I agree. I have no problem with what he said..just his denial of it.
January 5, 2012 at 8:05am
the last thing you would expect to see at a football game
January 4, 2012 at 3:56pm
marsha…you almost make sense. do you say the same for gingrich, perry, and anyone else who came in less than first? and please entertain us with your definition of “mainstream”.
January 4, 2012 at 3:46pm
bigdoggie do your country a favor and give it up.
January 4, 2012 at 3:45pm
…her name is madelaine morganstern.
January 4, 2012 at 3:43pm
that’s a real hoot of a braintwisting comment. how about trying some substance next time. you sound like a jugeared lib. see how easy that is?
January 4, 2012 at 3:35pm
another perfect example of small mindedness. you must be from the far right pro government wing.
January 4, 2012 at 3:30pm
must be a lot of “those” folks then BERNBART
January 4, 2012 at 3:28pm
according to the establicans you are a “paulbot”. funny thing is if you look at the polls ron paul has a steady incline of support….meaning he is convincing people. most of the other candidates have sharp up’s and down’s. romney supporters stuck at around 20% for the duration of the polls which might suggest that they are the “bots”.
January 4, 2012 at 3:21pm
well said…but nothing about paulbots to entertain the establishment republicans? i too have friends from both (parties) who support ron paul. some voted for obama and see the error in their choice and are listening to what paul is saying about where he believes America should stand…politically, militarily and socially. without the “paulbots” the republican cannot win the general. so why do the establicans continue to pi$$off the “paulbots”? Ron Paul (I)
January 4, 2012 at 3:09pm
romneybots…gingrichbots…santorumbots…republibots… see how easy it is. give us something with substance next time.