User Profile: CaptMickeyd


Member Since: June 01, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [33] January 30, 2015 at 2:29pm

    I find this story utterly amazing. Muslims acted the way Muslims act. Christians reacted the way Christians are supposed to react.

    Muslims act with hate and violence. Christians reacted with worshipping God.

    Their god (little g) requires violence. Our God (big G) requires worship. And He commands peace. And He expects us to share his message. How would that message have gotten out if the Christian churches responded in kind? I love these kinds of stories, because they are true.

    I love to tell the story of unseen things above.
    Of Jesus and His glory, of Jesus, and His love.
    I love to tell the story, because I know tis true.
    It satisfies my longing, as nothing else can do.

  • [18] January 29, 2015 at 11:10am

    Throw the book at this despicable human being.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 29, 2015 at 10:49am

    I’ve noticed it is a pattern with him. Look at the mummy story from today. The cover photo actually shows Egyptian hieroglyphs while the story is about a Siberian.

  • January 29, 2015 at 10:47am

    Apparently, though, this guy had extra tanks, but they wouldn’t switch over, which caused the emergency.

  • [49] January 29, 2015 at 10:10am

    “My position has evolved” Translation: “I’m finally secure enough in my position I don’t have to lie for votes anymore.”

  • [4] January 29, 2015 at 10:00am

    Zap, why would the government fear allowing law abiding citizens to have military-grade weapons? We do have the constitutional right to form militias. How are we to defend the homeland from invasion if we don’t have the correct hardware?

  • [9] January 29, 2015 at 9:57am

    Another great leader of men said the same thing one time. Look what God did to him.

    Daniel Chapter 4

    “28 All this came upon the king Nebuchadnezzar.

    29 At the end of twelve months he walked in the palace of the kingdom of Babylon.

    30 The king spake, and said, Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my power, and for the honour of my majesty?

    31 While the word was in the king’s mouth, there fell a voice from heaven, saying, O king Nebuchadnezzar, to thee it is spoken; The kingdom is departed from thee.

    32 And they shall drive thee from men, and thy dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field: they shall make thee to eat grass as oxen, and seven times shall pass over thee, until thou know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.

    33 The same hour was the thing fulfilled upon Nebuchadnezzar: and he was driven from men, and did eat grass as oxen, and his body was wet with the dew of heaven, till his hairs were grown like eagles’ feathers, and his nails like birds’ claws.”

    Wonder what might befall Ms. Moore sooner or later?

  • [2] January 29, 2015 at 9:08am

    @Duke, 1 Corinthians 1:17 “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.” If Paul wasn’t told to baptize, was he missing part of the salvation plan?

    The act of water baptism has nothing to do with your salvation. It is the first step in obedience for a successful Christian life.

  • January 29, 2015 at 8:26am

    She looks like Alanis Morrisette.

  • [1] January 29, 2015 at 8:25am

    The body art is not a “dragon-like creature.” It is clearly, and I mean clearly, some type of hoofed deer-like creature. My guess, in Siberia, reindeer. It even looks like it is in the throes of death; why? It’s hind legs are pointed up, the body is twisted halfway through, and the front legs are raring to go. This reindeer just got shot with an arrow, possibly.

    Anyway, a dragon-like creature? Jon Street, did you even look at the original article? Or do you just not know your wildlife?

  • [6] January 28, 2015 at 5:23pm

    I actually enjoyed him on Psych. He was a hilarious counter to Shawn and Lassiter.

  • [14] January 28, 2015 at 5:22pm

    Snafu, that is a lie straight from Satan himself. Of course he wants you to believe that you don’t have to follow a particular God, because then you can choose anything, which is really choosing nothing. Straight is the gate, and narrow is the way, man.

  • [7] January 28, 2015 at 5:20pm

    holden, I agree with everything you say except the “adult” part. There is nowhere in the Bible that says you must be a certain age to accept Jesus. All you must do is understand you are a sinner, repent, and accept the gift that Jesus gave to you. Accept that there is nothing you can do to pay for your sins, and the only way to reconcile to God the Father is through Jesus Christ the Son. My oldest child did this when she was four, and I myself was only eleven. My wife was eight.

    Instead of adult, you probably meant simply that you can’t be a baby when you are added to the “Kingdom of God.” And frankly, I know a lot of people that profess to be “born again” who are most certainly not “Christian.” Simply, they do not act like Christ. They were first called Christians in Antioch, as the Good Book says, and it was because they were like Him.

  • [4] January 28, 2015 at 5:10pm

    @Dacaria, we do not actually know what the administrators told the girl, as we are only going off what the girl has said. There was no mention of the school making a statement about what was actually said. We do not know what the issue with the dress was. As someone else stated, there is much missing from this story. Honestly, it sounds like someone thought they were going to cross the line and get away with it, and ended up being called on the carpet. She needs to get over it and realize that you don’t always get your way, especially when you’re riding the line on a rule.

  • [2] January 28, 2015 at 2:11pm

    Why is he still being called a “white-Hispanic?” Just call him Hispanic, for crying out loud!!

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] January 28, 2015 at 12:09pm

    Have you noticed that in the video and the pictures, they never show the back of the dress. I wonder if the back is lower than the shoulder blades, and this is why she was made to cover up. We don’t know, but when I saw the dress on the table while she was messing with it, it looked like that might be the case. It wasn’t the actual shoulder straps, but the policy of the back of the dress going down too far. Anyway, I think this might have been blown way out of proportion.

  • January 28, 2015 at 11:59am

    Only because we already do so. Make it the same as alcohol and tobacco. My druthers would be to let it go for minimal tax, but I know sales tax is how states are (generally) run, so no taxes would be almost impossible to pull off.

  • [4] January 28, 2015 at 9:12am

    Through beer goggles, she might look better. Wacky tobacky doesn’t give you blinders, though, dude.

  • [25] January 28, 2015 at 9:10am

    She has always seemed that way to me.

    The question should not be about addiction. I’ve never heard of ol’ Nancy advocating the de-legalization of wine or beer. Alcohol is a very addictive substance, and I have family members in AA to prove it. But you can also be addicted to attention (Nancy) or food, or weightlifting. Addiction is a personality problem, often. I smoked the wacky tobacky for 7 years, and guess what, when I got married and started a family, I gave it up. Why? I don’t have the addictive personality. I like my coffee, I like my video games, and I like my Star Trek. But mary jane is less addictive than nicotine (another fine, legal item.)

    This argument should be about the freedom to choose your poison. Alcohol related deaths and smoking related deaths dwarf deaths “caused” by marijuana. Let the people grow it, sell it, and put a vice tax on it.

    Responses (3) +
  • [137] January 28, 2015 at 8:59am

    While I agree with the sentiment, if she was made aware of the dress code before the dance, she is in clear violation. Shame on her for now arguing about it. The time to make it an issue was when the dress code was given.

    Now, if it’s true that other kids were wearing things outside the dress code, then shame on the school for not enforcing the policy evenly. Still, it’s a policy.

    Responses (14) +
123 To page: Go