TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying charliesouth's 10 most recent comments.

• Report: Surviving Bomber Suspect Admits He and His Brother Waged Boston Terror Attack

  April 24, 2013 at 6:10pm

  In reply to Soul Leister.

  “Obama must have thrown some money at them and this is all a distraction to cover for his aiding and abetting our enemies, again.” -Correction, you DID say conspiracy.

• Report: Surviving Bomber Suspect Admits He and His Brother Waged Boston Terror Attack

  April 24, 2013 at 6:09pm

  In reply to perry1980.

  Thank you, Ozchambers.

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 3:06pm

  In reply to HKS.

  Pro tip for life: You can’t say someone is whipped in an argument when all you’ve done is called them stupid. I mean…you CAN, but it doesn’t bode well for how you actually live your life. Fun fact: admitting to being wrong is, in fact, a graceful virtue. For example: if hard evidence, like a full out recording of Obama saying “I lied, I’m not Christian, I follow Islam” were to come to light, I would say, “Oh wow, guess I was wrong about that!” And furthermore, I can’t claim 100% certainty that he’s NOT a Muslim. It just seems, to me, that it’s more improbable that he is, and that 100% certainty on your behalf sounds very delusional. Note: I’m not calling you delusional, just saying the theory sounds as such.

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 2:56pm

  In reply to HKS.

  “Sorry Charlie, your just not smart enough to be here.” seemed to be the subject changer here. I’m still waiting on actual proof. Also, what’s up with someone who doesn’t agree with you being a liberal? Pro 2nd amendment, pro-life, pro-free market…So I’m a liberal?

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 2:05pm

  In reply to HKS.

  Great answer! (“your *dog’s* bigger…”)

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 1:34pm

  In reply to HKS.

  That’s…really all you got? You’re basically saying “I can’t argue a single thing you just said.” By the way, if you’re going to attack someone’s intellect, it’s best that you use proper grammar. (i.e. “you’re” as opposed to “your”)

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 1:00pm

  In reply to HKS.

  I’ve been *taught not to trust…

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 12:52pm

  In reply to HKS.

  Well, I have to admit you followed up with citation…except I’ve been not to trust a single thing that takes snippets of sound clips wildly out of context to further an agenda. Example: whether you consider the Quran a holy book or not, the fact remains that it is objectively holy text. It might not be what you believe, but heck I don’t believe in the Bible but I still acknowledge it as “the Holy Bible”. Seriously, don’t ask me if I’m really that dumb if you can’t provide solid proof that Barack Obama is a worshiping Muslim.
  That being said, I do agree that he caters a little too much to them, but ya know that could be out of fear of, oh, I don’t know, ******* off an extremist sect of a religion that has a vivid history of blowing things to smithereens when things don’t go their way…

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 12:41pm

  In reply to usnconstitution.

  And here we have it, folks. The utter destruction of civil discourse. “Because I don’t believe you.” Have fun expecting to never resolve a single thing for the rest of your life.

• ‘Armed and Dangerous’: Beck’s Latest Revelations on Saudi National Once a ‘Person of Interest’ in Boston Bombings

  April 24, 2013 at 12:24pm

  In reply to encinom.

  Hey Ben, I wasn’t talking about the original poster. Let’s put this into basics with paraphrasing:
  PERSON A: “This person (Beck) is straining to find something where there isn’t.” * note that this is an opinion on how Person A doesn’t find this story “newsworthy”.
  PERSON B: “You’re an idiot!” *note that this is a very curt and ineffective response, especially from someone who obviously wants to prove Person A wrong. Yet, calling Person A an idiot will not prove them wrong, all it does is show that Person B is not capable of providing his side of the argument unless all Person B was trying to do was garner backup from peers who also like slinging horrible pun-based insults, which they have succeeded in.
  *Let it also be noted that I am indifferent to Beck’s investigation. I neither think this is pointless or heroic. I like waiting for results.