Did you also catch the part of the story that said a gas guzzling SUV pushed a Lexus into a gas guzzling Hummer? I thought people in California cared about the environment?
 August 20, 2015 at 10:45pm
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
[-1] July 21, 2015 at 11:44pm
You are absolutely correct. I don’t give a s*** what attitude she had, attitude is not against the law. If she does not physically harm or threaten to harm the officer, then he is forced to deal with it. According to the idiots who are disagreeing with you, we should use force every time someone disagrees with us. The same morons who keep preaching freedom on this forum, but what they really mean is forcing their morals on others through force. That is the problem with society today, Democrats and Republicans that are two sides of the same coin, both want different things, but both are willing to use force, infringement of rights, or plain giving up their rights to get those things.
June 4, 2015 at 12:40pm
I will play devils advocate here and say that these communities that are crime ridden are lower income, and cost the tax payers hundreds of thousands of dollars to try and keep under control, not including government handouts. I am sure there are good people that live in these communities but from the evidence we see in news story after news story they are few and far between. The majority of the crimes are contained in those communities so why do the good families not move, regardless of the difficulty your life comes first. Then the cops can pull out and let that community do what it does, and in turn patrol the law abiding communities keeping crime from spilling out. Those communities constantly complain about cops, so pull the cops out, give them their utopia and let them kill each other, problem solved. But then that is not politically correct and does not fit in the modern day narrative that we have to take care of every single person on the planet.
 June 3, 2015 at 12:57am
As long as an individuals actions do not harm me or my property I could are less what they are doing. Feel free to stand on a corner and direct imaginary orchestras, or lead your troops as Napoleon. With that said, if you have all the parts of a man, and require hormones to stop being a man, your a man, don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining, then call me the one with an issue.
If those individuals were not insecure about acceptance of their decisions and their belief system they would not go to such extensive lengths to get public approval for their actions.
Bruce Jenner could have done all this with no media coverage and merely continued in dialog with his personal sphere of influence. His immediate family.
His choices I find as repugnant as pedophilia and would have preferred if he kept his personal turds of life to himself. it becomes offensive if I access several forms of media sources, print television, radio and it is there. Not one source but all.
And that does violate my personal belief system in it's dominating prevalence in our society thrust upon me by his force of will. He needs to shut up.
It might not directly affect you yet just give it a year or so and soon we will have to pay for gender transformation through our insurance premiums. And if you are an employer you will also be forced to pay for this transformation of your employee
It's the media hyping this, making it seem like a great thing, him having 2 million followers on Twitter, gaining popularity for this as some sort of fake movement -- that's affecting us all.
June 2, 2015 at 10:26pm
Human beings such as myself are not guided by any moral other than do unto others as I would hope others would do unto me. It’s that simple, I respect others person and property. IF you for some reason find that difficult then maybe you should have a DNA test to make sure everything is kosher. As far as the animals we must share this society with, force should be met with greater force, sorry evolution passed you by. One day the scientist will stop being PC and all will become clear, that I am certain of.
[-1] June 2, 2015 at 10:20pm
What you mean is unless those rules do not harm others or their property. You have no right to force any belief on others, and laws are force. The only allowed force/law is those laws/force that protects property and person. Any Christian moral that does not pertain to protection of property or person is a moral that is left up to the individual to follow and not law. IF you wish to make it law then you are no better than those that wish for sharia law.
 June 2, 2015 at 3:32pm
And what are we going to do about it? What can we do? Is it like drug addiction where you have to let the country hit rock bottom? Is it a situation where States will have to separate from the Union to keep from going down with it? Is that even an option? Maybe we hope that we can vote enough into office to make a difference before it’s to late? Does the majority of the U.S. even want freedom? Do we need to be looking at other places to call home? We know that armed resistance would be seen as crazies trying to overthrow a democracy, the Founders Spirit is dead, so what options do we have other than going down with the ship?
June 2, 2015 at 3:12pm
She said Allah cannot be God because of all the violence he perpetuated. It’s a stupid argument, because the Bible is full of violence also. And to dizymeup, when the f*** did I say extremist Muslims where not a threat? Any organized body whether it be religious, political, or private that forces itself on anyone is a threat. In my world you do as you please as long as it doesn’t affect others property or person. Once you cross that line and use force, you are met with greater force period. I will have my personal relationship with God the way I see fit, if you don’t like tough s***. You wanna force me to do otherwise you better bring an army.
 June 2, 2015 at 3:00pm
Only animals need rules relating to every aspect of their life. If you need directions on how to be, you are not human. It appears in the near future on the only freedom humans will enjoy is the freedom found in death, as the majority of so called humans are racing towards slavery, and strict directions on how to exist. Give me freedom, or give me death.
Unless those rules and directions come from the Christian version of God.
"If you need directions on how to be, you are not human." Um, sorry to say, but humans have absolutely NO natural behavioral inclination that causes them to act a certain way. Humans will act as society encourages them to act.
