Despite my feelings about the disturbing things in those videos, I’m a little uncomfortable with the idea being presented here. “If you’ve done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide” is a mantra used by fascists of all stripes.
 July 24, 2015 at 4:14pm
The Merciless Pepper of Quetzalacatenango!
 July 24, 2015 at 4:12pm
That said, the Spanish did destroy a wealth of ancient history when they burned all of the Aztec codex. So much history, gone forever. Same as when the Muslims destroyed the great Library of Alexandria. Can you imagine what we could have learned from either of those?
 July 24, 2015 at 4:02pm
Rand is hawkish and lies? How exactly is Rand Paul hawkish? He’s almost an isolationist. Don’t you know anything about American Libertarianism? And what is he lying about exactly?
July 23, 2015 at 3:44pm
Man it sucks that I have to tell my cousin and his wife they have to get a divorce. See, they tried to have kids and found out they can’t. So their marriage is now null and void since they can’t create a family.
July 23, 2015 at 3:37pm
gregorio57: Is that what you’re hoping for? 2% of the population died during that war, over 6 million people in today’s numbers. Sound like a good time to you?
July 23, 2015 at 3:22pm
Downvote ScottBytes all you want, but they DID base their decision on equal protection. What’s true for one group has to be true for all groups. That’s the constitution folks. So you can either ban marriage altogether, or pass an amendment to the constitution.
[-3] July 23, 2015 at 3:21pm
Isn’t that true on both sides? I’ve noticed that conservatives like to use the term “activist judges” whenever it disagrees with them but not when they agree with the decision, like in the Hobby Lobby decision.
I don't like what I'm seeing with our government in general regardless of the once every two decades when something goes the way I think it should. I'd like to see a return to a Constitutional government. One where our checks and balances operate as they should. And that doesn't mean things will go more the way I think they should. But to be an actual nation of laws rather than a fake nation of laws would be refreshing not to mention put us back on sustainable paths.
They are called "Activist Judges" when they go against the Constitution. The Constitution is "The Law of the Land". period. The Hobby Lobby decision was protecting religious freedom described in the Constitution, Hence there was nothing Activist about that decision.
However, when the court validates the ACA because it is a tax, yet the Dems and Obama swore up and own that it was NOT a tax (they had to do that to get it passed), that is creating something that wasn't there, hence the proper use of "Activist".
No, conservatives use the term “activist judges” when the decision is based upon social engineering and not on the Constitution. When the justices actually base decision on the ConstItution, such as they did in the Hobby Lobby case, they’re not being social activists.
 July 23, 2015 at 3:16pm
Since they argued the decision on the basis of equal protection, it would seem to me that the action Congress COULD take is to get government out of the marriage business altogether. I would be fine with that. And if they want to replace the concept of legal marriage with a concept of legal civil union for all, I would be fine with that too.
July 21, 2015 at 3:14pm
No, I do it for free…because I don’t much care for racist stormfront wannabes. Also, Hitler was a loser, get over it.
July 21, 2015 at 3:00pm
Because 10 years ago the aliens took Monk on their spaceship. And they violated him…sexually.
July 21, 2015 at 2:53pm
It’s amazing isn’t it? They’re following Trump right off a cliff. As a liberal, I PRAY that Trump wins the nomination. Don’t you think they’d be wary of a candidate we just can’t wait to put against the Democratic nominee?
July 20, 2015 at 4:14pm
Oh yeah, it’s crazy. We found a loophole when we got married a couple weeks ago though. We ordered the same damn cake that would have been a wedding cake, but said it was for a family reunion. It was about half as expensive.
 July 17, 2015 at 4:50pm
Companion – You’re just trying to cover your butt because you have no reading comprehension skills. You read the first sentence and went on a tirade. It’s like those people who can’t recognize sarcasm without a /s at the end of the sentence. Wow.
July 17, 2015 at 4:41pm
Wow. The 19th century called, and they’d like their sexist attitude back.
July 17, 2015 at 4:37pm
Sounds like somebody is jealous of the confidence of her officer friends.
July 17, 2015 at 4:29pm
This. Hamilton should stay. If you want to get rid of anybody I suggest dumping that genocidal SOB Andrew Jackson, who btw didn’t even believe in a federal bank.
July 17, 2015 at 4:19pm
I think you’re correct. Conservative voters would probably accept a candidate believing in a pathway to citizenship, but only once the border is secured. Until then, the position should be secure the border first, then we’ll have a discussion about it.
 July 17, 2015 at 4:07pm
So we should get rid of the Christian cemeteries as well, right?
July 16, 2015 at 4:20pm
You aimed WAY too high for the intellectual curiosity of most people here when you chose your user name. “You can’t be a libertarian and a socialist hurr hurr.” I guess they’ve never heard of a guy named Noam Chomsky.