My Patriot Supply

User Profile: Conkuur

Conkuur

Member Since: January 19, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [7] November 24, 2014 at 8:53am

    I’m with you I smell BS.

  • November 24, 2014 at 8:50am

    Maybe “Soon” is some ghetto heaven lmao.

  • November 23, 2014 at 7:28pm

    @Conservitearin Even drug addicts can have their moments of productivity that doesn’t make them any less sick or someone you want working in a position of honesty and trust. You have to at least agree with that. I went through addiction and I certainly wouldn’t have trusted ME in any position of trust because I would most certainly have abused it.

    I don’t think it is safe for the public to have any kind of addict in a place of power. Certainly Barry was worse than Ford but who’s to say eventually Ford may have gotten there had he not been caught earlier , right?

    Having been an addict I don’t remember any addict (Including myself) who was trustworthy even in their first year of sobriety. So no I’m not talking out of lack of understanding I’m very familiar with addict behavior.The longer someone is in a life of addiction the more the moral fiber of the person decays. So a person can go from stealing from his friends and family, and progress into grand theft,armed robbery,and murder,to get the drugs. Prison is full of them. Yet politicians seem to roam free.

    Personally I do not want an addict (or an ex addict for that matter) running any form of govt. I think we need to hold our leaders to a higher standard, and a real leader who was suffering from addiction would recuse himself from office out of principle and respect for the people. If he can’t do that then he is far from rehabilitated because part of recovery is taking responsibility.

  • [5] November 23, 2014 at 12:25pm

    Barry was worse then Toronto’s mayor. Barry was friends with drug dealers and helped them out and laundered money.He didn’t pay taxes,fines,or traffic tickets.Did drugs and prostitutes. Gave govt contracts to friends and drug dealers. Pretty much abused and skirted every law he could and no one really ever touched him. “Its good to be black and the Mayor” – Marion Barry

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] November 20, 2014 at 4:17pm

    Heres what kills me. We all can agree most average Americans are 1 paycheck away from poverty yet on the other hand if we see folks on hard times we automatically assume they are mental defective or lazy and drug addled.

    Heres some fun facts:
    1. Once you are homeless you have no address really freaking hard to get a job and fill out an app with no address. Those apps go in the trashcan.
    2.If you are older like this gentleman you can pretty much bet he probably has health issues from being old and living in the weather. Plus he is not exactly prime employment material from his age alone.
    3.Homeless shelters come in many shapes and sizes some are helpful in getting a person back on his feet, some are just warehouses with 90 day stay limits. Some are really nice and get great funding and they will keep what they call low risk homeless (individuals who are easy to handle) indefinitely just for a pay check. Then there are what I call exploitative shelters who will actually work homeless for Beer if you are an alc or 50 bucks a day and house them in nasty cramped conditions.

    I could go on but you get my drift. Being homeless is no picnic and not all those who will become homeless are drunks addicts or lazy. They just have no family and no money and no alternatives so lets cut them some slack and stop with the stereotypes. I totally get why this man chose jail being outside in the elements will in fact kill you it happens everyday but its not front page news cuz no one cares.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] November 20, 2014 at 11:11am

    I’m with Advection Why is it the liberal media the ones slamming him then? Its the left wing media (Havent seen but a slight blurb on Fox) amping this up. I think its mostly to deflect from Gruber

  • November 20, 2014 at 10:38am

    I thought I explained “Why Now?” It was brought up now because of Cosby’s comments on Blacks pulling up their pants and getting a job and being responsible. Liberal/progressives don’t like that kinda talk they live off of victim-hood they get the votes from victim-hood mentality.If you have Black, intelligent, logical, hard working folks they will no longer buy into the victim-hood mentality therefore losing that voter group.

    Bill Cosby actually settled a case accusing him of sexual assault and he tried to get a gag order so the other 12 womens names would not be released,of course the judge denied it. This is not new news but the media certainly shielded him. Heres verification you needed

    http://articles.latimes.com/2006/nov/09/news/wk-cosby9

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] November 20, 2014 at 8:45am

    There’s no question Bills guilty. What you are failing to realize is Bill left the Liberal plantation with his “Blacks need to pull their pants up and get a job and act responsibly” rant. They had the goods on him (NBC and liberal media) They just were more than willing to sweep it under the rug for him. Now though he is getting the liberal lynching. One of the women accusers recently was given a job at NBC smell the fish yet? When you have one or two women accusing thats debatable but there were like 12 women who gave the exact similar story well thats no longer a coincidence thats a pattern of a perp that kept doing what worked for him.

    Responses (2) +
  • [114] November 19, 2014 at 4:44pm

    WHAAAAAA?! Blacks are killing Blacks?!!!! Well we don’t mind if we kill each other because we can’t sue each other until the state hands out free suit money.

