User Profile: CtznRespondent


Member Since: March 13, 2011


  • July 19, 2013 at 1:23pm

    Not all that familiar w the specifics of Joker’s take down. At what point did he receive the throat injury? I don’t see any throat injury in these leaked snaps.

  • July 8, 2013 at 2:03pm

    So what if the kid is a reprehensible person. Maybe the trooper is the best guy in the world when off duty. Either characterization is irrelevant to the matter at hand, which is what happened at the check point. The video evidence is crystal clear. Police state apologists are deluding themselves about this case.

  • July 8, 2013 at 1:40pm

    I cannot condemn the people defending the trooper or dismissing the “smart @$$” kid. Those people are simply victims of a society moving away from individual liberty, and towards an acceptance of blind obedience to authority, which is troubling.

    Yes, of course the kid was out to make a point. That IS the point. He’s acting from the founding father’s mindset concerning state authority and individual liberty. Watch it, Expose it, Oppose it!

    His premise was – Roll into this check point while recording, comply to the point of what is legally required, and let the chips fall were they may. The young man never swore, raised his voice or attached the character of the trooper. He was polite yet earnest. He simply asked the trooper legal questions, which ensure were developed to protect our constitutional rights.

    I contend the trooper was also making a point, you do not question my authority. The trooper then became aggressive, belligerent and overstepped his bounds to drive the point home. Both had points to make, but only the trooper acted illegally.

    Is it not obvious that the young man did in fact make his point crystal clear? Of course it is.

    Does the FBI not run entrapment operations where they drive the illegal activity in order to catch the bad guys that they setup in the first place? Yup.

    Why is it okay for the state to make random checks of drivers for illegal activity, but it’s not okay for a citizen to make a random check to make sure the state is

  • April 10, 2013 at 11:06am

    Are there any other current happenings that make you highly suspicious of the government? Please limit any reply to under 100 happenings for the sake of bit space. ; )

  • April 10, 2013 at 11:00am

    Do you suppose sovereign citizens have a training where they identify marxist megalomaniacs as a danger to the constitution, and that those persons should be carefully watched? Just wondering.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 9, 2013 at 5:19pm

    Really uncle Joe? A newspaper in NY recently published a list of all the CC permit holders in 3 counties using FOIA, but the feds can be trusted with the registration of all guns. C’mon man, that doesn’t pass the straight face test. The state is not our friend and they can’t be trusted.

  • March 28, 2013 at 4:17pm

    “What we’re proposing is not radical, it’s not taking away anybody’s gun rights.”

    No, it’s just setting up the mechanism to take gun rights away.

    “…necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

    Could the intent of the constitution by more clear than that?

  • [54] March 28, 2013 at 1:10pm

    I came to this story late, and I did not read all 600 something comments, but I read a hundred or so.

    This article doesn’t debunk a thing. For instance the astonishingly weird performance of Mr Palmer. Folks, I saw him laughing and then getting into character w my own eyes. The article mentions it, but then has no explanation for it. How is that debunking?

    Assassinating the character of people who have serious questions about a serious happening is not debunking. It’s suppressing. Why?

  • March 28, 2013 at 12:33pm

    And there just happened to be a guy fleeing the direction of the school wearing similar outfit as Lanza. And the coroner just happened to resign his post until they changed the rules so pediatric autopsies didn’t have to be released to the public a year before the shooting? Seriously, does any of this make sense? It’s public record check it out.

    When you are trying to get to the bottom of a suspicious situation a good place to start is asking yourself, Cui Bono. Who benefits? So who benefits here? The statists rolled out the gun grab rhetoric within moments of the shooting.

    I’m not claiming anything. I’m just saying the whole thing is suspicious. But, we can’t even raise questions because of the horror of the massacred children. How ’bout that?

  • March 28, 2013 at 12:17pm

    Yeah, but she’s not alive. Does that seem a bit convenient?

  • March 28, 2013 at 12:15pm

    Why print cartridges? You can press out “actual” rounds close to a hundred an hour rate with two hundred dollars worth of gear. Yes, this truly is a great country. Amen.

