User Profile: CaptMickeyd


Member Since: June 01, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [45] December 22, 2014 at 1:39pm

    A child who fears guns in the house has parents who do not properly teach them what guns are used for.

  • [16] December 17, 2014 at 5:01pm

    When you walk into a wal mart or a target or pretty much any store wearing nice clothes, people tend to treat you like you work there. I work in an office, and after hours if I’m at a store, I’m repeatedly asked if I’m the manager. (WASP as they come here, too.)

  • [61] December 16, 2014 at 10:57am

    If he becomes the nominee, this will be the year I vote for a third party. ANY third party candidate. The RINOs in the beltway need to know that we do not want any more of these moderate types in the white house. Might as well have another Clinton in there.

  • [5] December 16, 2014 at 10:50am

    Anyone that is a saved, born again believer is a saint, according to the Bible. Ghost, nowhere in the Holy Scripture does it give a board, council, or a person authority to make a person a saint. This is another religious construct created by the Catholic church.

  • [2] December 16, 2014 at 10:48am

    Buddhic attainment? Now you want to mix Christ, Judaism, and Buddhism? Talk about new age garbage. If “many” people believe this, then they don’t believe the Bible, because the gift of personal Christhood is not exactly mentioned, even once. There is the priesthood of the believer, with Christ as our High Priest.

    But I’ll go with Thop and assume you were being sarcastic.

  • December 11, 2014 at 11:10am

    No prob, Baron. It actually got me thinking about the argument being made.

  • [3] December 11, 2014 at 11:08am

    You really are nuts, aren’t you?

  • [2] December 11, 2014 at 11:00am

    @ Avenger — I always enjoy your posts. Keep it up. The smarmy little pr*ck blink needs people like you to shine a light on his ignorance.

  • [6] December 11, 2014 at 10:31am

    He convinced me :)

  • [25] December 11, 2014 at 10:28am

    If this is all they have on him, they’re going to have to start manufacturing stuff now in order to stop his roll to the White House.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] December 11, 2014 at 10:21am

    I mean, even if you’re an evolutionist, this should be an easy one. (I guess, especially if you’re an evolutionist, really!) The drive to reproduce would make one desire the opposite gender. Perhaps this should be the next course of evolutionary study: Are gay people subconsciously trying to take themselves out of the evolutionary gene pool because they are otherwise genetically imperfect? It would be an interesting idea.

    Responses (4) +
  • [66] December 11, 2014 at 10:17am

    This article is actually a pretty good read, if you believe in the Biblical reasoning behind the so-called “anti-gay” movement. It is an unnatural act, and God Himself never gave it a name, “merely” called it an abomination and “unseemly.”

    Responses (6) +
  • [7] November 26, 2014 at 1:56pm

    Wrong. Tithes predate the law. Hebrews spells it out pretty well. We paid tithes to Melchesidech IN Abraham. God requires a tenth of our increase.

    Responses (8) +
  • [22] November 25, 2014 at 11:50am

    So Sharpton thinks Democrats can only win when the black base is afraid of “whitey?” Sounds plausible.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] November 25, 2014 at 11:46am

    You are an idiot.

  • [5] November 24, 2014 at 8:34am

    Almost my favorite part of the reply.

    “PS. As you can see, the captain has given me some plastic wings. So clearly, I know what I’m talking about.”

  • [14] November 24, 2014 at 8:06am

    Romans chapter 1 says something about this. Pay special attention to verse 31.

    28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

    29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

    30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

    31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, WITHOUT NATURAL AFFECTION (emphasis mine), implacable, unmerciful:

    32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

  • [6] November 21, 2014 at 10:50am

    Traditional liberals are for the rule of law (by this I mean Thomas Jefferson liberals) and limited government. That is not what modern “liberals” are for. Most democrats aren’t even a modern definition of liberal, they are progressives and socialists and communists. Thought they pander to Unions and minoroities, they really only care about their position as the 1%, and everyone else can suck it. Redistribute so that the 1% stays the 1% (if they’re democraps or progressives) and everyone else becomes serfs, owing everything to the government. “We’ll take care of you!”

    Anyway, that is the progressive end game, for RINOs and Demoncrats. This plays into all of their hands. And don’t let those repubs fool you; except for a few stalwarts like Cruz, Issa, Sessions, and Gowdy, they’re all in the tank too.

  • [15] November 21, 2014 at 8:49am

    I have actually looked at an album cover though and thought, “No doubt about his sexual preference.”

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 10:30am

    I’ve always found my Glock21 to be super accurate.

123 To page: Go