TheBlaze readers wanted to do bodily harm to the headline writer of this story.
 May 23, 2015 at 1:24am
Why is Mr. Huckabee coming to the defense of a then 15-year-old boy that molested his sisters and others? Is Huckabee part of the leadership of the Family Research Council? It looks to me like the FRC leadership didn’t do its job when it hired Druggar.
I’ll be honest with you. I don’t want to have anything to do with child molesters, and I really don’t feel sorry for them when they get caught and then struggle later in life. I have more forgiveness in my heart for drug dealers and murders than I do for child molesters.
Don;t we first have to actually define what "molestation" actually occurred (especially when it comes to children "molesting" other children)? Also, what was the age of the victims?
Perhaps you have more information than I do. I have never watched this show and know nothing about the actual facts. I just wonder and, I think the severity must be taken into account. I also hear pedophilia mentioned here. Unless we know the ages, of both parties, isn't that POSSIBLY a stretch?
Wow, what other sins do you feel God will not forgive? And if God forgives and you do not, where's that leave you in the end?
I have worked many years with abused neglected children and their abuser. One thing certain, a person who is what most would call "a pervert"... does not change, nor do they want to. They all leave a pattern of continued abuse. This guy has been in a fish bowl with both DHS and law enforcement watching him. Over a decade, nothing.
This is no more than a curious teen who made bad thoughtless mistakes. Thus is the definition of teen. But he has not reoffended. And that more than anything, defines youthful misdirected curiosity from a hardened disordered behavior.
I love the internet, but nothing brings out the lynch mob behavior more than this.
 May 21, 2015 at 5:07pm
I bought a used truck and got a great deal because the bed is all banged to s hit. According to the guy I bought it from, his “wife” couldn’t back it up with a trailer.
 May 20, 2015 at 6:47pm
She could BBQ live kittens in the Rose Garden and the press would report how wonderful it is that Hillary was doing something to raise PETA awareness, and then make charges that Republicans only care about kittens when they can take shots at Hillary.
 May 19, 2015 at 1:19am
I’m an atheist and that story even brought a tear to my eye. What a wonderful little boy.
 May 18, 2015 at 5:46pm
That was my thought exactly (assuming well written and very informative was sarcastic). Is he really still married? Did they breakup? Is there some other reason for not getting married?
Come on TheBlaze — your spelling and grammar has been getting better, but now your forgetting to answer WHY. This is journalism 101.
You mean you're forgetting. Replace with you are to see if it makes sense.
One must be careful to spell correctly and use proper grammar when commenting on spelling and grammar.
As far as answering the question, if the family wanted the world to know I'm pretty sure Sarah would have spelled it out in her Facebook message. I appreciate the fact that The Blaze chose to not stick their nose into what is most likely a painful personal matter right now.
We all knew what you meant. Dumbdiego is extremely anal. Apparently, dumbdiego wanted to stick his nose into their painful personal matter....he IS here reading the story after all. Or is he only here to check every ones grammar, spelling and punctuation? No worries... I can keep him occupied with all my gaffs.
Uh....Dondiego, you need to check "your" (possessive) book of grammar because Daithi's use of "your" is correct..... "yours" is incorrect. You're is a contraction, as in two words: "you are". "You are spelling and grammar has been getting better...." is not proper.
Before you criticize or correct someone, be sure "you're" correct.
Borissgal - Dondiego was referring to the second "your". "Your forgetting...." really should be "you're (you are) forgetting". He even states that in his first sentence. Other than that, yes, you are correct :) Also, make sure that you are correct too. :)
 May 17, 2015 at 9:24pm
I was drinking a beer in the bar the other night and heard some Muslim guy talking about how there were over a billion Muslims now. Then I overhear a guy behind me say to one of his friends, “Wait until we really start playing cowboys and Muslims.”
May 17, 2015 at 2:49am
That was the only one I wasn’t sure about either — 1919 or 1923? Had to guess.
 May 15, 2015 at 4:11pm
In other words, he’s on a football scholarship.
 May 12, 2015 at 10:02pm
I gave your comment a thumbs up — even though I know I wouldn’t have returned the items to the previous owner.
I gave him a thumbs down. It is an estate sale and the person selling it obviously had not idea, just a big faceless person that failed to examine it first.
