I seen a little bit of a clip on fox news, where Michelle had an interview or something with someone I think in the mainstream and she was talking about the importance of the people feeding thier pets properly..
January 16, 2013 at 11:54pm
Okay I will say this one time and I will never repeat myself here again… So someone from the BLAZE BETTER BE LISTENING….. I suggest you look up the Dick Act of 1902. O bama and congress has no right to impose any gun control and let Rand Paul know to along with many other in congress that don’t know about it…. Look it up folks……… I don’t care who gets the credit….
Very good we can open the debate with a check or check mate.
Everyone please get very familiar with The Dick Act of 1902
I am now familiar, thanks.
Maybe the Banksters won't get our guns, but they will not give up.
They can get us with a pandemic, biological chemicals or a false flag nuclear war.
These are NOT your REPRESENTATIVES, and they could care less about you.
The have an agenda and they are SO CLOSE..... Except for those damn Americans clinging to their guns !!!!!
The ends justifies the means......
The Dick Act of 1902
Everyone read up on this and suggest the information to the Blaze at the bottom right of of the site at the " Have a tip?" section so the can publish this information and send it to your local representatives.
I checked and found that the Dick Act (1902) was amended in 1908. I could NOT find any information regarding the actual Act, including amended language. I read one post that asked how one Congress could be bound by an earlier Congress, and I have to agree, that Congress can (and perhaps has) change this bill. If anyone could provide additional information, it would be greatly appreciated.
You may want to include this in your studies:
thank you so much. God Bless!
If I read it right, the Dick Act states that able bodied men between the ages of 18 and 45, being part of the unorganized militia, has the right to carry or possess any gun they choose. So me being 52 or when someone turns 46 does that mean they lose their right to the 2nd amendment?
I suggest you all read this.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
All you founding fathers lovers, this is why there is a second amendment. Because the founding fathers didn't want a standing army. So they wanted to call men up for protection of the country if needed. So they wanted them armed and ready for that possibility. Then they founded the National Guard that is controlled by the states, but can be taken over by the federal government if needed in a time of war or threat.
No because of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
And the gun lobby i put as part of this complex. You have people screaming about this. no one wants to take your rifle for hunting or your hand guns for protection. But the only reason you want an AR-15 is the same reason you have a tattoo or smoked cigarettes. You think it makes you look cool.
Get over yourselves and just use as Glenn Beck always says "use common sense"
I looked it up, here it is.
The 2nd Amendment puts no age limits around the militia, as that would silly. So, what happens if your young guys all get slaughtered, are the guys 46 and older expected to sit around drinking lemonade while their houses are burned and their children/grandchildren are killed?
The beauty of the Founder's plan is that they were extremely liberal with their "paint brush" (liberal in a good way).
Have a look at who the militia is...
This is on the books, folks... not the blatherings of some uninformed blowhard.
REALINDEPENDENT was correct about the intent of the 2nd amendment.The framers did not want a permanent standing army. Art. 1 Sec. 8 of the Constitution grants the authority to call forth the militia to repel insurrection and invasion, and so for us to be able to meet that call of duty, our right to keep and bear arms had to be protected. As an aside, and though we do not find the verbiage in the Constitution, but in the writings of many of the founders, we, the people needed a means to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. The access to weaponry has to be equal, to meet the intent of the amendment, so the Armed forces and federal officers should not have access to more powerful/capable weaponry than the citizens... a pea shooter is no defense against a Squad Assault Weapon.
REALINDEPENDENT and I disagree on a few points: if the standing army had not been established and maintained, and we weren't using it for precisely the purposes the founders feared, then I do not believe the MIC would be nearly as large or powerful. As the onus for defense would be on the citizenry, I think the gun business would be doing fine without the MIC.
I don't want a M-4 because it looks cool. I want it because it puts me on more equal footing with a government that may attack me.
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 4:08am
I suggest you all read this.
Your reasoning is skewed! The PEOPLE (all of them) have a right to bear arms for the expressed purpose of defeating a tyrannical turned government and to protect the homeland from invasion!
Also your don't know what an AR15 is and until you do stop making foolish statements. Do your homework and do not believe anything the lamestream media reports!
The formal name of the Dick Act is the Militia Act of 1908. It was amended in 1908. Try entering the Militia Act in Google. For some reason, I can't link it to this page. Probably operator error.
Ok,explain to me how the Dick act affects gun control or the second amendment? Im not real sure why you chose this or what you point is, care to explain.since the Dick act has nothing to do with gun possession,just how the govt.co opted states militias.
