:32am
you didn’t read the whole article; the father chased after the guy, who got away, and followed up with calling police and warning neighbors.
 June 23, 2015 at 9:15am
bet he won’t sleep THERE again! Lesson learned.
 June 23, 2015 at 9:08am
they’re lying; I was offended some years ago when Walmart caved to the gay agenda. I was offended when they told their employees to say “Happy Holidays” at Christmas. I was offended when a shopper posted a pic of a Christmas tree topper shaped like the Islamic crescent. I was offended when Walmart bowed to Muslim demands to honor them, and hired Muslims, putting them front and center at the cashiers. I only saw that one Muslim woman at the front, but she strangely disappeared; maybe she had an issue handling the pork products. So anyway, like all libs, Walmart sprinkles sugar on their lies.
 June 20, 2015 at 10:46am
actually, Satan wanted to exalt himself & his throne above God; he used equality to deceive Eve. If 5 women are in a room, & all 5 work the same job, are of the same race/height/weight, make the same salary, are single w/1 child the same age, each have a house & car etc, etc, you get the picture. As long as they stay in that room, they are EQUAL. As soon as they leave that room, they are no longer equal. Pursuing nationwide equality is tantamount to capturing the end of the rainbow; it’ll never happen. In America, we have rights because we allow(ed) ourselves & others to have them. People chose (yes it’s a choice to take offense) to be offended at the sign because of their strong passion of a certain subject(s) uppermost in their mind, which is why they wrongly assumed the church was addressing the thing they believed in.
 June 19, 2015 at 9:23am
He follows the same pattern as others when addressing this issue: praising his wife before lowering the boom. God appointed Adam to rule Eve in Genesis because he failed to speak up thus allowing her to be deceived. BUT, if it were an edict for all men to adhere to, it’s never repeated by God or prophets for 1000′s of years until Paul wrote of it. Paul’s letters are a response to problems at Ephesis & Corinth that we don’t have a record of. If we hold up his letters of wifely submission to the law of 1st mention, then it makes sense. If a husband keeps silent and/or does nothing in a situation which causes her to be deceived, THEN he is to be the head of the house as retribution for his failure and protect her in future. The words “help meet” is ezer ezer, same word repeated. It means, “surrounding aid-surrounding aid.” That is the wife’s role for the husband, always surrounding him w/aid w/o having to constantly defer to him or wait for instructions, never lifting hand or foot on her own cos he’s “the head” of the house. This false teaching was brought back when women began stepping into the pulpit in the 70′s. According to Paul women aren’t to teach, preach, or talk in church. If you’re going to enforce this area of Paul’s teachings, then you should enforce the rest. In which case, churches will be empty. And don’t forget to insist we don’t cut our hair!
Well, the analogy is that the husband is the head, just like Jesus is the head.
Are you saying that we don’t actually need to obey Jesus? That instead, we should just surround Jesus with aid, without having to defer to Jesus or wait for instructions from Him?
You seem like a really educated person, but you don’t seem to understand the basics of common sense, so all that education is lost on you.
Being the head of the house is not "retribution." It's responsibility.
@captainbars - If you wouldn't mind clarifying a few things for me. If every other punishment that God gave to Adam and Eve has been experienced by every generation since, how then can you separate God appointing man over woman to only Adam and Eve?
To say that these words have never been repeated in 1,000s of years would mean you would have to bypass Isaiah chapter 3 which references women or children leading the home instead the man.
When you give your reason for when a man should be head of his household, you reference it in a way that makes the reader infer your dislike for the words of Paul. Paul states that the head of every man is Christ and the head of every woman is man. Can you clarify your reasoning? Is Paul incorrect?
Can you provide your source for ezer ezer. I have never heard it put that way. According to the Strong's concordance, ezer means help or helper. I have read that the words in the Bible are stated as ezer kenegdo, but never ezer ezer. At least not in Genesis.
Your references to cutting hair, not talking in church, or lifting a hand unless her husband allows it are misguided. Jesus, as well as, Paul spoke in terms people would understand. In that culture a woman's hair was important and so was her veil. The silence of a woman had to do with usurping authority not talking in general. No one will agree that a woman can't lift a finger without her husband's consent. That's not scriptural and would be a false teaching.
