User Profile: Crush_Liberalism
Member Since: January 22, 2012
CommentsDisplaying Crush_Liberalism's 10 most recent comments.
Channel Finder
Find TheBlaze on your TV
Channel Finder
TheBlaze is available on channel .
Spread the word!
If you can't find TheBlaze, please call to upgrade your package
Channel Finder
Unfortunately, TheBlaze is not available on .
But you can help! Call at or press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.
But you can help! Press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.
ContinueRequest TheBlaze
Please complete the form
Thank you for supporting TheBlaze
Interested in doing more? Spread the word about TheBlaze to your friends and family.
Spread the word!




















































































































‘Let Go of the System’: How Can Parents & Teachers Stop CSCOPE?
March 10, 2013 at 7:49am
TESLANDEDISON, “The indoctrination must continue so they can have more useful consumer idiots.”
MASTERFULLY said!
California Police Chief: ‘A Gun Is Not a Defensive Weapon — That Is a Myth’
February 15, 2013 at 10:45am
The Chief demonstrates his police-state philosophy, ““A gun is an offensive weapon used to INTIMIDATE and show POWER,” If THAT is not a communist, or fascist, exposing himself nothing else is. Because, entirely despite this man’s dogmatic proclamation of what a firearm is for, the FOUNDERS did not view it that way. They didn’t desire to empower government with ANY ability to “intimidate and show power”. Interestingly, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke has the completely opposite opinion. He said, “You can beg for mercy or you can fight back.” Notice, he says “YOU can fight back”, not “the GOVERNMENT can intimidate your attacker”. All California chief Ken James offers is a politically biased opinion that exposes his philosophy…POLICE STATE. “Intimidate…show POWER”. Exactly WHAT makes his opinion more valid than Sheriff Clarke’s?? Nothing…except that liberals are pro-police state, so they agree with James. Also interesting is the fact that Sheriff Clarke’s office is a CONSTITUTIONAL office in the state, where as an appointed chief of a municipal police department is not – James is an appointee of government. Sheriff Clarke is empowered by the constitution of Wisconsin and chosen by constitutional election. Amazing the difference there, no?
Dad Uses Half-Naked Pictures of His Own Daughter to Sell His 1977 Datsun on eBay — And Isn’t Sorry (UPDATE: Now Says He’s Not Her Father)
November 29, 2012 at 11:40am
FYI, he later admitted to a local news interviewer, that this woman is NOT actually his daughter.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2239968/Car-seller-used-half-naked-pictures-blonde-sell-1977-Datsun-admits-just-friend.html
Knife-Wielding Home Intruder Breaks Into Wrong Home, Greeted by .40 Cal Handgun
November 28, 2012 at 1:51pm
Patio, you cited Romans 13, which was speaking of the ruling government officials. Your quote is out of context, thus, invalid. Im a conservative, but if you are going to cite Scripture, cite it in context. That same text says to pay taxes to whom they are due, and honor those in authority…but bet you won;t quote it when talking about the America Revolution, which was over the unwillingness to pay taxes to whom they were due….just saying. (p.s. I am not a big-government type at ALL. I just get irritated when people do not “RIGHTLY handle the word of truth”.
Critics Go Berserk, Hurl Insults at Beck Over ‘Obama in Pee Pee’: ‘F**kwit,’ ‘Worse Than Feces’ & ‘Enjoy Hell’
November 28, 2012 at 1:46pm
People, you might as well STOP expecting equality from those who falsely claim to promote and value equality. They will ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, and ALWAYS have a spin on it to make it,somehow, “different” when such things are done with images or symbols of Obama (or other liberals), but entirely “expressive and acceptable” if done against symbols of Jesus or Christianity…it is just “different”, and always will be….according to THEM.
Which Liberal Radio Host Wishes an ‘Angel of the Lord’ Would Come Down and ‘Lob’ the Heads Off All the ‘Tea Bag Bastards’?
November 28, 2012 at 1:33pm
Yeah, the angel of the Lord would have SUCH a problem with the Tea Party because of their small government positions…He (the angel) would CLEARLY pass right over the MILLIONS responsible for (and defenders of the “right to”) the slaughter of babies in the wombs of their mothers…the blood of the unborn crying out “please don’t kill me. I will love you mommy, just don’t KILL me. I’m sorry for being here in an inconvenient season, I’m sorry for being conceived by a random encounter, I’m sorry for how I was conceived, but please don;t kill me – I just want to live and be loved”…yeah, the angel of the Lord would just glide right over the mega-millions of slaughtered unborn, butchered at the altar of lifestyle-convenience and instead, he would just slice away at the Tea Party folks (most of whom oppose the slaughter) instead . There will indeed be a Day of reckoning (Isaiah 13:9 “Behold, the day of the LORD comes, Cruel, with both wrath and fierce anger, To lay the land desolate; And He will destroy its sinners from it.”)
Which Liberal Radio Host Wishes an ‘Angel of the Lord’ Would Come Down and ‘Lob’ the Heads Off All the ‘Tea Bag Bastards’?
November 28, 2012 at 1:25pm
Excellent point!
Which Liberal Radio Host Wishes an ‘Angel of the Lord’ Would Come Down and ‘Lob’ the Heads Off All the ‘Tea Bag Bastards’?
November 28, 2012 at 1:24pm
No, you are a racist for pointing that out! Well, it makes sense when THEY say it, anyway!
Which Liberal Radio Host Wishes an ‘Angel of the Lord’ Would Come Down and ‘Lob’ the Heads Off All the ‘Tea Bag Bastards’?
November 28, 2012 at 1:23pm
And do we honestly expect anything DIFFERENT from the “tolerant, enlightened, intelligentsia” left? I mean, HONESTLY…why would we expect anything different?
The Twinkie Is Dead: Hostess to Close, 18K+ Layoffs Expected
November 16, 2012 at 11:51am
Funny how people say it is “good” that 18000+ Americans will lose their jobs (thanks largely to the AWESOME work of their Unions) because the product, if consumed in excess, is unhealthy. Sounds like the Nanny State folks of New York who clearly cannot be trusted to make wise choices for themselves so they NEED government to step in for them. And here, it is viewed as “good” that thousands more people will e on unemployment and food stamps because someone else might EAT TOO MUCH….that is the mind set that Obamanites generally have. It is “good” to lose so many American jobs (which generate TAX REVENUE…that thing which liberals worship) because they produce something that might be over-consumed….sheesh.