User Profile: COFemale


Member Since: October 15, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [4] July 5, 2014 at 2:23pm

    That phrase “that was mighty white of you” is a bigoted statement in my book. However, it can be taken a couple ways. That what you initially said was racist, bigoted or prejudice about another race and someone said “mighty white of you”. Or that what you did was not something a black person would do. It all depends on the context of when it is said. I think it’s a phrase that should be avoided in either case.

  • [17] July 5, 2014 at 2:05pm

    As a Christian I feel she was over the top with asking people not to take the Lord’s name in vain or discussing salvation in the place of a business. It is not the time, nor the place. I have no issue with her saying “Have a Blessed Day”.

    When the Bible says to profess the word of the Lord, it did not meant to go harass people. Let the people come to you. Plant yourself in one spot and talk of the gospel. That is how the disciples did it.

  • July 5, 2014 at 1:56pm

    I have no problem with her saying “have a blessed day”. I say “bless you” when my students sneeze. They have not complained. I do not think she should go any further than that. When you begin to question patrons on religious things, I think you do cross the line. If this were a Christian business, then it would not be out of line.

    I do think some Christians are too pushy. While I’m a Christian and sometimes get put off with their approach myself, I find the best way to get them to move along is to agree with them and say something in return.

    Should she be fired for saying “have a blessed day” only. NO If she continues with “harassing” patrons with her beliefs or imposing questions, YES.

    Responses (3) +
  • [22] July 5, 2014 at 1:37pm

    Somebody asked why only Catholics seem to get possessed. One reason is their devout religious convictions. The devil will go after those who are stronger in the faith and try to break them. That is his goal. Sometimes he wins. Why would he go after those who don’t believe?

    I know this somewhat 1st hand. For the first 50 years of my life I wasn’t very religious, but believed in God. I did not profess it as I do today. When I began reading the Bible and praying to God, my world became filled with challenges more than any other time in my life. Coincidence, possibly. However, I think there are evil forces making my life difficult on purpose so I will turn away from God and the belief in Christ.

    Responses (3) +
  • [41] July 5, 2014 at 1:29pm

    Except he makes no money off what he does for people, I guess reading comprehension is hard for you. I also doubt you are a lawman. I call you on that one. It is true he will make money from this movie, but so what. Why do you care? He is taking nothing from you? Only the ignorant like you do not believe there is evil in this world. Evil is all around in many forms. There is alot we do not know about this world nor understand and to think you do is not only idiotic, it very arrogant.

  • [9] June 28, 2014 at 12:45pm

    If he loses his temper here on something like this. Imagine his abuse on his girlfriend.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 28, 2014 at 11:07am

    While I would never support or attend a gay gathering, they have a right to hold rally’s. I realize they aren’t in the U.S., but the fact that Singapore allowed this is amazing. I do fight against is them thinking I have to accept their immoral ways. That ain’t going to happen.

    Yes, some will be offended that this rally will happen, eventually they will get over it.

  • [14] June 14, 2014 at 11:06am

    Once those doors closed everyone is required to stay in their seats. And why the hell did not the mother take the children to the restroom prior to boarding. Sorry, I’m on the attendants side.

  • [9] June 14, 2014 at 11:04am

    I’m sorry I’m on the flight attendants side. This so called mother should have made the potty run before they boarded the flight. It is her fault the child peed her pants not the flight attendant.

    Once that plane is pushed back no one can leave their seat. Had the flight attendant let the mother/child get up and the plane had to make a sudden braking stop and they got hurt the airline would be at fault and could be sued.

    This mother should be mortified that she is such a bad mother.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 8, 2014 at 1:42pm

    Who said taxpayers are paying for this and even if we were, it ‘s no different than me paying for an alcoholic or a drug addict going to reparative therapy for their addiction.

    Science is never exact and what is said today can be changed a year from now. How many times have science said coffee is bad for us or some other food. Sorry science is ever changing, so I don’t hold stock in what some scientist says to support his own personal agenda.

  • [2] June 8, 2014 at 1:36pm

    I will NOT CONFORM!

    Responses (1) +
  • June 8, 2014 at 1:34pm

    So you are against alcoholics seeking help, you are against sex addicts seeking help, or a drug addict seeking help. Those are ALL REPARATIVE THERAPY.

