Martha Washington burned the letters that were exchanged between her and George Washington during the Revolutionary War. I really would like to know what George said to her in his private moments but it won’t change history if I never find out. Hillary could change history and thus the two situations don’t exactly compare. I think it is safe to say that if anyone read them, they would be unlikely to change their mind about electing Hillary. The e-mails were destroyed because they could only hurt her, not help her. I would not be surprised, if needed ten years down the road, there were some lost episodes found and finally someone would actually buy her book or her daughter’s book for a reason other than a campaign donation.
March 28, 2015 at 6:59am
Hillary comes from the Watergate era and remembers very well the problem Nixon had with the Plumbers, a bunch of guys hired to stop leaks from the White House. Hillary is the master plumber. If Nixon could have hired Hillary instead of Gordon Liddy, history would be very different. She probably feared leaks going into the White House as much as those coming out. Thus the perfect plan: Shut off the water at the street and weld the valve shut. The big difference between Gordon Liddy and Hillary Clinton is that Gordon Liddy went to jail. Does anyone remember what the heck it was that Nixon did not want to have the public know? Liddy’s crew broke into a doctors office and copied some records. They charged him for stealing the electricity to see what he was doing since he or his crew turned on the lights.
Most students will not qualify for a CCP anyway, they are too young to legally have a pistol. The new people on campus with pistols will be the same people who can carry legally off of the campus. There is something magic about being “on campus.” It apparently makes you stupid, immature or drunk just being on the wrong side of the line. The people who will be impacted will be legal carry people working, visiting or having other legitimate reasons for being there on the campus and those over 21 years of age and qualify for a permit off of campus.
 March 26, 2015 at 2:18am
I suspect that Iran already has a Nuke. It is untested but how many have ever failed to go off? The testing is usually to get confirmation of the triggering mechanism. Anyway, Iran already has a nuke and is using these talks not only to buy time, they are using the talks as a way to get more nuclear material for more bombs. You don’t need centrifuges to get nuclear weapons grade material. We used gaseous diffusion process in WWII. If they only have one bomb and they use it on Israel they they would be defenseless against the Sunnis in Pakistan. They would hand over dominance to Muslim Heretics. They need to have more than one bomb to stand after the initial exchange with Israel. Maybe Israel will nuke them all? Maybe they are boring tunnels now under major cities in Israel and planting Nukes made in North Korea? Doesn’t Putin understand if these nut cases are allowed to have nukes, the fallout will be heading North East toward Russia?
 March 26, 2015 at 1:40am
Yes, you can be a moral person without religion, but only if the culture confirms it. The problem is that the Atheist claim that they have a rational basis for their morality. Their morality comes from reason. The problem with this is that it ignores the conscience, which can be corrupted by culture(Abortion is legal, thus OK). Reason can also be corrupted by culture(Hands Up. Don’t Shoot). Reason, to be fully useful in moral decisions, must have the full involvement of Truth. We are learning new truths every day and tomorrow we will have more truth than the day before. Our inability to know all future truth prevents us from being perfect in our moral decisions. Another shortcoming of humans is that something that seems to be bad might be the first step to something good in the future. We really won’t be able to act in the present morally until we can see the future perfectly. Did dropping the bomb on Japan shorten the war and save lives that would have been lost otherwise? I think it did, but can not prove it. Atheist have no way to end the nagging doubt about any chain of historic decisions and will seek a source of comfort where there is no criticism. When they cant find that place, they will try to make that place and they will then get ugly by forcing the doubt to go away.
 March 25, 2015 at 1:53pm
My suggestion is to pray for the strength to hate our own favorite sins as much as we hate the ones we are not attracted to.
 March 24, 2015 at 2:24pm
Jerry Rivers didn’t help a lot either
 March 24, 2015 at 2:36am
Does this mean George, that you regret voting for him too?
It takes $50 to debunk a $5 lie, so campaigning against a Democrat is very expensive. Look how long it took to debunk the Hands Up-don’t Shoot lie. Some “news organizations” still have not corrected their false narrative. I think the economy is recovering now and I see Democrats claiming that Obama single-handedly saved the economy and got it going in the right direction. Who else could save the economy with part time jobs, less disposable income and massive debt? I think the recovery is caused by the hope that our goofy economic policies are about to change.
 March 23, 2015 at 5:01pm
There is a right to education? I thought there was a right to ignorance. It seems that no education can be accomplished without truth, but ignorance abounds with relative truth and home made truths about social justice. Don’t we have aright to believe that Hands Up- Don’t Shoot is the way it went down in spite of the forensic evidence? Don’t we have the right to believe that George Zimmerman was a racist who asked for the beating he was getting before he killed Travon Martin? Don’t we have a right to believe that Gay marriage is as good or bad as Heterosexual marriage? if we have the right to say crazy or wrong things, why don’t we have the right to act on them or force others to act as if they were true?
