User Profile: christianUSA

christianUSA

Member Since: March 01, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [4] March 27, 2015 at 5:10pm

    Ah the Guy just saw a crack of reality in the obamamatrix.

  • [4] March 27, 2015 at 5:08pm

    Progressives, Liberals, socialist, communist, religious-leaders, political-‘leaders’, lawyer, judges have all used and do twist definitions, meanings, legal-phases often even redefining them into opposite from original meaning; see the history of words and meanings; and all too often it is for evil cause/s.

  • [6] March 27, 2015 at 5:05pm

    There is a world of difference between requiring someone to be forced to do something he considers grossly morally offensive As opposed to refusing to give service Just Because of Who the people ideology, race, or sex is!

    Responses (7) +
  • March 27, 2015 at 5:00pm

    To whom are we to shout complaints louder at: congress is either deaf or do nothings’, big media is pro-leftist, cooperate is pushing this, most church leader are liberalized or separation from state issues or non-tech-savy, courts are both mixed liberal bag and way to ssllooww, stop using protest gets no where, can not block legally nor helpfully; so how realistically?! It is not just this issue but hundreds and we seem out of normal options. 2016 election is waiting for Godot or waiting for a train on dead rail line.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 27, 2015 at 4:54pm

    Where when and how do feminist and progressives give any rights to men in:
    Reproduction: women can alone murder/terminate fathers child!
    Child raising: 1 can without trial or hearing where the man is present remove him from his earned house and 2 any real say of child raising!
    Men in most states can not even divorce with bias if their wife gets pregnant with another’s child! Why such a man may even be forced to pay child support for the bastard.
    Rape: by single claim of of women even week/s later; even wife against husband even if written consent just prior; is not the point of marriage “I do” is to give public sexual consent and bond?! How could a man under current laws claim rape against wife?
    Post marriage support: most judges and ‘lawyers’ laugh or ignore man’s request for support, but if man misses one monthly support payment it jail time, BUT
    Child Visitation if man is Denied months or even YEARS of of contact or even if woman by lies and insults terrorizes the child of father she still can keep primary custody with no real penalties {I seen this many times!)
    Women get promotions without years a man by earning by hard exceptional work or in some cases even if she a poor worker demands it; men are unjustly removed by women in power, but with very little recourse.
    It is not equal rights feminist demand but superior power And forcing their ways!

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] March 24, 2015 at 10:55am

    and progressive rinos will non-do like what jawing yacking complaining but doing nothing as they done so far to make it SEEM like they are not part of problems like crony socialist democrats or supporting such actions!
    Far past time for formation of new party for major different changes and approach.!

  • March 23, 2015 at 12:59pm

    Trying to reform islame to peaceful and ‘good’ is like polishing poop.
    1Corinthians 10:20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to God, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons.
    Revelation 9:20 But the rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent of the works of their hands, that they should not worship demons, and idols of gold, silver, brass, stone, and wood, which can neither see nor hear nor walk.
    John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am THE WAY, THE TRUTH, and THE LIFE. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

  • [8] March 18, 2015 at 4:37pm

    Revelation 3:-17 “So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth.”Because you say, ‘I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing’ — and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked

  • March 16, 2015 at 11:28am

    In order to learn one must First be taught, preferably in mass of all people at early school levels! 1 true adversarial nature of banks to people, 2 other methods of living, Saving and buying Without banks, 3 other national wide systems for money, 4 be unChained from govnm enforcement of banks!

    In reply to the contribution Will We Ever Learn? Subprime Lending Is Back!

  • March 12, 2015 at 2:21pm

    Kupo: You deceptively twist issue from being about a Jewish father’s USA civil rights or Jewish or Jewish-Christians fathers’ Rights and traditions by Old and New Testament Law and religion then change issue to “Gentile Christians” a complete different matter; as shown in my previous quotes decedents of Israel both Jew and Christian Jews were to continue to circumcise their sons; Even Jesus was circumcised as required by Eternal God that does not change nor His Laws, but you call circumcision part of God’s Law “a barbaric act”;
    Matthew5:18 “For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
    Luke16:17 “And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one tittle of the law to fail.
    2Timothy3:16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
    But by Acts15 Gentile were not so require for salvation as also shown in Galatians5. You come off as a Jew hater, rejector of God’s Word and Laws and against civil rights of fathers; If you really read the Bible, as you seem to suggest, you would know difference; therefore LORD rebuke you.

  • [-1] March 11, 2015 at 11:20pm

    Book of Luke and ACTS are New Testament also in Acts 16:3 Paul is lay down Christian Doctrine, that means post-crucifixion Christianity teaching, so again you give me reasons to doubt your Claim to be “christian”; if you are maybe you should actually read the Bible. To matter of keeping it in his pants, Seems Double Standard, what about her keeping in her pants so does not she have equal responsibility?! In short she, and woman mostly has control of selection of sex partner in US, should have been more discerning about her choice but once made as responsible adult she must live with the consequences of that choice as much as the man; making baby is Life long entanglement commitment; a commitment she was not thinking of, ready for, or possibly intended to give ever to the father. Sadly this article is missing research facts and in presentation: was she taking or getting child support etc? Even if not fathers have rights also, through many clearly, as seen here in comment, would not nor do support father rights; and that is how families life is destroyed which destroys societies structure which is big factor in destroying USA.