    I laugh at you, the ignorant one. Gays make a conscious decision to act on their sexual desires, just as the alcoholic takes a drink, the sex addict has sex with multiple people, and the drug addict shoots up.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] June 8, 2014 at 1:29pm

    Frankly the name “reparative therapy” is the wrong name. What happens to gays who don’t want to be “gay”? Should they be denied help? Is LGBT community going to ostracize them because they don’t conform to their agenda? I think so.

    Let’s face it gays can be confused just as much as a straight person about their sexuality. Does not sex addicts seek “reparative therapy”? YES. So why should not gays? Aren’t you then denying gays equal rights? Why yes, yes you are. Liberals need to be careful on demonizing Republicans for this stance. It could backfire on them, like Bergdahl has.

  • [5] June 8, 2014 at 1:10pm

    We get called that regardless what we believe or support, so WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE?

    Except many white and black women also support the Republican platform somewhat. I’m more conservative and do disagree with many of the Republican stances, but I do feel gays should not be denied the ability to seek help should they choose to do so.

    Responses (3) +
  • [6] June 8, 2014 at 1:06pm

    You also seem to be stuck in the Old Testament. Try coming into the New Testament in your talking points.

    You can hear your bigoted tone by your statement, “the religious right”. It seems the only person allowed to think and have opinions is you. I support traditional marriage and will always support traditional marriage. Unfortunately, gays are not going away, so to some degree Christians will have to tolerate gays wanting to get hitched. I won’t call it marriage, as that is between one man, one woman. I don’t support it, but will tolerate it because I’m not a close minded person. I don’t believe people have to think like me or accept by beliefs as their own. Liberals think like that. It’s your way or the highway.
    I feel anyone, whether gay or straight should have the right to seek help in any form.

  • [6] June 8, 2014 at 12:56pm

    So now gays are not allowed to seek help because they are gay. Really? Let’s face it, men turning to men and women to women is not normal. I don’t care how much it occurs, it’s wrong to deny them a way to seek help.

    If you delve into the reason why someone is gay, more often than not, something traumatic happened in their life and this trauma contributes to their choices. Gays can struggle with who they are and not address that trauma that they repress them. Seeking the same sex can also be lust driven, just as a straight man or women who seeks multiple partners. It’s unhealthy sex; it’s animal behavior.

    Someone said it’s not a health issue. I beg to differ. This is how the AIDs virus began. One French man who had over 100 male partners. Watch the movie, “And the Band Played On”. We have an AIDS epidemic in Africa where men rape the women repeated and w/ multiple women. That in itself tells you, you are going against nature.

    This by no means you shun or treat gays inhumanly. They need to be treated with respect and with dignity. They have a gender confusion and are seeking love unnaturally. They should be able to seek help to change that. It’s voluntary, not a mandate. If they want it, I support them.

    Responses (1) +
  • [21] June 8, 2014 at 12:37pm

    oops typo alert. That should be “throw money”. Senior moment.

  • [76] June 8, 2014 at 12:34pm

    Exactly how have you solved the problem? You say you give them shelter, but you do nothing for them to solve their underlying issue. You turn them back out onto society to get drunk, take drugs or whatever made them homeless. You do nothing, so get off your high-horse. Do you invite the drug addict and drunks into your “shelter” or is it just those who find themselves homeless due to no job?

    Nobody wants a indigent sleeping outside their home so don’t pass this off as snobbery. If I pay high dollar for my home, why should I be subjected to some alcoholic who refuses help? Sorry, even low income people don’t want a drunk or drug addict outside their home either.

    The problem w/ you Liberals you do surface help and feel you are for the poor and down trodden. You never come up w/ long term solutions. Your answer is to through money at the problem rather than help the person themselves.

  • [1] June 8, 2014 at 12:17pm

    People who are upset about the spikes are the ones who have never experienced a drunk, stinky, vomiting homeless person parked outside their door into their apartment complex.

    When I worked downtown, you would always find a homeless person curled up near the entrance. They were disgusting. People forget those who are alcoholics are people not seeking help. Why should I have to tolerate your inability to take responsibility and walk past you vomiting daily?

    These people are sent to rehab dry-out centers or the emergency rooms to sober up and then put back out on the street. They never get long term rehab. I’d rather have my tax dollars spent to send these people to get long time rehab and get them back as contributing to society rather than taking from society.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] June 4, 2014 at 12:07pm

    Oh boy. I think a parent raising their own child how they deem is none of your business. The government trying to force how I raise my child to their liking is the fascism. Let’s get it straight.

123 To page: Go