So you always knew the corrupt administration and Hillary didn’t leave trails to things like using the IRS to go after people, etc.. and now you know it when the democrats leaked memo says things like “This document should not be emailed or handed to anyone outside of the building. Please only give campaign staff these best practices in meetings or over the phone.” Then you see how many meeting Obama had with the IRS head.
 August 31, 2016 at 5:05pm
No blaze article on the Trump blowout speech in Mexico? I guess they are waiting for the liberals to meet to come up with how they can make this a negative instead of the positive it was. President Trump home run. Vote Trump 2016!!
That's easy to explain. Beck hates Trump and would rather see Hildebeest as President. I think Beck's train left the track years ago.
August 30, 2016 at 10:13pm
It’s in the data dump that included email accounts, passwords, phone numbers about two weeks ago. When reported, there were some examples, but not specifics on accounts for the blaze. I suppose if you can come up with the dump, you’ll find what you want.
 August 30, 2016 at 7:14pm
One thing you know from the hack release of data accounts is many hillary propagandists have blaze accounts, so no doubt many of these comments are coming from Hillary liberal supporters. Pretending to be Beck followers to try and convince other Beck followers to not vote for Trump. Note I say ‘followers’ because that seems to be the most accurate way to describe them. Trump has laid out many policies, all good solid conservative based, plus who he will consider for the supreme court. So you know what’s going on, and you know what Hillary will give you.
how about providing us with the info...like links... and back up your claim...
hack release of data accounts is many hillary propagandists have blaze accounts....
I want to see who they are...
And how about those good solid conservative based policies like " single payer health" that Trump wants???
STUCK WITH TRUMP 2016
Nice try, moron. 31,000 posts on Breitbart and the Daily Caller as a Conservative. Another 15,000 posts under a second username (when I lost the password for the first) as a Conservative. Did you ever think it might be the Trumptards who are Hillary supporters? How else do you explain their no longer caring about deporting illegals, Bernie Sanders' policy on trade, complete Liberal positions on Planned Parenthood & men in little girls' restrooms (and locker rooms), or a man who constantly lies to change the subject?
[-1] August 30, 2016 at 4:12pm
I think Beck thinks god gave him this platform, and at that point, he thought he was god. He thinks he gets to judge people like Trump when in fact Beck doesn’t know enough about the Truth to make any judgements. He confuses his opinions with truth.
 August 30, 2016 at 3:47pm
actually Rush follows the first rule of Regan’s 11th commandment. he never talked bad about any of the GOP candidates, probably leaned a little towards cruz, but didn’t buy all the BS about Trump, but also didn’t care, he was there to support whoever the nominee was. Beck has alot to learn, although it may be beck is actually a shill for Hillary, a claim he made against Trump, nonetheless, Beck is not honest.
If you listened to Rush all the way through the year you could come to no other conclusion. OR you could refer to one story on the unbiased Blaze and make an asshat of yourself in the comments. Either or.
I actually have listened to Rush since the late eighties and have never been disappointed until Trump came along. Things changed dramatically once Trump started sounding like a conservative with no PC filter. I liked what he said too at the beginning until I like most conservatives listened to what he was really saying. Lies, lies, lies. Limbaugh got conned by his golf buddy and couldn't take it back. Poor Rush, I still will listen to him though. Not Hannity. As for Asshats, Iv'e been called worse for no reason.
 August 30, 2016 at 3:32pm
The caller sounded like a typical sore loser beck follower. Trump is the best person for the job of anyone that ran, in fact that has ran since Regan. He will do more than Cruz every would have as well. With Trump, you may get Cruz on the SCOTUS where he belongs, with Hillary, you’re going to ruin the lives of millions of children for the next 35 years. It’s on you, the voter.
In August and September, 1980 the race with Carter was statistically even, Carter was not leading by 6 to 7 points, as the Hildabeast is currently leading Trump. And Reagan wrapped it up with strong debate performances, something Trump is unlikely to have over the Pantsuit Harridan (I think neither one will perform well in debates). In 1980 we had a competent candidate (and one incumbent President) in the race, today we have neither in the race. At this point in the 1984 re-election campaign Reagan was ahead by about 15 points, 'nuff said.
