User Profile: cknapp

cknapp

Member Since: August 16, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] July 2, 2015 at 2:50pm

    Instead of viewing video clips from “The Blaze”, I open a new tab, got to YouTube, then search for the video with the YouTube Search bar.

  • [1] July 2, 2015 at 2:48pm

    I started watching the video..but when the title/label appeared indicating that this was a “cave jump”, I exited the video.

    Language and words are very important to me, I cannot tolerate inaccurate language.

    He is not jumping through a “cave”, (a three sided space inside rock, generally, at least large enough for a human to occupy…he IS jumping through a natural ARCH.

  • [2] July 2, 2015 at 1:34pm

    The question was likely worded that way as a study, to determine where to spend money (more government spending) to target areas not getting “enough exercise outside work”…regardless of their level of activity at work…notice it is the “heartland” where people likely do physical labor at work, thus may not need exercise additional work.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] July 2, 2015 at 1:31pm

    My first impression upon a quick glance at the map, is that those who had not exercised outside of work in the last month, seem to live in areas where their jobs are likely to involve physical labor, thus they are in fact getting exercise. The Blue areas where people are exercising outside of work appear to be in areas which may not involve a great deal of physical work, thus, they compensate by working out, outside of work.

    I notice that the Fayetteville, NC area appears to be listed as lazy for not exercizing outside work…despite the fact that bout 30,000 Soldiers to PT every morning…thus many of us do not “exercise off duty”, though many of us do go to the gym or run on our own.

    This would be like saying that areas where people binge-watch netflix are lazy, without taking time to determine of other factors are in play such as level of physical activity at work, access to reliable high speed internet access…weather considerations (Northerner’s may not get out much to exercise in winter, for example).

    Responses (1) +
  • July 2, 2015 at 10:05am

    I wanted to punch O’Reilly in the face last night (01JUL2015). He allowed a female guest to say that one does not CHOOSE whether they are gay or not…without challenging her. I was not aware that the “born gay vs. CHOOSING to be gay issue” is proven. Allowing anyone to say that it is, allows them to win the debate. Most people are not actually “anti-gay”…they are actually “anti-gay activist”..they just have not made the distinction.

    What I kept hearing on talk radio yesterday, from Liberal guests is that no one is forcing clergy to perform same sex marriage…what they are not saying…unless the inverter-viewer asks the important question “should a church which fails to perform same sex marriages be allowed to keep their tax exempt status?”..then you get answers that start out…”since they are in violation of….” meaning “yes, you can deny performing same sex marriages, but we will punish you for failing to do so”. If you are punishing behavior then you are attempting to force compliance.

    Am I the only person who sees these things?

    Responses (1) +
  • July 2, 2015 at 9:12am

    Easy, you make them wear a rainbow colored star on their shirt.

  • [-1] July 2, 2015 at 9:11am

    I am a Christian, anti-gay or other activist (most people do not realize they are NOT “anti-gay”, they are “anti-gay activists”, they just have not reasoned it out.

    Unfortunately we have lost the “redefinition of gay marriage” issue (with the accompanying automatic redefinition of the the term “spouse” and all the entitlements/benefits inherent therein).

    The owners of this hardware store are idiots. Refusing gays onsite service whether it be a meal at a restaurant or selling them a TV is not the argument Christians need to be fighting.

    Instead, the religious argument against being forced to render off-site services of a religious nature to gays (baking a cake and having the customer pick it up at the shoppe is much different than being forced to cater the cake off-site,during a marriage reception. Same thing for photographers, caterers, and other wedding service providers.

    On a side note, I wanted to punch Bill O’Reilly last night (01JUL2015) for allowing a guest to say, without challenge, that one does not get to choose being gay…..hello, McFly…the “born vs. CHOOSING to be gay” issue is NOT resolved scientifically, this is the crux of the argument that gays do not deserved Civil Rights protection status. To be consistent and since Sharia Law is headed to America within the next 20 years, perhaps religion should no longer have Civil Rights protection after the age of 18. This would reserve Civil Rights protection for traits one cannot change or CHOOSE.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 1, 2015 at 10:58pm

    Just as Conservatives must endure the consequences of our honest speech….Liberal idiots must be forced to suffer the consequence of their free speech…if beating them up is what it takes…so be it. Just because you can burn the American Flag does not mean that Americans should be burning it…leave that to nations which hate us. Not saying they can’t legally burn the flag, but if Trump can be fired over mere speech, then a public beating is fine…less permanent than being fired.

  • [4] July 1, 2015 at 10:22am

    I just retired from the Army last month, so it has been awhile since I filled out job applications.

    The all seem to list options like:
    White-Hispanic
    White Non-Hispanic
    ..sometimes White is replaced by Caucasian.

    When did Hispanic become white? If the government lumps Hispanics with Whites, then of course the crime rates by race are skewed…against Whites.

  • [14] July 1, 2015 at 10:14am

    Here is a question.
    In this post PC era, are the police allowed to ask if those they arrest are a citizen? If the answer is no, then of course government statistics will be wrong.

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 9:06am

    Never…I mean NEVER mention “skirt” and Hillary” in the same post. Are you not getting the RNC talking points in your E-mail.

    …”Search and Destroy will now be referred to as Sweep and Clear…” ….Full Metal Jacket.

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 9:04am

    “I ain’t no ways taair’d”

    “I ain’t no ways electronically challenged”

    ..Hillary The Clinton

  • [3] July 1, 2015 at 9:02am

    Interesting that they compare themselves to Conservatives.

    I have no idea what the Liberal books are rated on the Best Seller List..who pays attention to that?

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 6:52am

    I live in Fayetteville, NC, can get Rush and Beck on FM 106.1 WTTK-FM out of Raleigh…they also have a great call in morning show…K.C. O’dea. WTTK-FM is also on I-Heart Radio.

  • [1] June 30, 2015 at 10:59pm

    Liberals are idiots. Just because I am anti-redefining the term “marriage” does not mean I am anti-gay.

    I am anti-gay activist.

    I am becoming bigoted…… towards all activists.

  • [2] June 30, 2015 at 10:58pm

    At 53, I would never have imagined I would see the leader of the Free World so proud to embrace the redefinition of the term “marriage” (and by default, the term “spouse”, with all the unintended expenditure for entitlements/benefits for an un-forecast population…not to mention that all institutions can now come under attack for failing to adhere to the new definitions: government, military, industry, all manner of private sector businesses and universities as well as religions/churches/synagogues etc.).

    What an embarrassment.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 30, 2015 at 10:52pm

    Russia at least has a strong leader and values tradition….sounds like a good place to be an EX PAT.

  • [1] June 30, 2015 at 10:51pm

    To Lantern59,

    I hate to correct your post, but Barrack The Hussein will not “wet his pants”…he will wet the pants of his “buddy” who only has lowered the backside of his pants!!!!

  • [5] June 30, 2015 at 10:50pm

    We will show him a “red line” he is not to cross…Russkies hate RED as in RED COMMUNIST…this will scare them…if they cross said RED LINE…Obama will draw a rainbow colored line…….

  • [-1] June 30, 2015 at 10:35pm

    Because Conservative Talk Radio tends to be on AM, in my area.

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love