Key FOB transmission power is very small. It doesn’t take much EM noise at the right frequency (around 315 MHz) to disable them.
 March 24, 2015 at 9:24am
“Doesn’t play well with Rinos.” – Peter King
And I care why?
 March 24, 2015 at 9:17am
I would be ecstatic to vote for either of these gentlemen!
[-3] March 23, 2015 at 3:40pm
I will give Cruz a chance but at this point I strongly prefer others (which I hope will be running).
 March 23, 2015 at 3:34pm
I read a few of Selk’s articles and it’s obvious he’s not a fan of the mayor or her statements regarding sharia law. So I think it’s very likely he’s planning a hit piece.
 March 18, 2015 at 11:56am
Dem’s won’t give republicans something they want so republicans block something they want. It’s called partisan politics. And, of course, we get one of the standard dem responses: play the race/gender card! These people have no integrity.
In 2010 Obama said to the GOP "They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back." Durbin didn't have a problem with that concept in 2010. Now it's the Dems turn to sit in the back.
[-1] March 18, 2015 at 11:51am
“I am the only one who can make America truly great again!” – Trump
I don’t think many people would agree with this. So even if he believes it, I think saying it only makes him appear egotistical.
 March 16, 2015 at 5:38pm
1- I think the golden rule clearly applies to slavery. No one wants to be a slave. Also, it’s pointless to discuss the topic about women serving because even if I concede the point for this discussion, you’re underlying logic is that I’m sinning – therefore it’s ok for others to sin. The truth is we’re all sinners and it’s not ok. We should be striving to hit the mark, not striving to move the standard.
2- Did you read what I wrote at all? We’re not under the law, the old testament is there to learn about God’s character, likes and dislikes, His overall plan, etc. Your inability to grasp my meaning either means you aren’t taking to time to really think about what I’m writing or you’re a troll – either way I think the value of continuing (if you even read this) is questionable.
3- If you believe the bible then you believe the epistles are inspired by God and therefore what is in them reflects God’s opinion on those matters (i.e. Christ’s opinion). So a bible believer will state that God (i.e. Christ) was very clear on the issue (1 Cor. 6:9). If you’re not a bible believer then you think Christ was a just a man and conclude that the rest of the New Testament may or may not reflect His opinions. I’m in the former camp. From what you’re saying, I’m guessing you’re in the latter. We’ll have to agree to disagree.
 March 16, 2015 at 5:00pm
There are a lot of churches wrestling with this issue. The bible is pretty clear on this subject so many churches choosing to allow LGBT relationships make statements like “We have to quit relying on letters written 2,000 years ago.” It’s very reminiscent of how the democrats refer to the constitution as a 200 year old out of date piece of paper. Note that I’m not in any way suggesting the constitution and the bible are equivalent, but it’s human nature to denigrate that which we don’t agree with.
My opinion is that if you want to throw out the bible and make up your own rules at least be honest enough to give your new religion a different name.
 March 16, 2015 at 4:43pm
1) If you want to have a discussion on a complicated issue like women serving in church that’s fine. Sexual immorality is not one of those complicated issues. I think if Jesus had a big disagreement with the general attitude towards homosexuality of his day he would have said so.
2) You completely ignore the important point: new testament lens. In short, the old testament is for reference to learn about God, His character, His overall plan, His likes and dislikes etc. So if there’s something there specifically pointed to as repugnant and disgusting in His eyes…. it would be difficult to argue He suddenly has no issue with it in the New Testament.
3) Again, you miss the point. You can’t say that Jesus said nothing about homosexuality. All you can say is that the writers of the gospel didn’t record any comments by Him on that subject.
 March 16, 2015 at 4:30pm
Jesus’s messages invariable included the words “repent” and “go and sin no more.” It may not be PC. It may not be popular. Eventually it might even be against the law. But it will always be the truth.
 March 16, 2015 at 3:52pm
1) So the words of the apostles don’t count? Paul had plenty to say on this subject.
2) The old testament doesn’t count? Yes, it has to be viewed through a “new testament” lens but there’s no evidence that the definition of what was and was not sexually immoral changed.
3) Check out John 21:25. The truth is you don’t know what Jesus said (or didn’t say) specifically about this topic. You just know the authors of the gospels didn’t record anything.
 March 16, 2015 at 3:34pm
Jesus constantly forgave those who were repentant (i.e. recognized that what they were doing was wrong and wanted to change). He would forgive them and instruct them “Go and sin no more.”
The Pharisees were examples of sinners who were not repentant. They did not believe what they were doing was wrong. His words for them were not so gentle (see Matthew 23).
If Jesus were pastor of that church he would forgive the people who were repentant and, just as he did with the pharisees, condemn those who saw no problem with their sinful behavior.
March 16, 2015 at 1:57pm
Excellent video! I want one of those!
March 16, 2015 at 1:49pm
Nedned is right. She has physical access to the server and all the backups (if she made any). Unless she had offsite backups that she does not have physical access to, with a little technical know how she can delete anything she wants in a way that it is not recoverable (or she can simply alter it however she wishes).
So if and when they ever look at the server, it’s very unlikely they’ll find anything she doesn’t want them to find. So the only real evidence will be what’s missing as I’m sure there will still be very large gaps in the email history. For anyone with any sense that’s enough evidence to convict but this is Hillary.
 March 13, 2015 at 4:53pm
I would love to see him win the presidency if for no other reason than to see if he would keep his word on this issue.
 March 13, 2015 at 4:41pm
Luke 12: 32 “Do not be afraid, little flock, for your Father has been pleased to give you the kingdom. 33 Sell your possessions and give to the poor. Provide purses for yourselves that will not wear out, a treasure in heaven that will never fail, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys. 34 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”
Luke 16: 13 “No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.”
14 The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus.
15 He said to them, “You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God’s sight.”
1 Peter 5: 2 Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, serving as overseers–not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not greedy for money, but eager to serve;
3 not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock.
Do Ceflo’s actions seem consistent with these verses? I think someone who loved the kingdom more than they loved money would find a better use for $65M. Again, this would fund roughly 200 missionaries in poor countries for 30 years each!
If you do find Ceflo’s actions consistent with scripture and you do think this is the best way to spend $65M to further the kingdom, we’ll have to agree to disagree.
 March 13, 2015 at 4:27pm
Over 100,000? Who did the counting? Is this a number he’s published or an organization not associated with him has published?
Also, even if he is a wonderful evangelist reaching many people across the globe, that still doesn’t mean every decision he makes is correct. Even if he were Billy Sunday I’d find this wasteful.
Just like the parable of the talents, Ceflo will be held accountable for how he manages the resources he receives. I think spending $65M on the gold standard of personal jets will not be judged a wise decision, but God will, of course, make the final call.
 March 13, 2015 at 4:08pm
The question here that needs to be asked is whether this is the best way to spend $65M dollars to further the kingdom.
Let’s say $10k would support an missionary in a poor country for 1 year. This amount of money, $65M, would support over 200 of these missionaries for 30 years each!!!! Do you really believe Ceflo would do more by himself traveling from spot to spot with a G650 than 200 missionaries remaining year round?!?!
March 11, 2015 at 3:07pm
If they run Bush or Christy I’m going to cry. Big tears!