So other than on a typically Liberal "feelings" basis, what would cause anyone to think of a similarity between 1980 and 2016?
BTW, Donald Regan was Reagan's Treasury Secretary and later White House Chief of Staff. He didn't run for election.
I never liked ronnie raygun. But for you to even hint that trumpense is of the same caliber as ronnie was should be an insult to those on the right.
 August 29, 2016 at 4:58pm
Of course she’s a bigot, as are most liberals, they are completely intolerant of any ideas of others, so much so they want to shutdown and disrupt free speech from colleges to the trump campaign (although it wouldn’t have mattered, it would have been any gop candidate). You can see Beck is being a bit of a bigot himself, he didn’t get his way, so he refuses to endorse the candidate of the party of Lincoln and knows he is actively trying to get Hillary and her anti-freedom policies and activist judges into government.
The party of Lincoln? Hahahahahahaha! There is no party of Lincoln anymore, it's the Demoncrap party and the Demoncrap party lite!
It is the way of the dems and the weak-kneed RINOs (redundant, I know), to keep funding a permanent socio-economic underclass (the current plantation of 'soft racism' of low expectations) where they are constantly told that they will never amount to anything, have no hope of amounting to anything and can only succeed with more government. The permanent socio-economic underclass does not care where the money really originates, and the politicians who support such ignorance like that just fine - they know they are recognized as the sugar daddies.
 August 29, 2016 at 2:02am
so if you don’t know why he said that, it’s because he gave that example just the day before this happened as he has been reaching out to help make America safe again for the black communities. But he was attacked in the media saying he didn’t know what he was talking about and kept asking the question they thought would be rhetorical “what is he talking about”. But they got an answer and look like fools, so they try to make an issue out of that instead of eating crow.
Oh, Lord, I'm going to try. The problem is, Trump is missing the empathy gene. That's the one that's for caring about other than self. It probably the second most important gene in a president. He's supposed to care for each and everyone one of his three hundred and sixty million people in the country. Make sense, right. Smart first, empathetic second. Trump and empathy are MILES apart. All he had to do was send his condolences. We are not stupid. We would have gotten his message. One word. Would you walk up to the mother and say, "I told you so?" Or wouldn't a hug be enough? Do he has no empathy. None of the things he says is halfway respectful. He talks to us the like he thinks we're stupid. Dispute what folks think,
 August 28, 2016 at 2:35am
I have no problem with Trump pointing out what he was talking about when the past couple days everyone in media was putting out propaganda saying “what is trump talking about” and how “insensitive” it was to the African-americans. So right in their face, a public name figure is reported, so now trump says “this is what i’m talking about” and instead of eating crow, the media tries to propagandize that response. And while I have no problem with trump, I do have a big problem with people that have a problem with it, those type of people are the problem in this country, and that includes the blind Beck followers who think Beck was sent from god. He’s actively helping Clinton when he slandered Trump saying he was trying to get Hillary elected when he wanted Cruz who had no chance against Hillary and the media. So if you have a problem with what trump is saying, go look in the mirror, you’re the problem with the USA and the continual loss of freedom.
 August 27, 2016 at 8:21pm
Trump has been giving speeches the past few days and specifically used the example of a mom walking down the street with daughter getting shot and he want’s to fix it and make it safe again. Liberal media and rino’s were saying it was offensive to suggest that is happening and wondering “what is Donald trump talking about”. This happens and now he says “this is what I was talking about”. They make up more fake outrage, if rino’s (including cruz now) don’t tell the truth, I’ll never vote for an establishment person at all, if they are on the ticket, leaving it blank. This is literately exactly what trump said is happening and everyone who was offended by him pointing it out were the same ones saying it wasn’t happening and Trump didn’t know what he was talking about. So Beck, you going to fight for the truth and what’s right or are your feelings still hurt. Cruz is now without a political future, he be better off on the SCOTUS anyway, you should be promoting that.
Can’t trust the liberal media these days, which includes Becks rag. People of Chicago live daily with gangs and gunfire, but the left thinks the people are now all of a sudden scared and taken back over a honest tweet?
