Me, too. I was screaming at the TV (just before I turned it off) to turn off the cameras and if there was going to be an “issue’, it would be because of the publicity. That black twerp was trying to provoke a response. What if that cop had had enough and was willing to give up his career and smash that kids face in? Would the kid be happy lying in the hospital half blind, jaw wired together, his nose smeared all over his face. Naw, he would be whimpering and whining about how he is going to be ugly the rest of his life and how unfair life is?
 November 17, 2015 at 4:39pm
Blocking interstates? Time to break out the directed sound projectors and see how many of them we can get to throw up!
 November 16, 2015 at 4:46pm
Uh, “pin” as in “pin number (like for your credit/debit card)”. Or in other words PIN as in Personal Identification Number. Like, enter your pin (number).
 November 16, 2015 at 4:16pm
That’s alright. Now we have two choices. The conservative plan where we make Daesher’s pay for each attack (Each Paris like will cause another section of Raqqah to get leveled) or we can go the progressive “O, poor babies” routine so that our grandchildren will only have two choices: Sunni or Shia. Students at Missouri and Yale won’t have to worry about choices: Men- beheading; women – stoning.
Life will become much more simple. Prayer rugs and burkas.
 November 13, 2015 at 4:11pm
I like it. It we can do “freedom from religion”, we should be able to do” freedom from color”. Raise your elbow, “power to the bland”.
November 7, 2015 at 5:20pm
One name that hasn’t been referred to is on the cover of the book, “Killing Reagan” – Martin Dugard. O’Reilly several times has said that Dugard is “his researcher”. I have no way of knowing how much Dugard has in the way of documentation, but it sure would be interesting to have him provide the copies of documents and the recordings of conversations (if any) he has that he and O’Reilly used to write the book.
But then, THAT is the reason O’Reilly was pushing the issue that Will stated (and that is open to debate) he was going to call O’Reilly before he published his editorial. Presumably O’Reilly and Dugard would have provided the documentation that would have allowed Will to write a properly researched editorial.
Sounds like (and this unusual for someone the stature of Will) O’Reilly has the upper hand regarding the facts in his book.
November 7, 2015 at 4:37pm
Alabama doesn’t have the market cornered on thoughtless and immature college students. They just advertise it better.
 November 1, 2015 at 4:30pm
Bolling has a bad habit of trying to turn “The Five” into “The Bolling Show plus Five Other Miscellaneous People”.
 October 29, 2015 at 3:41pm
Is there any chance these girls went home to a discussion that included sentences that started with “Who do you think….”, What were you thinking…..”, We’ve discussed the proper activities in school and it doesn’t include……” and “While the world knows what you are like, now they think I have no …….”.
Yes – Well, maybe this is the first and last…… .
No – There is a chance we are going to enjoy seeing them get tazed again..and again..and again.. .
 October 23, 2015 at 3:27pm
I like it, but I wouldn’t parachute them in. I would have them landed by submarine at night (they used to be called ‘pig boats’ anyways – sorry bubble heads, me saluting you). They would have time to run all over the countryside by morning. Still, you can imagine the uproar since they would be all shot ASAP. Remember pigs aren’t desert animals and get sunburn. Still worth a chuckle.
 September 30, 2015 at 4:12pm
Roughly 5 or so years ago I don’t remember what city it was, but firemen watched a person drown because “they weren’t certified for water rescues.” The victim was 5-6 feet from shore. I’ll let you decide about ‘breaking protocol’.
I remember the case. I believe several civilians took videos instead of helping. I also believe the victim had some type of disability.
 September 29, 2015 at 3:53pm
I would have had so much fun with that form. One question would have been pro gun, the next anti-gun. My parents would have been one liberal and one conservative making me a liberal conservative or conservative liberal. Not sure which I am. I would have no guns in my house and used them several times for defense. All their little minds would have gone “TILT”.
 September 26, 2015 at 6:19pm
We tried to fight a front line war against the Viet Cong in Vietnam. It didn’t work. Deja vu all over again. These people don’t have countries, the have TRIBES. Eff every body and everything else.
What is it going to ****** take. Stupid question! Obama out!!!!!!!!
 September 21, 2015 at 4:33pm
Yup. She’ll do anything for her child up to, but not including, a spider on her shoulder. So long, kid. You’re on your own.
 September 12, 2015 at 5:23pm
Mr. Paul, you told us more about yourself than I think you wanted to. Whatever you think about Trump as a politician, you shouldn’t ignore everything else he has done. IOW, who sneaked up to those buildings and put that big T, R, U, M, and P on them. Apparently it was a joke because that guy is just a “reality show host”, right?
Yes he shouldn't ignore the buying of politicians and the employment of relatives of govt. officials to get eminent domain and exclussive buildong code waivers which made him rich. Or how about the distruction of a man's life opposing the golf course in Scottland by Trump hiring a well connected surveyor and the relative of a govt official, and having boundries moved and tearing down a boundry fence, a portion of a building and his electric service. Or how about two others who opposed the golf course having loose dirt piled up between their house and the ocean so that every time the ocean breeze comes in dirt and dust covers their land and the contents of their home. YES, don't ignore any of these things
 September 7, 2015 at 3:44pm
This issue should have never gone to any court, let alone SCOTUS. She wants her martyrdom and make an issue of this rather than say the magic 6 words, “I can’t do this, I quit”.
The COMPASSIONATE thing to do would be to give Mrs.Davis a day's leave of absence on the days the fruitloop licenses are issued by another employee.
 September 7, 2015 at 3:38pm
There is more harm than good being done to the idea of “religious freedom” with crap like this. Any other jobs she want to be hired for and paid to do without doing it, e.g., bartender, stripper, prostitute (legal areas), pig farmer, bacon slicer, etc.?
 September 4, 2015 at 4:00pm
Six words indicating she objected to what she was elected to do and all of this would not be an issue. Both the bible beaters and the progressives have their agenda and it is costing people in Kentucky a lot of money and terrible publicity. Divisiveness isn’t restricted to feminists, racists, etc. and yes, I am conflating all of them into groups who want to bring down this country from the inside.
She was not elected to marry gays, that was illegal at the time she was elected. I am all for the decision to not issue marriage licenses at all. Thanks to the gays, marriage is now meaningless anyway so why not relegate it to a religious ceremony without legal effect and eliminate state sponsored marriage entirely? Instead of divorce, couples will be separated under partnership / economic joint venture principles. That is what the gays have wanted all along, to destroy the institution of marriage.
[-1] September 3, 2015 at 4:43pm
She was elected to carry out the duties the county clerk, in accordance with the laws of the county, state of KY and the U.S. as applicable. If, for any reason – medical, physical or any matter of conscience, she is to prepare a resignation letter, pack up her conscience, bible and use her feet to “exit – stage left”.
It is as simple as that and anything else is babble.
so your thoughts on the marijuana issue. what about ALLLLL of those Cops, judges, courts, states that CHOOSE not to obey federal law because of THEIR conscience and state laws?? What about cities that refuse to obey and or enforce federal immigration laws? I suppose that is just all ok, but let ONE bible thumper do it and throw her in jail? I understand, as i lived in Germany for many, many years and know this very story..
yes, to uphold the constitution, as well. She is. SCOTUS isn't. 14th amendment applies to freed slaves, not gays who want to marry. 10th amendment wins. You lose.
August 30, 2015 at 5:10pm
Bring it on. The one thing that will bring the wrath of the U.S. down on you is to mess with our money. There will be kids with their piggy banks …………….. Well, then you will be sorry – piggy banks.