User Profile: deeberj

deeberj

Member Since: March 07, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • August 29, 2014 at 3:23pm

    I think you are wrong. This man viewing child porn determined on his own it was at least OK to view, so it’s obvious some folks’ moral compasses have no true north.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:57pm

    Wow, what a good idea. You have to do a bunch of research I guess, and what about purchasing “made in China” stuff? I guess you do this when you can.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:56pm

    Lucretius – you are getting morality mixed up with socially accepted norms. They are not the same thing. Slavery is immoral. I don’t care how many people in a society think it’s fine, it is not. So it was immoral 200 years ago, and you are mistaken if you think everyone in the USA thought it was moral.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:54pm

    Lucretius – I am not sure the numbers supporting homosexuality is increasing. I think the number of people not caring is increasing. As in, I don’t care if you are a homosexual, just please leave me alone and don’t make me love what you do, and I’ll leave you alone and won’t me you love what I do.

    And this issue is not really about if we support or allow homosexual marriage or should we. It is about if a business owned by private citizens (it has not become a public business) is allowed to refuse service to anyone. So stop going off in all directions and stick to the subject.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:45pm

    No. She just left and we never saw her again.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:42pm

    If you give unto the Lord and follow His leading in giving, then it doesn’t matter what the person does with the money. You are being obedient to God and therefore blessed, and you have no idea how God is working in that person. I know someone who was panhandling for crack, and a Christian gave him money and said God loves you, and the fact that God loved him was driven home that day and he eventually stopped smoking crack. All because of someone giving money to a crack head that was used to purchase more crack.

    However, I’ve also witnessed people giving money because they were convinced or co-erced or shamed into doing it, and that is not the same thing. It’s like throwing your money into a black hole.

  • August 29, 2014 at 1:30pm

    who the heck is the Divine Serpent? And why is it capitalized?

  • [3] August 29, 2014 at 1:30pm

    Yes. It’s so great for a precocious child who can read billboards to read it and then ask his mom what it means when the child never had a though of sex until then. Billboards are not appropriate places to bring up sexual discussions.

  • [-1] August 29, 2014 at 1:27pm

    Just because something is true doesn’t mean it needs to be advertized on a billboard. No one is saying God hates sex. But discussion of sex is not appropriate everywhere, and a billboard makes that happen.

  • [4] August 29, 2014 at 9:34am

    Oudated views. Please. They are only outdated to the people pushing this agenda. And it’s less than 2%, gator. That’s an inflated number.

    Responses (5) +
  • [6] August 29, 2014 at 9:31am

    So who receives the $10,000 fine after they pay it? I’m unclear about that.

    And ALL of their employees have to attend the stupid state training? Who is paying for that?

    These people got so ripped off.

  • [4] August 28, 2014 at 12:30pm

    I went to a church years ago where one of the people that started attending started off with all sorts of woes, including cancer, no job and needed help. People helped her soooo much, befriending her and giving money and time and rides and such. I never did anything for her and actually avoided her because something didn’t ring true to me. Evenutally it was discovered that she never had cancer and she was just there trying to get attention and help. It took about a year of her lies before the truth came out.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 27, 2014 at 2:23pm

    mutual fantasies to violently rape and murder children.

    Let the both of them rot in jail. NEVER let them out.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] August 22, 2014 at 4:22pm

    I did not allow my son to have a smart phone until he was 16. I saw no need for it.

    He is 21 now and he got his first old school cell phone at 13. It could text and call. No camera, not a smart phone.

    You can’t just allow your kids to be on phones, computers, tablets, without your supervision. If you want them to have these things, you have to block stuff, use software that records what they do, and keep a close eye. I decided to just not have it around. I didn’t have the internet at home either. I didn’t need him being tempted to watch porn when I’m asleep. He had access to computers that had people all around so he had no private moments with it but he could do his school work and google stuff that wasn’t awful.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 22, 2014 at 4:16pm

    A kid does not HAVE to have a smart phone. They still make those old school cell phones that just text and call.

  • [5] August 22, 2014 at 4:14pm

    They should not have called the police. They should have snatched away that smart phone and if she had a tablet or computer take that too. Get her away from all social media. Forbid it and make sure she follows your rules. If it’s absolutely necessary for her to have a cell phone, they still have ones that can call or text only.

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] August 22, 2014 at 4:12pm

    And did he know she was 13? Some 13 yr olds like to dress up and do their makeup all grown up and take selfies. It’s not easy determining age sometimes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [11] August 21, 2014 at 4:03pm

    The couple went to this place on purpose, to make a stink and go to court.

  • [22] August 21, 2014 at 8:56am

    Dostoevsky in Crime and Punishment said, “if there is no God – then everything is permitted”.

    Responses (7) +
  • [6] July 24, 2014 at 3:47pm

    Italy had to come to the rescue of an American citizen’s family. Will some other European country have to come to the rescue of the man being held in Mexico?

123 To page: Go