User Profile: Conservative Democrat

Conservative Democrat

Member Since: August 31, 2010

CommentsDisplaying Conservative Democrat's 10 most recent comments.

  • HA HA! I love it all those folks who say pot don’t mess up your life!!! that’s funny as hell!
    It may not mess you up any more than smoking physically, but try to pass a sobriety checkpoint when your driving and stoned! it’s call DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE for a reason. The same with DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED. It indicates the driver is impaired to the effect of being able to operate a motor vehicle, boat, bicycle, mower, airplane or other type conveyance. Cops don’t care if its speed, meth, heroin, cocaine, booze or pot. You are still going to Jail, You are still going to have to pay fees, attorneys, fines or loose your license, and that gets you into more trouble!
    Yep, pot don’t hurt no one, well maybe that family you crashed into and killed, but hey, YOU got that right don’t ya?

  • ERROR on my part……..Hazard is the county and Harlan is the “town”
    sorry, I tr to stay s far away as possible now that I got older……..and smarter!

  • Ever hear of a town called Harlan it is in Hazard county Kentucky, I have been there numerous times and would rather have my teeth (ok TOOTH) drilled with no pain meds then ever go there again. Has to be the worst crime area in Kentucky!
    Ever wonder why Elmore Lenorad (Justified), wrote his books about Harlan and Hazard!
    I think they have won “worst humans on the face of the planet” 30 years running!
    Seriousy I have seen the CC there it was just next to the jail (convienetly)!

  • And to finish:

    5. Very few reasonable people are “stockpiling” arms and ammunition, I do not have to and many others are the same. I will not call a “prepper” crazy, but I am less apt to sell to them once I find out the person is a “prepper”. This is another of the mistruths floating around, yes, some people are very afraid of the government, and in light in what has been said by some politicians they should be.

    6. You do know that if something is made illegal, it does not simply go away, right…please say yes or this whole thing is redundant. Making something illegal does nothing but make it unsafe, open to misuse and cause undue harm. I point out two examples:
    “Prohibition (19 amendment) because it could not get 2/3 ratification in 14 years expired (21 amendment 1933).
    “War on drugs” No amendment, just kind of started and as with all government programs never ended (as of this date)
    However, what many people do not know is the fact is if you pay the right tax, and have enough money you can still get almost any drug you want.

  • Continues:

    A “cop killer bullet is simply an armor piercing round and are strictly limited and regulated, Teflon bullets are also on the restricted list, or could you mean the “hydro shock” style bullet? Clarity is important.

    3. Question, I thought schools were “Gun Free Zones” the simple act of taking a weapon onto school grounds is illegal. There may be a reason this person did not get the rest of his written “hit-list” is exactly because there was someone armed there to stop him. (I happen to know of the event you speak of). There are way more “stories” of a person STOPPED from shooting many than there are of “mass killings” but of course, the latter gets the national news coverage.

    4. No one is advocating the overthrow of the government, what we are angry about is the WAY the president made his statement of executive order, it may be just old Joe shoving his foot in his mouth again, but that is dangerous when it comes to a Constitutional rights. No one ever said “everyone no matter what should have weapons, we all understand there has to be, and here is the magic word “REASONABLE REGULATION OF DANGEROUS WEAPONS” You do make some valid points, mental disorders, unless well regulated should be a disqualifying item, problem is when I do a NICS check it does not look at past mental illness because the ACLU declared it was unconstitutional as being medical records. There is a question on the application, but it says involuntarily committed to a mental h

  • Continued from previous post:
    1. For clarity nothing was banned, it was taxed, [NFA 1938] if you want them you can still get them, but there is a large tax and some serious background checks as well as many hoops to jump in and out of. I happen to have a class 07 FFL with a SOT class3. This allows me to make, buy, sell and rebuild fully automatic weapons. I know of about 8 people personally who own “Tanks” or Armored vehicles and two of them with operating main guns (102mm), pay the appropriate tax get the things you want (with a very clear background). Automatic weapons built after 1986 are non-transferable.

    2. Not to sound petulant but they are Magazines, a clip is what they used to load bolt-action rifles and some semi-automatic rifles like the M1 Garand’s. A magazine is loaded INTO the weapon and designed to facilitate the placement of ammunition into the chamber automatically. So a magazine, in your opinion should have how many rounds? 5, 8, 10, 12 how many? Take into consideration the ability of the owner as a marksman and the conditions of use. Personally I prefer the 1911 .45 cal. government model (only eight rounds (7 plus 1 in the chamber) a good short action bolt-action rifle or a M14 style. speaking of a M14 would you consider that an “assault weapon”? Even if it was semi-automatic? A “cop killer bullet is simply an armor piercing round and are strictly limited and regulated, Teflon bullets are also on the restricted list, or could you mean the “hydr

  • SCD, the following is a post I made on another site:
    1. We do not allow people to own an Abrams tank, or even a machine gun. Those were banned from ownership back in the days when gangsters used them.
    2. High capacity clips. They are not necessary for the public. They are for the military. Cop killer bullets? No! Eliminate those from the public. Assault weapons those are for the military. Not for the public
    3. As for adding cops or armed security at schools, that is no guarantee that it solves the problem. Two kids were shot in school in California yesterday and that school had armed cops on duty.
    4. But I never considered trying to overthrow the government because a majority of the people voted them in twice
    5. The answer is not stock piling an arsenal to overthrow that government, but to offer policies that people want. Elections matter.
    6. If he did not have access to the ammo, he could not fire the gun and those people would be alive today. Same thing at Sandy Hook. One handgun against a guy with 100 rounds of .223 ammo and body armor does not have much of a chance.
    _________________________________________________________________________________

    My retort taken in the above order:

    see ext page

  • Registration Will Lead to Confiscation

    January 11, 2013 at 1:51am

    I have read with a lot of interest this whole Gun fiasico (by the Federals) which has led to this horrible ending, After serving this Nation as a Law enforcement Officer and in the Army, I can only conclude that this goverment we now have is very near to its end, kind of like Rome in the end. We all will have to make some very hard decisions, and then live with those decisions we make. I have seen war, I have seen the brutality of man on man and I am not suprised anymore by much. My father was also a career mitilary man and he asked me, just before I joined the army “You are going to have to make some hard decisions, you have to ask yourself, what are you ready to die for?”. I firmly believe this constitution we have is the answer, and I am fully prepared to give the last full measure in its defense.

    In the words of the TEXANS ” COME AND TAKE IT”
    I say this knowing the full ramifacations of what I say, let us hope it does not resort to that, But in the event I am wrong, God be with all of you.

  • To continue, Actor 2 just elevated the use of force matrix (by picking up a deadly weapon (the rock) and entered into another “danger Zone” call felony Battery/ fortunatly actor did not go up the matrix and then held back and subdued actor 2 with less that leatal force (pepper spray) this ended the fray and officers on the scene found wants and warrants on actor2. Actor 1 got his phone back, actor went to get a shower and 3 hots and a cot (and may be some lovin cell mates)

    The point is there is only one criminal act that happened, that was possesion of stolen property, misdemenor, 30 days for theft for poor actor 2 , No need for outside lawyers to give a narrative about how every one but the thief should be sued. Sorry it doe not always work out the way you want it….no, no no state funds for you MMoron. Sorry.
    P.S. stay in school some of us out here have a bit more that 4 years of liberal study, some even have 8 or 10 years.

  • Never mind, Found them after the post. things that make ya go….Whaaaaat !