  • March 28, 2013 at 12:09pm

    This “report” comes out the same day as Obama hosts families of the Newtown shooting?

    That’s coordination. C’mon man, it’s kabuki theater folks. I think most people here recognize this.

    Can you please do us all a favor? Can you gently ask any of the zombies in your life if they think the timing related to any of this shooting stuff seems a bit manufactured, and then why that might be?

    We need to start handing out red pills asap.

    Responses (5) +
  • March 28, 2013 at 11:09am

    @13:35 Cody’s throwing up his double U’s. How ’bout that?

  • March 19, 2013 at 12:52pm

    The number of National Instant Checks (NIC) checks just about breaks a new record every month for years now. But, they know gun ownership is declining because of phone surveys? Really?

    Would you ever tell a stranger calling you out of the blue that you own guns? Have any of you gun owners received such a call? Hmmm, I guess you weren’t counted then. C’mon man. Does any of that pass the “straight face” test?

    Not to mention the fact that more guns (scary evil) in the hands of less people (racist wackos) fits the statist narrative to a T. As in, “of course we need to register all guns and their owners in order to know what they are up to because whatever it is, it must be a threat to the Union.”

    That’s profoundly Ironic considering they won’t give the people any rational answers as to why they are militarizing our domestic agencies. Answers for me but not for thee!

  • March 18, 2013 at 2:28pm

    Because no one is that bat crap crazy but you? Golly, where is an American Nigel Farage who can stand up and marginalize this woman for the fool she is?

    ‘Who the Hell You Think You Are?’ Nigel Farage throws egg in Eurocrat

    Responses (1) +
  • March 18, 2013 at 2:13pm

    Unwanted pregnancy is failure. Not minor failure like forgetting to put out the garbage, but the profound failure to take seriously the responsibility for creating a human life. Abortion is the convenient “fix” to extricate the involved individuals from the consequences of such profound failure. It’s a sweeping under the rug so to speak. It just is.

    Should people really be celebrating such abhorrent behavior? What kind of message does that send about taking responsibility for ones actions?

    Remember, shame is a powerful shaper of behavior. Is the effect of this type of celebration to reduce the inherent shame created by snuffing out life because you couldn’t control yourself? You bet it is, and it’s by design!

    What could be more shameful than that?

  • March 18, 2013 at 11:42am

    I’m in the video production biz. I can tell you that in a big time production like the Bible there is no such thing as a mistake, chance, or accident about what something looks like on screen, especially a pivotal character like Satan. The production new exactly what they wanted the Satan character to look like.

  • March 14, 2013 at 3:35pm

    What’s the first thing the bad guy says to his abducted victim? “Stay quiet!” Why? Because that’s the only way the bad guy can get away with his crime.

    So what if Cruz is brand new to the Senate. He’s got every right, heck, it’s his duty, to remind his fellow senators when they stray off the path set forth in the constitution.

    Finally, who’s really being condescending when someone calls someone else condescending? For the love of free humanity, please please stay strong Senator Cruz no matter how many entitled feathers you ruffle.

    Responses (48) +
  • March 12, 2013 at 1:36pm

    The real world is what we make of it. Will finds a way. What are you doing to create more will, besides giving up? Not a personal attack, simply an observation on your post and an innocent question.

  • March 12, 2013 at 1:20pm

    Creating more and better jobs?

    There are only two damn things the government can do that will lead to more and better jobs. Lower taxes and less regulation. That’s it, period, over and out. It just is folks.

    Is there anyone seriously talking about doing those two things in Washington? I’m not talking lip service, I’m talking serious political will that has a chance to go somewhere. The answer is No, of course not. So what can we deduce from this observation?

    That everything you are seeing in Washington is political theater, cronyism, pocket lining, and backside coverage. Or in other words public posturing for personal profit.

    Let’s not kid ourselves. That’s a crystal clear explanation of the situation, and we’re allowing it.

    Responses (1) +