Liberty University

User Profile: dissentnow

dissentnow

Member Since: April 02, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • September 27, 2014 at 4:24am

    #1 Why are you so interested in how I will look while I’m in my coffin? Are you into that sort of thing?
    #2 I think that if I’m laying in a coffin I will have more important things to worry about than a “wall of green wrinkles”.
    #3 Get a life.

  • [3] September 26, 2014 at 5:52pm

    “Soon You Can Smell Like a Racist Revolutionary or a Communist Dictator”

    Now we know the real reason why Holder is stepping down……he’s starting his own fragrance line!

  • [2] September 26, 2014 at 4:42pm

    Trash?
    Non sober?

    You are very judgmental but, hey, at least you own up to it.

  • [2] September 26, 2014 at 4:27pm

    Tommy Lee….
    Dave Navarro……
    lightweights, the lot of them! If I had to be a rock star, I would be Lemmy.

  • [13] September 26, 2014 at 4:20pm

    I work hard for my money and, as such, I will do with it as I please. Do I have ink? yes….Will I continue to get ink? yes. Do I give to charity? Yes. Will I continue to give to charity? Yes. Life is a balance.
    Besides, all the time that you’re wasting putting people down online for getting inked could be time used for even more charity. Balance?

  • [25] September 26, 2014 at 4:13pm

    Opinions are like Obamas…..everyone has one and they all stink.
    I, for one, like women with tattoos.

    Responses (4) +
  • [4] September 6, 2014 at 5:14pm

    @Brent

    I’m not a “right-winger”. That might be hard for a disingenuous, intellectually impaired, leftist troll, such as yourself, to comprehend.
    Try again, stupid.

  • [3] September 6, 2014 at 5:11pm

    @Brent

    There is more integrity and intellectual honesty in the group of people that I cited above than there is in the entire democrat party.
    Go ahead and keep cheerleading your liberal heroes as they continue to push to get us involved in more entangling foreign alliances, arm terrorists, trample the 4th amendment, expand the domestic spy program and warrantless wiretapping, blow up innocent women and children with drones, and wage a war on federal whistle blowers.
    Stay classy, leftist troll.

  • [7] September 6, 2014 at 3:29pm

    @imperative

    I believe that it is a matter of perception. The republicans said nothing as bush gutted the 4th amendment and spent us into oblivion but as soon as Obama got elected they all magically found their inner Thomas Jefferson and got their collective Gadsden flags in a wad over Obama’s fiscal irresponsibility. They’re all hypocrites. The same goes for the democrats who wanted to impeach Bush for the patriot act and domestic spy programs but who haven’t said a word about Obama tripling the domestic spy program, renewing the patriot act and signing the NDAA.
    Party politics is hypocritical by nature and, thus, the river of hypocrisy flows in both directions.

  • [9] September 6, 2014 at 1:12pm

    @imperative

    New republican party?
    Seems to me that the republicans have be acting like this for a LONG, LONG time. Both parties, in fact, are equally hypocritical in their logic (or lack thereof).

  • [3] September 6, 2014 at 1:09pm

    Swanny,
    I understand where you are coming from but I disagree with throwing it all on the SCOTUS. We need to elect leaders who exercise restraint and who understand the consequences of their actions, especially in regards to future administrations. Like it or not, precedent DOES shape laws, which is why we need leaders who will not be so quick to jump towards knee-jerk legislation or abuses of executive powers.

  • [3] September 6, 2014 at 12:04pm

    Its all good. We usually are on the same page, East

  • [11] September 6, 2014 at 11:31am

    “if you are somehow implying that Unconstitutional laws can be moderated or justified based on their intent, then, yes… we disagree sharply”

    East,
    I didn’t say anything close to that. I actually argued the exact opposite. No offense but I don’t think that you actually read what I wrote.
    My point is that both parties are guilty of knee-jerk unconstitutional abuses of presidential powers and that both parties claim to do it for “good intentions”. We must understand these intentions or we will be doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over and over again.

  • [21] September 6, 2014 at 11:24am

    “Bush also never used wiretapping for political gain. He did for our protection”

    There is no excuse for violating the constitution.

  • [12] September 6, 2014 at 11:00am

    “i don’t care what either Bush or Obama’s intent was/ is”

    I couldn’t disagree more. The issue here is precedent and when it comes to precedent, intentions are everything.
    Both parties have disastrous knee-jerk reactions to certain issues; Democrats have knee-jerk reactions to issues involving race, gender, sexual orientation, climate, etc, whereas republicans have knee-jerk reactions to defense, war, national security, etc.
    In both cases, both parties claim the moral high ground, citing “good intentions” (i.e. safety/preventing another terrorist attack in the case of republicans, and social justice in the case of the democrats) while simultaneously, both parties seek to limit our freedoms and our constitutional liberties by pushing legislation such as the patriot act and Obamacare.
    This is why we must single out the intent behind the laws that are passed. It is to ensure that we don’t make the same knee-jerk mistakes again because the unconstitutional powers that an administration grants to itself never go away. Instead, they transfer to all future administrations. It is a snowball effect with tyranny as an end result.

  • [193] September 6, 2014 at 9:34am

    but the precedent that Obama has used to gut 4th amendment was set by the Bush administration. Although, I tend to agree that Bush had noble intentions, whereas Obama is fulfilling a socialist big brother utopia, the fact remains that Obama is using unconstitutional powers that transferred to him from the Bush administration.
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions……
    This is why we need to elect solid constitutionalists, such as Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, or Justin Amash; people who understand precedent and who understand that any unconstitutional powers that you use will one day be transferred to future administrations.

    Responses (10) +
  • [10] August 20, 2014 at 9:54pm

    This administration’s hatred for all things “white” knows no bounds. Holder may be even more despicable than Obama is…..if that is even possible.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] August 20, 2014 at 5:58pm

    You guys are low information posters.
    Maher has been saying that Islam is a violent religion and that Muslims commit the overwhelming majority of acts of terrorism around the world for years. I guess that you only hear what you want to hear….typical of kneejerk reactionaries like yourselves.

  • [9] August 20, 2014 at 5:57am

    You couldn’t be more wrong. I can’t stand Maher but the man is much harder on Islam than he is on Christianity.

    Responses (3) +
  • August 10, 2014 at 9:32pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVmeeYwEiQw

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go