The “rich” already pay virtually ALL taxes in this country… why don’t you peruse the IRS tax tables sometime and “discern” what share those in the top 5% already pay… and then take a gander at what “share” those in the bottom 40% pay…
Hint, the anwers are “most” and “none” respectively
So take your liberal, progressive, socialistic statist carpola elsewhere, low-information one.
 April 30, 2013 at 4:03pm
Ignore EncinoMOMMYlockedmeinthebasementafterIgraduated… he’s just getting churlish after so many years in the – literally – dark.
You’re the poster child for “mindless” and “nut”; with a clear mental block against anything remotely approaching rational thought and/or logic.
Every single person in Newtown, and in Auroro, and in that Luby’s and… so on ad nauseum… died in a legally “gun free zone”… yep, sure protected those people, huh?
You are a special kind of stupid; incapable of true logical thought.
Try looking up key logical concepts like syllogism sometime… you might actually learn something.
 April 30, 2013 at 3:58pm
And you, EncinoMOMMYlocked me in the basement, are nothing more than a trollish lefty/progressive.
NOTHING about law abiding citizens being armed “puts children at risk”; certainly not MORE risk than they are in a defenseless locked down school, while a law breaking criminal (or insane person) slowly and methodically mows them down.
Fact: Citizenry who take the time, trouble, effort, and cost of investing in concealed carry are the LAST people who would ever risk their Carry ID by doing something – anything! – illegal.
Criminals, and the insane… not so much.
Chicago has the most restrictive gun control legislation in the entire country. And it leads in murders by gunfire. Why? Because those who ARE the crims KNOW their victims are almost certainly UNARMED! That, and the fact that they don’t actually prosecute violations
We don’t need NO LAWS (sorry but that’s specious nonsense, Godfather1), what we need is enforcement of the laws we have. And the right to defend ourselves – anywhere.
September 21, 2012 at 12:40pm
All y’all dumping on Scott Brown because he’s a RINO (which he *is*) are missing the point…
I’ve lived here in Mass for over 30 years now. I was one of 7, yes SEVEN, R’s in my town before I moved to a different one that is somewhat more balance. This is the reddest, of red states… the *best* we’ll ever do here *is* a RINO…
It may sound/feel good to say “we’ll replace him next time”, but we’ll never, NEVER replace him with someone more to the right/conservative side. It’s the way it is. As long as he caucuses “R”, and supports the important filibusters (which he does and has), it’s all we can hope for….
September 18, 2012 at 3:39pm
At Andyeditmoves: and your post of supposedly the Moochers being from RED states, via this link:
One minor flaw with your (and their) liberal logic… that is “non-filers”, not filers who don’t pay, and not “filers” who file and get a payment/credit… THEY are the true moochers…
If you don’t file, and *have* earned something – you are breaking the law and the IRS hunts you down, and catches you
If you don’t file, and you haven’t earned a dime – you get *nothing* back from the feds in the form of Earned Income Credits
Apparently, you, the WP lefty bloggers, and the left in general have difficulty understanding that words mean things… Failing to FILE is not == a “Moocher”
The true demographic is to show the same graphic of all the states and identify specifically how many FILERS receive payments back that exceed their payments in (via withholding), and how many filers who file (because they had withholding) owe NOTHING in Federal taxes at all; i.e. they get a refund of 100% the paid in…
THAT would be the true “moocher map”
August 29, 2012 at 3:20pm
Was that designed to be a MOCKING piece? Sure seemed that way… get rid of it, or get a better editor
That video is horrible. It was disgraceful no matter who did the editing
August 21, 2012 at 10:42am
Another example of the “Religion of Peace”… ROFLMAO
August 21, 2012 at 10:25am
Given that it *is* New Mexico, and that they *were* stupid enough to give him a 15% win last time… unfortunately, his and his campaigns ‘judgement’ of the intelligence of the voters there may unfortunately be correct…
August 8, 2012 at 1:10pm
Being Gay is Either a) a Choice, or b) a condition from birth
If it is a Choice, then it can be corrected… if it is a birth condition, then, under laws of evolution, it is a birth defect (heritance NOT supporting promulgation of the genes).
As far as the “value” judgement of the choice or defect… I tend towards libertarianism… “whatever, but don’t force it on anyone else, in any way whatsoever”…
Personally, I’m inclined towards birth defect/inherited, but that’s just my direct experience with people involved.