User Profile: DamoclesAurelius


Member Since: November 01, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • April 16, 2015 at 10:31pm

    Ok here is the history of the term.

    The term “Neo conservative” originated during FDR’s term when he was pushing for his New Deal. In order to increase its popularity FDR tried to get “new conservatives” who would be for it (but who were still socially conservative). The definition later expanded to refer to anyone who is socially conservative, but likes the same types of fiscal and regulatory policies (I.e big government) as liberals.

    And now you know!

  • [6] April 7, 2015 at 5:48pm


    Responses (1) +
  • [8] March 19, 2015 at 5:46pm

    It takes a pretty intellectually dishonest person to accuse someone of ONLY being concerned about the political backlash because that’s the ONLY consequence they listed. That or you’re stupid.

    So which is it commie? You a dummy or a liar?

  • [13] March 19, 2015 at 5:40pm

    I don’t know if the KKK is “liberal” or “conservative” as we use the terms today.

    But I do know that Progressive Liberal icon Woodrow Wilson supported the KKK and even aired the KKK propaganda film “birth of a nation” from the White House lawn. Progressive liberal democrat Robert Byrd was member of the KKK and progressive liberal LBJ was an avid racist who opposed civil rights.

  • [-1] March 12, 2015 at 11:03pm

    If you only defend free speech when you are talking about action by the government, do you really believe in free speech?

  • [1] March 12, 2015 at 11:01pm

    Cavallo is correct: outside the US, the comparison of a person to a monkey does not have the racial undertones it has here in the states, because they do not share our history of racial strife. My wife (who is from South America) learned this lesson the hard way when she made a similar remark about an ex-girlfriend (who happened to be black). Good thing for her, she only said it in front of me so it was easily corrected and has never happened again.

    Hispanics will say you look like in a monkey if they see the resemblance, regardless of your race. It has no racial undertones. Univision is overreacting, probably due to pressure from white, ignorant liberals.

  • [9] March 11, 2015 at 11:56am

    Here is a story of a true disciple of Christ, who supped with prostitutes and publicans, saints and sinners, and called all to repentance with love and meekness. God bless this man for his charity!

  • [12] March 7, 2015 at 2:39pm

    A prominent conservative -who writes for national review which is an establishment republican/Neo-conservative rag- criticizes a tea party favorite for not engaging in the politics of the day.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] February 17, 2015 at 11:24pm

    “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;” 2 Timothy 4:3

    “Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
    From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
    Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
    But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
    Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
    For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
    According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.” 1 Timothy 1:6-11

  • [4] February 14, 2015 at 12:27pm

    All the people in the crowd yelling “allahu ackbar”?

    Just taze them bro!

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] February 5, 2015 at 8:29pm

    Federalist Restoration Party.

    Responses (3) +
  • February 4, 2015 at 7:07am

    Two words. Wesley. Snipes.

    Three words actually: dumbass.

  • [2] February 4, 2015 at 4:19am

    “Godwin’s law” is all I have to say…

    Responses (5) +
  • [18] February 3, 2015 at 5:48pm

    @rabid, pg, and jd (Larry, curly, and moe?), your comments demonstrate a bias and ignorance typical of the left. You would compare the government FORCING a potentially dangerous chemcial that cures a disease into your body with banning a potentially dangerous chemcial that CAUSES a disease-like condition. And then you expect us to believe you are the bastions of reason and liberty?

    I’d tell you to “stfu” but even idiots have the right to their own opinions.

  • [-1] February 3, 2015 at 12:45pm

    His anger and confusion and outrage are understandable, if only human. We live in a world of choices, both good and bad. Suffering exists, just like joy exists, so that we can learn to choose rightly in the face of adversity and temptation. It is this gift of free will that makes our choices special: we can choose to do good in spite of the evil we see around us, or we can use suffering as an excuse to choose poorly. But in the end, the choice is ours.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 3, 2015 at 12:38pm

    Of course, the lack of advancement in internet speed has NOTHING to do with FCC regulations that restrict how many and how much telecommunications companies can develop in an area…right?

  • [7] February 2, 2015 at 2:51pm

    First off, who has ever heard of fines for holocaust deniers? Not in America that’s for sure.

    Second: are we really going to compare imaginary fines to real-life murders?

    Just more proof that Iran is a nuthouse run by the inmates.

  • January 29, 2015 at 12:32am

    The problem is your (intellectually lazy and flawed) interpretation of Deut 18:21-22.

    Compare to Jeremiah 18:1, 7-10

    The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying…At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;

    If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.

    And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it;

    If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.”

    In other words: prophecy is contingent upon the choices of mortals.

    I could regale you with all the other examples of how your use of the scripture is completely and utterly hamfisted and inept, but here’s a link that does that for me, instead.

    “The purpose in raising this example is not to question the wisdom of the Lord, nor the truthfulness of the Bible, but to point out that an overly critical attitude and a black-and-white application of Deut. 18:22 may reject even true, Biblical prophets. If we try hard enough to find reasons to reject a prophet, we will surely succeed, but we must beware lest we judge unwisely and reject those whom God has sent and anointed. “

  • January 29, 2015 at 12:22am

    ///I love how people resort to immature name calling to defend a position, instead of facts. A true sign of wisdom and intelligence. The apostle Paul penned many a letter starting with “You Punk!”///

    If you prefer, I could follow the Savior’s example and call you a fool and a hypocrite if you prefer…Or maybe John the Baptist’s and refer you as a pit of vipers?

    //How many of his prophecies came true? Unless it was one hundred percent, he would and should be labeled as a false prophet, and the Mormon faith is nothing but a con game.//

    Why don’t we cut to the chase, and you can list the ones you think were false?

    Before you go that route tho, understand that, by your criteria, Jonah was a false prophet: He prophesied that Nineveh would be destroyed in 40 days (Jonah 3:4). It wasn’t. Likewise, Isaiah prophesied that King Ahaz of Judah would not see harm (Isaiah 7:1-7). He clearly did according to 2 Chronicles 28:1-8. And let’s not forget the countless prophecies of the last days that have YET to be fulfilled (including some by Christ Himself). Will you argue that those prophecies (and the prophets who gave them) are false because they haven’t come true…YET?

    Double standard much?

    And where are your prophets? You know, the ones that Paul said should exist ” Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”…something that hasn’t happened yet..

  • [3] January 28, 2015 at 10:46am

    Mormons not only follow Christ’s teachings, they do a better job than some other Christians. I am willing and able to debunk every point you make. The issue is…will YOU listen? Challenge accepted, punk.

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love