Please, Mr. Never let a tragedy go to waste has no plans of ever making the city safe and it's time the people wake up and follow the money. The majority of the money never makes it into the inner city, but rather goes into the coffers of the DemoRats.
You live in a small town. I get it.
 August 24, 2016 at 6:10pm
actually, going through and around police barricades is the essence of America. Heck the old friendly police officers would help. It’s this new last 30 year gestapo government that keeps encroaching on freedom. Vote Trump 2016 to push back a little bit.
 August 18, 2016 at 2:13am
It’s not Trump working for getting Hillary elected, it’s Beck that is working for Hillary. Beck was a shill for her. He knew Cruz couldn’t beat Hillary, now he’s in a panic that Trump will beat her.
If Cruz couldn't beat Hillary it's because too many people have lost respect for the constitution and need to be led around by the nose.
Most insane post I've read so far.
Let me tell you a little secret: If Glenn Beck had the power to stop Donald from being elected, then Donald never would have been nominated in the first place.
Also: Donald said that he didn't need people like us in order to win.
He IS winning right? All of those states he already has locked up? Because, I mean, you could run just about anyone against Hillary and win. She's one of the weakest candidates in history. I bet you're sick of winning, just like Donald promised.
"Beck was a shill for [Hillary]. He knew Cruz couldn’t beat Hillary, now he’s in a panic that Trump will beat her."
That has to be one of the most ridiculous theories I've ever heard.
 August 17, 2016 at 9:30pm
Beck was one of the shills coming up with this Trump is working for Hillary nonsense. But it turns out that Beck is the one working for Hillary. He know Cruz couldn’t win and now working for Hillary. This makes sense, over the past few years you can see something happened to beck. Now he’s actually actively campaigning for Hillary, but doing it a sneaky way. It appears Beck had listeners and what was left are followers which he’s leading down the path to darkness for them. With the SCOTUS in play, this election has consequences out 35+ years. Don’t be fooled by a wolf in sheeps clothing!.
Goes back to that meeting with the 2 dudes he talked about making a visit to him! The Soros clan that is they put the fear into him and shut him downnnnnnn fast! But he won't admit it!
August 15, 2016 at 11:42pm
and Beck wanting to save face is willing to have anti-american liberal judges be appointed to the SCOTUS instead of sucking it up and, if not admitting he was wrong, at least support Trump.
 August 11, 2016 at 6:15pm
If Trump doesn’t win, which I believe he will despite the corrupt power brokers attempt to keep power. You can put the next civil war on people like Beck and these never trump morons. Beck is completely out of touch and his got stuck by his dishonest characterization of Trump. So he’s not willing to say he was wrong because it makes him look bad, instead, he wants to keep whatever is left of his viewer base. If he was really a man of god, he’d be behind Trump 100% and calling out the dishonest and distorted media.
 June 15, 2016 at 1:02pm
It’s written with implied between the comma before “the right”. It’s just dishonest lawyer and tyrants who try to muddy things. The first thing a well regulated Militia (armed people) is then described why, then goes on to ensure the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You can also look at the text prior to the final text and its even more clear the second part stands on its own, if you then look at the debates, the same thing. They expect everyone to be armed and to use them to protect themselves. They even used to have duels if both agreed and shoot at each other, and nobody went to jail, however, if you murdered someone, you’re getting an eye-for-an-eye executed. Lot more freedom and smarts back then.
If one looks at the commentary of Madison and others during the debate of the Bill or Rights, one may find the text that supports the notion that the citizenry should be armed – the term “well-regulated Militia” should be reviewed as to 1) what comprises the militia? 2) who has authority over the militia? 3) what “regulates well” that militia (hint: it’s not the answer to number 2)?
 June 15, 2016 at 12:56pm
Where does The Constitution give the feds any power to make laws over individuals? The Feds are their to ensure the states are not too restrictive and to handle the nations interest with foreign governments. And there is no “gun problem”, there is a lack of swift execution problem, lack of smart policing (due to PC), lack of honest media problem, lack of freedom of speech problem…
 May 10, 2016 at 7:45pm
My monthly payment is about the same, but the deductible is much higher, and everything I do has a copay amount for every single line item. So a physical ends up costing me $80 when it’s supposed to be free. Anything else done, more cost. It’s crazy!