I believe Jesus also gave husbands an example when He said to love our wives as Jesus loves His Bride the Church. Jesus sacrificed all for the Church. That is what we husbands are called to do. Jesus came as the servant king not as a king from old; He washed the feet of His disciples (one of the most menial tasks in a household.) He came as the One Who established and gave the grace of God, not the One who withheld the greatest gift ever until people praised Him. God blesses the human race through the sacrament of marriage. Husband and wife was already blessed individually; now the blessing they receive through their marriage adds to their blessings.
 June 15, 2015 at 11:01pm
I started watching that first night; the actors said G—d— 2 or 3 times, and I thought, so that’s how it’s going to be. Then, when the woman was in Houston’s tent…I turned the channel and haven’t watched any more of it. I also wondered if it were historically correct; I’m glad these Texans called them on it.
You don't think Texans swore or fornicate back then?
I know what you mean. The language was probably accurate history but not essential to the flow of history. The sex in it was not required for anyone wishing to relive or experience the history either. I seems like I remember that there were numerous engagements after Houston's victory but they made it seem like it was all over. The History Channel is not really a history channel once it starts pushing the porn envelope. It does leave you with a sense of hopelessness if we ever had to experience such a wild and uncivilized life even briefly. Can anyone under thirty understand what it means to fight and lay down their life for liberty, a country, or an idea bigger than themselves? The cinematic skill to produce an image is far superior to the cinematic skill to project the truth.
June 15, 2015 at 10:06am
I loved it that T-rex & the raptors were turned into the “good guys”; we’ll see if the franchise continues the idea. I knew the arrogant In-gen guy was going to meet his end at the jaws of the raptors; they didn’t like him. When Owen & Beth escape from the hybrid, he holds out his hand, so he can drag her behind him while they’re running. She speeds past in a blur, running without problem in the same high heels he sneered about, earlier. That was funny. In fact, she keeps them on, the entire movie. I’m glad the writers refrained from having children killed; if you think about it, in real life, and such a situation, the death toll would’ve been much higher. I’m also glad they didn’t stoop to slasher mentality, and that cursing was kept to a minimum (I counted 2). Someone said “Jesus,” but it was said during a tragic scene, in sympathy with human deaths, & not used with spite. In all, an enjoyable movie, not overly gory or violent. Parents should use discretion; probably not for children under 12, or sensitive teens.
I think that an older pre-adolescent child, even if under 12, could easily watch this, as long as they wee not extremely sensitive to thrills or scary moments. They did a really good job, IMO, of keeping the violence to a level that made it scary but not extremely gory.
June 13, 2015 at 1:16pm
This doesn’t make any sense; the statue of limitations of up, so why hire a lawyer for an apology, that could only stroke his ego. If they were truly sorry, they would’ve done it by now. A forced apology is fake. He’s making himself look bad. And why keep a termination email, and reread it? Learn from it, and move on, dude.
 June 13, 2015 at 11:33am
I was all for it till I read this; he has valid points I hadn’t thought of. Every new law has flaws that show up later, & this will create an army of victims. I’m the (law-abiding) mother of an inmate. Anyone directly related to an inmate has had the police in or around their homes, not to mention friends. No one can guarantee that these videos won’t be hacked or fall into the wrong hands, or not released to anyone asking. I wouldn’t want recordings of my family’s homes out there, or the times I was questioned as to my son’s/friends whereabouts. Pieces of the past for people to mock, study, copy, and generally make our lives hell. My son has enemies who would love to know where his family lives & what we look like. Criminals are very protective of their families; this would open a new can of worms with unforeseen negative circumstances. The root of the problem is dishonor/disrespect of authority which isn’t being taught by parents, but perpetuated & encouraged by Obama. This open season on police lies at Obama’s feet. Those who are dividing the nation crave the very thing they seek to destroy: power & respect. They can’t have it both ways; lusting for authority while preaching hate against it.
It's not the be all end all but it is a step in the process; a piece of the larger mosaic to address this issue as much as reasonably possible.
If I were a cop I would buy my own body camera. I don't mind being accused of what I do, but I am not real neighborly when being accused and lied about over things I have not done.
