I guess it’s impossible for people to get through any article without somehow making it political.
November 12, 2014 at 10:58am
Aaaaaand of COURSE someone had to bring up something about Obama in an article about a haunted house. Makes total sense and doesn’t make you sound obsessed at all.
April 24, 2013 at 6:10pm
“Obama must have thrown some money at them and this is all a distraction to cover for his aiding and abetting our enemies, again.” -Correction, you DID say conspiracy.
April 24, 2013 at 6:09pm
Thank you, Ozchambers.
April 24, 2013 at 3:06pm
Pro tip for life: You can’t say someone is whipped in an argument when all you’ve done is called them stupid. I mean…you CAN, but it doesn’t bode well for how you actually live your life. Fun fact: admitting to being wrong is, in fact, a graceful virtue. For example: if hard evidence, like a full out recording of Obama saying “I lied, I’m not Christian, I follow Islam” were to come to light, I would say, “Oh wow, guess I was wrong about that!” And furthermore, I can’t claim 100% certainty that he’s NOT a Muslim. It just seems, to me, that it’s more improbable that he is, and that 100% certainty on your behalf sounds very delusional. Note: I’m not calling you delusional, just saying the theory sounds as such.
April 24, 2013 at 2:56pm
“Sorry Charlie, your just not smart enough to be here.” seemed to be the subject changer here. I’m still waiting on actual proof. Also, what’s up with someone who doesn’t agree with you being a liberal? Pro 2nd amendment, pro-life, pro-free market…So I’m a liberal?
April 24, 2013 at 2:05pm
Great answer! (“your *dog’s* bigger…”)
April 24, 2013 at 1:34pm
That’s…really all you got? You’re basically saying “I can’t argue a single thing you just said.” By the way, if you’re going to attack someone’s intellect, it’s best that you use proper grammar. (i.e. “you’re” as opposed to “your”)
April 24, 2013 at 1:00pm
I’ve been *taught not to trust…
April 24, 2013 at 12:52pm
Well, I have to admit you followed up with citation…except I’ve been not to trust a single thing that takes snippets of sound clips wildly out of context to further an agenda. Example: whether you consider the Quran a holy book or not, the fact remains that it is objectively holy text. It might not be what you believe, but heck I don’t believe in the Bible but I still acknowledge it as “the Holy Bible”. Seriously, don’t ask me if I’m really that dumb if you can’t provide solid proof that Barack Obama is a worshiping Muslim.
That being said, I do agree that he caters a little too much to them, but ya know that could be out of fear of, oh, I don’t know, ******* off an extremist sect of a religion that has a vivid history of blowing things to smithereens when things don’t go their way…
April 24, 2013 at 12:41pm
And here we have it, folks. The utter destruction of civil discourse. “Because I don’t believe you.” Have fun expecting to never resolve a single thing for the rest of your life.
April 24, 2013 at 12:24pm
Hey Ben, I wasn’t talking about the original poster. Let’s put this into basics with paraphrasing:
PERSON A: “This person (Beck) is straining to find something where there isn’t.” * note that this is an opinion on how Person A doesn’t find this story “newsworthy”.
PERSON B: “You’re an idiot!” *note that this is a very curt and ineffective response, especially from someone who obviously wants to prove Person A wrong. Yet, calling Person A an idiot will not prove them wrong, all it does is show that Person B is not capable of providing his side of the argument unless all Person B was trying to do was garner backup from peers who also like slinging horrible pun-based insults, which they have succeeded in.
*Let it also be noted that I am indifferent to Beck’s investigation. I neither think this is pointless or heroic. I like waiting for results.
April 24, 2013 at 12:07pm
April 24, 2013 at 12:05pm
Charliebartow you are a sad human being. How desperate for attention do you have to be to this into Obama bashing. I pity you.
April 24, 2013 at 11:45am
DZ know exactly how to rebuttal against people they don’t agree with. Not with intellect and counter arguments, but with a thinly veiled insult based off of an idiom said by the previous poster. You sure showed us that that poster was wrong! Watch now, as we get a weak watered-down excuse that it’s “no use” debating with “********” (or as DZ probably refers to them as “anyone who doesn’t agree with me”).
April 24, 2013 at 11:40am
Holy crap,is he??? How did you find that out? Sources, please. Intuition alone cannot be considered objective in such a wildly ignorant statement.
April 24, 2013 at 11:39am
What does that even mean?
April 2, 2013 at 9:30am
This is stunning. The man (Chavez) has a birthday that happens to fall on Easter. This is what’s ruining America. The far left want a strict control on things nearly coming to a totalitarian face, and the far right are far more concerned with crap like this. Are you really that pathetic, to cry about a website not showing something Easter-related, when you people are supposed to celebrate his life, miracles, death and ressurection EVERY SINGLE DAY? Freedom of speech: awesome. Freedom of religion: great. You all are ruining both.