May 11, 2015 at 6:27pm
Jews involved in mass killing during WWII.
 May 9, 2015 at 8:26pm
It’s kind of like kids wearing t-shirts with flags on Cinco de Mayo. Apparently, it is inflammatory, or a micoaggression, or other such nonsense if you wear attire that supports traditional values instead of embracing the “progressive” beliefs of the left.
 May 9, 2015 at 8:08pm
I agree darkeningskies. That lady also didn’t seem too nervous to me. She seemed ticked off to being detained for no real reason.
Additionally, what gives them the right to detain you, or confiscate your vehicle, while they wait for a dog. If they didn’t have a K9 unit on site then too bad. Either arrest me on legitimate charges or get out of my way — and no you can’t have my car.
I wonder what the Colonist would have thought of British stopping random people on horseback and inspecting their bags at random — or for being “nervous”. The 4th amendment seems to mean about as much as the 10th. Just ignore it. No one will care.
 May 9, 2015 at 7:45pm
Here it is in a nutshell — we have millions of illegal aliens crossing the border who have little skills, education, and can barely speak English (if it all). What is Lindsey Graham’s solution? Give them citizenship, because that’ll help the Republican party. What!!?!? How many times was this guy struck with the stupid stick?
 May 8, 2015 at 6:29pm
Most people don’t realize it, but every dollar of taxes the government takes is a dollar of taxes taken out of the economy, which can no longer be used to pay wages, or raises, or expand the business and hire more people.
It infuriates me to no end every time I hear some “journalist” ask a Republican how they are going to pay for those tax cuts. No my friend, you have it backwards. Ask the Democrats how many people they are willing to layoff to pay for their social programs.
May 8, 2015 at 6:18pm
I’d rather they stole from me when I’m dead than stealing it while I’m still alive.
May 8, 2015 at 6:12pm
Indagila, I get you point, but it still doesn’t change things. People should earn what they get based on their effort and merit — not on inheritance. If a father wants to pass his family farm (or other business) down to his children then form a family partnership, or family corporation, and let his kids earn their ownership through years of working on the farm/business. That is the way it should be.
BTW, I have actually worked on a family farm as a teenage (my uncle’s farm). It is hard work. I can also tell you that NONE of my uncle’s kids wanted to work 16 hour days of hard labor to keep his farm going (nor would I).
Corporate farms also are not evil. They’re actually much more efficient and productive than the family farm — just like Walmart, Amazon, and Home Depot are not evil, and have resulted in much lower prices, and better selection, than the family run corner store, bookstore, and hardware store. Don’t fear the change — or at least enough fear mongering please.
"People should earn what they get based on their effort and merit — not on inheritance. If a father wants to pass his family farm (or other business) down to his children then form a family partnership, or family corporation, and let his kids earn their ownership through years of working on the farm/business. That is the way it should be."
And what right do you have to determine "the way it should be" regarding the property of others? Your position is nothing more than your personal valuation. Why do you think that it should have any priority over the wishes of the person who actually owns the property and wants to grant it to his loved ones? YOU earned none of it, yet you think you have some claim on how it should be dispensed.
May 8, 2015 at 5:57pm
mtsnj, I’m not arguing that government needs more taxes. In fact, if I had my way, the only source of taxes would come from death taxes, and government would be reduced to only providing for guaranteeing our liberty — i.e. national defense and a federal court system. So your offering a red herring as an argument. The question is what is the fairest source of taxation?
"The question is what is the fairest source of taxation?"
There is no fair tax, since by definition it is taken involuntarily by men with guns. Additionally, taxation under a democratic style government has the moral hazard so obvious in your position. Your position isn't one of "fairness" -granted "fair" is a completely subjective term -but a position of personal benefit. In a democratic system, where men are allowed to vote on taxes, the populace tend to want the benefits of taxes, but not the burden, so they vote to tax others. Tax the dead rich guy, not me! That's fair.
 May 8, 2015 at 5:29pm
Yep, the Serpicos, and apparently good apples too.
 May 8, 2015 at 5:21pm
That’s what I was thinking. He wasn’t just nailing a teacher, he was nailing the principal, and getting high with her too. That’s impressive.