User Profile: Dougral Supports Israel

Dougral Supports Israel

Member Since: November 24, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] September 2, 2014 at 12:58pm

    This stuff wouldn’t happen if more people acted like adults. Be willing to put up with a few things and for tall people, politely explain to the person in front of you that you have no legroom when the seat is reclined. Most people are decent if given a chance.

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] August 31, 2014 at 9:13pm

    I believe it falls within his right of free speech to refuse to stand. It was also an abuse of power to have police eject him. He wasn’t being disruptive, he simply refused to stand.

    Responses (1) +
  • [13] August 28, 2014 at 10:49pm

    I beg to differ. What happens on the road is that the aggressive drivers stay in the right lane until the last minute then try to force their way over close to the lane restriction. They are running out of road so they slow way down or stop and this forces the left lane to slow down to a crawl also.

    Responses (4) +
  • August 28, 2014 at 10:36am

    Perhaps he is the perpetrator. Some people would do anything to create a viral video. I’d certainly look into that if I were the cop investigating this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [16] August 23, 2014 at 11:06pm

    Meade represents a failed narco-state that is run by terrorists and criminals. He may wish to rethink what absurd means.

  • [35] August 23, 2014 at 11:02pm

    If anything, he’s on his way to make sure the perp gets off.

  • [2] August 21, 2014 at 11:02pm

    She shouldn’t have posted on Facebook. What happened to her is a prime reason why. She posted under an identifiable name. This allowed the forces of political correctness to take retribution against her rather than the idea she posted.

    Ideas are more important than the individual posting them. Anonymity is the way to ensure that the ideas get discussed.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] August 21, 2014 at 10:44pm

    Don Lemon thinks an AR-15 is an automatic rifle and he claims to have bought one that fires multiple rounds with one pull of the trigger. Enough said there.

    Even if the cop doesn’t have a fractured eye socket, it’s enough that he was attacked. We demand that our police engage the bad guys and arrest them. We owe them support when they are forced to shoot an individual who chooses combat rather than peaceful submission to arrest.

  • [-1] August 21, 2014 at 6:59pm

    The right to keep and bear arms is specifically enumerated in the Constitution via the Second Amendment. The courts have a constitutional duty to uphold our right to keep and bear. BTW, the judiciary has yet to uphold the SA to the extent that they are supporting same sex “marriage”.

    In the case of same sex “marriage” the courts are creating a right that previously didn’t exist. In keeping with human biology and the natural formation of families over millennia and countless different cultures, our definition of man/woman marriage was put into law. Now the federal courts are redefining that under a creative reading of the 14th amendment.

    Next up will be Muslims and FLDS suing to allow polygamy. If natural biology and the traditions of the ages weren’t enough to protect man/woman marriage how long do you think the one on one restriction will hold?

  • [7] August 21, 2014 at 12:21am

    By your logic, only people who belong to the Beck Collective should post their happy thoughts here, all others will be marginalized and not welcome to post their opinions here. If you are not with us, you are against us. How very Obama-like of you.

    I think it valid to post criticisms and counterpoint because many of us are Glenn’s customers who are paying money for a product. If we don’t like what we are getting its considerate to tell the businessman before taking our business elsewhere. You, in effect, are saying “just pack up your dolls and go home”.

    Its very ironic that many people come here to find an oasis of freedom and there are those here that want to shut our mouths and only allow the conversation to be one way. Perhaps the lesson t be learned here is that the ideologies may differ but the people are much the same right or left.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 20, 2014 at 9:44pm

    He’s not our top cop. He’s the assistant to the Rabble Rouser in Chief.

    Responses (3) +
  • [7] August 19, 2014 at 11:30pm

    That’s a simplistic and wishful way of looking at it. Beck has changed his tack and that has some people questioning whether he is still relevant to their way of thinking. I am about as far from liberal and one can get but I am also considering whether or not to keep my Blaze TV subscription.

    No human being has cornered the market on right thinking and none ever will so it’s completely valid to question Beck. Wasn’t it he that quoted Jefferson “Question with boldness even the existence of a God”. I’m not questioning the existence of God here, just Beck’s relevance in my own world view.

    Responses (1) +
  • [23] August 19, 2014 at 8:51pm

    I liked Wilkow a whole lot better than Dana. Maybe its my age but she seems shrill and twitchy and it is hard to watch her because of that.

  • [61] August 19, 2014 at 12:12am

    They won’t. Holder is as corrupt as they come. His minions will scour the town for evidence that Brown’s civil rights were violated. When they don’t find anything they will disappear like they did in the Zimmerman case.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 14, 2014 at 10:35am

    I believe the cop overreacted a bit but the prankster should not be purposefully annoying people either. You never know what you’ll get from someone if they’re annoyed. One day one of his “victims” will pound his face into the ground.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 14, 2014 at 7:56am

    I wonder if it ever dawned on the motorist that he wasted far more time with his roadside antics than he would have if he’d shown some patience with the bicyclist and stayed in his car.

  • [13] August 14, 2014 at 1:38am

    What if just being there is enough to “justify” the arrest. police are asserting more authority than they used too all over the country.

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] August 12, 2014 at 4:43am

    if it takes 5 inches for Detroit then we can hope for three feet to fall on Washington.

  • [2] August 9, 2014 at 8:16pm

    I would like to see an end to the idea of “civil forfeiture”. Under this doctrine the government deems that because of a “violation” that was committed, assets can be taken by the government. Anything taken, monies fined etc. should have to go through a court process.

  • [11] August 5, 2014 at 12:07am

    Compromise means two different things to the two sides. The Democrats are good at compromise. They will take half a loaf today and the rest tomorrow. Compromise to them means I can’t have it all today but that’s OK because I will get it all before too long.

    Look at how they react to the TEA Party who actually has the temerity to want to roll back some of the Democrat gains. They hate us and the establishment Repubs do to because they are the other part of the Great American Sellout.

    Does compromise mean that gains made by one side (Democrats) are sacrosanct and in the sprit of good compromise cannot be touched? Of course, all the conservative ground is always up for negotiation. In my book if Democrats feel that everything is always up for grabs then it is and we can rip down what they have built when we have the ascendancy.

    I refuse to cede ground when the other side is unwilling to give anything up of theirs. War is better than a slow death.

123 To page: Go