User Profile: dig4gold


Member Since: October 15, 2010

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

  • March 5, 2014 at 6:07pm

    J-Mo: Evolution is Science.

    J-Mo: “Science” has yet to duplicate ANY evolution of one species from another.”

    So which is it? Is evolution observable and repeatable or is it just what you have faith in?

    Responses (1) +
  • March 5, 2014 at 10:24am

    These strata were tilted and went through great tectonic activity as the Colorado Plateau was uplifted during the final stages of the Flood. The sedimentary layers which make up the nine distinct layers of the third major division of the Canyon walls show that they were soft and unconsolidated when they bent, unlike the basement rocks which fractured. The sand grains in these sedimentary layers show no evidence that the material was brittle and rock-hard, and neither has the mineral cementing the grains been broken. Instead, the evidence points to the whole 4,000-feet (1.220 m) thickness of horizontal strata being still “plastic” when it was uplifted and bent.

    Sorry, long age doesn’t cut it.

  • March 5, 2014 at 8:16am

    J-Mo, your objections are based on uniformitarian models. That view has come under fire in the scientific community lately. One only has to look at Mt. St. Helens to see the error of that theory. In a matter of a few days or even hours a 1/40th scale model of the Grand Canyon was formed. This was documented and witnessed by modern humans, if you want to say that people in the 1980′s were modern. ; ) Any comment on the video “Evolution vs God”?

    Responses (1) +
  • March 4, 2014 at 10:58pm

    Without deep time evolution fails as a legitimate theory. There are many challenges to this deep time. There have been unfossilized tissue found on dinosaur bones. There continues to be c14 found in almost everything that it should not be found in given the amount of time that is alleged, even in diamonds! But don’t take my word on it listen to the greatest evolutionist of our day try to explain their position. It’s great for a laugh.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 27, 2014 at 8:51am

    All of these planets obey mathematics and mathematics is from the mind of God:

  • January 27, 2014 at 8:49am

    “I’m sure the story of the flood and a boat to rescue life is a Babylonian invention,” he reportedly said.

    A Babylonian invention? Babylon came after the flood, so yes they would have had a record of it. A perverted record but a record of none the less.

  • January 24, 2014 at 1:19am

    Yikes! I wouldn’t marry her for a million dollars … oh wait, 130 million dollars …she’s not so bad. Kidding, still not going to happen.

  • January 23, 2014 at 8:44am

    It is harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle. This should give anyone pause when considering what they put their trust in. It is not wealth that excludes one from heaven but the love of wealth. You can be wealthy and a blessing to others if you love your neighbor as yourself but if you love your wealth more then it will not save you in the end.

    You simply will end up in a real nice coffin but you will be separate from true wealth, true love for eternity. I would suggest to desire the things that are eternal, of what importance will it be to hold a bag full of gold in heaven when as you look down you realize that you are walking on streets of gold?

    Store up riches in heaven where neither moth nor rust will destroy.

  • January 15, 2014 at 6:04pm

    If you mess with Jerusalem you are messing with the apple of His eye (Zechariah 2) and with the bride of Messiah (Rev 21).

    Don’t go there!

  • January 15, 2014 at 5:56pm

    You can’t fix liberal.

    In reply to the story Michelle Obama Doesn't Rule Out...

  • January 15, 2014 at 5:44pm

    We “seasoned citizens” don’t give a crap about colored dots, but hey, if you like your dot you can keep it.

  • January 3, 2014 at 9:04am

    Creation science has made *predictions that were proved true. Evolutionism at its core is based on anti-scientific principles such as life from non-life, organisms increasing in complexity beyond their DNA programming and species changing into completely other kinds of species to name a few.

    *Dr. Humphreys made predictions about the magnetic fields of Mercury, Mars, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, well before those magnetic fields were measured by spacecraft. As of July, 2012, the first five have turned out to be “right on,” whereas the expectations of evolutionists were not fulfilled.

  • September 17, 2013 at 6:37pm

    The duty of our military is to defend our country. This cannot be done without the proper tools, i.e., guns! A soldier without a weapon is like a plumber without a wrench. The job cannot be done without the right tools.

    No if we can get these “tools” out of our government we the people can be safe again.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 29, 2013 at 9:25am

    I had to laugh. The “evidence” that she did provide illustrated a bird “evolving” into a …. bird. The bird changed and there is no argument about that but it didn’t change what it was; a bird. Isn’t that the point?

    Responses (2) +
  • August 20, 2013 at 3:02pm

    PATRIOTNAMERICA: Don’t worry be happy!!! Celebrate life under the Jewish Apartheid!
    PATRIOTNAMERICA: Who gives a damn while under Jewish occupation?

    Now that is a prime example of a racist. These three hoodlums and this “patriot” are two sides of the same coin.

    Zech 2:8 For thus says the Lord of hosts, “After glory He has sent me against the nations which plunder you, for he who touches you, touches the apple of His eye.

  • July 25, 2013 at 2:57pm

    Sorry, credit for “Who created God” by R.C. Sproll. May his name be remembered!

  • July 25, 2013 at 2:55pm

    Who created God? Did God need a creator?

    Choose an object, any object. OK, you picked a pen (for this purpose).

    If this pen can be said to exist then one of the following must be true:

    1) It created itself
    2) It always existed (eternal, no beginning, no end)
    3) It came into being by an eternal being (or force)

    As I understand it those are the only choices for being.

    We can rule out created itself, that is a contradiction that is plain to see. If there is Nothing to create then Nothing will be created.

    Is it eternal? It could run out of ink and thereby change i.e. it is not immutable which means contingency. Besides I don’t think the pen is the supreme being.

    Did it come into existence through something that has the power of existence within itself, something that has the power of being in itself? I think this is the only logical explanation to this excellent question.

    Chance is a word – That is all it is. It has no power because it is not a being, it is not an entity. Chance is no thing, let me say it again, chance is nothing.

    To dispute the fact that something eternal and self existent is responsible for everything requires a flight into irrationality.

    There is a transcendent (by that I do not mean geography but ontology [nature]) being.
    He alone has the power of self existence He is the highest order of being and the supreme point of highness is to have ones being in and of oneself.

    He transcends everything else in the univers

  • July 24, 2013 at 9:31pm

    The Chaplain’s essay was not an assertion of the phrase but more of a historical account and some personal reflection about the implications of the phrase. Totally appropriate for a Chaplin’s reflection and exhortation.

    What is not appropriate is someone who is offended by a historic phrase and demands that no one else can be encouraged and inspired by it because well, it offends.

    War is hell. That offends me, it is true but it still offends me because the enemy of my soul causes the strife and hate that causes the wars. I however do not demand that no one can read or hear this quote. It offends me because it is true and maybe that is the point.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 24, 2013 at 3:55pm

    Guns I’ve got. Now if we could get the government to allow us some ammo!!!

  • July 23, 2013 at 9:28pm

    Mutations produce less fit organisms. Natural selection destroys unfit organisms. Time brings death and disintegration.

    The 3 legged stool of evolution cannot stand. They all work against each other.

    By the way, what percentage of mutations are possitive?
    What percentage are negative or detrimental?

    Wouldn’t there necessarily need to be a greatly higher percentage of possitive mutations for there to be any upward “evolution”? What do we see in science? Hmmm.