When one considers the parallels between ****** Iran and the Nazis, comparisons are both profound, troubling, and portend evil for the world. Chinese/Japanese allies; Hitler was allied with Russia (Soviets) from September 1939 – June 1941; Hitler took over Austria, Iran has de facto control or Iraq, etc.
“Why would the Obama administration claim victory in the middle of a sensitive negotiation? Maybe for the same reason that the swap of five Taliban commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was declared a national triumph and Bergdahl himself, now charged by the Army with desertion, was praised for serving with “honor and distinction.” On occasion, the administration seems so anxious to score political points that it is incapable of acting with restraint.”
According to Will Rogers: “Politics pretty quiet over the week-end. Democrats are attacking and the Republicans are defending. All the Democrats have to do is promise “what they would do if they got in.” But the Republicans have to promise “what they would do” and then explain why they haven’t already “done it.”
LOL, and she was burnt at the stake for heresy by mystics in the midst of centuries of religious wars. What's your point?
April 14, 2015 at 7:38pm
The Iranians have their Japanese/Chinese; Italian/Syrian allies. Instead of physical occupation, the Iranian/Nazi Germany regime exercises Anschluss with Iraq/Austria through political influence and interference with fellow Shiites: Moqtada al-Sadr. Iranians pursue religious ideology while Nazis followed racial ideology… for the minority elite.
The Revolutionary Guard constitutes a “parallel security state within Iran” and resembles the Shutz Staffel (Protection Squadron), Hitler’s SS, or body guard. Instead of protecting a person, however, this elite group protects the Iranian Revolution and its clerics. Independent of the regular military establishment, the Revolutionary Guard is deeply entrenched within the Iranian economy.
“The weakest point in President Obama’s defense of his deal with Iran is his claim that “it is a good deal even if Iran doesn’t change at all.”
Let’s consider that scenario. An Iran that does not change will reap hundreds of billions of dollars in fresh revenue from the lifting of sanctions, and it will surely use much of that to fund its ongoing military adventures in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. It will supply more weapons to Hamas and other radical Palestinian groups, and invest more in its long-range missiles, cyberweapons and other military technologies not covered by the agreement. It will continue developing advanced centrifuges for uranium enrichment and after a decade will begin installing them.”
In 1996, the late, great New York Times columnist William Safire published a column, “ Blizzard of lies,” in which he laid out a series of falsehoods by Hillary Rodham Clinton and declared “Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady — a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation — is a congenital liar.”
There's a bridge out there missing its troll. Oh there you are!!
Ted father convinced Ted HE"S the 2nd coming
and God ordained him to be president.
I am thinking more so that the JOKE is you.
I think the comparison between liberals posting on sites like The Blaze, and conservatives posting on sites like Huffington Posts, is interesting. In almost every case, conservative posts provide reference links, logic, and facts to the conversation. Liberal posts always make some lame attempt at grade-school put downs. When your argument is basically "nuh uh!" don't you think you might want to rethink your political position?