These countries keep their women and children subjugated and create violence. I’m not saying patriarchy is inherently bad, but when taken to the extreme, you end up with islam. The men can do no wrong and the children and women have to take what they’re given. Is that compatible with Americanism? No. We have tried to stamp out abuses like that in America, and here we are importing it again.
let's see, what was that definition of insanity? Oh yea, when you do the same thing over and over but expect different results. Sounds like liberalism/Kommon Kore education to me.
 November 25, 2015 at 10:43am
Especially among those responsible, law abiding citizens involved in this case, right?
 November 24, 2015 at 2:04pm
“Judge not…” seems to be the place where many people stop reading their Bible. God tells us to separate from those that are openly in sin, so there has to be some form of judgment taking place. By reading two words of the New Testament and using them out of context, you invalidate your argument.
 November 24, 2015 at 11:55am
I agree with the sentiment.
 November 20, 2015 at 2:41pm
It’s amazing, but the headline is just another way to try to cover their butts. He didn’t say it. He was responding to an ill-founded question about something he didn’t reply to in a separate interview. It was a set up to begin with. There’s a Breitbart story that sums it up nicely.
That was my first thought too. There are too many people that are trying to stir up strife. Look at all the anti-gay crimes that come to light as being self-inflicted. “Racist” crimes have been seen to go that way as well. This is some protester that wants to make some noise like Yale and Mizzou.
 November 20, 2015 at 8:25am
“Most news organizations require reporters refrain from commenting on policy issues in a partisan way.”
Was this a joke? I don’t get it.
November 19, 2015 at 2:40pm
Good to know. I was not aware of that.
November 19, 2015 at 2:24pm
He could just refuse to sign it. If he vetoes it, it can go through the process of being overturned. If he just doesn’t sign it, it never becomes law and nothing happens.
Have you noticed how much they look like Obama when he had his hair cut just like that when he was working for Bill Ayers. Why...they could all be Muslims or family members.
CaptMickeyd, You win the internet for today.
Most likely they were helping to smuggle Muslims into the USA and they don't care if the Muslims are terrorists or not. After their jail terms are over, please deport these guys!
I also notice the article didn't say where they were from. If it was a terrorist friendly, that is a muslim state, you can rest assured the money they madde went at least partially to a terrorist organization.
I’m virtually certain I went to high school and played soccer with 2 of those guys. They’re from Somalia but were definitely Muslim.
 November 13, 2015 at 11:20am
Todd P. you are wrong. I’m not catholic, and I’m not an atheist, but the term “immaculate conception” implies that Mary herself was conceived without sin. Where catholics get the idea that conception is inherently sinful, when we know that “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge,” is a mystery. However, they believe this, and they believe that Mary had to be a “perfect” person to be the vessel by which Jesus was brought into the world. (Note to catholics, Mary sinned. Just saying. She was a human being.) So, because Mary had to be perfect, in their minds, and because conception produces “inherently sinful” people, they had to come up with a way that Mary could be perfect. So, without any Biblical proof at all, they decided to announce that somehow, miraculously, the act that created every person born on this earth since Adam and Eve was somehow different for Mary’s parents, and they produced a sinless child who would be the perfect vessel to give birth to Jesus Christ.
I know, it’s confusing. And it’s a load of horse manure. However, you insisting on defining it as something it isn’t is embarrassing to those of us Christians that actually know what catholic doctrine is, and how to counter it. Please, do a bit of research from here on out if you plan on arguing with the big boys.
 November 13, 2015 at 10:55am
Oooohhhh, lawdy, somebody done left the plantation. Get that girl back over here, or she might start spreadin’ common sense to the rest of them Democrat slaves!!!!
 November 10, 2015 at 3:18pm
I just threw up in my mouth.
 November 10, 2015 at 2:19pm
No warrant means no law enforcement in the home without permission of the homeowner. Pretty simple.
Yep, that was a uniformed home invasion. The Officers are quite lucky that they were not shot as the trespassers that they were.
Might makes right . Pretty simple.
did I see a head bag................
Don't be so naive. All the cop has to do is say he heard someone inside the house yelling for help and he has the legal right to make entry into the home. Simple as that.
Not necessarily. In the case of a domestic violence situation, most jurisdictions will allow the police to enter with the victim to collect their personal belongings. Neither a warrant or probable cause are required in that setting. There are, of course, limits to what the police are allowed to do once inside.
I think the permission angle has some wiggle room here, CaptMickeyd. The ex-girlfriend had personal property in the home, so she had at least "squatter's rights" until and unless she was evicted; as a result, she could invite the police to enter.
Glad I'm not in a position to be the one to have to sort things like this out.
depends on what the property paper work said, and the status of a possible court order.
if she is his ex because he assaulted her the courts would have issued an order for police to aid her in retrieving her property that is the warrant. if she was on the paperwork as co- leaser/renter or on a mortgage the she had every right to enter the location and give police the okay to enter.
He her what who. Good lord Blaze this is a terribly written article.
Houston, it is time that you get rid of the Screaming Liberals destroying your City. Start with the Police Chief.
But when it's a dirty squatter, "Sorry ma'am, there's nothing we can do."
Except if it is the ex-girlfriends home also, under state law, then permission was given. We don't know the details or facts of that part of the issue.
Not really simple at all.
1. Guy runs from you into a house, no warrant needed.
2. If you feel someone is in danger in the house, no warrant needed.
3. If someone that lives in the house, like this girl obviously did, and someone is trying to keep her out, he had every right to go there with her and make sure she was able to get into her own home. Once the homeowner showed no sign of cooperating, he had to make sure the girl wasn’t in danger as she got her sh$t.
There are a MULTITUDE more reasons a cop doesn’t need a warrant to go in your home. Like it or not.
Now, there are a ton of rules protecting the homeowner against certain reasons a cop cant go in your house and those are all good. But if it falls under one of the above, or some others, you better get your ass out the way.
 November 10, 2015 at 2:13pm
Ever get the feeling that most of these kids have absolutely no idea what it is they are protesting? I bet a good half of them are just there to get out of class.
Jesus would take no pledge to a country other than Israel, which He is destined to be King over. However, “Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”
Caesar was their ruler at the time. America is our country. Rendering unto America and our flag an oath of allegiance is not unbiblical or anti-Biblical.
 November 4, 2015 at 3:18pm
That’s why I like the old paper ballot. Fill in the circle with a blue pen. They can still be counted electronically, but everyone’s goes together.
And what if it had been animal porn? Would the identifier not have been necessary there as well? What if it had been illegal underage porn? Would the identifier not have been necessary there? It’s good to know what you’re dealing with when it comes to the perversions of these so-called educators.