User Profile: comforteagle

comforteagle

Member Since: January 21, 2013

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • June 29, 2013 at 10:43am

    Ray comfort is a moron. he is consitantly making a fool out of himself by saying things like snails are not animals, it is harder to prove the sun exists than god, bananas are proof of god. Reading origin of the species doesnt make anybody knowledgable on the current science of evolution; it would be like calling yourself an expert at mathematics after reading an algabra book,, we have come along way since darwins theory. comfort also says that the beauty of nature is enough to prove gods existance, his naivity or simple foolishness speaks for itself.

    Responses (3) +
  • June 29, 2013 at 7:53am

    Seems like alot of people here dont understand what einstien ment by “god”. He was a follower of Spinoza and had the same spinozistic god in mind. you can replace “god” with totality or nAture. there is a very pantheistic tone to einsteins god. a quote posted by atrum_angelus furthur down is pointing this way.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 29, 2013 at 7:39am

    He was not a deist nor a theist. he was a flavor of pantheist. To him “God” is the same thing as the totality of everything that exists, or nature

  • June 23, 2013 at 12:47pm

    How about you do some research on the atheists before saying they are not open to religions. dan dennette (famous atheist starring in the film) has advocated for years that religions should be tought in school just like other subjects. he wants christianity, islam, buddism, anr many others taught throughout a childs education. if that is not open minded or accepting, tell me what is

  • June 23, 2013 at 10:28am

    There is no such thing as nothing

  • June 21, 2013 at 10:31pm

    Heidegger showed that nothing has being in a certain sense, andtherfore is something every time you think or utter the word. I believe words like “nothing” “being” “exsitence” are vapor words when you get down to it…. you need a negation of a word in order to have it mean anything.. All my examples have no negation

  • June 16, 2013 at 6:21pm

    Sounds like you would rather have sombody dead than sombody pushed down, with his glasses and book stolen. I think adding a gun to the situation would make it much more violent of an outcome

  • June 6, 2013 at 2:10pm

    Atheism is not a religion. theim is not a relgion, deism is not a religion, pantheism is not a religion. christianity, jewish sects, islam, satanism (both theistic and atheistic) are religions.

  • June 4, 2013 at 6:33pm

    Nu uhh, mormonism is the same as christianity only more true, nu uhh, my god told me that your god is wrong, nu uhh, really we are all jewish, nu uhh, if you read between the lines you can tell we are both right, which means im right and you just didnt know it… these comments should be enough to turn a person atheist

  • June 4, 2013 at 6:20pm

    The most efficient way to become an atheist is to read the bible.

  • June 1, 2013 at 1:11pm

    Theother…. if you want to talk science, you need some peer reviewed scientific journals, not a website made by creationists, not a creationist journal which they only allow to be reviewed by other creationists, and not any scientist. i asked for a scientific journal with published information supporting your thoughts that is peer reviewed, and you give me a creationist website or name a creationist journal… learn what science means, the scientific methode, falsifiablity, what theory means, and how peer review works.

  • May 31, 2013 at 11:13pm

    Regions with differing temps are closer to us than the background radiation. when we measure as far as possible the measurments are extremely consistant with the predictions… and lets just pretend that the background radiation was compleatly dynamic, would that imply that a god existed? Theories need predictions that are testable and falsifiable… unless you can come up with a test we can do for god, it is impossible to criticly analize it

  • May 31, 2013 at 5:25pm

    First… irc.org is not anything published in a scientif journal, nor is peer reviewed by the scientific communoty; it is a creationist circlejerk website… Next, rocks dont become spiders; amino acids are a major building block for life (which we find naturally in asteroids as well as earth… also you are made of mostly four elements, thats all, just elements, elements are not alive like rocks are not alive but when elements get togerher in a way which can reproduce/feed/excrite/respond we call it living… also, if i accept your stTement as true, all you are doing is making a god of the gaps aurgument, which im sure you have heard of…. learn what a peer reviewed scientific.journal is, then learn the difference between that and a.website.

  • May 31, 2013 at 5:16pm

    Thor… if a theory has a testable prediction, it can be falsified. the big bang has had testable predictions which as i have said, have been verified…. Believing in a god has no testable predictions. and fyi the radation is uniform. the universe’s mass is ununiform but the background radation we detect is

  • May 31, 2013 at 3:34pm

    Thor… there is background radiation (which was predicted with the big bang theory before it was found) that supports the theory. there are also philisophic reasons for a begining of space/time… but saying there was an explosion at the beggining is not the same as saying that an omipotent, omniscient, onmibelevilent, trancendent (while at the same time in the world) “being” which made everything but cannot be verified or more importantly, falsified.

  • May 31, 2013 at 3:25pm

    Ad athoritarium… and not even a good one since currwnt medicine relied on our understanding of evolution to make

  • May 31, 2013 at 3:14pm

    Just so i have this strait… The sun rises and sets, bees polenate plants we can eat, and stars exist….. therfor god exists. i knew he was a good fiction writer for a reason

    Responses (2) +
  • May 31, 2013 at 3:08pm

    Canyou…. Evolutionist have come a long way since darwin. show me a peer reviewed science journal debunking evolution (in its current state)… Attacking darwin is a straw man and ad hominem attack that would be like me saying newtons theories are a crock because he believed in alchamy.

  • May 31, 2013 at 1:33pm

    No mass blew up because the big bang created space/mass/time… an atom has two forces which keep hings in orbit around it, solar systems have one, and the universe has nothing orbiting it. atoms have an electron cloud that has equal stuff orbiting in every possible direction, solar systems have one main belt in which the majority of the mass revolves, the universe has no cloud or belt of mass around it. When doing prediction for atoms and their electron clouds we must use quantum theory, while making predictions for solar systems we use einstiens/newtons theory…

  • May 31, 2013 at 10:21am

    Quita… nobody said you cant be a christian and a hypocrite

123 To page: Go