I haven’t watched this show enough, missed the introductions, and don’t want to waste time looking but..
Is she a liberal?
Cause that was a typical liberal attack. Roe v. Wade.
Conservatives just don’t want our tax dollars to fund abortion.
We can’t stop people really wanting an abortion any more than we can stop people who really want to commit murder or fraud or theft
All we want to do, is say “Pay for your own mistakes.”
That’s the difference between liberals and conservatives.
Liberals are sheep. They need safety in numbers because they are “Doing it” and thinking “If I can get someone else to pay for messing up, I don’t have to worry cause everybody messes up.”
The thing is, conservatives, true conservatives that is, believe in being responsible for their actions, and a few hits to the wallet means they with try not to commit the same mistakes. Which means they NEVER take as much from the pot as people who just won’t learn, a.k.a. liberals.
Things collapse when the responsible group gives up and starts taking as much as the irresponsible group.
Another name for this condition is socialism/communism.
You can’t “stop” investigative journalists from releasing such information.
The only thing you can do is sue them, to say they lied.
Which of course means you must open yourself and your records, to official scrutiny but…
The SS– I mean– the PP, has nothing to hide anyway, right?
From what I'm reading some of the filming occurred in California which could violate laws against secret recordings. Additionally some of the filming could have been in restricted/secure areas where filming could be a violation of patent privacy laws. So it looks like CMP is going to get hit with the sort of laws that Republicans put in place to stop animal rights groups from doing stings on cattle/chicken/pig farms. What goes around, comes around I guess.
July 29, 2015 at 2:27pm
So far I haven’t seen any patients, so privacy hasn’t been violated any more than as if someone had done an internal sting video on a company accused of dumping pollutants or abusing animals.
ALL sting videos are obtained in this manner so stop your whining. Especially since the right is finally turning the left’s tactics back on them.
And other than being Prolife, what exactly is the connection to Tillman? And the abortion center bombings.
That’ like saying anybody who is pro 2nd Amendment is associated with psycho killer– Oh wait the loonie left believes that too.
And what’s horrified the public is the flippant attitude, the joviality of the PP employees when discussing this.
It’s EXACTLY the same attitude the Nazis had about killing the Jews. They absolutely didn’t consider Jews to be human beings.
Maybe they are saying the fetuses are patients, now wouldn't that be something...since they treat them as garbage otherwise.
 July 24, 2015 at 6:32pm
If it wasn’t an honest mistake, then it was a blatant sign of the under 30′s generation’s morals.
They seem to think they “deserve” more, better, the best even, without earning it.
And if they don’t get it?
It’s payback time.
The only time too many of them see any value in a piece of property, is when it’s someone else’s, and they can get revenge by trashing it.
We used to be taught to treat other people’s property better than our own, but I’d bet that concept lost on most that age.
Many of my friends have tried to retire a number of times, but former employers keep begging them to stay, often offering crazy amounts of money, because our generation saves far more $$$ in repair bills and downtime.
Paraphrasing that old 60′s saying, I think the new version will be, “You can’t trust anybody UNDER 30.”
 July 21, 2015 at 8:58am
Hate to be a party pooper but…
Several years ago, during a home run competition, I think it was Macquire who broke Hank Aaron’s record, and the kid who caught the ball returned it to Macguire, and since sports collectors valued the ball at a quarter million bucks, the IRS tried (Don’t know if they won) to get the taxes from said quarter mil out of the kid.
So if these people give a 600 G place away, won’t the IRS come after them?
Yes. People still have to pay taxes on it. It’s considered a prize in a contest, and you have to pay taxes on prizes you win and gifts you receive. This was one of the first things I learned in economics: you have to pay taxes on Christmas presents if they are over a certain dollar amount in estimated value.
The same problem happens to people who win the HGTV Dream Home contests. They would build these amazing million dollar houses and give them away in a contest, but the people who were winning weren’t millionaires, so when the tax bill came along (which was usually between $150,000 and $400,000) the people had to sell their Dream Home prize just to pay the taxes.
People in England used to get around this kind of tax system by estimating that their house was worth a certain number of beans, rather than estimating the value in money. So if your house was worth $200,000 the estimate would say it was worth 200 beans. It was code, so people could get around paying taxes on their properties.
