Instead of viewing video clips from “The Blaze”, I open a new tab, got to YouTube, then search for the video with the YouTube Search bar.
 July 2, 2015 at 2:48pm
I started watching the video..but when the title/label appeared indicating that this was a “cave jump”, I exited the video.
Language and words are very important to me, I cannot tolerate inaccurate language.
He is not jumping through a “cave”, (a three sided space inside rock, generally, at least large enough for a human to occupy…he IS jumping through a natural ARCH.
 July 2, 2015 at 1:34pm
The question was likely worded that way as a study, to determine where to spend money (more government spending) to target areas not getting “enough exercise outside work”…regardless of their level of activity at work…notice it is the “heartland” where people likely do physical labor at work, thus may not need exercise additional work.
I see several factors not taken into account. Small towns don't always have a gym nearby or it's too expensive for the local yokels. States with mountains, beaches, and other features fare better than flyover country states if people want to be outside and draw the active bodies. Which states are you most likely to be eaten alive by mosquitoes, ticks, chiggers, and the like? Hot, cold, or perfect weather? Types of jobs available?
 July 2, 2015 at 1:31pm
My first impression upon a quick glance at the map, is that those who had not exercised outside of work in the last month, seem to live in areas where their jobs are likely to involve physical labor, thus they are in fact getting exercise. The Blue areas where people are exercising outside of work appear to be in areas which may not involve a great deal of physical work, thus, they compensate by working out, outside of work.
I notice that the Fayetteville, NC area appears to be listed as lazy for not exercizing outside work…despite the fact that bout 30,000 Soldiers to PT every morning…thus many of us do not “exercise off duty”, though many of us do go to the gym or run on our own.
This would be like saying that areas where people binge-watch netflix are lazy, without taking time to determine of other factors are in play such as level of physical activity at work, access to reliable high speed internet access…weather considerations (Northerner’s may not get out much to exercise in winter, for example).
I get 1 hour 3 x per week to go to the gym. I would count that as off work exercise time as well.
July 2, 2015 at 10:05am
I wanted to punch O’Reilly in the face last night (01JUL2015). He allowed a female guest to say that one does not CHOOSE whether they are gay or not…without challenging her. I was not aware that the “born gay vs. CHOOSING to be gay issue” is proven. Allowing anyone to say that it is, allows them to win the debate. Most people are not actually “anti-gay”…they are actually “anti-gay activist”..they just have not made the distinction.
What I kept hearing on talk radio yesterday, from Liberal guests is that no one is forcing clergy to perform same sex marriage…what they are not saying…unless the inverter-viewer asks the important question “should a church which fails to perform same sex marriages be allowed to keep their tax exempt status?”..then you get answers that start out…”since they are in violation of….” meaning “yes, you can deny performing same sex marriages, but we will punish you for failing to do so”. If you are punishing behavior then you are attempting to force compliance.
I recently had a debate with a friend of mine about this . She is conservative normally . I just asked her to think for a second "If there was a gay gene or proof of being born gay , wouldn't they be shouting it from the roof tops?". I don't care personally but can't stand that they act like the debate is over .
July 2, 2015 at 9:12am
Easy, you make them wear a rainbow colored star on their shirt.
[-1] July 2, 2015 at 9:11am
I am a Christian, anti-gay or other activist (most people do not realize they are NOT “anti-gay”, they are “anti-gay activists”, they just have not reasoned it out.
Unfortunately we have lost the “redefinition of gay marriage” issue (with the accompanying automatic redefinition of the the term “spouse” and all the entitlements/benefits inherent therein).
The owners of this hardware store are idiots. Refusing gays onsite service whether it be a meal at a restaurant or selling them a TV is not the argument Christians need to be fighting.
Instead, the religious argument against being forced to render off-site services of a religious nature to gays (baking a cake and having the customer pick it up at the shoppe is much different than being forced to cater the cake off-site,during a marriage reception. Same thing for photographers, caterers, and other wedding service providers.
