User Profile: ComeTakeIt


Member Since: October 16, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [33] September 11, 2015 at 2:49pm

    This quiz is racist and sexist.
    When you look at the breakdown after you finish, men score higher than women on every question, and whites score higher than blacks on every question! I demand this website be blocked and the people who run it be forced to attend sensitivity training!

    Responses (2) +
  • [53] April 21, 2015 at 2:20pm

    Same here. Caught a rerun the other day and I can’t remember the exact episode but it was basically Stephanie lying about something, which caused big problems, and then Danny explaining to her how even though being honest seems harder sometimes, it’s always the best thing to do and will make things better in the long run. I said to my wife “Remember when all shows were like this? Family Matters, Home Improvement, etc” Sad thing is it’s not like I’m that old (I’m 28) and already the values that I grew up with are no where to be found on TV, other than maybe Duck Dynasty and The Duggars.

    Contrast this with something like “Secret Life of an America Teenager” where the lessons are usually how dumb and out of touch the parents are, and how the 15-16 year olds are “adults who can make decisions for themselves” which has been said several times in the episodes I’ve seen. It’s the default assumption that everyone is having sex with whoever they are dating or interested in.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 26, 2014 at 4:01pm

    Since when did we have to start editing the word ****?

    EDIT: Oh wow… imagine that

  • [10] November 26, 2014 at 2:27pm

    Watching this just makes you wonder: What is the point?
    What are they trying to accomplish by smashing in windows and setting things on fire?

    I see the people crawling out from the building w the red crosses on it with arms full of clothes and it just makes it so obvious this has nothing to do with Brown, or justice, or politics or anything. It’s just a reason for them to act crazy, break stuff, and hopefully get some free stuff in the middle of it all.

    I just watch it and think : If you truly are ‘outraged’ by what happened… what does this rioting and looting have to do with getting justice? What does it have to do with anything? That’s like I’m mad at Taco Bell for making my food wrong, so I’m gonna go burn the shed down in my neighbors yard…

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 26, 2014 at 2:20pm

    Yea I couldn’t believe the dude didn’t attack him from behind… if i was the one standing up protecting the PapaJohns I def wouldn’t have let the second guy behind me.

  • [2] November 13, 2014 at 12:53pm

    That’s a guy?

  • [7] November 12, 2014 at 11:29am

    Exactly. Compromising with incrementalists is still losing.

    Just like they wanted to “compromise” on gun laws…

    “Hey we want to confiscate and destroy all guns (except those of criminals and gov’t employees)… but we’ll settle for universal registration, magazine limits, and a hosts of other things that violate your rights”

    Luckily we shut that down… but even if we went along with it, they’d be back in a couple years wanting to “compromise” some more

  • [1] November 10, 2014 at 4:24pm

    The ones on Kurt’s twitter don’e seem to be laughing. They seem to be angry, and wishing death upon him for his option, like the OP stated.

  • November 10, 2014 at 4:16pm

    I can’t remember what exactly the topic was, but Stu talked about ‘consensus’ in the scientific community a while back. There was some made up name, and ridiculous study that made no sense, and there were (i dont remember the number exactly) but 70 scientist who approved it and ‘agreed’ with it…

    Just like with global warming now days.

  • [1] November 10, 2014 at 4:14pm

    So there are no scientific laws? Only theories?
    Never heard that one before.

  • [8] November 10, 2014 at 4:07pm


    Wouldn’t both evolution and creation both be ‘spontaneous presence’?

  • [1] November 10, 2014 at 2:49pm


    If you really entered your information on the .gov website, you better go get a LifeLock account asap.

  • November 10, 2014 at 8:32am

    I believe it was D’Shaun Jackson (or however u spell his name) has done it once, if not twice in the NFL. I’m pretty sure it’s Jackson… I know it was an Eagles WR at the time (a few years ago)

  • [8] May 20, 2014 at 9:18am

    What is an “assault rifle”?

    And if we better not carry them because people are afraid to see guns then you might as well just say “Don’t carry guns because people are afraid of guns”.

    Luckily I don’t decide which rights I should exercise based on what someone else may be afraid of. Personally, I wouldn’t go around carrying a rifle of any kind (even an “assault rifle” if I can ever figure out what that is) because it’s impractical and too heavy to be convenient for me, but that’s my choice… I didn’t make that decision based on the irrational fears of others.

  • [5] May 20, 2014 at 9:13am


    What’s an “assault rifle”?

  • [-1] May 14, 2014 at 11:19am

    If death entered the world through Adam… how did we have billions of years of death before Adam was here?

    Choose Creation or Evolution… but Theistic Evolution (at least based on Christian theology) makes the least sense. You can’t believe what the Bible says and believe there were million/billions/trillions (whatever the number is this month) years before Adam was even here.

    You either have to say Genesis isn’t true… and if it’s not true, then why believe any of it?
    Or you have to say God created a world that was imperfect, with death already here, which would imply an imperfect creator…so again, why would you believe any of it?

    You can’t mix them Pat… one or the other.

    Responses (3) +
  • May 8, 2014 at 4:24pm

    Come on Blaze, don’t fall into calling everything conservatives stand for ‘anti’ like the MSM.

    the sign says:
    I think the sign says
    thieves liars

    it’s not an ANTIgay sign… it’s a pro-Christian sign

  • [2] May 8, 2014 at 4:10pm

    I wouldn’t scream (or screech) and yell, and run at you and assault you over it.

  • [3] May 8, 2014 at 4:09pm


    This student didn’t “stand up for his rights”, he attempted to assault someone… I only say attempted bc he seems so unstable that he was barely able to stand most of the time.

    If you stood in front of my church with an offensive sign, I would likely shake my head and keep going, maybe approach you and speak with you. Ask you what basis you have for such an opinion… at worst I may make a sign refuting your sign and stand next to you… I would scream (or screech) and yell, and run at you and assault you over it.

    The student wasn’t ‘standing for his rights’, he was sent into a violent rage over the fact that someone else was exercising their rights with an opinion he didn’t agree with.

  • [8] May 8, 2014 at 3:59pm

    That’s what the Fed Gov’t does… puts regulations/fees/fines on something, then grants waivers to it… then if you don’t do what they want, they pull their waivers. It’s called extortion.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love