 July 20, 2015 at 12:49pm
A friend told me something he did the first time his son flopped down on the floor and threw a screaming tantrum for not getting what he wanted.
He threw a cup of water in the kid’s face.
The sputtering kid was shocked, and never did it again.
And some thirty years later the kid is a multi millionaire running his own company, because of a no nonsense work ethic instilled by his father.
 July 10, 2015 at 4:42pm
It is the job of scientists, yes.
Just one problem.
What if scientists have an agenda.
They’re in “consensus” about Global Warming for instance.
And as I explained before here, scientists are not supposed to do “consensus.”
They’re supposed to do everything possible to SHRED the work of scientists in their field, by review and conducting experiment to disprove.
For example, if all Carbon 14 should have left something by 1/4 million years, and if all diamonds were formed billions of years ago, why is there C 14 in diamonds?
Some scientist has something wrong about C 14 Dating, yet we still use it religiously. (Pardon the pun.)
 July 8, 2015 at 11:39am
Why is it liberals can’t understand that a stranger swearing and/or screaming at you is WAY more traumatic on your kids than some mind your own business guy walking past with a gun?
In fact, a screaming psycho is EXACTLY one of the reasons to carry, as such have already crossed one of society’s lines that indicates someone just MIGHT BE a danger to you or your family, or society in general.
 July 8, 2015 at 9:30am
A stranger swearing and cursing at me, especially just over some difference of opinion, is WAY MORE intimidating than some clean cut looking guy carrying a gun, who’s politely minding his own business.
Society is so mixed up it’s not only lost the ability to debate logically, it’s lost the ability to debate, and even be, polite.
I’m a Canadian for Pete’s sake, and believe society would be a LOT safer if laws insisted everybody have the means and training to protect themselves with firearms.
Truth be told – baring all obvious jokes and criminally convicted – society would probably be quite a bit safer if at least it were mandatory for women to have such training and were allowed to carry cause, although the guy running the camera stated it via obnoxious loudmouth, most men have the physical capability to defend themselves.
In a fair fight at least.
Which crooks tend to avoid, I might point out.
 June 26, 2015 at 8:06am
Want to see how lovey dovey Mother Nature is?
Pick up “Mother Nature is Trying to Kill You.”
June 24, 2015 at 11:07am
To the person who voted down here.
I’m pretty sure Useful was being sarcastic.
Unless it was a liberal troll who voted down.
So I’m canceling your vote.
June 24, 2015 at 9:50am
 June 24, 2015 at 9:01am
“How many black friends do you have?”
How many blinking blanking times have I heard that?
And when I say “None. I grew up in a rural community where there weren’t any.” they go, “Ha!”
Then I tell them about the Japanese who moved in after the war because we racists were so nice. Probably a quarter of the population is Japanese, and there were Native American communities nearby as well as other “minorities” in and out over the years, whites too, and you know what?
We all had friends amongst each and people we couldn’t stand amongst each, our “Own Kind” included.
Liberals are elitist racists because they keep track of how many non white people they know, like some sort of exotic zoo they trot out for their snot friends.
This is my black collection, my Asian collection, my Native Americans. and oh! Oh! Oh! The prize of my collection, I captured it on my last safari in a Central American jungle you know. A pure blood Mayan. They’re very rare as the Spanish wiped them out and most are interbreeds.
And what makes it even rarer? I’m sure – titter, titter – it’s GAY!
The reason we bigot non-racists can’t tell you how many “black” friends we have is because we don’t bag and tag them. We get along with someone or we don’t.
And every region in the world has had slavery, far too many some still do, and Whitie isn’t cracking the whip.
Last of all, ironically, since African Muslims have moved in that community has become real scary.
Exactly, see my post above. I believe it to be one of the greatest spiritual books in history. Not because of men, but God! Proof should be out in about 2 months!
Has it ever been fixed in all of History? No. Is man’s heart any different today than it ever was? No. It’s not about being a coward, it’s realizing where your real home is, and it’s not on Earth. For Christians that is. I don’t dispute God calls some people into politics and some to change certain things at certain times, but apart from that the world will never change because man will never change apart from Christ.
