TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying digijock's 10 most recent comments.

• Caption that photo!: John McCain

  March 9, 2013 at 4:00pm

  McCain: “You nuisance young troublemakers — GET OFF MY ELEVATOR!!”

• Nancy Pelosi: Violent Movies & Video Games Aren’t the Problem, Gun Laws Are

  February 10, 2013 at 9:16pm

  Nancy could very well be the poster-wench for Supremely Faulty Logic. Uh, maybe Japanese children aren’t as drug-soaked, ill-educated, politically-corrected and immature nowadays as what we find here? Do you *really* think constant bombardment with violent and ruthless imagery and fantasy has *no* significant effect? Really? How can anyone be so utterly stupid as Nancy Pelosi? Or Captain D. Or Schumer. Or Bloomberg. A pattern is emerging. In fact, she can’t even be that stupid. She’s obviously a lying manipulator, driven by her own political ambitions and personal greed. Heck, it’s the “new normal” – isn’t it? But then, that’s just my impression.

• What Is Google’s Map Update Showing in N. Korea?

  January 30, 2013 at 9:44pm

  In reply to GuruMeditation.

  Hahaha — yes badly wrong, indeed! ;-) #81000005

• Gawker Publishes Complete 446-Page List of ‘All the A**holes Who Own Guns in New York City’

  January 8, 2013 at 6:35pm

  I support the right to choose… S&W, Glock, Springfield, Beretta, Ruger, Colt, Bushmaster, etc… And the magazine size that you prefer.

• Navy Bans Live Nativity on U.S. Base Following Atheist Group’s Complaint: ‘Unconstitutional’ & ‘Dangerous’

  December 11, 2012 at 10:39pm

  In reply to calmandcents.

  To rebut this, either one must be cognitively impaired, ignorant of history, naive regarding human nature, or utterly stupid. To quote some anonymous historian or philosopher, “we have been here before”. There is nothing else left to say.

• Navy Bans Live Nativity on U.S. Base Following Atheist Group’s Complaint: ‘Unconstitutional’ & ‘Dangerous’

  December 11, 2012 at 10:23pm

  In reply to ChrisDiamond.

  If you wanted to celebrate the holidays by commemorating atrocities, I would worry about your sanity. However, I would also defend your right to do so, because that is fundamentally part of our constitutional freedom of expression and speech. Don’t expect me, or others to agree with you, though. I would argue that Christians do tend not celebrate past atrocities, but tend to focus exclusively on the virtues of their faith. Not so sure you can say the same for the Muslims, when they celebrate. Therein lies a difference. Perhaps I am unqualified to offer the explanation. I will leave that for you as another thought experiment. I am firmly agnostic, by reason that I have no special understanding of whose religion is most “correct”, and only that the obvious moral imperatives of sustainable civilization can be used to evaluate the present views of people.

• Navy Bans Live Nativity on U.S. Base Following Atheist Group’s Complaint: ‘Unconstitutional’ & ‘Dangerous’

  December 11, 2012 at 10:03pm

  In reply to stopprintn.

  Sadly, Civil War II.

• Dem Delegates & Supporters On Video: We’re Really Pro-Choice…Unless It Involves Food, School, or Union Choice

  September 5, 2012 at 3:44pm

  Add your “choice in firearms” to the list, too. They seem to be back on their “assault weapons ban” kick again. I *hate* these people. I know I shouldn’t hate anyone, but when you’re constantly worried about what they’re going to take from you next — that’s not America. That’s a state of fear. We should not be living in fear of the government’s whims and desires. Democrats, you are the Anti-America. You stand for just about everything *except* American principles of liberty, free choice and self-determination.

• Conference of Mayors, Representing 1,295 U.S. Cities, Calls for Stricter Gun Laws Following Sikh Temple Shooting

  August 6, 2012 at 10:34pm

  Attn: Encinom
  As much as I rather not pay attention to you, this must be said. Here’s the amendment in question:

  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

  Regardless of what you make of the rest, it does indeed say “the right of the PEOPLE”, not the right of the “militia” or “government”. Whatever the justification for the “right” may be, the directive is itself unambiguous. Seems pretty clear to me.

  Being a democrat-programmed moron and Orwellianist, you may have trouble understanding simple phrases. I hope this has helped.

• Alabama Town Defies Atheist Demands By Reinstating Bible Verses on Welcome Signs

  May 10, 2012 at 1:59pm

  In reply to RamonPreston.

  Interestingly, it would seem that, based on the language of the 1st amendment, congress *could* enact laws restricting matters involving the absence of religion – ie, atheism. Put that in your pipe…
  And no, I’m not particularly religious, myself. When asked, I claim to be agnostic. But this fanatical atheism has got to stop – you guys are just nuts.