User Profile: Cavallo


Member Since: October 05, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [21] April 20, 2015 at 5:22pm

    My bet is that an officer kneeled on his neck in the van after he got “mouthy”.

  • [17] April 20, 2015 at 5:08pm

    Was it included with childrens books on those with Schizophrenia, psychosis, neurosis, etc? Those conditions are far more likely to be encountered by children than delusional “transgender” crazy people. If not it barks very loudly of political indoctrination, not a course on tolerance and anti-bullying.

  • [92] April 20, 2015 at 5:04pm

    Pay no attention to the murderess lying fraudster behind the curtain of a pant suit!

    Responses (6) +
  • [41] April 20, 2015 at 4:59pm

    Remember kiddos, mental disease is a okay.

    Responses (6) +
  • [1] April 20, 2015 at 4:50pm

    Where the heck did he milk racism out of slayer’s comment?

  • [1] April 20, 2015 at 4:48pm

    “Are you saying we should get into a military confrontation with Russia?”
    Such would prevent a more costly war if we actually stand up and stop acting like a narcissistic autistic child. Russia understands machismo (why do you think Putin rides around shirtless on a horse and all that other stuff). They’ll see wishy washy parsing of words, and limp wrist negotiations as an invitation to push the envelope even further.

  • April 20, 2015 at 4:26pm

    I think technically there is still a form of it as I think the family of the bride is still traditionally supposed to pay for the wedding.
    Of course there is also that made up tradition by the diamond companies for the “engagement ring”.

  • [8] April 20, 2015 at 4:10pm

    I wonder how many more bundlers got cash from the public treasury, al la Solyndra.

  • [24] April 20, 2015 at 4:07pm

    Another good question would be is if the USA is willing to fire on Iranian warships to keep them from delivering weapons to Yemen.

  • [9] April 20, 2015 at 4:03pm

    I think he means the State Department acts unconstitutionally, often in violation of normal law to boot.

  • April 20, 2015 at 3:49pm

    It’s usually the other way around. Dowry. The family of the female pays the family of the male.
    That also used to be tradition in the United States as well until the 20th century.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] April 20, 2015 at 3:47pm

    So it’s against the law and not legal to force someone to marry. So what she is upset about is the family pressure.

  • [2] April 20, 2015 at 2:23pm

    Since.I.Gave is correct. Those rights are always rights unless specifically adjudicated in a court of law, such as a subpoena, and even then you cannot be forced to give information that would incriminate you. Rights are always rights. They are not granted to a person by government, however they can be respected by government or violated by the same. Laws can be passed that violate your rights, but that doesn’t mean the right does not exist.

  • [20] April 20, 2015 at 2:01pm

    This sounds like the city was nitpicking and out to get her. If she had been warned about not using the vehicle in the past I can see repeated violations deserving of a citation and fine. However, she was licensed and the conduct of the officers seemed to express that she was being targeted by someone in City Hall.

  • [6] April 20, 2015 at 1:08pm

    Iran keeps holding these “Death to America” rallies, as well as the Administration telling us that asking them to quit sponsoring terrorism is just too big a request for Iran to accomplish. I guess if Obama just gave them nukes that it would be too obvious.

  • [14] April 20, 2015 at 12:48pm

    Not far enough.

  • April 20, 2015 at 12:45pm

    @Tanker, If what you say is the story, then the cops were acting legally, but were being jerks about it. The police can detain you from entering your property while they seek a warrant to prevent the destruction of the illegal substance. I was always under the impression that the police were required to tell you that. Authorities are not allowed to just prevent you from entering your property because they want to. That’s an illegal seizure of that property. There must be probable cause. I am not sure if the authorities under case law are required to tell you, but I would be interested to find out if that is the case.
    Once CPS is involved though, once they have your children, you’re screwed.
    If you are going to advocate for drug legalization, you have to make sure you are squeaky clean legally.

  • [7] April 20, 2015 at 12:22pm

    They’ve already talked in democratic circles of seizing the 401k accounts. It would be something that they would claim is just being managed and “insured” by the feds. But just like Social Security the lock box idea is a lie. They’d dump all 4 trillion held in 401ks into the general fund and start writing it IOUs.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] April 20, 2015 at 12:14pm

    @King, True, and you did avoid the argumentum ad logicam, via your caveat that my prediction (albeit exaggerated for exclamation) is indeed possible.
    However, I should restate that killing someone because one believes that death is best for them (sans crime or armed conflict), is rather twisted in a civil situation. It becomes clinical and devoid of humanity. The monstrous nightmares of dystopian science fiction.

  • [15] April 20, 2015 at 11:45am

    I say let them leave.. Just don’t let them come back.
    I’d rather have them over there fighting than plotting BS here inside the States. Let them be target practice for the Jordanian pilots.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love