User Profile: The-Right-Rider

The-Right-Rider

Member Since: February 25, 2013

CommentsDisplaying The-Right-Rider's 10 most recent comments.

  • @LACEY

    “The only person I am defending is the woman in the interview. She is not full of hate as you say.”

    I never said she was full of hate. Apparently you have some learning disability that prevents you from reading with any semblance of competency.

    ” You also say she shouldn’t accept help. You can claim that you are talking in general about some alternate group some place, but then why would you say that as a comment on this particular article.”

    I was speaking about militant atheists. I speculated if she was one but i NEVER said she actually was. Again, your comments on this are disingenuous or intentionally deceitful.

    “I’m actually surprised this is even news. Of all the death and destruction the tornado caused, this is what gets the focus. Why? Because she isn’t Christian and as a non-Christian, she deserves to be the center of attention to be mocked, made fun of, threatened, and treated less than human. I do not think that is right and I speak out against what I see that isn’t right. If you feel insulted for me pointing these things out to you, I suggest to take a real good look in the mirror and see who you really are.”

    No one is mocking her, and if your hypocrisy wasnt so overwhelming you would realize that wolf blitzer brought atttention to her existence, not i, and not the blaze. Right now you are coming on here to attack and insult those you disagree with, proving your hyporcrisy in full.

    “Enjoy your day.”

    I am, thank

  • @LaceyJ

    That’s good. I hope you come back as someone or something far less ignorant of the facts of life.

  • @LaceyJ

    If you are an example of real education you lend credence to belief that every sensible parent in America should home school their child (instead of sending their progeny to a public indoctrination camp payed for the taxpayer) in order to prevent them from ending up like you.

  • @LACEY

    “The only person I am defending is the woman in the interview. She is not full of hate as you say.”

    I never said she was full of hate. Apparently you have some learning disability that prevents you from reading with any semblance of competency.

    ” You also say she shouldn’t accept help. You can claim that you are talking in general about some alternate group some place, but then why would you say that as a comment on this particular article.”

    I was speaking about militant atheists. I speculated if she was one but i NEVER said she actually was. Again, your comments on this are disingenuous or intentionally deceitful.

    “I’m actually surprised this is even news. Of all the death and destruction the tornado caused, this is what gets the focus. Why? Because she isn’t Christian and as a non-Christian, she deserves to be the center of attention to be mocked, made fun of, threatened, and treated less than human. I do not think that is right and I speak out against what I see that isn’t right. If you feel insulted for me pointing these things out to you, I suggest to take a real good look in the mirror and see who you really are.”

    No one is mocking her, and if your hypocrisy wasnt so overwhelming you would realize that wolf blitzer brought atttention to her existence, not i, and not the blaze. Right now you are coming on here to attack and insult those you disagree with, proving your hyporcrisy in full.

    “Enjoy your day.”

    I am, thanks.

  • @LACEY

    Really?

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

    Lay off the drugs. They are rotting your sense of reality.

  • @LACEY

    Your views tell otherwise

  • anonymous needs to be hunted down and prosecuted.

    These left wing anarchists have overstayed their 15 minutes of fame.

    If we had a real president they would no longer exist.

  • @GROVER STANDPIPE

    “It’s not just a religious institution, and it hasn’t been for a long time. And if the government did get out of it, there would be gay marriage in every state. There most be a hundred religious sects in this country. There are bound to be a few who would say yes.”

    So what youre saying is, because the government violated the Constitution to begin with, you’re perfectly ok with them continuing to do it and doing it even more egregiously with gay marriage?!

    Well so much for your claim of being a “libertarian” you just sound like a Statist to me.

    Finally, even IF there were a few churches that allowed their same sex members to get married, at least it wouldnt be a violation of the Constitution (even if it was a violation of JudeoChristian belief)
    Your red herring argument just got deep fried with that mention.

  • @GROVER STANDPIPE

    “No, you are trying to restrict marriage by claiming that the concept of marriage and the very word itself should be defined entirely by religious opinion, and not just by religious opinion, but by the rules of your particular faith.”

    If by restrict you mean “keep legitimate” then i would agree with you, however it’s quite evident your vernacular is stating a false premise in that you fail to realize that Marriage is NOT a creation of the government, it was created by an institution of faith. Show me where exactly the US government patented the institution of Marriage and i’ll gladly concede my argument.

    “there are millions of straight couples in this country who were married by the government without having to seek the permission of any church, and their marriages are just as real as yours. It’s been like that for a hundred years before we were born and nobody ever objected until they started talking about giving same sex couples the same opportunity.”

    Apparently you skimmed the part where i already spoke of the government basically getting into competition with faith by offering a secular alternative to Marriage aka the “civil” marriage. And how do you know people didnt object..were you there?
    And not every law put into effect is legal…surely you realize that dont you? Laws are only as just as the people who make them. Or perhaps you agreed with SCOTUS in plessy vs ferguson that segregation was legal?

  • Charles:

    what is truly evil is the sheer level of your bias.