May 21, 2015 at 1:21pm
In Joshua 6:20-21, God helps the Israelites destroy Jericho, killing “men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.” In Deuteronomy 2:32-35, God has the Israelites kill everyone in Heshbon, including children. In Deuteronomy 3:3-7, God has the Israelites do the same to the people of Bashan. In Numbers 31:7-18, the Israelites kill all the Midianites except for the virgins, whom they take as spoils of war. In 1 Samuel 15:1-9, God tells the Israelites to kill all the Amalekites – men, women, children, infants, and their cattle – for something the Amalekites’ ancestors had done 400 years earlier.
Many of them were the descendants of Lucifer's Angels and Nephilim off spring so I guess you have to believe that first. The had bred with everything and anything like animals, they engaged in homosexually and with children creating cross breeds with corrupt DNA. Noah's flood obviously didn't do the job the first time. I would check those names I think most are Nephilim tribes. One of them..God said to leave alone and they went after them anyway,it didn't end well, there was punishment. So there was a point not random murder, totally different reason., I want to say Amalekites were to be left alone but I'm not sure.
Which is why God sent Jesus and the New Testament to stop the idiocy. Unfortunately, the muslims do not have a Jesus to come and change them.
cbrian1978 Is that happening now? NO. I would suggest you take Muslim extremists as the threat and not something the Bible said happened 1000s of years ago. If you think you're head won't be lopped off by one of them in a second for disagreeing on just about anything then you need to do some more research.
She said Allah cannot be God because of all the violence he perpetuated. It's a stupid argument, because the Bible is full of violence also. And to dizymeup, when the f*** did I say extremist Muslims where not a threat? Any organized body whether it be religious, political, or private that forces itself on anyone is a threat. In my world you do as you please as long as it doesn't affect others property or person. Once you cross that line and use force, you are met with greater force period. I will have my personal relationship with God the way I see fit, if you don't like tough s***. You wanna force me to do otherwise you better bring an army.
 March 28, 2015 at 8:32am
I am no racist, but I am classicist. I expect individuals who do business on the Hill to be well spoken, educated, and express the highest degree of etiquette. If she is an example of who represents this country then there is surely no hope.
 December 12, 2014 at 9:47am
What he says is true. But what he fails to take into account is that States Rights have been stripped. The way the States are billed has changed. At one point in time States where issued a bill at years end by the Federal Government. That bill was for approved spending, meaning the State paid for what it used. For States that did not use much of the available Federal resources, their bill was small.
Today the States are forced to give almost all their money to the Federal Government, then they have to lie, cheat, and steal to get as much of it back as possible, hence pork and welfare States. If you do not fight for your money back, then some welfare State addicted to spending will steal it from you.
 November 5, 2014 at 1:49pm
….a well armed porcupine voting on what’s for dinner.
Well, sometimes you need to vote on what isn't for dinner, then maybe you can get around to voting on what is for dinner. But they got the point either way.
October 22, 2014 at 11:55am
I don’t understand why people keeping flocking to them. We have some here in Texas that make you pay a monthly fee to have a dog, and you have to pay a fee to do work on your home on top of paying for a permit from the county.
I have seen other HOA’s that where reasonable. A very simple contract that states how large your building lot should be, how large the house you are building should be, no hoofed animals, no trailer houses, no junk in your yard. Hell I wouldn’t even live there. Maybe I want a goat to stand on a junk car in my back yard! Not really but you get my point.
 October 22, 2014 at 11:50am
@mike79 You stated, “Many HOA contracts are written by lawyers or wannabe lawyers so that it is impossible to know what you can or can’t do. They also usually have thousands of stupid rules, so even if you attempt to read them all, it’s darn near impossible not to miss a few.”
Then it is his fault for signing something he didn’t understand, better yet hire an attorney to read it for you. Even better don’t live in a ******* HOA.
 October 21, 2014 at 4:20pm
You can. But if you sign an agreement that you won’t then you shouldn’t. No one put a gun to the guy’s head and made him sign his rights away. I don’t agree with the HOA, but I am smart enough to not live in one.
Many HOA contracts are written by lawyers or wannabe lawyers so that it is impossible to know what you can or can't do. They also usually have thousands of stupid rules, so even if you attempt to read them all, it's darn near impossible not to miss a few.
 October 21, 2014 at 4:17pm
Why should they be outlawed? We have freedoms in this country, even the freedom to be a dumbass who lives in a HOA. Who is the real idiot, the guy running the HOA, or the guy who willfully signs over power to him?
 October 21, 2014 at 4:13pm
Is it stupid? Hell yes. Is it also stupid to sign a contract and move into a HOA? Hell yes. Is it stupid to sign a contract then complain when it’s enforced? Hell yes.
October 17, 2014 at 1:42pm
The helmet didn’t stop the bullet. Due to the low angle of the bullet it traveled between the outer core and the interior straps. Guy was just plain lucky. Those helmets are only rated for pistol rounds and small fragmentation. Better than nothing, but I think we can do better.