When seconds count, Officer IsEnglish of the Grammar Police is only minutes away. “To Correct And Serve.”
 October 7, 2015 at 1:20pm
Depends. You aren’t allowed to defend “property” with deadly force. The Castle Doctrine assumes that if an intruder is in your home or business that they implicitly mean you bodily harm. Pets are considered property under the law, and therefore can’t be considered for use of deadly force in public. However, if they’re attacking your dog uninvited inside your home of business or car in some states.. just make sure you are a judicious marksman so you don’t inadvertently hit your puppy. In public, put yourself between the assailant and the dog and if they continue the assault they are assaulting you and you may defend yourself.
Castle Doctrine most certainly allows you to protect your property. That's the whole purpose behind it, anything else is self defense.
“The Castle Doctrine is a common law doctrine stating that an individual has no duty to retreat when in his or her home, or “castle,” and may use reasonable force, including deadly force, to defend his or her property, person, or another.”
While I understand this happened in Detroit, most other castle doctrine states are not that different. In Texas, deadly force is authorized when involving property under most circumstances. Read “Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.” of the Texas Penal Code (http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#D).
 October 7, 2015 at 1:13pm
Yup, you’re not supposed to fire on fleeing suspects (unless they are fleeing with maybe a kidnap victim). Keep it “holstered” unless you, or some other innocent person is in immediate threat of bodily harm.
Incorrect. While I understand this happened in Detroit, most other castle doctrine states are not that different. In Texas, you are allowed to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect in most cases in dealing with theft of property. Read “Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. (2)(B)” of the Texas Penal Code (http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#D).
"(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property"
 October 7, 2015 at 11:57am
That always seems to be their line, isn’t it? Socialism failed in the past because they just weren’t as passionate about it or educated in the right lingo and intentions as the modern Socialist and Totalitarians. They will know how to make it right this time and they promise, they pinky swear, not to murder millions. (Despite Bobo’s good buddy Bill Ayers recommending the slaughter of 25 million Americans who wouldn’t go along with their new Weatherman Socialist Revolution).
 October 7, 2015 at 11:49am
I dunno, Obama and the shooter had quite a bit in common. Mixed race, hatred of Christians, links with Islamic extremists and terrorists. Plus, black lives only matter when they are taken by cops. Blacks shooting each other really isn’t worthy of comment by the Lord High Marxist Messiah.
Both of them are/were into the Occult too.
Most people don't know that about Obama or his mother.
His peeps in Shitcago are doing him a favor by killing one another. It saves him the trouble later on. It's just another one of O's ideas of "Late Term Abortions."
 October 7, 2015 at 10:58am
Resisting arrest is often one of those charges they automatically tack on. Giving them more reason to “take you downtown”, leaving it up to the defendant to prove he is innocent of the charge. The YouTube video will be good evidence. In a civil society disrupting a meeting should be an escort out, then a citation (like a traffic ticket).
He's lucky they did not add trespassing. That would have happened at my city council meetings. They are scared to death that there is going to be an irate citizen come in and shoot up the place. They are always messing with some ones property, business, or making it harder to do business. They are constantly trying to condemn property that is not producing enough tax money and the city inspection system is riddled with logical inconsistency based upon who you are.
 October 7, 2015 at 9:54am
It has ALWAYS been the tactic of Russia to push until someone pushes back. They, like the Chinese, respect only strength. The first gay president and his tranny husband don’t scare the Russians. Especially after they were able to annex Crimea and are well on their way to getting eastern Ukraine, or at least getting eastern Ukraine as an independent puppet. None of these tactics the Russians are using are new. They’re old Soviet foreign policy playbook tactics. I’m sure they’re loving having an American opponent that is more feckless and incompetent than Jimmy Carter at the helm.
That's all we as Americans respect, as well. Otherwise, we do as we see fit. Might makes right. It always has, and it always will.
I'm sure they laugh at our rainbow president
Crimea voted and eastern Ukraine is trying to vote to get away from the U.S./NATO installed puppet.
Clearly, it has been the U.S. that initiated the pushing in Ukraine and Syria.
 October 7, 2015 at 9:46am
They were likely having their vote cast for them even while they were in jail anyway.
 October 6, 2015 at 5:18pm
Or a douche product.
“Do you ever have that certain unfresh feeling? ”
“Try Freeform douche, from ABC. Now with Frozen Characters on the bottle!”
 October 6, 2015 at 4:06pm
Putin seems to be winning playing chess. While the Obama Regime seems to have a very long string of failures behind it. It’s no secret that Russia has been an ally of Assad. This isn’t something new. Russia is really capitalizing on the military and political incompetence of the United States. Remember just a short time ago the Bobo Regime declared that Russia would be isolated from the world?
Charge him with brandishing a firearm. You don’t have to speak in order to communicate a threat. The videographer may be able to claim that he was just checking his weapon. However the message seems to be that the filmer threatens harm to the man he is following. He should have the ability to make his case in front of a magistrate or jury to prove his intentions were not hostile or malicious.
 October 6, 2015 at 12:15pm
Brandishing. It was a purposeful threat. If this was done and posted concerning an ex-GF it would also be actionable. If, instead it was just laying in a center console in a holster or in his belt in a holster it could be argued that the view of the weapon was unintentional, and not brandishing. However the unspoken message is clearly that he is considering harm to the man he is stalking.
 October 6, 2015 at 11:45am
What massively powerful weapons is she talking about? Does that ignorant slag even have a clue what she is talking about?
She’s probably just talking about things that look scary (black with a pistol grip, bi pod, flash suppressor, and some sort of detachable box magazine), rather than say a Marlin 45/70, or a Remington bolt action 300WSM.
I think obliterate is the word you are looking for when plugging that squirrel with a .50. To blow up an elephant, I think a claymore or a mine or maybe a bunker buster would do what she is alluding to. The 45/70 will put in a big hole in just about anything.
So, if she has access to things that blow up, I want to know where and how she is getting these items. I want mine.
 October 6, 2015 at 11:08am
“removing a nation’s capacity to make nuclear weapons”
Like shutting down all their centrifuges? No.. those get to keep spinning.
Like making sure they get inspected in a fair and varifiable manner? No.. hrmm they get 24 days notice before outside inspectors get there, and other places they get to inspect themselves..
Like making sure their funds would be limited to pursue such and expensive endeavor? No.. hrmm they’re getting 100 billion plus released to them, and the ability to earn vast sums more.
Like making sure that if they had one it would be difficult for them to deliver with missiles? No.. hrmm their missile program gets to keep right on track..
We seem to be doing all but just handing them a bomb on a silver platter. Way to go Team Bobo!
 October 6, 2015 at 11:01am
Schedule an open carry demonstration. Watch the Secret Police have a cow.. that is.. if they’re sober enough to notice.