we actually like Carson because no far right religious kook will ever be elected by moderates-
 November 5, 2015 at 1:37pm
Longer than 18 months because a logical accompanying plan would be to disable the South Korean and German plants.
G. Gordon Liddy warned of the grid’s vulnerability almost 20 years ago in an article he published 20 some years ago.
November 2, 2015 at 10:47pm
Bring it on tea boy tapper.
[-2] November 2, 2015 at 12:31pm
Watch a show called “Genesis Week.”
I won’t say it proves Intelligent Design.
But it sure points out some nasty flaws in evolution that are never brought up in school.
Transitional fossils for instance.
Or one of evolutionists dirty little unsolved secrets, that fossils AREN’T found in descending/ascending layers as we’ve always been told.
Something I remember learning, (Which you might want to ask your kids if they are still being taught.)was that sediment laid down over time covered animals and eventually fossilized them.
Our teachers never seemed to think, if it takes thousand of years to lay down an inch of sediment, (For argument’s sake let’s say it could be done in a year.) How long does any carcass lay around before scavengers have shredded it and scattered the bones?
And how accurate is Carbon 14 dating?
Lasting only a 100 thousand years, there shouldn’t be any in fossils, and especially not diamonds, yet there is.
And that uranium creating C 14theory has been dis-proven.
The earth and the universe are indeed older than we know but evolution is an absurdity that is beyond common sense and actual real science proves it is false! Mathematics the most solid of the sciences prove evolution to be absurdly impossible! But the reason most people hold on to that lie is that they refuse to believe. You must follow science where it leads and dawkins is clearly unable to do so!
- Fossils are found in sedimentary layers, and yes, occasionally fossils can be found outside of layers in which they formed (due to erosion and reburial). A great example of this is the petrified trees found in the Grand Canyon region.
- Sedimentation happens at different rates. For example, during a seasonal flood situation, an animal can be buried in sediments quite rapidly – before it can be scavenged. In China, there is a great site for dinosaur finds where the carcases were quickly covered by volcanic ash, preserving very fine details – like feathers. In the case of larger animals, predation of the fossilized corpse likely has occurred - but the bones were left behind.
- C14 dating is accurate to ~50K years and the study deterimining C14 levels of diamonds was debunked long ago. It came down to methodology and tools used ..
"I won't say it proves Intelligent Design"
ID is nothing but 'let's call creationism something else and lie about it', the Discovery Institute was caught red handed basically just changing the world "creation" to "intelligent design" in some of their own literature, and the Dover trial, which they could not even be bothered to attend and defend their own lie, pretty much sank ID as anything even remotely close to credible from a scientific perspective.
'And that uranium creating C 14theory has been dis-proven.'
 October 27, 2015 at 9:08am
I want to know the whole story.
Cause while I’ve NEVER personally seen a cop being an arse…
I’ve seen LOTS of teenagers I’d have no problem giving a swift boot up theirs.
October 26, 2015 at 6:47pm
How about you libs can it with setting limits on conservatives?
You don’t accept limits we want, so put a sock in it.
I just don’t understand how you can’t see the difference between a baby in the womb and a murderer.
Explain why there is no difference.
We can tell you why there is.
A baby has had no choice in its conception, and has not, by choice, harmed anybody.
A murderer has, by choice, harmed somebody, and usually has had some twenty years after the fact to live, before being put to death.
Why can’t a baby be at least given 9 months, so it can be adopted?
 October 26, 2015 at 12:54pm
Even here, you can’t follow a logic path.
You admit it’s an irrelevant point, then fail to see it’s ALWAYS liberals who bring capitol punishment up.
Pro Live supporters don’t up BECAUSE it’s irrelevant.
You even conclude by trying to make it sound like WE always bring c.p. up.
Let’s turn things around.
If abortionists have no problem killing a baby, that’s really done nothing but inconvenience a woman because that’s what the pro abortion argument is: “It’s not the right time for me to have a child.”
The baby is an inconvenience..
If so, then why is it such a big issue to execute a proven murderer who has really inconvenience society, and at least one person big time?
