User Profile: conservative_teacher

conservative_teacher

Member Since: May 13, 2011

Comments

123
  • September 14, 2011 at 9:54am

    “including his monkey wife”? WTF? Are you serious, dude? Nothing would make me happier than to see Obama resign or get tossed out on his ass for what he has done, but attacking his wife and refering to her as a monkey? You make me sick, dude.

  • September 14, 2011 at 9:51am

    Jimmy who?

  • September 14, 2011 at 9:46am

    Sickening.

  • September 13, 2011 at 7:09pm

    I’ll go. Where do I sign up?

  • September 13, 2011 at 11:40am

    And the Blaze/Beck do it again. At least we can all say you clowns are consistant–consistant in attempting to railroad Ron Paul. Uh, quick question Scott/Glenn, how do you morons sleep at night? Please, for all our sakes, never bump into me on a street corner.

  • September 12, 2011 at 11:48pm

    Honestly, why do I come back to this site and read this BS? Scott and Glenn, I’m surprised you haven’t endorsed Santorum. I mean, since all three of you are about equal in terms of being hell bent on a theocracy. You don’t give a rat’s a** about liberty or the Constitution. All you care about is bringing about “Change God Can Believe In”. You don’t want America to exist as a free Republic. You want America to exist as a theocracy, where even non-radicalized Muslims are public enemy number one and adherence to your small-minded, religious dogma is considered “patriotism”. Like Santorum, you make me sick to my stomach.

    Responses (4) +
  • September 12, 2011 at 11:27pm

    Agreed. 100%.

  • September 12, 2011 at 11:22pm

    Hey model, why don’t you suck my member…I’m sure you’re very talented at it.

  • September 12, 2011 at 9:29pm

    She’s a complete moron. Enough said.

    Responses (6) +
  • September 12, 2011 at 2:28pm

    Really? Does anyone really care what Krugman says? Crazy people say crazy things, that’s how they roll. What difference does it make? Krugman isn’t going to influence policy decisions or even the general direction of this country. He appeals to such a small minority of ultra-liberals and progressives that he and his words are less than inconsequential.

    Responses (13) +
  • September 12, 2011 at 10:27am

    If we get out of our three unconstitutional wars, there won’t be a need to cut defense spending. This isn’t rocket science. America must maintain a vastly superior military in size, scope, and technology. What we cannot do is continue to be the world’s police. It simply isn’t constitutional to continue to travel down this path.

    Responses (13) +
  • September 10, 2011 at 10:09pm

    Get us out of all the unconstitutional wars, bring every last troop home, and the defense budget can be cut while maintaining our current level of readiness…even increasing our level of readiness for that matter. Rumsfeld is a liar, always has been and always will be.

  • September 10, 2011 at 9:50pm

    Horsehiit, Rumsfeld. It simply isn’t true.

    Responses (7) +
  • September 10, 2011 at 9:31pm

    You should be sorry, moron. I loath Barack Obama and his ideology, but to suggest he wants to have terrorists attack our country and kill Americans is ridiculous. Get a grip on reality you freak.

  • September 10, 2011 at 8:57pm

    Better no evidence followed by no attack than obscure evidence after an attack.

    Responses (2) +
  • September 10, 2011 at 8:01pm

    @ConservativeMomofFour,

    I just want to thank you for that post. There really is nothing like being vindicated in an argument live, as the argument is happening. You, along with the rest of your religious nutball buddies, have done just an absolutely wonderful job in proving my point—that you are all quite nuts. And people wonder why western civilization spent over a millennia in the dark ages. Given the opportunity, I’m sure you’d burn a self-proclaimed witch at the stake as well. Please take the “Conservative” part out of your username. You are not conservative. You are a religious radical.

  • September 10, 2011 at 5:22pm

    @Patriotme, again you are missing the point of my original comment. I did not imply that it was “no big deal”. Of course it’s a big deal. It’s sickening actually, but you’ve missed the point. For a ‘believer’, the fallback position of “God’s Will Be Done” is the position of no big deal. Apparently you don’t read many of the posts on the Blaze, or you simply choose to ignore them. On topics such as disasters or the like, the vast majority of the posts are both religious in nature and fall into one of the two categories I described. You cannot escape this fact. The evangelical Christian faith demands that you either accept a tragedy as being “god’s will” or the aversion of a tragedy as “God’s intervention”, both of those being completely out of your control—hence the “no big deal” implication.

  • September 10, 2011 at 3:45pm

    @Partiotme,
    First, thank your husband for his service from me. It is greatly appreciated. Second, isn’t it in fact true that you really don’t know jack shiit about me? Do you know if I am myself a veteran or not? Do you know if like you, I have family members serving this country overseas? Of course you don’t. But like the rest of your religious nutball buddies, that doesn’t seem to matter—facts don’t seem to matter. And therein lies the contradiction—the hypocrisy of religion that have and will continue to comment on and expose whenever and wherever I can. You claim, like most BBT’s will, that our Republic was “founded on creationist principles”, but at the same time choose to either ignore or pretend that the truth of factual history. You spend your time falsely accusing me of being a liberal, but not a single word of the people on this very thread calling for the mass murder of human beings solely on the basis of their religious affiliation. Of course, that isn’t surprising due to the fact that Christianity has held this stance in the past and in fact attempted to carry out those plans more than once.

    Islam, as a religious dogma, is a threat to liberty. Christianity is a threat to liberty. Progressivism is a threat to liberty. Psuedo-conservatism, more popularly known as the religious right, is a threat to liberty.

  • September 10, 2011 at 2:15pm

    @Logictrumps,

    You arrive at your conclusions about me via a common misconception—that ‘Conservatism’ is married to religion. Nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives—true conservatism has been hijacked by the religious right in our republic. Beck is the poster child for this axiom.
    The reality is that I despise the concept of central statism no less than I despise religious control. I am staunchly opposed to Marxist socialism. I’m staunchly opposed to big government. I’m staunchly opposed to Barack Obama. What I am for is Constitutional Liberty—no more, no less. As far as I’m concerned, Obama, Soros, Evangelicals, Beck, MSNBC, Fox News, and yes even The Blaze are all equally as much a threat to true liberty.

  • September 10, 2011 at 1:43pm

    Eat me, Model82A1.

123