Build a Wall! Yes you will!
Build a Wall! Yes you will!
Build a Wall! Yes you will!
Ahh, this blackshirt and armband fit real well.
'Says he wants to put a stop to it'.. Fixed it for you. Donnie loves Cankle policy, pimped it for decades. Even said Barry was doing a great and beautiful job. Winning for the brand?
Cat: Well, for universal viewpoints both Europe and Putin like Trump over "The Beast." Maybe they think "The Art of the Deal" can work for them, as well? For sure Hillary is in a cloud, in between her flights on a burning broom.
Foo...I know you're staunchly against Trump. I'm no fan of his either. I see him as lacking in knowledge and very wobbly on conservative principles. On this Sunday's talk shows his campaign people hinted that he'd review his positions once in office and having to deal with congress. All this tells me that Trump won't deliver.
But having said all that.....after seeing the level of corruption, kick backs and utter incompetence of Hillary Clinton and the democrats in general....I'd rather take my chances on a squishy, ill-informed buffoon like Trump than Hillary Clinton who's policies, corruption and ineptitude have set the middle east ablaze and Europe seeing weekly acts of terrorism. Economically and business wise she'd be an utter catastrophe for this country. I'd rather get Trump elected then show him the door and get a true conservative elected in 2020.
I cannot in good conscience allow Hillary Clinton to get the top job and allow the world and the US to fall deeper into instability and economic uncertainty. And her VP choice is a complete idiot..at least Pence has a level of competence.
 July 24, 2016 at 9:29pm
What did the ISIS suicide bomber trainer say to his recruits?
Watch me close, I’m only going to show you this once.
 July 24, 2016 at 9:27pm
She was the Boss! It was her’s the lying sack of bleep.
 July 22, 2016 at 9:39pm
I think Fox edited the video to fit their a format they wanted.
 July 22, 2016 at 3:44pm
and blame bush
 July 21, 2016 at 1:47pm
 July 21, 2016 at 1:29pm
An amateur cell….. is that anyway like Obama’s JV team?
in this case they may be right, no guns or bombs, just an old 70′s record “Everybody was Kung Fu Fighting” for inspiration, not to impressive.
Perhaps they are part of a much more sophisticated plan wherein they are simply a group that was intended to be a “diversion” and lull Brazilian police into thinking that they had everything under control.
Meanwhile, the “real” planning continues at a much higher level with trained terrorist.
Just a thought.
 July 21, 2016 at 6:57am
I just had a thought… The next time I get carded, I’m going to sue for discrimination……
1000 agrees from me. It must be nice to be a dumbocrat and have the authority to be able to pick and choose and impose those selections on everyone ( except themselves) in America. I'm only prejudiced against one group.. democrats who think they know it all.. escape punishment for doing wrong , criticize others for doing exactly what they've done in the past.. and anyone that thinks another democrat should occupy the white house.
Perhaps these cops agreed with you. They may well have just left quietly. There is nothing to indicate they were the onrs even brimgimg the controverse to the fore front.
"Just 12 Days After Deadly Ambush, Dallas Officers Go Out to Lunch — and Get Frosty Reception"
Blaze, don't you think that caption is to say the least hyperbole? One moron employee in one restaurant in Dallas is not "a frosty reception."
I agree, to a point. I can see a business that offers goods, but how about a business that offers critical services (i.e. utilities companies, gas stations, cable providers, etc.)? Yes, if a company decides not serve an individual or a group, the market will take over and another company can exploit that, but in cases with services, the logistics are a little more difficult to overcome.
Cataclysm, I find it interesting that you haven't found out that the rules aren't applied to the left. :)
As with the other articles just like this, the Obama-voters demand $15 per hour to ruin the businesses the work for.
These all seem to be single employees who have taken it upon themselves to hurt the business owner and "speak truth to power." People need to get over themselves.
The resturaunt said they were sorry. What else do they want?
No, discrimination in both of your examples is simply wrong. You don't get a bye on discrimination just because you own a business, you still don't get to discriminate. The business that serves the public serves the public, simple.
I think you can chose who to serve but do not be surprised if others don't like it but I disagree with government forcing someone to do business with anyone.
