User Profile: DamoclesAurelius


Member Since: November 01, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] February 17, 2015 at 11:24pm

    “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;” 2 Timothy 4:3

    “Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
    From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
    Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
    But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
    Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
    For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
    According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.” 1 Timothy 1:6-11

  • [4] February 14, 2015 at 12:27pm

    All the people in the crowd yelling “allahu ackbar”?

    Just taze them bro!

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] February 5, 2015 at 8:29pm

    Federalist Restoration Party.

    Responses (3) +
  • February 4, 2015 at 7:07am

    Two words. Wesley. Snipes.

    Three words actually: dumbass.

  • [2] February 4, 2015 at 4:19am

    “Godwin’s law” is all I have to say…

    Responses (5) +
  • [18] February 3, 2015 at 5:48pm

    @rabid, pg, and jd (Larry, curly, and moe?), your comments demonstrate a bias and ignorance typical of the left. You would compare the government FORCING a potentially dangerous chemcial that cures a disease into your body with banning a potentially dangerous chemcial that CAUSES a disease-like condition. And then you expect us to believe you are the bastions of reason and liberty?

    I’d tell you to “stfu” but even idiots have the right to their own opinions.

  • [-1] February 3, 2015 at 12:45pm

    His anger and confusion and outrage are understandable, if only human. We live in a world of choices, both good and bad. Suffering exists, just like joy exists, so that we can learn to choose rightly in the face of adversity and temptation. It is this gift of free will that makes our choices special: we can choose to do good in spite of the evil we see around us, or we can use suffering as an excuse to choose poorly. But in the end, the choice is ours.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 3, 2015 at 12:38pm

    Of course, the lack of advancement in internet speed has NOTHING to do with FCC regulations that restrict how many and how much telecommunications companies can develop in an area…right?

  • [7] February 2, 2015 at 2:51pm

    First off, who has ever heard of fines for holocaust deniers? Not in America that’s for sure.

    Second: are we really going to compare imaginary fines to real-life murders?

    Just more proof that Iran is a nuthouse run by the inmates.

  • January 29, 2015 at 12:32am

    The problem is your (intellectually lazy and flawed) interpretation of Deut 18:21-22.

    Compare to Jeremiah 18:1, 7-10

    The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying…At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;

    If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.

    And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it;

    If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.”

    In other words: prophecy is contingent upon the choices of mortals.

    I could regale you with all the other examples of how your use of the scripture is completely and utterly hamfisted and inept, but here’s a link that does that for me, instead.

    “The purpose in raising this example is not to question the wisdom of the Lord, nor the truthfulness of the Bible, but to point out that an overly critical attitude and a black-and-white application of Deut. 18:22 may reject even true, Biblical prophets. If we try hard enough to find reasons to reject a prophet, we will surely succeed, but we must beware lest we judge unwisely and reject those whom God has sent and anointed. “

  • January 29, 2015 at 12:22am

    ///I love how people resort to immature name calling to defend a position, instead of facts. A true sign of wisdom and intelligence. The apostle Paul penned many a letter starting with “You Punk!”///

    If you prefer, I could follow the Savior’s example and call you a fool and a hypocrite if you prefer…Or maybe John the Baptist’s and refer you as a pit of vipers?

    //How many of his prophecies came true? Unless it was one hundred percent, he would and should be labeled as a false prophet, and the Mormon faith is nothing but a con game.//

    Why don’t we cut to the chase, and you can list the ones you think were false?

    Before you go that route tho, understand that, by your criteria, Jonah was a false prophet: He prophesied that Nineveh would be destroyed in 40 days (Jonah 3:4). It wasn’t. Likewise, Isaiah prophesied that King Ahaz of Judah would not see harm (Isaiah 7:1-7). He clearly did according to 2 Chronicles 28:1-8. And let’s not forget the countless prophecies of the last days that have YET to be fulfilled (including some by Christ Himself). Will you argue that those prophecies (and the prophets who gave them) are false because they haven’t come true…YET?

    Double standard much?

    And where are your prophets? You know, the ones that Paul said should exist ” Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”…something that hasn’t happened yet..

  • [3] January 28, 2015 at 10:46am

    Mormons not only follow Christ’s teachings, they do a better job than some other Christians. I am willing and able to debunk every point you make. The issue is…will YOU listen? Challenge accepted, punk.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] January 28, 2015 at 10:42am

    A Mormon church IS a Christian church you nitwit.

  • [1] January 27, 2015 at 11:14am

    Sorry Rand, but you are both right and wrong: Mitt won’t win but it has nothing to do with his ability to “reach out to new constituencies”. We need a presidential candidate who can energize conservatives and libertarians, who make up the majority of this country, into participating. We need someone who will roll back and restore the Constitution to the pre-progressive years (no income tax and no popular vote for senators). We need someone who will pledge and keep that pledge to get rid of corruption in D.C. I dont care if he appeals to blacks, whites, hispanics or asians, as long as he appeals to freedom loving men and women of all races, creeds, and tongues.

  • [5] January 19, 2015 at 11:47pm

    Her view is a very moderate one, truth be told. She is not blaming men for looking when enticed, nor is she holding women responsible for every sexual thought, lust or deed committed by men. She is holding herself responsible for what she herself can control -a mature and wise position for anyone- by deciding that she will not be a stumbling block for other men by wearing immodest clothing designed to elicit certain desires and urges in others, while allowing others to decide for themselves where to draw the line.
    Who can find fault with such a position?

  • [3] January 19, 2015 at 5:45pm

    Travis you clearly did not read the bible. There are TEN plagues, all of which are scientifically plausible; whether you believe that they happened or is another story. And I bet you believe in man-made global warming, but a weather phenomenon that parts the red (reed) sea is impossible? And the jews didnt wander because they were lost. They knew where the promised land was, but the Lord denied it to them for a generation for unbelief. They were a nomadic people until then.

  • [15] January 19, 2015 at 5:40pm

    As a Christian I believe the biblical account because of a spiritual witness, not an academic one. But even so, stories like this always are nice because they reassure one’s faith.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] January 16, 2015 at 5:54pm

    Haha very funny Blaze. When did you start posting articles from The Onion?

  • [7] January 14, 2015 at 11:58am

    //Since when did intolerance and discrimination become part of natural law? //

    It’s called “freedom of conscience” you twit. Natural law simply means that I cannot act to do another harm. It does not mean I MUST act to one’s benefit.

    “That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations…that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor’s benefit”. Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892)

  • [1] January 10, 2015 at 11:09am

    Anyone else notice his other run ins with the law seem to involve his significant other? Either he has some domestic issues that need resolving, or he is hooking up with some vindictive, bat-shiz crazy people.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love