User Profile: DebateMe

Member Since: November 06, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [4] October 20, 2016 at 2:02pm

    This is the kind of stuff that in truth, Christian leaders need to steer clear from. Stop predicting when the last days will be and stop speculating on who’s a prophet or who’s anointed by God.

    What we do know from the Bible is that fairly regularly God and Jesus worked with all people, including people of poor character… and transformed them to perform His will. By this definition, hillary could be anointed by God… though I’m still not voting for her.

    But this constant speculating on the future will of God demonstrates a great deal of arrogance on our part. The truth is simple, if God has anointed Trump to lead the USA at this time, he’s definitely going to win.

    But consider these things: Who’s to say that hillary isn’t “saveable” and becomes a servant of God at some point. We’re all “saveable” that was Jesus’ whole point of dying on the cross. More cynically however, why might God be anointing anyone to save our country when we’ve allowed our culture to be hijacked by progressives, secularists, and atheists and are currently engaged in full blown rebellion against Christians, Jews and God’s word? Perhaps God intends for us to experience reaping what we’ve sewn and to learn from it. Perhaps these are the last days, and this all just keeps getting worse.

    But back to the point, I really wish Christian leaders would stop with all these kinds of things and focus on what’s really important – that we all turn to God and be saved.

  • [8] October 20, 2016 at 1:52pm

    This is why the media is loathed. Let’s keep talking about ‘nasty woman’ and ‘won’t guarantee he’ll accept election results.” In the meantime, 20T debt, flat lined economy, stagnant wages, out of control borders, islamic terror, government that has gotten so huge it meddles even in the kinds of toilet paper we buy. Then you have any number of hillary scandals that far exceed locker room potty talk. But yes, CNN, YES… let’s just keep talking about ‘accept the election outcome’ and ‘nasty woman.’ /golfclap

  • [3] October 20, 2016 at 1:27pm

    “Social Network News” is an oxymoron. You can call it “Social Network Idiocy,” “Social Network Gossip,” “Social Network Propaganda,” “Social Network Half-Truths,” “Social Network Low-Info Chatter,” “Social Network Progressive Sound Bites,” “Social Network Bumper Sticker Factories,” “Social Network Quippy Quips,” “Social Network Analysis Minus The Analysis” or any number of things, but “Social Network News” makes no sense and doesn’t exist.

  • [5] October 20, 2016 at 1:23pm

    To focus on Fox News is to focus on a symptom. The root problem is that the entire media industry has rotted to the core. So even if your aim is to be fair and balanced so to speak, you’re still operating in a sick and corrupt industry and that will be a constant hindrance to getting at the real truth of things.

  • [10] October 20, 2016 at 1:16pm

    As usual the msm focuses on the trivial and all the social media lemmings follow their lead.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 19, 2016 at 11:55pm

    I wouldn’t vote for hillary. But even with a Trump win, 8 years of obama has thoroughly ‘cooked’ this country. Even if we found our ‘George Washington’ and got that person into office and reverse course was expediently implemented, there still aren’t enough years left in my life to see the kind of America that existed when I was young, warts and all… still better than the collectivist road we’re on now.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 19, 2016 at 11:52pm

    None of this situation fits within a quipy 3 second sound bite or on a bumper sticker for a Prius. If the media would talk about this, which they won’t, your typical hillary voter would just yawn about it anyway and resume obsessing over Trump’s locker room potty talk… because though offensive, apparently that act was the mother of all travesty in human history.

  • [5] October 19, 2016 at 6:03pm

    If anyone’s shocked or surprised by this, please raise your hand. Anyone? Bueller?

    There’s another thing going on here as well. The teacher is trying to put a wedge between the children and their parents. The leftist tactic of pitting children against their parents is alive and well in your government schools.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] October 19, 2016 at 6:01pm

    Quick Quiz:

    Which of these statements are true:

    A) You can keep your doctor.
    B) You can keep your plan.
    C) Healthcare will be cheaper.
    D) None of the above

  • [7] October 19, 2016 at 5:57pm

    So she’s changing her tune because she needs to be re-elected. Hope the Germans see right through it.

  • [6] October 18, 2016 at 12:25am

    My dad lived under communism for a great deal of his life. The way he puts it, under communism you are a zoo animal that lives and dies based on whether or not your government caretaker takes care of you. And even when he does, it’s just enough to keep you alive, just barely.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 18, 2016 at 12:23am

    Well, 2+2=racist these days, so why not, “Bush killed more than stalin” – makes as much sense.

  • [16] October 16, 2016 at 6:33pm

    More of that liberal ‘tolerance.’

  • [6] October 16, 2016 at 6:31pm

    Biased? No no no. The media left biased behind back in the early 1990s. Today’s media is straight forward shameless propaganda.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 13, 2016 at 12:09pm

    Too many millennials in our government run schools have grown up believing they’re socialists. Once they start living the “dream” they’ll begin their real education. Many of them will live their entire lives trading great amounts of liberty and power to the government in exchange for meager scraps in the form of government hand outs. But some will recognize the con job for what it is. If we’re lucky, the country could return to it’s roots within 3 to 4 generations… if we’re lucky.

    In reply to the contribution Liberty rocks, socialism kills

  • [-1] October 13, 2016 at 12:04pm

    Don’t watch the show and probably never will now. That was a pretty humiliating thing to say to her on national TV.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] October 13, 2016 at 12:01pm

    With the last 3 years of 30% increases year over year, last year my obamacare monthly healthcare premium payment became more than my monthly mortgage payment. And that doesn’t even include co-pays and deductibles which have increased 300% over the last 3 years. What’s happening is those who always had healthcare now don’t (or are struggling to keep it) while those who didn’t have healthcare before obamacare now have it… but don’t pay much if anything at all. That’s a result only government can achieve.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 12, 2016 at 11:45am

    I’ll go out on a limb here and predict this will be ignored by the media.

  • [5] October 12, 2016 at 11:42am

    On the one hand we have a contemporary culture that celebrates with great jubilation a crassness unseen in prior generations. Exhibit A: reality TV. The condemnation of Trump while ignoring that tens of millions of voters celebrate the horrible behaviors on display in the media is one gigantic case of selective outrage. I’m no fan of what Trump said about women but look no further than your average secular citizen for far more outrageous behavior and attitudes. Just a casual browsing of youtube videos reveals what Trump said as amateur hour… most people would probably be yawning at it if it weren’t for their fearless leaders in the media proclaiming what he said as THE MOTHER OF ALL TRAVESTIES.

  • October 11, 2016 at 10:26am

    The elites mock their own creation because their own creation is too stupid to realize they’re being mocked.

123 To page: Go