Not if he's a registered democrat, they have been dispensing enforcement action along party lines since 2008.
May 27, 2015 at 6:49pm
dungarees are long gone sailor.
 May 27, 2015 at 6:47pm
Back in the day it was us common enlisted squids who would be barred at the door to a nice place like that, but officers would be welcome. Now even an officer in her dress uniform cannot get into a fine establishment….its not a White thing anymore, its a reverse discrimination thing these days.
May 27, 2015 at 6:45pm
Back in the 60s/70s we were hearing all kinds of stories where certain types of people were barred entry into certain White country clubs and the like, were they a bunch of poosy entitled morons then? Reverse discrimination must be challenged wherever and whenever it crops up.
May 27, 2015 at 6:43pm
AG32, I’ll bet your right!
[-2] May 27, 2015 at 1:37pm
Yea! But no! If someone places something on a US Government computer, that person is subject to being told to remove it and if they do not, then a formal lawful or a direct order from her superiors is in order or you will have a break down in good order and discipline across the board in other areas. She was wrong and the order was legit.
May 27, 2015 at 1:34pm
POF: That would be an illegal order and you know it. That’s called intellectual dishonesty on your part…saw what you did there.
 May 27, 2015 at 1:32pm
hi: That’s called conflating issues. Saw what you did there. This is not that! She was wrong, end of story.
 May 27, 2015 at 1:31pm
J-mo is right and I am a Christian.
She was wrong on many levels but most of all disobeying a direct order. That cannot stand. I had 3 people in my unit directly under me who refused a direct order to take an immunization shot while on deployment, all three were punished.
 May 27, 2015 at 1:28pm
Who’s computer did she post verses on? That’s right! The US Governments. She disobeyed a lawful order to remove it and then the direct order from an officer over her. She forged the weapon used against her in defying the legal standard that everyone must obey. She thought maybe she could use her faith as a weapon against the laws around her mainly the UCMJ. To push back where she had no power to push back was futile and immature of her, now she cannot tithe anything to her church.
If she carried a bible in her government issued uniform would she have been disciplined?
In World War II our troops were issued bibles, C-rations and cigarettes. They fought as Christian warriors and defeated the godless Germans, Italians and Japanese. We haven't had any victories like that since. Why?
May 26, 2015 at 11:45pm
No hugs for you, but prayer maybe.
 May 26, 2015 at 11:44pm
I’m sorry, but one does not need to provide an excuse or reason why they do not want to engage in giving a huge to a total stranger. As the Reagans said, Just say NO!. No you may not hug me! I appreciate your blind compassion as if a hug solves everything, but I’ll pass on making pretend we are family or something more. This is utter ridiculousness, the one suggesting a hug is way out there in la la land because liberals have her believing that this is a real form of love. Its not. You don’t get right to love until you’ve crossed some LIKE’s and a whole lots of TRUST’s not to mention CHARACTER traits which you agree with. Can or will you ask to hug Kim jung Un who just murdered another general for sleeping? I think not. Do I walk up to Charles Manson and say hey bud how about a hug? Of course not. Arrg.
I guarantee you that the very gracious Ronald Reagan would have hugged her and he was no liberal.
 May 26, 2015 at 11:39am
Your right, but in this case, your talking about a neighborhood where it was well known the families philosophy. And when its put into those terms, then people react differently because they themselves would never allow their own children to be un-supervised for one minute and therefore they can’t stand that someone else and is getting away with it. We live in a world of snitches.
 May 25, 2015 at 11:45am
She learned to pull the race card there much like here in the US.
 May 23, 2015 at 11:05pm
Ferguson was one thing, this is totally a miscarriage of justice. This feeds the narrative that blacks are under constant attack by police like no other case so far. Cleveland might get a new nickname. Instead of “mistake by the Lake”, it will be called “Convict for God’s sake”
 May 22, 2015 at 12:21pm
I think what the good professor FAILS to take into consideration is that its not just that two homosexual wish to marry each other, but what they promote to the mainstream along with their supporters which is a gender neutral position where there is no such thing as a male or a female person which flys in the face of creation and our genetic hardwiring which in turns leads to confusion and further overall decay of family…the bedrock of any civilization…if being a male or a female can be challenged as an absolute, then anything can be…this is where society will collapse. No one will know what is right to do…we are almost there now.
Gender roles started to disappear along time ago. They allowed women to vote, have careers, control when they have babies, demand equal pay for equal work, etc. Don't expect it to go backwards anytime soon ..
If the only reason you can determine the gender of a person is religious belief/the bible, then you really need to stick with that. Unbelievably, there are a few of us with some sort of gift that allows us to determine a person's gender by sight alone (unbelievable, huh?). I have to admit that there are some female impersonators that can make the task difficult (many make quite 'pretty' women), but the deception would end rather abruptly when clothes are removed.
 May 21, 2015 at 2:11pm
Political Correctness is a mental condition.
 May 20, 2015 at 7:44pm
He sure does not have any problem exercising his 1st amendment rights when it comes to being critical of the average America and denigration of Christians or anyone who does not believe as he does.