I think "right" implies right--and of course, I'm taking advantage of my right to my opinion here...
there is an absolute Good and an opposite of it, in my opinion. "Right" and "Wrong". So, you may have the idea and the ability to take someone's car, but not the "right". The right is on the side of the owner, and sanctions must be implemented to keep absolute rights safe. I would have to say I'm on the side of many libertarians who say marriage should not be a government institution, but I'm on the side of the Bible as far as the right and wrong of different sexual activities, and their context. Still, a consensus should be reached as to what should be the general standard used to apply sanctions for various behaviors, and to decide things like custody issues, and the developmental stage at which babies may be murdered, for instance.
 March 23, 2015 at 4:49pm
In Mexico, a voter ID is your primary ID. It has your name, address, voting precinct, your signature and it has a photo of you. It expires in ten years. We are just upgrading our system to the Third World’s.
 March 23, 2015 at 4:41pm
My state neutralized the expense argument by giving photo ID away. The cost of it was not as much as predicted. Even if you have lost your drivers license legally, you can still vote. This still does not prevent a student from voting at college and then driving home to vote but that little trick is about to be very dangerous in the near future.
March 23, 2015 at 4:25pm
Qur’an 3:31-32—Say: If you love Allah, then follow me, Allah will love you and forgive you your faults, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. Say: Obey Allah and the Apostle; but if they turn back, then surely Allah does not love the unbelievers.
Qur’an 98:6—Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Qur’an and Prophet Muhammad) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikun will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
Qur’an 4:65—But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission.
Qur’an 33:36—It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter, that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.
Qur’an 5:101-102—O ye who believe! Ask not questions about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if ye ask about things when the Qur’an is being revealed, they will be made plain to you, Allah will forgive those: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most-forbearing. Some people before you did ask such questions, and on that account lost their faith.
Qur’an 48:29—Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.
Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who
March 23, 2015 at 4:21pm
Martin Luther found error, maybe 95 of them, in the interpretation of the Bible. There is no error in the Qur’an, Sira or the Hadith that can be explained or exploited to make it more civilized even though you can easily find examples of differing interpretations. All three say kill the infidel, the Jew, the Christian and the Polytheist. If you happen to be an atheist, you are not safe either. People are regularly killed for religious innovation in Muslim countries. Muslims have to be converted or killed, either one at a time or in large numbers. We could hope for change but that policy changed Turkey from Christian to Muslim. It changed Egypt from Christian to Muslim, It changed Afghanistan from Buddhist to Muslim. It changed Pakistan from Hindu to Muslim.
 March 23, 2015 at 1:03pm
Maybe Rev. Al needs to start a fund to help people fight police brutality. Instead of trying to settle the matter in the street with a fist fight or running away, make the fund available for legal representation. Rev. Al could save three or four lives a year or more. As long as Obama is president, the government would not grab the fund to offset the taxes he owes.Only people who comply with the officers instructions will be given access to the money. Nobody who is in constant contact with the law trusts the Public Pretender System, so lots of Liberal lawyers could donate services like they do at the ACLU and NAACP.
IF Al Sharpton, (or the ACLU or the NAACP),was concerned at all, in any way, about the problem he would want to be helpful. He isn’t trying to help black people. He’s an instigator only concerned with inflaming the issue. He has a platform that could actually help but he won’t do that. He could say what Graham said to the black community. Be respectful, follow orders by Police, right or wrong. If the Police are in the wrong Sharpton could advocate for community advocacies to be formed in the communities to support victims of wrongful arrest or abuse. But no, Sharpton won’t be using his platform to help – because he does not care about the problem outside of the ways that it profits him. And this damages the black community in a very serious way.
 March 22, 2015 at 4:58pm
There are 799 college students from Saudi Arabia in my little county of about 86,000 people in Tennessee.
 March 22, 2015 at 11:03am
Trying to make certain words come out of their mouths changes nothing. They have more loyalty to their world view than to the truth. The aggressor decides when and for how long a war is to be fought. We are just tourist at a Tunis museum and ISIS is acting as the agents of social justice. It is the administration’s job to keep reminding us that it is Bush’s fault. Skip over the verbal water boarding part and get on with just exactly who they have to kill and in what American city before they will take reasonable action to do their real job.
 March 22, 2015 at 1:54am
How about a law that made anyone posting a gun free zone liable for any injuries due to the inability of the customer, student or patron being unable to defend him or herself?
 March 22, 2015 at 1:47am
How do Liberals decide what is good character? Lying seems to be OK if it serves the purpose of the agenda. Stealing seems to be OK as long as the government does it for you. Killing seems to be OK as long as good intentions were mostly on the part of the government. Adultery is OK. Coveting is the Socialist Gospel. Damaging the economy is OK as long as you say it will save the planet. Massive debt is OK as long as we only owe it to ourselves. If everyone has their own opinion of what good character is, what is the standard?
 March 22, 2015 at 1:33am
Meanwhile, while this diversion is going on, is any competent person working on the water problem, the traffic problems, the debt problems and the retirement crisis in California? Where is the power going to come from to air condition all of the new illegal aliens?