User Profile: Dougral Supports Israel

Dougral Supports Israel

Member Since: November 24, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 3, 2015 at 3:02pm

    Mass shootings are a very small contributor to the death toll. If those two want to prevent gun deaths then increase the sentences of gun criminals. Of course they won’t do that because all the bastions of liberalism would go broke keeping half their urban populations under lock and key.

  • July 29, 2015 at 7:43pm

    They don’t care about youth unemployment. It just give the left a reason to expand college aid since college will be unaffordable for more people. One thing I have learned is that liberal solutions are always designed to lead to a need for future liberal solutions.

  • [1] July 29, 2015 at 2:38pm

    Medication may be a more effective method than educating patients on good diet and exercise. How many patients have said “yah, yah doc. I’ll exercise and cut out the snacks”, and then gone right out and had a gargantuan lunch?

  • [8] July 29, 2015 at 12:03pm

    The warmists will present it as sea level rise to make it sound like AGW is the culprit. The actual science reason is that the land is sinking due to completely natural causes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [6] July 27, 2015 at 7:53pm

    Most of the other candidates aren’t preaching a sanctmonius message of saving the planet from the evils of CO2. Its quite hypocritical to be telling everyone else to be frugal while she spares no resource for her own convenience.

  • [3] July 25, 2015 at 7:15pm

    Trump is going to flame out. I can see him attacking McCain’s politics but when he goes after good conservatives without having anything better to offer from his own record, he’s gone too far.

    Responses (3) +
  • July 24, 2015 at 8:17pm

    So, one might conclude that Obama and Hillary helped to create and arm ISIS.

  • [4] July 24, 2015 at 6:42pm

    We don’t want capitalism, we want a free market economy. Capitalism is Marx’s term, calculated to demonize the free market. So here are your creative, innovative, disruptive ideas Hillary.

    Reduce regulations so that businesses are free to be creative.
    Reduce taxes so that businesses have the money to innovate.
    Disrupt the leviathan government we have and get off the backs of business and the citizenry alike. A LOT of us just want Washington to dry up and blow away.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 23, 2015 at 11:40pm

    Maybe they hoped they’d bag the Choomer in Chief himself.

  • [12] July 23, 2015 at 10:23pm

    The record of people who carry is not one of opening up in a dark room in a panic. Unlike the bad guys, we who carry really would care if we hurt an innocent person. No legal gun owner wants to lie awake at night with regrets.

    Ever wonder why these nutjobs pick movie theaters? One big clue, without exception they are gun-free zones. When was the last time one of these shootings occurred in a gun shop? What do you think would happen if someone tried it?

  • [30] July 21, 2015 at 12:32am

    Every day that same message comes from me to the Cursed One and every day my middle finger flies high towards the White House.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 21, 2015 at 12:28am

    @Welltouched, The Second Amendment states that the right of the PEOPLE ( not the states or the feds) to keep and bear arms is not to be infringed. That means no creative government definitions as to who is eligible and who is not.

  • July 21, 2015 at 12:21am

    Driving a car is not a right, but the right to bear arms is an enumerated right under the Constitution and is not to be infringed.

    Practical application: How many seniors go out and shoot up the mall? I haven’t seen this as a problem. You need to take up a cause that actually addresses as real issue.

  • July 21, 2015 at 12:17am

    The Second Amendment is quite clear, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Now the Constitution says people, not states, and not militias. It is stated as an individual right and meant as so.

    So now, you want to regulate the right of senior citizens to own arms perhaps of fear of incompetence. How many nursing homes have been shot up by angry seniors? What kind of social chaos has been created by criminal oldsters bearing arms? It doesn’t sem to come close to a compelling government interest needed to regulate a right.

  • [1] July 20, 2015 at 7:36pm

    Gender card? That’s the only card she has in the whole deck besides the joker.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 20, 2015 at 5:54pm

    Well, seeing that our Constitution says we have the right to keep and bear arms and it doesn’t qualify it by saying “only if the government agrees”, there are going to be a whole lot of people that stand on their rights rather than listen to an increasingly lawless government.

    Here’s a good example. NY State passed their SAFE act in January of 2013. The law gave gun owners until April 15th, 2014 to register their AR-15s. At the time it was estimated that there were a million guns that would need to be registered. To date, the state refuses to publish a total number of registered AR-15s. The only number I have seen published came from a local cable news reporter who claims 5000 AR-15 rifles were registered. Now that’s a pretty big disparity between the million claimed guns and the actual number registered. So, even if the claimed million guns was quite a big high, one might say there are a quarter million new felons in NY State right now.

    That is something that will be repeated nationwide if the government thinks they can get good citizens to just hand in their guns.

  • July 20, 2015 at 3:35pm

    I’d like to see how they’d propose to enforce this. They could deny a senior citizen the ability to buy a firearm by flagging him in NICS but it doesn’t do anything about the firearms already owned. The government doesn’t know who has what guns in most cases either. A lot of people if they got an advisory letter from SSA telling them to turn in any guns they owned would just wad it up and throw it away.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] July 20, 2015 at 12:39pm

    It should never have gotten far enough that the diner owner needed to take action, the parents should have shut the kid down.

    My wife and I were in a restaurant a number of years ago when a woman came in with 3 young kids. The kids were loud and rambunctious. The mom warned them a couple of times and finally laid down her ultimatum. One more thing and she would pack them up and take them home with no restaurant meal. One of the kids decided to put her to the test and the next I saw she had grabbed them all and was herding them out the door to the car. They hadn’t ordered yet so their was no bill for her to settle. Hopefully her kids remembered that and it helped them to grow into good citizens.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] July 15, 2015 at 3:45pm

    Not as hurt as liberals and socialists are going to be if Obama is wrong and Iran becomes a sponsor of nuclear terrorism. Never forget that they frequently chant “Death to America”. They aren’t going to stop because Obama handed them nukes on a platter either.

    The way I figure it, Iran’s best friends in America are the ones most likely to suffer in an Iranian attack. Terrorists usually go for the big city environment because they can kill the most people. Cities are populated by liberals and socialists. So the ones going up in smoke will be the “enlightened” city dwellers while us rednecks in the burbs and the country are all spread out and aren’t good targets.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] July 15, 2015 at 12:54pm

    When a black stays in school, works hard at a job and succeed he is accused of acting white but when a white person succeeds they are demanded to renounce the fruits of their hard work and effectively “act black”. It seems they want us all in the same ghettos, acting like third-world failures.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love