It's not the panacea but it will help a great deal to at least address what the cop said and did once they arrived on scene.
It took all of two months for the coordinated union assault on the public having the ability to have more evidence of citizen/ public interaction with law enforcement employees wearing body cameras to be turned into a negative.
Why are all law enforcement unions (and their underground organizations: associations, orders, councils etc.) opposed to body cameras?
Why are all law enforcement underground training businesses and equipment suppliers supporting the anti- body camera campaign?
Why are all of the usual employee websites and blogs all a twitter about strategies to defeat body cameras (this is exactly the same reaction by the same groups when law enforcement was forced to install dash cams)?
Why would any thinking person believe the bile spewed here about privacy when as a matter of law enforcement industry policy all manner of derogatory, inflammatory, personal information is given to media when it suits industry objectives?
Why would anyone believe this line about privacy when the law enforcement industry partners with tabloid videos for “real life action” of “squat” raids, and all other manner of state initiated mayhem?
Why would anyone believe this privacy line when employees of the law enforcement industry regularly and routinely strip, sodomize, and molest suspects? Does privacy not apply to state sexual assault? Many times the assaulting employee is of the opposite sex or homosexual.
What a bag or wind! Bottom-line documentation is not good for business.
 June 11, 2015 at 10:46am
He’s in error cos he doesn’t know the scripture; Satan comes to steal, kill, and destroy (John 10:10). Therefore, God didn’t “take” the child, as in, stealing its life or killing it. Jesus defeated Satan, who never surrendered, and is the god of this world (2 Cor 4:4). But to say that the mother should’ve quoted scripture or prayed more, is putting the child’s death entirely on her (which is unfair and wrong). It’s just as wrong to blame God, Who only creates. Since our souls, or spirits, will live forever in heaven or exist forever in hell, that’s proof enough for me that God is incapable of ending what He created. Even Satan and the demons can’t be killed. When you don’t know what to say in a situation like this, it’s best to keep your mouth shut, offer a hug, and pray for her in private; for healing, and peace. And don’t watch the 700 Club; I haven’t seen it in years because of some things he’s said.
June 11, 2015 at 10:23am
I think he’s got something there; just glue the results to a square or oval wooden plaque. I bet people would buy it.
 March 4, 2014 at 5:41pm
I worked in a factory for 14 yrs, no union. We were expected to hold it till breaktime, but our bodies aren’t clocks. It was the supervisors/set-up discretion to take our place if we had to go. Countless times I’d be in pain before set-up took my place. One day on another line was real bad, set-up ignored my pleas & I threatened to walk off. I’d held it so long it still hurt after I came back. Habitually holding your water can cause bladder infection. BUT I wouldn’t have been so crass to pee in a box! All she had to do was walk to the toilet & if the products fell off the assembly line, well our bodies are more valuable than anything man can make. That place was Dickensian but if we complained enough they eventually caved.
 February 17, 2014 at 10:17am
why did they go to the school officials in the 1st place? We’ve been brain-washed into thinking it’s the responsibility of the school. First, you buy a spy-cam, get evidence, then to the boys parents, talk to them. When my son was 8, he was being bullied; I pressured him to tell me where the bully lived. I went & talked to the bully’s mom & it stopped. It never occurred to me to report it to the school. I commend the brother for defending the sister but he’s been around liberals too long; their influence has poisoned his thinking.
December 16, 2013 at 9:32am
I think you’re a little mixed up; Islam is the religious faith of Muslims; a Muslim is an adherent of Islam. Non-Muslims are enemies of Islam, period. It’s the p/c crowd & other Muslims who came up w/all these titles & fancy explanations. They all read the same book, worship the same entity & prophet. Any peaceful Muslim is doing so from individual choice in disobedience against the Qur’an. Christianity IS a peaceful religion; the WBC, tho reading the Bible & worshiping God, are in disobedience to the Word of God. Islam is the enemy of God bc they reject Jesus. No doubt Christians in the ME don’t confuse the issue w/fancy titles (jihadist, insurgents, terrorists, etc) ; to them, if you’re Muslim, you’re the enemy.