But, according to Farrakhan, Blacks should be going to war with anyone that kills them. So now we have a "War on Illegals". Because, you know, they kill Blacks too...
 August 8, 2015 at 11:39pm
If they keep this up, Black Lives won’t matter…
 August 7, 2015 at 1:18pm
In the same boat too Bub47, mine started in 84 and the ole Zenith data systems 286, back when Raid wasn’t yet used and no out right hard drive crashes unless the computer was just dropped! The methods they indicate for failures is pure mythical and as you point out with their kinds of funds backing, I’m sure they only bought the best of the best for reliability, imagine that? There must be some thing on there that Hillery doesn’t want out like Bill actually did have sex with that woman!
August 3, 2015 at 10:16am
Wasn’t the the E-lax commercial too??
 August 1, 2015 at 1:46pm
Yes but what’s more troubling is that neither 911 service was willing to call the State police in, Dah that’s what’s done when a crime is being committed across jurisdictions!
 July 27, 2015 at 11:15am
Time for a Rainbow flag burn march….
 July 25, 2015 at 1:10pm
Term limits is the only way to counter what happening now and for the future. It’s sad it takes a Trump with money reserves in the billions to counter the Republican Elites, having ones own money give the interdependency of following what one believes id true and right! All these so called Talking heads are completely out of touch with the average voter that’s tired of the BS!
But term limits will only work if it's 1) crafted with an understanding of those currently in office and 2) crafted knowing that those in office will try to cheat it.
So if we're going to institute term limits, it would have to contain a provision that immediately terms out anyone that's currently in office (and those that have already served). Then, it would have to place strict limits on each office and prevent people from simply jumping from one office to the next. In other words, if we're going to limit the House to 3 terms, there should also be a provision that prevents that person from simply jumping to the Senate for 2 more terms, and then to the Presidency. They should have to pick either the House or the Senate and then the Presidency. They could serve in both, but only if they serve, say, 1 term in either chamber and then they can't go back to the other chamber. That way, they could server 1 term in the House, 1 term in the Senate, and then 2 terms as President. Keeping the length of each term the same, that would give that person 16 years in office total.
This is just an example. But simply setting term limits wouldn't prevent a politician from serving his/her term in the House, jumping to the Senate and serving there, and then jumping to the Presidency. Depending on how long you limit each one, they could still be in office for a long time.
All of the above should have the desired effect of killing off "career politicians".
Term limits would have very little effect in the Senate, since every State has two Senators. However, term limits in the House would give the most populated States an absolute dictatorship over the least populated States. The entire nation would be controlled by the top 10 or 12 of the most populated States.
The existing "seniority system" in the House of Representatives is what allows States with small populations to have a modicum of control over legislation. By continually reelecting House Representatives, small populous States can achieve the Chairmanship over one or more committees, if they are in the majority party and have the seniority. Term limits would eliminate any hope of small populous States obtaining a Chairmanship on any committee.
That makes term limits in the House of Representatives a very bad idea indeed.
 July 20, 2015 at 12:22pm
Every soldier that dies on the battle field is brought back to the USA in a Flag draped casket, their own personal half mast flag if you will! That FLAG is give to the family at the burial!
As Monk had said it should of been at half mast to honor those fallen military! No excuse for it, except being the Muslim in Chief!
Hey being retired has it’s privileges then, can’t fire moi and it is a little fun to stir that ole pot!!
 June 26, 2015 at 1:23pm
Scalia’s dissent says it best!
But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in
today’s judicial Putsch. The five Justices who compose
today’s majority are entirely comfortable concluding that
every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135
years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification
and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-sex marriages in
2003.20 They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment
a “fundamental right” overlooked by every person
alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else
in the time since. They see what lesser legal minds—
minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Oliver
Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis,
William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black,
Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly—
could not. They are certain that the People ratified the
Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to
remove questions from the democratic process when that
is called for by their “reasoned judgment.” These Justices
know that limiting marriage to one man and one woman is
contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as
government itself, and accepted by every nation in history
until 15 years ago,21 cannot possibly be supported by
anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are
willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with
that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the
unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies,
stands against the Constituti
I had to look up Putsch. It means : a secretly plotted and suddenly executed attempt to overthrow a government. Pretty telling coming from a Supreme Court Justice.
I thought it was a variant spelling of "putz"
 June 23, 2015 at 12:39pm
I fail to see where any of the Justices use the constitution in it’s fullest meaning, at no point with in the constitution does it ever talk about a Conservative meaning or a Liberal meanings! We need a way to recall, ANY member of the government, appointed, elected or just plain civilian hire! I really don’t think any one prior to Obama’s administration and AG, ever really thought much about how that AG and it’s entire Department could be used in a way that was never intended?? Clearly this Asset forfeiture being used against people is Unconstitutional now!!
 June 11, 2015 at 9:13am
Then you have a valid Birth certificate? To this date none has been shown, yes you have a Hawaiian government worker saying it exists, so lets take his word for it even tho he’s a Democrat!
Muslim, well I guess his action speak louder than words on that one!!
 May 26, 2015 at 10:08pm
Start stetting up that train to the border for self deport when Cruz wins…