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:54pm
"Okay I will say this one time and I will never repeat myself here again… So someone from the BLAZE BETTER BE LISTENING….. I suggest you look up the Dick Act of 1902. O bama and congress has no right to impose any gun control and let Rand Paul know to along with many other in congress that don’t know about it…. Look it up folks……… I don’t care who gets the credit…."
Thanks very much for pointing out about the Dick Act of 1902!
Obama "seems " to have a king complex? "seems"? ackkkk!
Everyone is doing a great jobs with the information flow. Keep it up and frame the argument how our Founding Fathers wanted it framed.
Know why they gave us the 2nd, not for hunting
Why there is a distrust in the government, "We pass it before we read it" This has been going on longer than just this president.
Acknowledge that even this miss trust is because of both sides of the isle (the Patriot Act, NDAA)
Life is a basic human right therefore Self Defense is a basic Human Right. Self Defense a single thug, or a Tyrant government, like the ones we have helped in the Arab Spring.
Self Defense proceeds from Natural Law, not positive law civil, or canon
Before you all get too excited, according to my research, the Dick Act of 1902 has little or no bearing on what was actually passed...which was the Militia Act of 1903. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Act_of_1903,
Your research is appreciated, although you haven't yet learned that WIKIPEDIA is the WORST
reference for finding the truth.
It Can be, and IS edited by people.
The Global Elite have full time crews that only stay focused on WIKI, covering up any "Theories"
that are in opposition to the Elite's Plans.
I KNOW FOR A FACT. WIKI is NOT CREDIBLE.
They show an ABSOLUTE and ULTIMATE FACT (Chemtrails) to be something else (Contrails).
They post a picture of 100% undeniable chemtrails, and label them and Condensation trails.
THEY ARE LIARS !!!!!
Please read the 2nd Amendment carefully. It does not grant anyone a right to own a gun it expressly prohibits the federal government from making law to prevent you from owning a gun. Depending on your state constitution your state might be able to pass law to stop you from owning a gun. Back in the day when wearing a gun was fairly common some Sheriffs required a gun to be handed over to them. Once they left they got their gun back.
WHO DO YOU BELIEVE ?????
1000's of people claiming one thing for NO FINANCIAL GAIN....
1 PRIVATE Corporation (WIKIPEDIA) owned by the Global Elite AND EDITED by their ARMY of FULL-TIME DISINFO SHILLS ??????
I will trust Thousands of People.
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 4:08am
You have people screaming about this. no one wants to take your rifle for hunting or your hand guns for protection. But the only reason you want an AR-15 is the same reason you have a tattoo or smoked cigarettes. You think it makes you look cool.
Obviously getting your junior g-man badge out the cornflakes box did nothing for your IQ.
Numerous PROG pigs have specifically cited gun confiscation as the goal --- several in the
past week including Cuomo, Bloomberg, Feinstein and others.
Also, you dont have a F'ing clue why anyone here owns an AR nor is it any of your business.
" because contrails can only persist a short time) is entirely baseless." [improper synthesis?]
For a contrail to remain Persistant, the atmospheric conditions MUST BE
-40c coupled with a 60% relative humidity (see appleman's chart)
So all over America, The Air above us is -40c and 60% RH, ALL DAY LONG at elevations of 15,000 to 30,000 feet ?
The "persistant contrails" that they show, linger ALL DAY and SPREAD OUT.
Check the HAZE today. Look at those OFF-WHITE SKIES.
REMEMBER our deep blue skies ????
Interesting! But that's about as far as it will go if Congress chooses to ignore it! Unless we are willing to take up arms to force Congress to abide by the law it's not likely this act will ever be acknowledged in the chambers of Congress! It would be nice to see it referenced in Paul's bill, however! The Dem's are going to stand in the way of everything we do to resurrect the America that was - the one we love! The sooner Conservatives see that the Dem's are actual enemies - using words, legislation, and brainwashing as weapons - out to conquer our Nation and make it theirs, the sooner we do what is necessary to defend ourselves as required to remove the threat! Voting in '14 and '16 MAY get us back a bit of power but, it will NOT end the maneuvering by the Socialist Left to Conquer our Nation! And remember: The upcoming Generations of our Children have already been brainwashed!!!
I did check it out.Good news finally.I guess that means Obama doesn't know Dick.