The irony here is that it is not this company's policy to ban serving police officers. Got a feeling the employee knew that while he was working, he was the company's representative, an ambassador. He knew whether or not this company caters to cops or not. If a company, not the employee, chooses not to serve cops, then that is the company's prerogative, but there will be consequences such as public outcry especially in this case right after police ambushing. This should be for all businesses across the U.S., but today, it isn't Semper Fi
It even goes further than that. ALL restaurants are places of "public accommodation" and by statute can't discriminate. All of those businesses that provide products and services to weddings are contract based and the same liberal jackholes who want the "liberty" and "privacy" to kill babies, smoke dope, and sodomize eachother, are against a person's freedom of choice and conscience of who they want to contract with.
To make a proper apology and effective news, the person fired should be exposed to us in this article, including a mug shot.
The business owner wasn't the problem; the employee took it upon him/her self.
While I believe that a business reserves the right to determine who its customer base should be. most businesses in corporate America cater to all. It isn't up to the individual or the particular location to determine who to serve or not to serve, that's up to corporate headquarters to decide. i think both the employee and the manager (if it was shown to be a failure on their part) should have been let go. but do not condemn an entire corporation for a few malcontents at the bottom.
Businesses SHOULD have the freedom to serve to whom they choose, no matter what the reason, as long as their policy is a consistent one. But this is a case where the employee overstepped his authority, and it was NOT the policy of the restaurant. When the Federal and State governments overstep their Constitutional authority and SUE or PENALIZE an owner for not serving a customer, especially when their policy has been a consistent one for years, then we have a bunch of tyrants who have usurped the authority of the people, and have encroached upon the freedom of lawful Americans. Sadly, It is too bad that that so many Americans don’t recognize when their freedoms are being destroyed by the politicians.
Amen..I'd rather have a cruiser sitting outside than not.
You make an Excellent valid point !!!!
Firing the employee will do nothing but make the situation worse................
This idiot employee that was fired is one of those that have listened to all the garbage liberal teachers have crammed down their throat. He is one of those lambs that will be holding a phone after calling 911 and hear the operator tell him an officer will be there in 20 to 30 minutes as an armed gang banger is kicking down his door. Of course those same liberal teachers preach how bad those nasty guns are. Maybe he can fend them off with his cell phone by beating them to death with it.
Maybe the Genghis Grill would prefer to have a gang of BLM or black panthers meet there to plan a future attack on the police. Maybe they would prefer to have BLM answer their next 911 call too.
They should and do but we got to get the terrorist out of our government for us to keep our rights! Progs have got to go!
As long as it's the owners making the decisions and not the hostess and servers.
The free market is the ultimate arbiter.
I agree. And they should suffer any blowback from that decisions without PC protection or influence.
If the establishment doesn't want cops there because they are afraid the police will get killed while eating that does reflect some scary reality of our current Obama driven environment.
If they don't want the police there because they think all police are racists, then that's another issue and should be publicly stated. Then the customers will decide whether or not they want to eat at a place run by a moron!
 July 20, 2016 at 10:24am
I will admit I had to try the game because of all the news about it. Its strangely addictive. But the game is designed for people to get out and walk…..
So they stare at their phones while crossing the street and get hit by a car.
Not as long as Rupert "I love Hillary" Murdoch owns it.
Not without Ailes there. He has been rumored to be in ill health and on his way to retirement in general over the past year or so and Murdoch has been pushing the day to day agenda. This is why the coverage has veered so sharply left into Trump territory 24/7
Rupert's sons are in charge now.
I was shocked to read that Murdoch is looking at dumping Ailes.
At first I thought Gretchen was just an ungrateful old broad who got canned because her ratings sucked (and her stupid 2nd Amendment stance). However, there is this story. I’d also noticed that Megyn Kelly hasn’t come out in support of Ailes either, and she owes him a lot. Now I’ll withhold judgement until I know more.
Ailes single-handedly built the original conservative Fox. The Fox you've seen lately has been due mostly to Rupert's sons. Ailes was the only thing stopping them from turning Fox into CNN
I'm not sure who is right or wrong, but Fox has definetly gone left, and is it due to Ailes, or the sons?
There are very few programs we watch. The stand they had when the network was formed is not the same news outlet. Most of the , and Fox is right up there wit news media are so far left it makes a Comservative want to barf, and Fox is right up there with them.
If you think fox is progressive you must be really right-wing
 July 14, 2016 at 6:22pm
They are already trying. Why do you think they all want the self driving cars and trains?
 July 14, 2016 at 6:21pm
Wow what’s your phone number? Your rates are cheap! My company its more like an arm and a leg.