User Profile: conservativeone

conservativeone

Member Since: October 11, 2010

CommentsDisplaying conservativeone's 10 most recent comments.

  • First Of All … It wasn’t helmet to helmet.
    Secondly, he led with his forearms and shoulders. He didn’t launch his head at the WR.
    In fact, if you look at the slow motion footage, the impact in mostly on the shoulder pads of the WR.
    I see both sides of this debate …
    The offensive player must be prepared for hits like this during the season.
    No coach wants their defensive players to shelter their aggression & instincts.
    I thought the DB made a great defensive play, and broke up a pass.
    One can argue it’s a Spring Game and it was his own player, but Spring Game or not, you play at full speed.

  • “Apparently I have to live here a certain amount of time before I have an opinion,” she told the newspaper.

    Wait … Who told her she couldn’t have an opinion. It appears to me that she expressed her opinion.
    That’s the thing with Liberal People. They think if you don’t agree with them, then you’re not allowing them to voice their opinion.

  • First of all Tom Arnold is the moron. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting. And who the hell is Tom Arnold to tell me what I need and what I don’t need?
    Tom Arnold is a loser that lived off the coat tails of that pig he was married to. Why Bill O’Reilly allowed him to be relevant on his show is beyond me.
    Isn’t it funny how some Liberals will own guns, but the guns they own are the right guns to own? You don’t need those dark scary black ones that shoot no different than the semi-auto pistol.
    And personally, I have never seen a hunter that went hunting with a fully automatic rifle.
    As usual, Liberals have to cite extreme cases that hardly ever take place.

  • Why is it that the 1st order is to investigate the store’s protocol? If this woman was going to take her own life, she would have done it whether there was a waiting period or not.

  • For this man, “guns” were banned, yet he still managed to ignore the law and get them.
    And why would a man that killed his grandmother with a hammer, ever be allowed out of prison?

  • LOL !!! What a bunch of idiots. All they did was show Criminals who doesn’t have guns in their homes, which makes for easy pickin’s. Regardless, if I were a gun permit holder there, I’d sue them.

  • Morgan is lying … The Semi-Automatic AR-15 can only shoot ONE ROUND per second. He is giving stats for the Military Issued AR-15. Those have three shot burst capabilities, the Civilian Models do not.
    AR-15′s purchased by civilians are not “Full Auto”, nor can they fire in three shot bursts.
    Morgan is the one lying to the American People.

  • Liberals are using inaccuracies to support their agenda and nobody is correcting them.
    The “assault rifles” that civilians have are not the same as the Military has. This is a complete fabrication. The share similar platforms, but have different capabilities.
    2nd, Anyone convicted of Domestic Violence cannot purchase a gun. Soledad O’Brien is lying or just simply ignorant to the laws.
    You can buy any Remington 870 shotgun (used for hunting), and you can change the stock, add a side-saddle and change the forearm on it and then it would be labeled “assault”.
    Many that criticize “assault rifles” don’t even have a clue what they are or how they operate.
    To even own a “full auto” weapon, one must submit for a Class 3 Stamp (per item @ $200 per). The background check is extensive, and believe me, those that get the stamp are not looking to harm society. Full Auto Weapons run anywhere from $3,000 to $15,000 (or more) per gun.
    Criminals are not applying for these types of permits.
    Clinton’s Assault Weapon Ban was in effect in 1997 when (2) Armed Bank Robbers conducted the Nation’s largest shoot-out in North Hollywood. It was also in effect in 1999 when the Columbine Shootings took place. Thus proving that those with criminal intent do not care about laws or rules.

  • I have a hard time believing this is completely true … I think a lot of these guns were probably confiscated guns that they’ve already had that were being displayed to give the impression people are turning in their guns.
    Not that I don’t believe some people turned in old junk guns, but I have a hard time buying that anyone turned in a TEC-DC9 and an Uzi 9mm submachine gun for $250 each. An Uzi sells for around $3,000-$4,000 alone.

  • There’s No Such Thing As Crime Prevention … No Law Will Ever Prevent The Intent of a Criminal.
    We have laws against Drunk Driving, yet thousands of people are killed in drunk driving accidents every year.
    We have laws against child molestation, yet thousands of children are subjected to such horrific acts.
    We have laws against killing people, yet thousands are murdered each year.

    Adam Lanza tried to purchase a rifle that week and was denied during the process. This means that the gun control restrictions currently on the books, worked in that situation. However, it did not prevent his intent.