The Dick Act is the nickname for the National Guard Act of 1903 (several versions of this tried to get passed but never did until 1903). It is the bill that ended the militias and created the National Guard as we know it today. This was Teddy Roosevelt's baby and the first thing he tried to get done as soon as he became President. His first versions of the bill all got shot down because they consolidated all military power into the President's hands so by 1903 he had dumbed it down to a bill that simply made militias a more formal organization under the official title of "The National Guard". It did end militias as they were known up until that time and change their structure but that was all it did. Later amendments consolidated the National Guard further and consolidated their leadership structure until an amendment was finally passed to make it so that the National Guard would have to obey the orders of the President and that he could call upon them at any time for any reason, thus making the President the Commander in Chief of ALL military force in the US, not just over the regular Army, as was originally written and intended. Because it "reorganized" militias, it effectively did away with them and made the formation of one illegal. It also opened the door to the argument that firearm ownership was no longer necessary and that firearms could be restricted and controlled. Roosevelt was a raging Progressive and this was his baby, the "Obamacare" of his day.
the Dick Act is nice and all...but someone already explained that...
this addresses the "fear" of the Founders in creating a standing army... really..you sure on that one... because one of the first acts of the Continental Congress...before writing the Declaration and declaring war was to establish the Continental Army and Navy, 1775, with an active Continental Marine force. In 1798, under the Constitution, President John Adams created the US Navy and months later the US Marine Corps.
Granted...not technically a standing "army" but they were an organized military which is what "standing army" pertained to during that time period. So all the Founders, even Jefferson and Washington, knew about and supported this, since President Jefferson didn't rescind the order from President John Adams, whom he disagreed with on nearly everything.
The Continental Army was never completely disbanded.
Organized State militias were also never disbanded and even used by President George Washington to put down the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794.
The US Army today is said to be 237 years old, older than the nation itself, under the US Constitution.
So while the Dick Act turned the militias into the National Guard, the power of the President to control them dates back to George himself, 218 years ago.
Ooo mf'ng Rah CONGRESSWATCHER
If only 10% of gun owners decide to say "Fk off!" it's still an 8 million "implanted", local, well-armed insurgency. All this inflated buying isn't to earn the privilege to hand things over when the Muslim in Chief says to do so. I think that's why he punted to the Congress on this mess.
VANCE you are reaching dude!
October 26, 2012 at 10:24am
I didn’t know people stll listened to Geraldo.
February 3, 2012 at 11:42am
I would think that the people should have realized that during this speech that Obama made a mockery of Jesus Christ and the Bible and the people should be angry about this .
October 17, 2011 at 10:41am
Do America a favor don’t elect anymore blacks for President. It is obvious they just start trouble.
I find that kind of a blanket statement is disturbing and is not inline with the principals of the 912'ers or TEA party participants. People like you give us a bad name
September 21, 2011 at 10:38am
lying sorry sack of dog mess.
September 21, 2011 at 10:36am
He has many faces
August 3, 2011 at 10:29am
You would think that the Indian Tribes would have more sense than this.
August 3, 2011 at 10:21am
Celebs like Matt is exactly why I no longer whatch movies or buy them. I boycott all actors and actress’s
June 6, 2011 at 4:00pm
This nut job better becareful in what he wishes for he may not like the end results. We are Americans.
Something to think about a quote from Abraham Licoln: America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
May 2, 2011 at 12:47pm
Bet he uses this to win the 2012 election. Sad part is the people will more than likely fall for it.
May 2, 2011 at 12:44pm
Wonder what code pink is thinking right about now?
May 2, 2011 at 12:41pm
Bet the terrorist stop using their iphones so they can not be tracked anymore.
May 2, 2011 at 12:36pm
Will I would like to see some sort of proof, but I keep asking why is everyone giving credit to Obama. I thought he used Bushs’ plan.
April 28, 2011 at 12:33pm
I hope that the American people will do this country and I a great favor in the 2012 election and that is VOTE THIS MAN OUT OF OFFICE PLEASE.
April 14, 2011 at 1:10pm
You are for getting some of the nut cases out there in the world tend to keep the same old nut cases in both house until they die while in office. One example is Ted Kennedy and there have been a few others.
April 14, 2011 at 1:05pm
Because they are just as sick as she is.
April 14, 2011 at 1:03pm
Does anyone realize yet that this woman has a very bad mental problem. This is one reason I am for anyone running for a political office be examined for mental illness and the results made public.
April 14, 2011 at 12:52pm
Will she evidently does not know the Constitution very well. I do believe she would find in order for her to be in the house as a Rep. she would have to be a citizen for 9 years and/or if she was a senator now she would have to be a citizen for 7 years. She should go back and study the U.S. Constitution before she speaks.
March 22, 2011 at 12:37pm
He wants this country to become a third world country.