User Profile: dissentnow


Member Since: April 02, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • March 24, 2014 at 10:09am

    History will also show that al-Awlaki was an American citizen and, as such, he deserved his due process, no matter how wicked he might have been. The precedent that Obama created here is terrifying. One day, a future president may use this precedent to assassinate his political opponents or people that he claims pose a threat to national security. Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that the government proposed that right-wingers, libertarians, gun owners, returning veterans, Ron Paul and Bob Barr supporters, and people with pro constitution literature were considered to be the most likely to engage in domestic terrorism.
    History will also show that it was the reactionaries, ( the people who support legislation such as the patriot act and the NDAA out of fear, intimidation, cowardice, or a false sense of “patriotism” ) in both parties, who are responsible for giving future presidents the power to do unspeakable things.
    You are either on the right side of history or the wrong side of history.

  • March 24, 2014 at 9:23am

    “and any person or group who does not believe in upholding the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law”

    Does that include the people who supported the Patriot Act, both under Obama AND Bush?
    How about the people who supported the murder of Anwar al-Awlaki?

    Responses (2) +
  • March 23, 2014 at 6:23pm

    If it is faulty spelling and improper punctuation that you seek, you should head over to worldstarhiphop.
    I highly doubt that you have the guts or even the intellectual integrity to mock their spelling mistakes. It wouldn’t fit your narrative, would it?

  • March 23, 2014 at 1:29pm

    Actually, they already have the progressives and the neocons. Unless the GOP has the testicular fortitude to nominate a candidate like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz ( someone that puts the best interests of America first, instead of the insane interventionist foreign policy that we have followed now for decades ), then they will have the GOP as well. Remember, Romney supported the Syrian rebels, well after it was public knowledge that the rebels were, in fact, al Qaeda.
    Islam will always have the left because progressives hate western values and culture but do we really want them to have the right, as well?

  • March 23, 2014 at 12:55pm

    If there is one thing that unites the progressives and the neocons its their unwavering support for a foreign policy that promotes radical Islam, including the support of terrorist groups like al Qaeda.

  • March 19, 2014 at 6:42am

    Here’s to swimmin’ with bow-legged women

  • March 18, 2014 at 8:16am

    Next he’ll say that the Earth is only 6,000 years old………

    Responses (1) +
  • March 16, 2014 at 5:53pm

    ” How does the news strike you that Phelps is reportedly near death?”


  • March 15, 2014 at 11:34pm

    Great…….Another war! Obama and the neocons can’t get enough…..

    Responses (1) +
  • March 15, 2014 at 7:14pm

    I hate Maher because he is a flaming hypocrite that doesn’t hold Obama to the same standards that he held Bush. Maher, as well as the majority of the left, has given Obama a free pass on drones, the NSA, domestic spy programs, renewing the patriot act, blowing up innocent women and children with drones, doubling the size of the war in Afghanistan, gutting the freedom of the press, waging a war on whistle blowers, creating “no free speech zones”……..shall I continue?

  • March 15, 2014 at 7:06pm

    I despise Bill Maher but apparently none of you have actually watched his movie, Religulous. Maher is much more critical of Islam and the Islamic world than he is of Christianity. And, yes, he has gone to the Middle East and said those things.
    You guys sound like a bunch of liberals with all of your crying. Quit playing the victim card.
    That being said, Maher is still a raging D-bag and the Blaze should not even bother covering him or his crappy show. More people read about him on the blaze than actually watch his show.

  • March 15, 2014 at 12:04pm

    So, questioning the official government 9/11 narrative is horrible and evil but its ok to question whether the government is killing bankers?

  • March 13, 2014 at 2:26am


    Again, you prove my point. You have no idea what a “truther” is. A truther is anyone who questions the official government narrative. I will also bet that your dealings with “truthers” are comprised entirely of message board flame wars with internet trolls.
    Mindless, you say……kind of like how everyone here mindlessly supported the patriot act and domestic spy programs when an (R) was in office….
    “If ya aint got nothin’ to hide, then ya aint got nothin’ to worry about”

  • March 13, 2014 at 2:16am

    Then you really haven’t dealt with many 9/11 truthers, have you?

  • March 12, 2014 at 6:08pm

    ” Nothing threatens this country more than liberal democrats, nothing!”

    Don’t forget republicans that support the patriot act, the NDAA, domestic spy programs, endless foreign interventions, out of control spending……..shall I continue?

  • March 12, 2014 at 6:06pm

    I question the official 9/11 story AND I do NOT believe in man-made climate change. What is your point, Gator?

  • March 12, 2014 at 5:52pm

    The dumb republicans are the ones who, during the Bush administration, were telling everyone that “if you aint got nothing to hide, then you aint got nothing to worry about”. They are the same ones who are now calling for Obama to be impeached over domestic spying. Those are the dumb ones. They should be divided…..and called out……and removed from the GOP because they have proven that they can’t be trusted with our freedoms and our liberties.
    If calling out the yellow-bellied, cowardly neocons can bring more true leaders like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Justin Amash to the forefront, then more power to them.

  • March 12, 2014 at 5:40pm

    The truth behind Benghazi is that we were running guns to al Qaeda…..I guess that makes me a “truther”, huh?

  • March 12, 2014 at 3:38pm

    Being a “truther” doesn’t necessarily mean that you think that Bush and Cheney pushed the plunger that took down the towers.
    “Truther” is an umbrella term. There are lots of different people who have different theories about 9/11. If you question any part of the official story, then you are a “truther”.
    If you question the motives as to why are government is currently aiding and supporting al Qaeda in Syria, you might be a “truther”.
    Questioning our government is not a bad thing.

  • March 12, 2014 at 3:32pm


    There is nothing wrong with questioning our government.
    I would be willing to bet that if 9/11 happened under a democrat’s watch, there would be plenty of people here questioning the official story.
    But because the president had an (R) at the end of his name……..nothing to see here, folks, move along….
    The fact remains that are government is openly supporting al Qaeda in Syria. If we are willing to use al Qaeda to effect policy change in Syria, who is to say that we wouldn’t use them to effect policy change here at home? Look at the massive policy changes that occurred after 9/11. Look at how many freedoms that we lost.
    Never let a crisis go to waste, right?

123 To page: Go