User Profile: Dano.50

Dano.50

Member Since: July 15, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [11] August 31, 2015 at 9:00am

    I just keep asking the idiots in denial, if I ever said to you, “I’m going to KILL you.” and if I constantly repeated it in public and private, would you invite me into your home, or even have anything to do with me?

    And while they stumble and stutter for an answer I hit them with, “Don’t even bother saying you would. And you’d call the cops to boot. So why do you insist on treating these idiots who continually chant “Death to America.” are any different?”

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 29, 2015 at 7:28am

    Schilling’s only bad choice was apologizing.

  • August 29, 2015 at 7:16am

    Yeah, we have our own version of the EPA up here.

    In 94 I was a stock grower director in the area, and one day we got hold of a map of the new “Critical Wildlife Habitat” areas in the Sand HIlls.

    Four irregular shaped spots, maybe thirty or forty miles apart, but I SWEAR TO GOD, when you looked on a larger map, they formed an exact rectangle.

    We all said it’s obvious that twenty years down the road some clown just had to draw 4 lines and in make the whole dang thing a park, and like the slime buckets all government greeines are, we were assured that would never happen.

    Now we’re fining out about the 1992, Agenda 21 Earth Summit.

    It’s just insane what these people are getting away with.

  • [18] August 28, 2015 at 12:16pm

    These greenies just don’t get that ranchers developing water for cattle is what enables the wild life to thrive.

    I used to ranch in the Great Sand Hills in south west Saskatchewan, and the area is a grass covered desert, that even the Indians refused as compensation in the first part of the 1900′s because their ancestors saw it as waterless wasteland death trap, and they skirted it like the plague.

    So the Canadian government opened it up to homesteading immigrants who were too stupid to know any better.
    (One of whom was a friend of my grandfathers in the 1930′s.)

    Ranchers developed water wells for cattle, farmers grew grain crops, and with such a smorgasbord, in came the deer and antelope, and ducks, geese and whooping cranes, and all sorts of animals bigger than a sparrow.

    And then came the oil and gas industry…

    Which the greenies said is harming all the wildlife.

    So now they want to make it critical wild life habitat and kick out, not only the oil companies, but the farmers and ranchers too.

    If the greenies really want it back to its “Natural State” then the thousands of water sources maintained by the farmers and ranchers should be destroyed, as they aren’t “natural” and just watch everything bigger than a small bird die off and/or leave.

    Cause the government hasn’t got the resources, or the pride in work that comes from owning a busines, to maintain the water.

    And greenies ain’t got the intellectual capacity/common sense.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 27, 2015 at 8:00pm

    When are these idiots going to understand laws only prevent crime, in that they instill penalties for antisocial behavior?

    There will always be criminals because such choose will accept the risk of incurring penalty for higher gain coming from less effort, and those who can’t comprehend consequences of action, which are the crazies.

    Crazy can never be accounted by any law because, by definition, they suddenly quit obeying the generally predictable behavior of society.

    Making laws to stop crazy is like making laws to stop tornadoes; it can’t be done.

    And like tornadoes, the only thing one can do to be prepared for such a disaster, to be able to help yourself, those around.

    A far more logical way to limit crazy damage would be to pass laws saying everybody must know how to operate common fire arms, and every household must have the means of protection.

    A secondary effect to such a law would be to increase the risk of penalty to the logically thinking criminal, as in, “Dang. Ain’t dvd/watch/rape victim worth a bullet.”

  • [7] August 18, 2015 at 10:26pm

    Finally.

    This is what you do when you find out you’re involved with people who behave criminally.

    You cut all ties with them.

    And I don’t mean just for something like this.

    If people like Hillary, and Wrangle, and Wiener, would be given the heave ho, and made to PAY for their crimes, others would be deterred.

    And the only way to keep those in power, in check, is to make sure they pay a MUCH higher price for abusing their power, or breaking the law.

    This “My private life has nothing to do with my public life” is the biggest sham the public has ever swallowed.

  • [-1] August 18, 2015 at 2:09pm

    Looks like I just smacked the lefty bee hive.

    My first triple troll assault has me all teary eyed.

    Can Soc. I never said the right didn’t have any nuts. I just said the left has them too, (Even though you always deny.) and it’s not like the left hasn’t pulled stuff like this before, to make it seem like some conservative nut is responsible.

    And no, I’m not going to name them for you. You’re online. Go look yourself.

    C.T.

    Rudolph was wanted by the FBI and Roeder if I remember right, said he has no regrets.

    Kinda puts me in the “They dun it. Throw the book at them” category.

    By the way. Wasn’t Tiller was facing 19 illegal abortion charges?

    I am not justifying Roeder’s actions at all.

    But YOU need to explain the difference to me between Tiller and Roeder.

    Both MADE the choice to murder what the law said was a human being, with all the rights and protections afforded, and going by the law, Tiller WAS even worse. Like an amateur Gosnell.

    Your opinion the baby isn’t human is irrelevant because right now, the law says it was so don’t even bring it up.

    The left is notorious for continuing to embrace convicted criminals trumpeting “I’m persecuted by the System for being a social champion.”

    And LibSoc? Cast the first stone? Libs sling mud, pebbles, stones, and are as peaceable as an avalanche when they attack.

    If you believe those P.P. videos have by CMP are selectively edited lies there’s a democratic candidate with e-probs who could use you in her corner.

  • [-2] August 18, 2015 at 9:05am

    I COULD be wrong but…

    Planned Parenthood and the liberal left are such lying ideological skunks that the very first thought entering my mind was, “Is this idiot some lefty who so believes in Planned Parenthood he’s willing to take a fall to paint P.P. as the “Heroic defender of women’s rights despite the dangers they face every day from right wing religious extremists?”