 June 22, 2015 at 3:07pm
America’s UNINTENTIONAL homicide rate may be higher because we’re raising idiots these days, but INTENTIONAL?
This guy needs to get out more.
And Point #3 is ludicrous.
Laws NEVER HAVE and NEVER WILL stop crime. Their purpose is to punish various levels of irresponsible behavior, and leave responsible behavior alone.
If we only had one less gun nut is like saying if we only had one less rapist. Or one less hacker. Or one less burglar. Or one less crooked politician. Or one less dictator.
Society will never be rid of such, so stop making decisions based on that ever happening.
We’ve had decades of “Talking about our feelings” so why do 1st world nations still have nut jobs?
Brain scans show police officer’s brains respond to violent images exactly the same way remorseless psychopathic killers do, so if anybody has the potential to go nuts it must be a cop, right?
Should we lock them all up just to be safe?
A nut will ALWAYS have the element of surprise because we believe everybody thinks like we do; I just want to make a living, support a family, and have some fun once in a while.
Which is why we’re baffled when somebody just snaps.
The alternative would be to go around thinking “Someone/they’re all, out to get me.” which means we would be nuts then.
Crazy behavior is unexpected behavior, and It will always surprise us.
But a responsibly armed and prepared society has by far, the best chance of limiting the damage.
 June 20, 2015 at 9:22am
Promise me, promise all of us, that the crazy people, and the crooks, and the gulag governments will get rid of theirs.
That’s all you need to do.
Absolutely guarantee it.
That there are no bad, evil people.
Oh by the way.
Guard dogs can be poisoned. And shot too. And clubbed. And generally outsmarted by anybody prepared for them.
And I must give off some kind of scent when I get mad cause I’ve walked right past nasty police guard dog into a friend’s home. The thing went stupid on me, so I barked “F off ya mutt.” and went inside. (I had been invited.)
Which shocked the H out of my friend. “How’d you get past the dog?” he asked.
And not knowing really understanding his predicament, I just said, “What? Just told the mutt to F off.”
Turns out other potential owners had rejected that dog because it was too mean to handle.
Now maybe two I couldn’t handle.
And when you say guns do no good whatsoever, talk to farmers and ranchers?
And women who stopped a rapist.
You know what I would settle for?
And don’t make all the stupid jokes.
Arm all the women.
Us guys are big enough and most, over 30 at least, man enough to protect ourselves.
So let each and every woman who wants a gun, if she’s not a criminal and gets training, have a gun.
 June 20, 2015 at 8:54am
I LIVED there for six months and it’s YOU who are “factually incorrect.”
In fact, from the amount of time you’ve put in to commenting on this it wouldn’t surprise me that you’re some kind of Putin troll.
 June 19, 2015 at 6:49pm
Oh and one more thing.
Who provides the “Official” statistics from these countries?
Probably Obama. He's got stats for anything you want. You don't even have to ask. He'll tell you on his own. If his nose grew 1/32 of an inch every time he lied I wonder how long it would be. Gotta do some math.
 June 19, 2015 at 6:44pm
And I have friends in Australia.
Since the gun bans, murders and violent crimes by guns have gone down but…
Murders and violent crimes in general have gone up, just because crooks know they won’t be facing a gun when committing crimes.
A good old knife or club, or numbers and size are all that’s needed.
These anti gun activists just won’t stop twisting numbers, giving incomplete data, or outright lying, to further their agenda.
Factually incorrect...statistics show violent crime in Australia have dropped ...
People are anti guns because they are sick and tire of seeing mentally unstable people having guns. Guns are the worst thing ever invented. Life would be a better place if guns all went away period. They cause so much grief and do no good whatsoever. You want to go hunt grab a bow and arrow. Want to protect yourself from bad people robbing you buy a few german sheppards.
 June 19, 2015 at 6:31pm
Afghanistan? Russia? Pakistan?
Those are her examples?
I mean I’m not exactly sure of their stats on criminals using guns to kill their citizens but…
I’m pretty sure the DICTATORSHIP GOVERNMENTS there are pretty good at using guns to kill their citizens.
As well as torture, and imprison in gulags and reeducation camps.