User Profile: catlaugh12


Member Since: September 11, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] October 6, 2016 at 9:56am

    Wrong story to make that argument, Freedom_Tickles. It’s examples like this that strengthen my resolve not to allow any more gateway drugs than we already have.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 5, 2016 at 10:44pm

    MindtheGOP – But then why are you on here trolling those that are standing up for the unborn? If you have no argument with that viewpoint, it makes very little sense to pick an argument about something else here. Unless, of course, you are just picking a fight for the fun of it.

  • October 5, 2016 at 10:41pm

    MindtheGOP: Or…some of us go to church on Wednesday nights and aren’t online all the time. War is the natural outcome of man’s sinful nature. It’s not something to be rushed into or desired, but there is virtue in standing for your country. There are good wars and there are bad wars. The best are to stop evil men or movements (defeating Hitler, etc), the worst are nothing but the whim of a despot. That said, nothing about the existence of war justifies killing babies. But since you apparently agree with me on that, I’m not sure why you’re bringing it into the conversation. They’re two completely different issues.

  • [5] October 5, 2016 at 5:25pm

    Sam – it’s fine to quote verses, but you can’t take two verses and claim that they alone represent the cannon of Scripture with regard to salvation. The Bible clearly states that one who is in Christ will evidence repentance and turning from their embrace of sin, otherwise they were never saved in the first place. Let’s say a rapist claims he has accepted Christ, but he continues to say that rape is okay because it feels good and he’s pretty sure that God is okay with it. Would you believe his claim of being a believer? Of course not! His actions demonstrate that his faith is not real. Abortion is clearly against the stand of Scripture when it comes to life. The only people debating that are those that want to participate in it as a “way out” when a child is inconvenient. That doesn’t make it right, and it doesn’t evidence repentance.

  • [1] October 5, 2016 at 5:19pm

    MindtheGOP – If you will state that abortion is wrong in every case, then I’ll discuss war with you. Until that point you have no leg to stand on.

  • [2] October 5, 2016 at 5:17pm

    MindtheGOP – Stop drawing irrelevant parallels. Two actions can be wrong at the same time. Nice use of the false dichotomy fallacy, though.

  • October 5, 2016 at 5:15pm

    Sorry to disappoint, Sam, but I’m not going to play that game with you. If you have a point to make, then make it.

  • [7] October 5, 2016 at 4:12pm

    LS – Well done; you thought up a few insults. But nothing you said has anything to do with the key point. Please explain why you believe that killing a child in utero is morally acceptable. Then perhaps we’ll have a starting point to discuss.

    Just as an aside, an ellipses is not the equivalent of a period.

  • [14] October 5, 2016 at 4:10pm

    Sam – nope, not true. The God of the Bible does not offer belief in His Son as fire insurance, while allowing people to throw the rest of doctrine out. Even a cursory study of the epistles makes this clear. If you continue in sin and embrace it or try to explain it away, you are not in Christ. Repentance is a key part of salvation.

    Responses (6) +
  • [42] October 5, 2016 at 4:08pm

    A person who is in a coma has no choice…because it is physically and cognitively unable to do so. In this light, I hope you see how silly your comment is.

  • [11] October 5, 2016 at 4:07pm

    1.Because war is not murder.
    2. Killing is not always murder.
    3. God determines the difference between killing and murder, and both were defined ages ago.
    4. Abortion is not an exception because the baby is not in a war and has done nothing to deserve death.

    Were those supposed to be hard questions?

    Responses (12) +
  • [1] October 2, 2016 at 8:11am

    CSP – pretending that your candidate doesn’t have flaws that will keep people from voting for him is a huge mistake. Like him or not, Matt makes a very good point. There is no benefit to pretending your candidate is a classy guy when he isn’t. You need to let Donald know that no, he can’t get away with rudeness toward women anymore. Not if he expects to get your vote. And no, he can’t brag about doing things that are against the Constitution and expect a conservative to back him. Otherwise he will never garner enough votes to win. Letting Trump be Trump at this point leads to President Hillary.

  • [3] October 1, 2016 at 2:56pm

    rockn: One of the things that most of us learned in kindergarten is that insulting someone is not actually an argument. It’s intellectual laziness. Something for you to ponder.

  • [7] September 30, 2016 at 8:08pm

    As usual, you have missed the point by a mile. You went with calling me naive, and Matt a blabbering “butt hurt.” Echoes every point a Trump fan ever makes, but doesn’t change the mind of a single voter. You can either continue having fun calling everyone else stupid because your candidate squeaked out 30-40% in a primary, or you can accept that your candidate has flaws and needs to be reined in if he’s going to have a shot at the White House. So far, Trump fans choose their own temporary pleasure in being sore winners over actually helping their candidate. Up to you.

  • [19] September 30, 2016 at 2:36pm

    Every single one of you that are yelling at the messenger for an accurate message is ensuring that Trump will lose. I’m so tired of the whining and the name calling. If you truly believe Trump is better than Hillary, then you should be reading this article and appreciating Matt’s point. You as a supposed conservative need to help keep your candidate in line, or he will lose. Period. Trump CANNOT win if he doesn’t appeal to voters outside his current base. We get it. He has your vote! But he needs your neighbor’s vote too, and your neighbor’s cousins and aunts and uncles. Do you really think undecided female voters are going to flock to a man who prioritizes tweeting insults to women about their weight? Do you think people are leaning toward Hillary will change their minds when the GOP candidate talks nonstop about himself instead of pointing out her flaws? No one thought Trump won the debate aside from his current supporters. Again, if you want to bury your head in the sand that’s your choice. Just be prepared for President Hillary.

    Responses (3) +
  • [11] September 30, 2016 at 2:31pm

    This is time when you could unplug your ears, listen to Matt’s argument, and understand that what he has presented could actually HELP your candidate. But no, you’re helping him to lose by pretending he’s perfect. Well played.

    Responses (3) +
  • [17] September 30, 2016 at 2:16pm

    I can hear the sound of precious snowflakes melting…

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] September 24, 2016 at 8:34pm

    Brandishing a firearm IS a crime. Wave a gun at or near police, and you put yourself in imminent danger. Your choice. Oh, and the past tense of “see” is “saw,” not “seen.” Grammar: read about it sometime.

    Responses (3) +
  • [6] September 20, 2016 at 9:55pm

    Except his employer, Fox News, disagrees with you. Hence the reprimand. Did you even read the article?

  • [14] September 17, 2016 at 12:04am

    In other words, logic is not on your side so you have resorted to name calling. Got it.

123 To page: Go