User Profile: ChangeUSBack

ChangeUSBack

Member Since: January 10, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

  • January 17, 2014 at 11:29am

    This is my school–rather, the school I went to in Jr. High. This isn’t an inner-city school, it’s not it a ultra progressive area. It’s in an suburban neighborhood (homes built circa 1970s). Shawnee, KS has been a conservative-voting area since the 1850s. However, this quote:
    “The curriculum it is a part of, it aligns with national standards around those topics, and it’s part of our curriculum in the school district,” would make it seem as though this curriculum comes from a national curriculum, a common curriculum, a core curriculum that is intended to be nationally common. We took our kids out of public schools as well.

  • May 4, 2013 at 8:53pm

    Yep, unless some of us stop watching no one gets to see it. so… Who’s going to take one for the team and go to the range while the rest of us watch?

  • May 4, 2013 at 8:45pm

    Maybe if I donate $100 I can get an official NRA knife and better streaming bandwidth!

  • January 15, 2013 at 1:08pm

    I was never a big fan of Rob Lowe. But I do have to say I respect him more than I did before watching this magazine…

    Wait, no. I mean clip.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 10, 2013 at 11:00am

    Almost… Except the country isn’t taking $50 from “you” for the tattoo, “she” (the country) is taking $50 from you to pay the bills. The money for the tattoo, she would claim, was from her writing a check for $50 and depositing it back into the same bank account and claiming it paid for it with the $50 it just deposited.

  • December 14, 2012 at 2:10pm

    I don’t know which is worse, that we live in a world where someone would do something like this, or the fact that, rather than grieving, our elected servants immediately scramble to make all this about a political agenda on gun control. I never hear about how we are so disconnected from each other that someone could fester in this kind of evil and why are we so anonymous with our neighbors that no one could see this person (persons) were capable of doing something like this–not to mention preparing for it and carrying it out.

  • August 23, 2012 at 1:56pm

    What came to my mind was that sure, they could forcibly shave him, but why? If I’m the prosecution, I would prefer he not shave. For me, I would have rather answered the poll above with:

    Who cares? Showing up in court, LOOKING like a kill-crazy terrorist, won’t exactly help his defense.

  • May 4, 2012 at 7:46pm

    @Rover4444
    I respected where you were coming from below where you are basically telling everyone how they should listen, allowing everyone speak their mind. Then one post above you are telling someone who is trying to voice their opinion what they can or cannot say by saying they shouldn’t speak about religion. If she feels that’s something important and wants to add that to her part of the discussion. Who are we to say otherwise? If she feels religion helped her to become a self-sufficient member of society, then great–it’s her opinion of her situation. If you and I don’t agree with that perspective, well, that’s just as great.

  • May 4, 2012 at 5:45pm

    Okay, just to be fair, Hannity really didn’t get very far with letting this kid get a word in. I really wish he had let him say more because from what it sounded like was beyond the first few sentences of the “occupy talking points” everything sounded like it would have been absolutely drowned by logic and common sense. I can certainly see why Hannity wanted to verbally scourge this kid, but I personally think the satisfaction of a verbal beat-down. But if “occupy” is trying to say it has a valid argument and a workable plan for the United States, then let them state it honestly and thoroughly.

    Seriously. The stuff this kid was talking about was a joke and wouldn’t stand up to the scrutiny of a debate rooted in reality.

  • May 4, 2012 at 3:37pm

    Agreed. I am thinking they are going to leave the “law” alone and attack guns with regulations instead. Use the EPA, USDA, FDA, SEC, or even more likely, ObamaCare.

    Actually just yesterday this came up in conversation where a friend told me they were being asked by their doctor if they were a gun owner.

    Wow… wouldn’t it be keen if, to keep your freedom, you had to procure health care on the black market too?

    Sorry… it’s just getting harder and harder to keep from being a sour, jaded, cynic.

  • May 4, 2012 at 2:56pm

    Interesting also, in addition to the noted change in Mr. Nugent’s hand position (as mentioned in the story update); listen closely to the background audio. At 18 seconds (in the first clip), then there is a cut and after the cut you can hear an airplane that you can’t hear just before the cut where Nugent’s demeanor (and hand position) seems to change very quickly.

    That in itself would, arguably, provide a wide enough base of evidence to beg question of the producer(s) as to what they did not want “us” to see. It could have been Ted Nugent asked for a moment to clear his throat, blow his nose, or use the restroom. But the sudden change of mood in the conversation alone is (again, arguably) enough to call in doubt the validity of the entire interview.

  • May 3, 2012 at 4:27pm

    Why not? If you can afford it–and most of those things are legal in many states with the right taxes and paperwork. Have you priced even the cheapest transferable automatic firearms? Not to mention the cost of the ammunition? At roughly $1/round, (depending on the caliber, of course) how long can the average gun-owner afford to shoot a gun that runs around 700 rounds-per-minute?

    It’s already against the law to shoot at people. Why make laws that make breaking the law illegal? I have never had the desire, but I have to think if I am planning on going out and killing a bunch of people, I am not going to be worried about breaking laws against obtaining the guns I am going to use.

    Banning anything just stocks the shelves of the black market…

    Sorry, I suppose this is a little off topic.

  • September 28, 2011 at 2:28pm

    That’s absurd. Obama, is not the antichrist. But I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t have the antichrist’s contact info in his blackberry.

  • July 1, 2011 at 11:35am

    What do you expect those without class to do? Act under-creative and classless, of course. The depth of their intolerant intolerance, and ideological bigotry depicts such a new form a knuckle-dragging cluelessness. It’s absolutely breathtaking. How can these people who scream “fascist” look in a mirror and see fascism?

    Instead of acting like a schoolyard bully, why wouldn’t she, a true creative intellectual, seek to engage Mr. Beck in a true intellectual discussion? Unless, her definition intellect and creativity begins and ends with the of “spewing hate” and interacting with someone with different ideas on an intellectual level comparative of a preschooler.

  • June 28, 2011 at 12:52pm

    I just want the photo of me in my driveway as I was getting into my car taken off google streets.

  • April 26, 2011 at 2:01pm

    Executive orders are not a free pass to side-step the Constitution. If Obama uses executive powers to break a law, wouldn’t that fall into the “high crimes and misdemeanors” category?

  • April 6, 2011 at 4:00pm

    The sign reads: “Don’t feed the trolls.”

  • April 6, 2011 at 3:57pm

    I hope you are right Kentucky.

  • April 6, 2011 at 3:51pm

    The question is: Why? Personally, I caught Beck on Fox a couple of years ago and from there I started watching FNC in more time-slots. Whose choice is this? If this is a result of some Soros group’s pressure on FNC to drop Beck, then I have no problem eliminating all business with any News Corp entity–even so far as to cancel my subscription to the Wall Street Journal. If it’s true, as Beck is fond of saying, that ‘Sunlight is the best disinfectant,’ then the reason should be made known. Ratings don’t seem to be an issue here. Is this pressure from somewhere else? If so, where, and why? If Beck has done something wrong then bring it out, whatever it may be. Otherwise this looks like FNC has succumbed to an an outside influence and can no longer be trusted with the “fair and balanced” truth. Nor can any other News Corp. media outlets, and should be ranked with all the rest of the lamestream media.

    So? What is is Mr. Murdoch?