Overstock

User Profile: desertspeaks

desertspeaks

Member Since: December 10, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • March 20, 2014 at 10:58pm

    we need to divest ourselves of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES! and yes, it is a corporation!
    we live in the united states of America!

  • March 20, 2014 at 10:51pm

    had the child compared ovomit to jesus, it would be fine!

  • March 20, 2014 at 10:49pm

    what do studies say about when the police tase, mace, beat, break an arm, orbital bone, nose etc of a child as they are prone to doing too often today??.. oh the badge monkeys are immune from studies..
    the police are a fun loving bunch of thugs.. they are the do as we say, not as we do crowd!

  • March 20, 2014 at 10:37pm

    ex post facto http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ex_post_facto
    Art 1, § 9 and Art. 1 § 10. see, e.g. Collins v. Youngblood, 497 US 37 (1990) and California Dep’t of Corrections v. Morales, 514 US 499 (1995).
    18 USC § 241 – Conspiracy against rights
    18 USC § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
    42 USC § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights
    For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

    in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), to wit:
    Congress … cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

    U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431 a statute that regulates without constitutional authority is a nullity even though it be published in the books, recognized by the police and lowers courts, and even though it be unchallenged for decades.

    The Legislature, either by amending or otherwise, may not nullify a constitutional provision
    Rost v. Municipal Court of Southern Judicial District of San Mateo (1960)

    Brookfield Construction Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”

    “When an act of the legislature is repugnant or contrary to the constitution, it is, ipso facto, void.” 2 Pet. R. 522; 12 Wheat.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 20, 2014 at 10:28pm

    what kind of drugs do you take or are you naturally vacuous ?

  • March 20, 2014 at 9:58pm

    if “any” governor wants to cut taxes.. they should use their state’s multiple CAFR accounts to retire debt, resulting in LOWER property taxes..
    The above would generally make sense to a ‘non-politician” but given the choice to retire debt and lower taxes.. they choose to keep things status quo!
    If you don’t know what a cafr account is.. a search engine is your friend.. every state, county, city and town has cafr accounts, this is a second set of books that are “usually” awash with money derived from theft of taxpayers.. they keep this $$$ invest it for decades..
    it is estimated that combined, the cafr accounts across the united states of America amount to tens of trillions of dollars!
    these aforementioned cafr accounts don’t include the federal government abc agencies cafr accounts.. yes the irs, the fbi, cia and even the social security administration has cafr accounts!

  • March 20, 2014 at 9:49pm

    driving is an occupation and thus a privilege,.. traveling is a right!
    Robertson vs. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash 133, 147
    “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as inalienable.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
    Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22
    Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579.
    Kent v Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.
    Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.
    Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516.
    Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

    Go back to huffpo jrook as you have zero understanding of constitutional rights vs corporate privileges! your beliefs and opinions are propaganda

  • March 20, 2014 at 8:39pm

    well, since the government ignores the constitution,.. how about the Universal declaration of human rights, that the federal government is a signatory of..
    specifically
    Article 12.
    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

    Does this not count either?? probably not,.. our government is out of control !

  • March 20, 2014 at 1:29pm

    wtf is wrong with teachers and school administrators today?? someone needs to drug test teachers/admin and subject the teachers/admin to psychological evaluations!

    Responses (3) +
  • March 20, 2014 at 1:25pm

    ah yes the slavery card, yes that’s why ovomit can’t work with the teaparty, it has nothing to do with ovomits lies or corruption, right?

  • March 20, 2014 at 1:24pm

    jay “I lie for a living” carney, didn’t tell the truth, again! anyone surprised?

  • March 19, 2014 at 10:02pm

    !@ moderatormichele;
    cursing?? what pray tell do you consider cursing??? further; does the blaze pay you more than reddit pay’s its censors?? did you used to work there or do you censor there too??

  • March 19, 2014 at 9:59pm

    Just more of Eric Holders brainwashing per his own words! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM0asnCXD0

  • March 19, 2014 at 9:58pm

    If the Trans-Dniester region sounds familiar, it’s because it already tried in 1996 to break off from Moldova. The area also tried in 2006 to gain its independence by holding a referendum vote in which 97 percent of the population voted to join Russia. However, the vote went nowhere because the international community refused to recognize its legitimacy.

    Here’s why many countries don’t and won’t recognize breakaways.. regions of their own countries which WANT TO BREAK AWAY.. “I can think of some states in the US that want to break away from the oligarchy that is the UNITED STATES Inc.” would get the idea that they too can leave their SLAVE MASTERS BONDAGE!
    If it happens there, it can happen here! so any breakaway must not be recognized and stifled so that other’s don’t get the same idea!

    Responses (1) +
  • March 19, 2014 at 9:54pm

    term limits, NO INCOME TAX!

  • March 19, 2014 at 9:51pm

    president flustercuck opens his mouth and spews unconstitutional nonsense

  • March 19, 2014 at 3:09pm

    aipac must pay well!

  • March 19, 2014 at 3:07pm

    the officer was just promoting obamacare.. he broke the kids arm purposely to make the point that if he did have obamacare, just like the commercials.. he’d be covered!

  • March 19, 2014 at 2:50pm

    someone remind me again, who writes laws, the congress or the atf??

    Responses (1) +
  • March 19, 2014 at 2:47pm

    if Americans can’t pray in schools, then muslim’s can’t pray in public! have a nice day !

123 To page: Go