    Responses (4) +
  • [7] August 17, 2015 at 12:46am

    How about getting those same people to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist?

    “Crickets”

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] August 12, 2015 at 11:10pm

    Al Capone supplied soup kitchens in the depression. But he, and his men, murdered and beat u hundreds, maybe more, and broke the law to get the money to put on the appearance of doing good.

    Pablo Escobar made hundreds of millions in cocaine, but he, and his men, murdered and beat up thousands, maybe tens of thousands, and broke the law to get that money, to put on the appearance of doing good.

    Planned Parenthood made who knows how much money, certainly not as much as Capone or Escobar, and the slaughtered millions, and intimidated obviously just as many, to get that money, and put on the appearance of doing good.

    I’ll take Capone or Escobar any day of the week, because at least some of their victims had a choice.

    And by the way Verycobalt.

    When it comes to facts?

    Talking points are irrelevant.

    You definitely reason like a liberal.

    Responses (1) +
  • [21] August 10, 2015 at 11:12am

    This is why I hope we never have flying cars.

    People are stupid enough in 2 dimensional travel.

    Can you imagine how bad it would get if any moron could fly?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] August 9, 2015 at 10:55pm

    How the heck are officers being trained these days?

    It was a 22 year old woman with a knife.

    One male officer, with a STICK, should be able do deal with that.

    Any who can’t, shouldn’t be on the force.

    This is what comes from raising generations of boys not allowed to rough house enough to learn how to physically handle themselves.

  • [3] August 8, 2015 at 11:12am

    Y’all is either a troll, or what’s more commonly known as “Jess not all that bright.”
    Roun’ here you’s whats called liberal, and them’s real good tauntin’.

    Responses (2) +
  • [7] August 8, 2015 at 10:15am

    Margret Sanger can’t be removed from view because that would eventually give all aligned with Planned Parenthood the means for denial of any so called “Black Holocaust.”

    Sanger needs to publicly re-categorized as a female Hitler and we, especially the Black community, need to get as vocal about her as Jews are about their holocaust.

    Use the same tactics as the left.

    March and rally.

    Have her demonized face plastered everywhere.

    Burn her in effigy.

    Give her the “Whole Nine Yards.”

    So at least a few generations “Never Forget.”

    Responses (2) +
  • [16] August 5, 2015 at 11:11pm

    The Russians feel the same about wolves.

    Read ‘Wolves in Russia” by Will Graves.

    And ranchers in Canada are feeling the same with cougars and wolves being repopulated in the areas.

    In Elkwater, Alberta, lives the highest cougar density in the country, if not North America, and on ranches it’s like the old West, with the son coming in saying, “Pa, something’s spooking the horses.”

    Most ranchers bordering the don’t go out at night without a rifle, and town residents don’t let their young kids off off the porches.

    Then there’s the wolves killing livestock.

    City people wanting wolves ad cougars should be forced to live for a year in the boonies with their lovey dovey animals.

    Also read “Mother Nature is Trying to Kill You” by Dan Riskin.

  • [4] August 5, 2015 at 3:40pm

    G.D. it I can’t believe this S***!

    Ranchers had to fight this same cow fart burp b.s.20 years ago.

    First, we showed methane breaks down 8 times as fast as CO2 and second, and most important…

    Historical records show there were TWICE as many buffalo 200 years ago as there are cattle now.

    So if anything…

    The cattle industry is responsible for trying to “heal’ the environment.

    Lord, liberals are PIG headed.

  • August 4, 2015 at 2:31pm

    I have a question for Krauthammer, (basically an atheist) and all atheist types in general.

    If there is no God.

    No afterlife.

    No reincarnation.

    No nothing but the several some decades each human who exists, has existed, and ever will exist, will ever get.

    Then why aren’t you all virulently Anti Abortion.

    Cause since NOBODY can prove life doesn’t start at conception then NOBODY has the right to deny that solitary cell, that never develops into anything but a human being, it’s only “Kick at the Can.”

  • [7] August 2, 2015 at 9:06am

    Why do these socialists just, not get it?

    The ONLY reason people “who carry the load” tolerate working beside slackers, is because of the chance of advancement.

    If you think about it, slackers are actually a “Golden Opportunity” in that those beside don’t even have to shine. By comparison, just doing your job looks like you’ve gone the extra mile.

    But if slackers (usually good butt kissers) get the same or better reward?

    Any employee with half a chance at a better job is gone.

  • [3] July 30, 2015 at 12:31am

    I haven’t watched this show enough, missed the introductions, and don’t want to waste time looking but..

    The Blond.

    Is she a liberal?

    Cause that was a typical liberal attack. Roe v. Wade.

    (Derisive scoff.)

    Conservatives just don’t want our tax dollars to fund abortion.

    We can’t stop people really wanting an abortion any more than we can stop people who really want to commit murder or fraud or theft

    All we want to do, is say “Pay for your own mistakes.”

    That’s the difference between liberals and conservatives.

    Liberals are sheep. They need safety in numbers because they are “Doing it” and thinking “If I can get someone else to pay for messing up, I don’t have to worry cause everybody messes up.”

    The thing is, conservatives, true conservatives that is, believe in being responsible for their actions, and a few hits to the wallet means they with try not to commit the same mistakes. Which means they NEVER take as much from the pot as people who just won’t learn, a.k.a. liberals.

    Things collapse when the responsible group gives up and starts taking as much as the irresponsible group.

    Another name for this condition is socialism/communism.

    By the way.

    Didn’t Karl Marx sponge off his family?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] July 29, 2015 at 11:10pm

    You can’t “stop” investigative journalists from releasing such information.
    The only thing you can do is sue them, to say they lied.
    Which of course means you must open yourself and your records, to official scrutiny but…
    The SS– I mean– the PP, has nothing to hide anyway, right?

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love