Pro Abortion supporters walk away sputtering, because they have no valid line of logic.
So they throw a snit.
 October 25, 2015 at 6:34pm
Since by liberal logic, gun manufacturers should be sued for gun crimes.
And law abiding citizens should be prohibited from owning and using firearms…
Then why can’t the creators and companies of social media, like Facebook, Twitter, Google and Youtube be sued for allowing their “products” to commit hate crimes?
Maybe we shouldn’t be allowed to use social media, or even the net, until we’re licensed and have taken some kind of safe social media handling course.
Same with phone companies for that matter. Sue them if a phone is used in, or during, a crime.
How many have been committed with guns, compared committed using phones or the net?
Kids been exposed to porn, and are sexting.
What about those accidents caused by people not watching where they’re going?
Or company $$ wasted cause employees have to check their texts every two seconds.
Or the suicides resulting from online bullying.
But that’s getting off on a tangent.
Google, Facebook, and social media have far more control over their product than gun manufacturers do.
So they better get their act together or admit gun manufacturers and law abiding citizens are not responsible for some twit using their product for nefarious means.
 October 25, 2015 at 6:18pm
The proof Trump is a liberal, is he argues like one.
If we’re going to go down the mud slinging road, I don’t Dr. Carson has ever taken someone else’s property.
I think Dr. Carson has a higher percentage of customer satisfaction.
And I haven’t seen Dr. Carson engage in mud slinging.
And how the heck does “Not have created a job” in any way, shape, or form, detract from one being the top of his profession?
If you want to get into it, unless we get a list of all the lives Dr. Carson has touched, how do we not know he hasn’t inspired people to invent new medical techniques, or to bust their humps to climb out of poverty?
He may not have created jobs, but he certainly has created dreams and THAT is what builds societies.
Plus I think Trump is a pompous arse and Dr. Carson isn’t.
 October 25, 2015 at 5:58pm
I think Dr. Carson has such a decent view of things the lefties simply cannot comprehend him.
It’s like trying to describe the difference between a Van Gogh and a Renoir, to someone who’s been blind from birth.
And you want to have some fun?
Here’s how to stump a liberal.
Inevitably, when discussing your pro life stance, someone is going to ask about your stance on capitol punishment.
My response has been I’m for it, and then they “Ha, you hypocrite!”
So then I tell them, “Okay. Since we can’t settle this “life” bit, it’s best to err on the side of caution, so… I’ll give up capitol punishment if you give up abortion.”
What you're missing though is that when we ask your stance on capital punishment, we're challenging your belief that "all life is sacred" (as is the usual refrain, anyway), not our own beliefs.
Yes, we have no interest in giving up abortion, but then again, we're not the ones claiming every life is precious.
If your "argument" sends libs sputtering, it's probably because we're just annoyed that you wasted our time making an irrelevant point.
How about thinking about it equally? Stop killing period? How about thinking about unconditional support for the innocent? Why should they be ignored in this tug of war? I've started the petition "A Federal mandate from Democrats and Republicans: Protect Innocent Life" and need your help to get it off the ground.
Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link:
Here's why it's important:
It is time to stop the right/left argument about abortion. We morally need to rise up and protect the innocent who do not have any voice in their best interest's. Join me and supporting free, fully funded pregnancy and the unconditional economic support of all innocent life, from birth to age of consent and eliminate the burden of economic need driving abortion and the suffering of poor innocent children. Moving beyond taking 'undeveloped life' or abandoning post birth 'developed life', this is the ultimate and logical "pro-life" position.
That was one of the more brilliant logical arguments I've seen on this issue.
I'm perfecctly willing to give up capital punishment if the belivers in abortion will give up on their pathetic passion for abortions.
 October 23, 2015 at 7:54pm
I bet every one interviewed, heck everybody in the entire protest voted Dumbocrat.
Which explains why Odumba got re-elected.
Thing is, we have the same dopes in Canada, cause they just voted Trudope in.
 October 21, 2015 at 4:39pm
And the fact you have socialist in your user name is proof you know nothing about anything that IS socialism.