User Profile: crazedbanshee

crazedbanshee

Member Since: September 17, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [16] July 25, 2014 at 7:17pm

    Mr. Crow

    Please show some reference to these other experiments to describe the theorized preservation of this tissue. I would love to see what they used as a control and how they explain soft tissue not completely fossilizing over millions of years.

  • [5] July 23, 2014 at 2:07pm

    It is clear theft by the father. Look at the quote below and add that to what Balthazor pointed out.

    “Her father, Dr. Albrey Arrington, executive director of the Loxahatchee River District, said “we were all really amazed” over the findings.””

    What a scum bag.

    And Nab. You just lost all credibility to your claim as well. I skimmed through the article and picked up more than your reading twice.

  • [4] July 16, 2014 at 6:11pm

    I bet you make yourself laugh all the time.
    Since the woman was bludgeoned to death, I expect we will see some sort of protest from your friends to outlaw making a fist. But then what would we do with your banners?
    I will also expect that the protest will be a bunch of kids running down their street in underwear. (I guess if you can’t get people to join the real cause you may as well try to bolster your numbers with people that want to run around in their underwear)

  • [2] July 16, 2014 at 5:30pm

    Cavallo,

    You are also overlooking the fact that this move by Glenn, although fueled by charity, is also destroying the liberal argument against us. Their argument is that we are racist and hate these people, that is why we want them sent back. By showing them charity and requesting justice they have no ground to stand on.

    I know you don’t believe in God, nor Christ, it is why you don’t understand how both Charity and Justice can prevail.

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 3:05pm

    How can a non-living thing have an enemy? It is people that have enemies. Gov’t is only to serve the will of the people. If heads of the gov’t go against the will of the people then the heads of the gov’t have made themselves enemies of the people.

  • [5] July 7, 2014 at 4:25pm

    It looks like it was corrected. I am sure you supposed writing experts have never posted, realized a mistake and corrected. Your 13 year old daughter sounds stuck up. You sound like an enabler. Spelling and grammar rules change dramatically as time passes, yet somehow we can still read and understand things written with different rules. I guess your daughter is wasting her time on something that has little relevance. Good job, it obviously makes you proud. If you want her to do something useful guide her into computer language. That is a place where rules of the language really matter.

  • [1] June 24, 2014 at 3:22pm

    @Third Archon

    Um isn’t that the very definition of being “conservative”, decrying excess? It is also preserving tradition. You are confusing a political preference with an economic system. “Capitalism”

  • June 24, 2014 at 3:14pm

    Seriously think about what you just said. Then ponder on this: Do you really think that what you described is how Christ set up his church? Do you not think that Christ would set his church up in a way that lay ministers could serve and still maintain employment elsewhere to support a family? I guarantee you that he has. You need to keep searching buddy. You don’t need a degree to preach the gospel to a congregation, or gain a “higher” title, anyone who says otherwise is a liar. Authority comes from Christ.

  • June 24, 2014 at 3:00pm

    “(with BORROWED money–it’s not even someone else’s money, it IS the borrowers future money, AND they are taxed for the privilege of being forced to borrow it)”

    That is the most ridiculous logic I have ever heard. How can they posses something that they will have in the future now? If this is the logic that you and your friends follow, it is no wonder we have so many dimwits thinking that they own the world. It’s not about what they have earned, it is about what they think they will be worth in the future. What a total lack of understanding reality. Just unreal.

    In regards to your other statement. No one said they are living high on the hog, however the people living off of OTHER PEOPLES money usually do not care about their standard of living. They only care about basic needs. Many “philosophers” speak about finding happiness in simplicity. They revel in this simplicity, because they are free to “pursue their happiness”, without needing to work.

    Because of the easy money, and a large volume of freeloaders, the ones that really do work hard to better their position, have ridiculous tuition costs. As a result they are laden with debt for the majority of their lives. But don’t worry big brother has created another law to forgive the debt, er excuse me, the money that they gave themselves, after X amount of years.

  • [10] May 6, 2014 at 5:30pm

    elbee

    If you were smart enough you would realize it isn’t irony. It is symbolic. You also would have picked up on the fact that the e is located directly above the d. I know not much gets by you, but you may have also realized that losing is commonly misspelled and possibly realized that effect is commonly misused.

    You were only smart enough to look at the surface and ignore any depth.

    I have no respect for people that criticize for spelling and grammar, in a layman environment, and ignore everything else.

  • [2] May 5, 2014 at 2:41pm

    I love the mentality. “Cool Story Bro”, or “You Mad Bro”. Used to ignore facts and logic, then state your opinion as fact.

    Just those cliche phrases alone let me know to not even waste my time.

  • April 30, 2014 at 3:15pm

    Yep the negligent parents. The children WERE NOT in DCF custody. The DCF is being blamed because they allegedly didn’t respond SOON ENOUGH to REMOVE THE CHILDREN.

    To me it sounds like to many on this site that the DCF is guilty no matter what they do. Damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

  • April 30, 2014 at 3:09pm

    The title of the article is very misleading. The article is saying that the three children that died, died by the hands of an abusive person. The are placing blame on the department for not acting soon enough…(removing the children from the situation). How can you bash on them for acting in the Pelletier case, then on the other hand, bash them for not acting fast enough with the other children.
    From the comments it looks like the vast majority of you are completely lost.

    Responses (3) +
  • April 29, 2014 at 3:22pm

    Describe “fighting the good fight”. Using proper verbiage at the proper time is critical. Backing anyone who does not understand this, as a leader, will lose you the fight.

    Ask yourself this. Do i back Cliven Bundy?
    Cliven Bundy used poor verbiage to describe an opinion. Many here would still like to back him. John Kerry used poor verbiage to describe an opinion and we are calling for his resignation. Anyone who stands with Mr. Bundy while at the same time calls for the resignation of John Kerry is either a hypocrite or blind.

  • April 18, 2014 at 3:09pm

    1. I agree not a B2.
    2. The B2 is hella old now and certainly the shape of it is long past classified
    3. Spelling means nothing. Same goes for grammar. From my experience it is those that have no argument that even waste their time to bring it up.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:45pm

    Guess they don’t like go-nads, but penis is ok…go figure.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:43pm

    Adolph,
    Contrary to what you obviously think it is not a penis and vag that determine the sex, it is what gametes the ****** produce (sperm or egg). If we followed your logic the one that produces the egg would be the male and the one that has the sperm would be the female.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:30pm

    Third Archon-

    I will take the judges understanding of the New York constitution over yours. He states:
    “While plaintiffs may disagree with the governor’s and the legislature’s assessment of the need to act quickly, the governor included in his certificate a recitation of his reasons for urging speedy passage,” the judge said. “That is all the constitution requires.”

    Clearly it is more than just a nicety adopted by the legislature else why would the Judge cite a constitutional requirement?

    You went on some massive tangent about something you have no clue about, however if you had some reading comprehension you would have stopped yourself from looking like a fool…well maybe.

  • April 14, 2014 at 2:56pm

    zorro
    The initial protest (not paying the fees) was a protest against the right of the federal gov’t to own the land. It is clearly stated in the article.

  • April 14, 2014 at 2:53pm

    What is illegal about the claim?

123 To page: Go