  • [1] March 11, 2015 at 7:44pm

    You Claim to be christian, you give me reason to doubt in that you position violates God’s WORD in Bible! So your religion is of your own minds making.
    Genesis 17:10 “This is My covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised;
    Luke 2:21 And when eight days were completed for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called JESUS, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
    Acts 16:3 Paul wanted to have him go on with him. And he took him and circumcised him because of the Jews who were in that region, for they all knew that his father was

  • [2] March 11, 2015 at 7:34pm

    This Father has been and is trying to be part of the child’s life! So many are feminazi-brainwashed that by bold assertion only men/fathers are scorned if they dare ask for any even smallest say in their OWN Son’s life! NO HOW DARE you take all rights from Fathers! I have seen hundreds of caring zero offending fathers denied in courts any rights or even private visitation when even the (sicko) mother admitted to gross abuse to the child! I Heard in college MANY young women purposely says they had sex just to get pregnant then preplanned to cut/keep the father/guy completely out of child’s life. Note the repeated False argument by abortioners women that the child is their body thus mentally denying the man’s part of the baby/child! So by their actions and words there are mental denial of male DNA source part and rights to children! Father put through ringer of purposeful false accusation fight for year bankrupting themselves just to have bare minimum visitation. This IS DESTROYING the family and USA country! As far as timing for 4000 some odd years those of Israel have circumcised as their males as a primary part of their religion; I get it many of you are not part of this but it not really just about this groups practice but religious freedom and parental RIGHTS! Does not, should not a Father have any rights to guild or pass down his heritage to his OWN Son? Frankly such father right denial to me is sickening!

  • March 11, 2015 at 5:32pm

    DNA is capsule of who a Person is and is part of one individual; as such it should belong to that person to claim any rights to it is to claim rights to that individual; apart from a criminal trial judges orders or conviction from court of law honoring defendant Rights no such power should be given! Otherwise To claim rights to its ownership is to claim rights of ownership to individual or slaveship of that person; to claim rights to all persons DNA is to claim ownership and slave-masters to all those! Also with such knowledge electronic-chemical-psychological controls over people can be and will be build; this is not a slippery slope it is a current process in action.

  • [14] March 11, 2015 at 5:23pm

    This is really a case of total denying of The Fathers rights, and not a judge/govnm ordering a person/woman/mother to do something; it is also denying of religious rights and a flight denying of civil justice system; she is selfishly doing what is “right” in her own eyes denying the truth that babies come from joining to a man and a woman which seems a major problem with very many women these days!

    Responses (19) +
  • [10] March 11, 2015 at 5:10pm

    Intolerance of the ungodly Liberals screaming false lying persecution but in fact causing REAL Persecution on Christians. So per charge a Christian minister thus can not council according to Christian Bible or if he does lose his military job and maybe all he earned; so what if that is case that he/they can not serve Christ then it is time to leave; but woe to those that so reject Godly council and Christ from their mist.

  • [1] March 9, 2015 at 1:05pm

    US has truly progressiVe major long ways but is it really the united states?
    Who are US govnm and how is it us when it feels like Them?
    What rights do Them give us and what are every shifting rules under cams for We the people?
    What and why are Them policies and Them relations to foreign people and nations??
    Why do We hear and read some things but see and experience complete different events and things?
    Some seem to know the answers but why are so many clueless and certain minority and Liberals blind or supporting these actions?
    It seems that people want to believe/con themselves its one person or small group of persons when in truth it is the result of the lies, corruptions, immoralities, greed, laziness, intoxications, false teachings for long time of vast majority that brought these to be. Romans 3:23
    Galatians 1:3-5: Grace to you and peace from God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for our sins, that He might deliver us from this present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.

  • [5] March 7, 2015 at 6:46pm

    Since they say it ok for physical men or women to appear nude with physical oppose sex in the close unmonitored confines why need for dressing-rooms? Why not just change out on the floor or why need to wear clothes? Is not this more animalistic? Would it not be safer where others are around then? Also is not this condition problematic for Rapist Hunting ground; such criminal rapist coming in claiming to be transexual etc but really stalking mapping out best times etc!? Why must 99% be totally inconvenienced or threaten and lose all rights but less than 1% not be inconvenienced and Not threaten? Why can not this less than 1% change in bath-stall or toilet-stall of their own physical sex? Is not this another destruction of a basic human moral. In Many ways many times over gays by public force show that their behavior is about forcing change on other peoples public behavior and infringing on other peoples right; demanding more and special rights over other people. Seems right choice for nongays normal people etc is to drop membership and try get a refund by court if necessary and leave this place to those it wishes to serve.

  • [43] March 7, 2015 at 2:08pm

    Since they say it ok for physical men or women to appear nude with physical oppose sex in the close unmonitored confines why need for dressing-rooms? Why not just change out on the floor or why need to wear clothes? Is not this more animalistic? Would it not be safer where others are around then? Why must 99% be totally inconvenienced or threaten and lose all rights but less than 1% not be inconvenienced and Not threaten? Why can not this less than 1% change in bath-stall or toilet-stall? Is not this another destruction of a basic human moral. In Many ways many times over gays by public force show that their behavior is about forcing change on other peoples public behavior and infringing on other peoples right; demanding more and special rights over other people.

  • [1] March 7, 2015 at 1:54pm

    John 2:15 When He{Jesus) had made a whip of cords, He drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and the oxen, and poured out the changers’ money and overturned the tables.
    Luke 7:38-39 and stood at His feet behind Him weeping; and she began to wash His feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant oil. Now when the Pharisee who had invited Him saw this, he spoke to himself, saying, “This man, if He were a prophet, would know who and what manner of woman this is who is touching Him, for she is a sinner.
    Mark 2:23-24,27 Now it happened that He went through the grainfields on the Sabbath; and as they went His disciples began to pluck the heads of grain. And the Pharisees said to Him, “Look, why do they do what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”…27 And He said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.
    Matthew 15:2-3,13 “Why do Your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread.” He answered and said to them, “Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition?… 13 “making the word of God of no effect through your tradition which you have handed down. And many such things you do.”

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love