User Profile: CaptMickeyd


Member Since: June 01, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [22] November 25, 2015 at 2:28pm

    These countries keep their women and children subjugated and create violence. I’m not saying patriarchy is inherently bad, but when taken to the extreme, you end up with islam. The men can do no wrong and the children and women have to take what they’re given. Is that compatible with Americanism? No. We have tried to stamp out abuses like that in America, and here we are importing it again.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 25, 2015 at 10:43am

    Especially among those responsible, law abiding citizens involved in this case, right?

  • [20] November 24, 2015 at 2:04pm

    “Judge not…” seems to be the place where many people stop reading their Bible. God tells us to separate from those that are openly in sin, so there has to be some form of judgment taking place. By reading two words of the New Testament and using them out of context, you invalidate your argument.

  • [17] November 24, 2015 at 11:55am

    I agree with the sentiment.

  • [17] November 20, 2015 at 2:41pm

    It’s amazing, but the headline is just another way to try to cover their butts. He didn’t say it. He was responding to an ill-founded question about something he didn’t reply to in a separate interview. It was a set up to begin with. There’s a Breitbart story that sums it up nicely.


    Responses (2) +
  • [59] November 20, 2015 at 10:46am

    And now, when the FBI investigates who is looking at recruiting for ISIS, they’ll get a bunch of middle school students from Utah to muddy the results all up. Hmmm…convenient, yes?

    Wonder how many other schools or classes have done this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] November 20, 2015 at 8:34am

    That was my first thought too. There are too many people that are trying to stir up strife. Look at all the anti-gay crimes that come to light as being self-inflicted. “Racist” crimes have been seen to go that way as well. This is some protester that wants to make some noise like Yale and Mizzou.

  • [1] November 20, 2015 at 8:25am

    “Most news organizations require reporters refrain from commenting on policy issues in a partisan way.”

    Was this a joke? I don’t get it.

  • November 19, 2015 at 2:40pm

    Good to know. I was not aware of that.

  • November 19, 2015 at 2:24pm

    He could just refuse to sign it. If he vetoes it, it can go through the process of being overturned. If he just doesn’t sign it, it never becomes law and nothing happens.

    Responses (3) +
  • [291] November 19, 2015 at 10:50am

    Just orphans and widows, right?

    Guess those credit cards weren’t going to be used to finance terror, or anything like that.

    Responses (5) +
  • [8] November 13, 2015 at 11:20am

    Todd P. you are wrong. I’m not catholic, and I’m not an atheist, but the term “immaculate conception” implies that Mary herself was conceived without sin. Where catholics get the idea that conception is inherently sinful, when we know that “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge,” is a mystery. However, they believe this, and they believe that Mary had to be a “perfect” person to be the vessel by which Jesus was brought into the world. (Note to catholics, Mary sinned. Just saying. She was a human being.) So, because Mary had to be perfect, in their minds, and because conception produces “inherently sinful” people, they had to come up with a way that Mary could be perfect. So, without any Biblical proof at all, they decided to announce that somehow, miraculously, the act that created every person born on this earth since Adam and Eve was somehow different for Mary’s parents, and they produced a sinless child who would be the perfect vessel to give birth to Jesus Christ.

    I know, it’s confusing. And it’s a load of horse manure. However, you insisting on defining it as something it isn’t is embarrassing to those of us Christians that actually know what catholic doctrine is, and how to counter it. Please, do a bit of research from here on out if you plan on arguing with the big boys.

  • [10] November 13, 2015 at 10:55am

    Oooohhhh, lawdy, somebody done left the plantation. Get that girl back over here, or she might start spreadin’ common sense to the rest of them Democrat slaves!!!!

  • [5] November 10, 2015 at 3:18pm

    I just threw up in my mouth.

  • [147] November 10, 2015 at 2:19pm

    No warrant means no law enforcement in the home without permission of the homeowner. Pretty simple.

    Responses (13) +
  • [28] November 10, 2015 at 2:13pm

    Ever get the feeling that most of these kids have absolutely no idea what it is they are protesting? I bet a good half of them are just there to get out of class.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] November 6, 2015 at 10:38am

    @ Jackie

    Jesus would take no pledge to a country other than Israel, which He is destined to be King over. However, “Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

    Caesar was their ruler at the time. America is our country. Rendering unto America and our flag an oath of allegiance is not unbiblical or anti-Biblical.

  • [9] November 4, 2015 at 3:18pm

    That’s why I like the old paper ballot. Fill in the circle with a blue pen. They can still be counted electronically, but everyone’s goes together.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] November 4, 2015 at 11:52am

    Sky rockets in flight….

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] November 4, 2015 at 11:44am

    And what if it had been animal porn? Would the identifier not have been necessary there as well? What if it had been illegal underage porn? Would the identifier not have been necessary there? It’s good to know what you’re dealing with when it comes to the perversions of these so-called educators.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love