Having an opinion contrary to your hypocritical “tolerance” does not make me wrong. If you believe in freedom of choice and conscience you’ll get over yourself and realize having an opposing opinion is also a choice. You deem those monsters for simply having an opinion yet you’ll support groups like Islam which go beyond opinion into killing. Get a life…
 June 29, 2016 at 9:58am
Chris, I’m doing a “sit in” in opposition to bomb violence. We clearly need more laws—-
Hear hear! I'm all for it.
That will stop it. It's FOOLPROOF,
It's an absolutely brilliant solution!!! Laws will stop this stuff!
Mr Matthews fails to understand the concept of the explosives being used: fast and efficient delivery of force, causing the maximum amount of carnage and destruction of lives and property, in the most visible and dramatic of means possible.
Has anyone in the media also mentioned the fact that, several of these attacks, are involving sets of three bombers?
 June 28, 2016 at 4:52pm
We need common sense bomb laws… who wants to join me for a sit in?
June 27, 2016 at 3:30pm
The life of the child comes under the inalienable right to “life, liberty and prosperity”. You can’t do that if you’re murdered. This is not a “health” issue this is a government issue to thwart genocide—
 June 27, 2016 at 1:14pm
Maggie, screw you—-taking the life of an innocent child is sickening yet you smile. Only evil smiles at the blatant taking of innocent life. I’m tired of being nice to evil—so I really could care less what you think. If you prove that that little life inside a womb turns out to be something other than a innocent child, then I’ll support your claim. Otherwise, it’s murder!!
 June 27, 2016 at 1:10pm
It’s time to abort our system of these evil scum—killing innocent kids for money and their perverted agenda.
"how" = Progressive POS's
"why" = Obama & friends
Trust Gubbermint? = Less than ever before.
With the suck a$$ democrats in charge, you can not trust anyone.
here is something we should hold GOVERNMENT to as TELL the TRUTH STARTING WITH BERRY/OBAMA OR WHATEVER HIS/HER NAME REALLY IS PERIOD..
 June 27, 2016 at 9:47am
Apologize for what? For an opinion? For following the Word of God? My goodness, this Pope needs to point out the obvious evils of Islam and persecution of Christians. Yes, pray for those less fortunate, help those in need—but the Church needs to apologize? For what? For caring and sending money? Enough—
 June 23, 2016 at 1:00pm
I am glad to see a BIG government Republican finally firing back—hey, gotta’ give credit where credit is due!
He might, just maybe, be getting tired of being laughed at by everyone. Just maybe...
Paul Ryan paper tiger, grrrrr.
 June 23, 2016 at 9:13am
Are they sitting in for the 500 plus that died in Chicago last year? I’m confused….
 June 22, 2016 at 4:16pm
Which “home grown terrorist?”
Fort Hood – Was in contact with Anwar al Aliki, the HEAD of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, for months.
Boston – Trained by Al Qaeda in Chechnya, Russia warned us. They warned the FBI, and when they refused to do anything they warned the CIA who then warned the FBI. Which dots were missing?
San Bernadino – Paki trained by Al Qaeda in Yemen.
Orlando – In direct contact with Anwar al Aliki before he was killed. Took two trips to Saudi Arabia (and who knows where he went from there) in 2012 and 2013.
 June 22, 2016 at 12:54pm
…and why is government [still] involved in the institution of marriage?
I find it funny that no one really advocated for the government to get out of the marriage business until same-sex marriage became a hot button issue.
"If homosexuals can marry then no one should be able to via the government"
The family used to be the building block for society. Government had an interest in promoting family, and thus marriage, because it was both the primary means of making good citizens, shaping good behavior suitable for a civil society, and providing welfare to those in need. Having two parents in the home still has a greater impact of children's success in life than almost any other factor. Strong families made limited government possible.
If the government's going to change marriage into little more than a temporary status symbol with tax breaks, undermine parents efforts to raise their children, and actively try to raise the next generation to hate their parents, hate America, hate God, hate marriage, hate white people, hate marriage, and encourage dependence upon an ever growing government, laziness and riots, then your right, the government no longer has an interest in promoting strong families or marriage.
There was a good reason for Government involvement once upon a time, but government's goals for marriage and those of families no longer coincide.
 June 22, 2016 at 12:51pm
These people have no intention of bettering society but their main goal is to disarm us. It’s made very clear—if “gun violence” is at 1957 levels, why are they pushing gun control so badly? Because we’re being runned by a bunch of Marxists that want to disarm us and complete their takeover.
People don't realize that government agencies that have never been armed, are now armed. Is this Obama's police force. I think so.
 June 21, 2016 at 4:38pm
Welcome to the land of outcast, misfit toys. You’re one of us now—Americans fighting for freedom and REAL equality for all and to be free from a tyrannical, out of control government.
 June 21, 2016 at 4:31pm
Thank you sir for taking the time, confronting evil and fighting for the innocent children. This doctor certainly is not normal. Anyone that can brag about ripping apart innocent children is a coward!
 June 21, 2016 at 2:12pm
Areas regained— The White House, Philly, DC, CA and New Jersey.
 June 21, 2016 at 2:00pm
I heard he tried to mow them down then unlawfully cut corners….
June 21, 2016 at 1:13pm
Don’t worry—either way the DOJ and the media will blame the gun and say they got them legally but illegally.
 June 21, 2016 at 1:09pm
I am especially disturbed by the .50 BMG round—that’s a beer bottle opener.
 June 20, 2016 at 3:10pm
We have different states with different laws, stop comparing our country as a whole with Australia, Sweden, the UK, etc. Compare Montana with Sweden, or Idaho with Australia or Vermont with the UK. The USA, overall, is at 1957 “gun violence” levels yet we are the most heavily armed countries in the world. We are not [even] in the top 100 “gun violent” countries in the world. Don’t give me this 3rd world argument BS either—you want to compare countries you can’t just pick and chose just like you can’t compare DC with Vermont. Guns aren’t the problem—corruption, PC-ism and progressivism is the problem.