User Profile: ChangeUSBack

ChangeUSBack

Member Since: January 10, 2011

CommentsDisplaying ChangeUSBack's 10 most recent comments.

  • Yep, unless some of us stop watching no one gets to see it. so… Who’s going to take one for the team and go to the range while the rest of us watch?

  • Maybe if I donate $100 I can get an official NRA knife and better streaming bandwidth!

  • I was never a big fan of Rob Lowe. But I do have to say I respect him more than I did before watching this magazine…

    Wait, no. I mean clip.

  • The $1T Coin Makes Its White House Debut

    January 10, 2013 at 11:00am

    In reply to Infected.

    Almost… Except the country isn’t taking $50 from “you” for the tattoo, “she” (the country) is taking $50 from you to pay the bills. The money for the tattoo, she would claim, was from her writing a check for $50 and depositing it back into the same bank account and claiming it paid for it with the $50 it just deposited.

  • I don’t know which is worse, that we live in a world where someone would do something like this, or the fact that, rather than grieving, our elected servants immediately scramble to make all this about a political agenda on gun control. I never hear about how we are so disconnected from each other that someone could fester in this kind of evil and why are we so anonymous with our neighbors that no one could see this person (persons) were capable of doing something like this–not to mention preparing for it and carrying it out.

  • What came to my mind was that sure, they could forcibly shave him, but why? If I’m the prosecution, I would prefer he not shave. For me, I would have rather answered the poll above with:

    Who cares? Showing up in court, LOOKING like a kill-crazy terrorist, won’t exactly help his defense.

  • @Rover4444
    I respected where you were coming from below where you are basically telling everyone how they should listen, allowing everyone speak their mind. Then one post above you are telling someone who is trying to voice their opinion what they can or cannot say by saying they shouldn’t speak about religion. If she feels that’s something important and wants to add that to her part of the discussion. Who are we to say otherwise? If she feels religion helped her to become a self-sufficient member of society, then great–it’s her opinion of her situation. If you and I don’t agree with that perspective, well, that’s just as great.

  • Okay, just to be fair, Hannity really didn’t get very far with letting this kid get a word in. I really wish he had let him say more because from what it sounded like was beyond the first few sentences of the “occupy talking points” everything sounded like it would have been absolutely drowned by logic and common sense. I can certainly see why Hannity wanted to verbally scourge this kid, but I personally think the satisfaction of a verbal beat-down. But if “occupy” is trying to say it has a valid argument and a workable plan for the United States, then let them state it honestly and thoroughly.

    Seriously. The stuff this kid was talking about was a joke and wouldn’t stand up to the scrutiny of a debate rooted in reality.

  • Agreed. I am thinking they are going to leave the “law” alone and attack guns with regulations instead. Use the EPA, USDA, FDA, SEC, or even more likely, ObamaCare.

    Actually just yesterday this came up in conversation where a friend told me they were being asked by their doctor if they were a gun owner.

    Wow… wouldn’t it be keen if, to keep your freedom, you had to procure health care on the black market too?

    Sorry… it’s just getting harder and harder to keep from being a sour, jaded, cynic.

  • Interesting also, in addition to the noted change in Mr. Nugent’s hand position (as mentioned in the story update); listen closely to the background audio. At 18 seconds (in the first clip), then there is a cut and after the cut you can hear an airplane that you can’t hear just before the cut where Nugent’s demeanor (and hand position) seems to change very quickly.

    That in itself would, arguably, provide a wide enough base of evidence to beg question of the producer(s) as to what they did not want “us” to see. It could have been Ted Nugent asked for a moment to clear his throat, blow his nose, or use the restroom. But the sudden change of mood in the conversation alone is (again, arguably) enough to call in doubt the validity of the entire interview.