    Responses (4) +
  • [5] November 19, 2014 at 1:02am

    I hear polar bears are drinking coke and yacking it up as well :)

    Responses (2) +
  • [6] November 18, 2014 at 8:10pm

    ” In straight sex, is the woman being the “man” or being masculine if she is on top and doing the work?” That question lacked any cognitive thought. A woman is THE feminine no matter what the position because she is the one being penetrated so I found the question ridiculous.

    “If you can recognize that someone of your own gender is attractive yet not want to have sex or a relationship with them, then you know how I feel about women.” I feel the same way about women when I’m in a committed relationship. Why? Because I am in control of my sexual organs.

    “With gay relationships and sex, there is no “man” and “woman” roles. No masculine or feminine. It is two men or two women. Often, it is two masculine or two femanine people too.”

    I have been involved in behavioral studies and can assure you that your statement is not true.A matter a fact its like 5% so a small fraction. In Gay men studies less then 8% of gay men are monogamous. Hence why aids is still a real and present danger in only the gay male population. I have statistics if you need to see them.

    Someone is always the dominant therefore masculine partner while the other must take a more feminine submissive role.That is why there are bottoms and tops in the gay community. If I am wrong go to any Gay hook up site and see how they advertise themselves and please scream at them how wrong they are lol.

    You certainly can choose your sexual orientation some bi-sexuals would beg to differ, now Scientific evidence that then

  • [3] November 18, 2014 at 4:13pm

    When you can prove to me you can’t choose to be gay then I will believe the rest of it. I think you confuse attractiveness with sex. I find some men attractive but I don’t say “Yeah I want to have sex with that”. In order to have sex someone has to take a roll, masculine or feminine. Thats why even in Gay male sex there is a bottom and top roll. Bottoms are normally feminine and see themselves as feminine ( I would then have to assume there is a gender identity issue right?). So therefore Gay or straight there has to be a feminine roll played for it to succeed as a relationship.Therefore there is a conscience decision (not just a predisposition) to play your part.

    I personally can think of a ton of reasons for sexual identity issues that have zero to do with genetics,from childhood exploration,to overbearing fathers or mothers, making that gender no longer appealing,to missing fathers or mothers where one plays out the role of missing feminine or masculine figure. I could go on and on. You could say these arent choices as well they are psychological needs that get mucked up as puberty blossoms into sexuality.

    I am not a gay hater I think gays are good people with a sexual problem period. I wish you the best Harry regardless of your sexual proclivity. You don’t have to answer to me anyway and my job is not to judge you only to care for you like I would my own.

  • [9] November 18, 2014 at 3:39pm

    Call it what it is fecalphiliac! I’m sorry but I dont believe a gene predisposes you to shoving your privates into someones dirty anus,anymore than I think there is a gene that supports animal sodomy,murder,thievery,pedophilia etc…I would assume the study was paid for by a grant from the rainbow coalition.
    Living in a scientific family the ongoing joke is ” We can scientifically support anything if the grant money is big enough.”

    Responses (3) +
  • [5] November 15, 2014 at 4:18pm

    @ eutope
    Hes still towing the liberal line is why.

  • [111] November 15, 2014 at 4:16pm

    Nope this is a simple case of not towing the liberal agenda line. These allegations have been going back a long time except no one really cared or covered it UNTIL Bill Cosby started telling blacks to pull up their pants and get a job. Then all the sudden the liberal media went freaking bat sht crazy. All the sudden these rape allegations that they didn’t care a bit about before were all the sudden a big deal. Welcome Bill back to reality.

    I do not condone Bill Cosby’s behavior but I certainly condemn the fact the liberal media did condone his action for decades until it hurt their agenda. They are lairs and perpetrators after the fact and yet they declare they are FOR women and FOR Blacks. WAKE UP! They are only FOR control/power and could care less about you stupid public! Watch what they do and please listen to what they say when they call you stupid.

  • [39] November 15, 2014 at 3:18pm

    If you want your finger you can keep your finger -Obamacare

  • [8] November 15, 2014 at 2:06pm

    Not to mention that his constituents will be the ones having to compete for those jobs. They never think that far ahead……shoot…..they don’t think logically ever!

    welcome to the black jobless rate at 25% when Obama signs this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] November 15, 2014 at 2:02pm

    Its a great life unless your livelihood depends on it then the Govt regulates you into bankruptcy. Luckily for him though he doesn’t need the money YET.

  • [6] November 13, 2014 at 12:55am

    I’m pretty sure the stupid voters he is talking about are Democrats.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] November 12, 2014 at 11:37pm

    Ed just wants some ratings he could care less about issues. I wouldn’t give him any credence and let him slither back into obscurity Dana.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go