User Profile: dissentnow


Member Since: April 02, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 20, 2014 at 7:19am


    Beck was not being sarcastic when he called the tea party racist. He was in full CYA mode, which is the act of a true coward.

  • April 20, 2014 at 7:03am


    I posted the link where he said it. Perhaps you missed it.
    Happy Easter, moron.

  • April 19, 2014 at 1:06pm

    Legitimately criticizing Beck for taking a stance on an issue does not make you a troll, nor does it amount to “bashing”.
    Beck is in full CYA mode here and it is cowardly and pathetic but it fits a particular pattern with him.
    Furthermore, it is high time that the dumb republicans are divided and removed from the republican party….and by “dumb”, I mean those who have continuously voted for and supported liberals like Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain, and Romney, as well as the patriot Act, domestic spy programs, warrantless wiretapping, etc.
    If the republicans keep voting for the liberals that Karl Rove pushes, then they deserve to continue losing elections.

  • April 19, 2014 at 12:51pm


  • April 19, 2014 at 11:10am

    I don’t know why anyone is surprised by Beck’s behavior. He has a history of doing this. Remember when he called the tea party racist? Beck is an opportunist

    Responses (7) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 11:10pm

    Yep, they are all terrorists…
    and domestic spy programs are great….
    Killing American citizens without due process is awesome…..
    The NSA is the best…..
    The government is here to protect and serve…..
    War is peace……
    You are a tool.

  • April 18, 2014 at 10:44pm

    I wonder how they feel about Beck calling them terrorists?
    Its like when he called the tea party racists….
    A coward by any other name is still a coward.

    Responses (4) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 9:25pm

    I hope that all of the neocons out there who act like a bunch of knee-jerk liberals when it comes to their support for authoritative national security measures can finally understand why killing someone like Anwar al-Awlaki without due process is not a good thing.
    Yesterday’s terrorist (al Qaeda) is now our ally in Syria. Today’s terrorists, according to our government, are people who oppose the big government/big brother nanny state, as well as gun owners, libertarians, constitutionalists, Ron Paul supporters, returning veterans, etc.
    Wake up, people! Obama has set the precedent to kill American citizens who he deems to be a threat to national security (domestic terrorists) without due process and he did it with the blessings of so many people on the right who claim to be constitutionalists. This is not going to end well, people.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:36pm

    Oh, look…..Beck and Reid have something in common.

  • April 18, 2014 at 12:35pm

    That would explain Rachel Maddow….

  • March 24, 2014 at 10:09am

    History will also show that al-Awlaki was an American citizen and, as such, he deserved his due process, no matter how wicked he might have been. The precedent that Obama created here is terrifying. One day, a future president may use this precedent to assassinate his political opponents or people that he claims pose a threat to national security. Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that the government proposed that right-wingers, libertarians, gun owners, returning veterans, Ron Paul and Bob Barr supporters, and people with pro constitution literature were considered to be the most likely to engage in domestic terrorism.
    History will also show that it was the reactionaries, ( the people who support legislation such as the patriot act and the NDAA out of fear, intimidation, cowardice, or a false sense of “patriotism” ) in both parties, who are responsible for giving future presidents the power to do unspeakable things.
    You are either on the right side of history or the wrong side of history.

  • March 24, 2014 at 9:23am

    “and any person or group who does not believe in upholding the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law”

    Does that include the people who supported the Patriot Act, both under Obama AND Bush?
    How about the people who supported the murder of Anwar al-Awlaki?

    Responses (2) +
  • March 23, 2014 at 6:23pm

    If it is faulty spelling and improper punctuation that you seek, you should head over to worldstarhiphop.
    I highly doubt that you have the guts or even the intellectual integrity to mock their spelling mistakes. It wouldn’t fit your narrative, would it?

  • March 23, 2014 at 1:29pm

    Actually, they already have the progressives and the neocons. Unless the GOP has the testicular fortitude to nominate a candidate like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz ( someone that puts the best interests of America first, instead of the insane interventionist foreign policy that we have followed now for decades ), then they will have the GOP as well. Remember, Romney supported the Syrian rebels, well after it was public knowledge that the rebels were, in fact, al Qaeda.
    Islam will always have the left because progressives hate western values and culture but do we really want them to have the right, as well?

  • March 23, 2014 at 12:55pm

    If there is one thing that unites the progressives and the neocons its their unwavering support for a foreign policy that promotes radical Islam, including the support of terrorist groups like al Qaeda.

  • March 19, 2014 at 6:42am

    Here’s to swimmin’ with bow-legged women

  • March 18, 2014 at 8:16am

    Next he’ll say that the Earth is only 6,000 years old………

    Responses (1) +
  • March 16, 2014 at 5:53pm

    ” How does the news strike you that Phelps is reportedly near death?”


  • March 15, 2014 at 11:34pm

    Great…….Another war! Obama and the neocons can’t get enough…..

    Responses (1) +
  • March 15, 2014 at 7:14pm

    I hate Maher because he is a flaming hypocrite that doesn’t hold Obama to the same standards that he held Bush. Maher, as well as the majority of the left, has given Obama a free pass on drones, the NSA, domestic spy programs, renewing the patriot act, blowing up innocent women and children with drones, doubling the size of the war in Afghanistan, gutting the freedom of the press, waging a war on whistle blowers, creating “no free speech zones”……..shall I continue?

123 To page: Go