On a side note, I wanted to punch Bill O’Reilly last night (01JUL2015) for allowing a guest to say, without challenge, that one does not get to choose being gay…..hello, McFly…the “born vs. CHOOSING to be gay” issue is NOT resolved scientifically, this is the crux of the argument that gays do not deserved Civil Rights protection status. To be consistent and since Sharia Law is headed to America within the next 20 years, perhaps religion should no longer have Civil Rights protection after the age of 18. This would reserve Civil Rights protection for traits one cannot change or CHOOSE.
Biological “gayness” is not scientifically proven only when you adhere to the foundations of intelligent design or creationism. In real science, biological gayness occurs in nature among a number of species that are not currently allowed to marry and biologically unfit to procreate.
Thank you! Is it really so hard to see the difference between these two battles? Apparently, yes. LOL. You are not participating in a gay wedding by baking a cake for it. If you are asked to put two grooms on top, I think you have the right to give the little guys to the wedding party and have them do it. And you have the right not to stand at the wedding and serve it. Baking, however, is JUST baking.
 July 1, 2015 at 10:58pm
Just as Conservatives must endure the consequences of our honest speech….Liberal idiots must be forced to suffer the consequence of their free speech…if beating them up is what it takes…so be it. Just because you can burn the American Flag does not mean that Americans should be burning it…leave that to nations which hate us. Not saying they can’t legally burn the flag, but if Trump can be fired over mere speech, then a public beating is fine…less permanent than being fired.
 July 1, 2015 at 10:22am
I just retired from the Army last month, so it has been awhile since I filled out job applications.
The all seem to list options like:
..sometimes White is replaced by Caucasian.
When did Hispanic become white? If the government lumps Hispanics with Whites, then of course the crime rates by race are skewed…against Whites.
 July 1, 2015 at 10:14am
Here is a question.
In this post PC era, are the police allowed to ask if those they arrest are a citizen? If the answer is no, then of course government statistics will be wrong.
 July 1, 2015 at 9:06am
Never…I mean NEVER mention “skirt” and Hillary” in the same post. Are you not getting the RNC talking points in your E-mail.
…”Search and Destroy will now be referred to as Sweep and Clear…” ….Full Metal Jacket.
 July 1, 2015 at 9:04am
“I ain’t no ways taair’d”
“I ain’t no ways electronically challenged”
..Hillary The Clinton
 July 1, 2015 at 9:02am
Interesting that they compare themselves to Conservatives.
I have no idea what the Liberal books are rated on the Best Seller List..who pays attention to that?
 July 1, 2015 at 6:52am
I live in Fayetteville, NC, can get Rush and Beck on FM 106.1 WTTK-FM out of Raleigh…they also have a great call in morning show…K.C. O’dea. WTTK-FM is also on I-Heart Radio.
 June 30, 2015 at 10:59pm
Liberals are idiots. Just because I am anti-redefining the term “marriage” does not mean I am anti-gay.
I am anti-gay activist.
I am becoming bigoted…… towards all activists.
 June 30, 2015 at 10:58pm
At 53, I would never have imagined I would see the leader of the Free World so proud to embrace the redefinition of the term “marriage” (and by default, the term “spouse”, with all the unintended expenditure for entitlements/benefits for an un-forecast population…not to mention that all institutions can now come under attack for failing to adhere to the new definitions: government, military, industry, all manner of private sector businesses and universities as well as religions/churches/synagogues etc.).
Yeah, and as more and more people switch to digital radio I can guarantee you that Rush, Glenn, Levin, et al. will fully make the switch.
Right wing talk radio is plummeting.
Lead by Limbaugh,
Not a political statement - just money.
ADVERTISERS see it as a dying market,
it's audience is too old for the products they sell.
Is “Air America” so far back in the recesses of your mind you think we’ve all forgotten about it? Member? Ratings so low and the left so cheap they couldn’t even “pay” attention.
Rush is faltering? His last contract was his biggest ever. After the Sandra Fluke thing he gained advertisers and the ones who left took a spanking. The head of Carbonite admitted his company lost money abandoning Rush and that it was a bad business decision.
I will grant that if ALL radio goes by the wayside as a medium, you will be correct, but it’s not much of a prediction really. As you say “advertisers see it as a dying market.” Given technology and entertainment portability your prediction will merely be evolution in the marketplace and remember, we capitalists know all about stuff like that, so chillax, we got this.