User Profile: DrFrost

DrFrost

Member Since: December 28, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [28] December 16, 2014 at 11:47am

    “American general: Dems are aiding and abetting the enemy”

    They just noticed?!?!?!

  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 1:53pm

    Typical “the end justifies the means” mentality.

  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 1:45pm

    Whether a behavior includes a genetic predisposition or not has nothing to do with whether it’s good or bad.

    For example, antisocial personality disorder has a strong genetic link. Being born that way may make us a bit more understanding in private, but we prosecute these people to the same standard as people without this disorder if they cross the line.

    In short, being born predisposed towards a particular behavior has no bearing on whether it is good or bad. It doesn’t really matter if a behavior is chosen by a person or pushed on them by environment or heredity. The answer to whether it is morally good or bad is irregardless of these parameters.

  • [2] November 14, 2014 at 10:22am

    Dear Nancy,

    1) Mitch making the cover of a magazine had nothing to do with Mitch. It was all about the republicans taking control of the senate.

    2) Lots of people have been wondering and asking questions about Harry Reid and whether or not he’ll be chosen as senate minority leader.

    3) People dislike you because your performance has been terrible. In a time when republicans and democrats need to be building bridges you have a history of vitriolic and divisive speech. Instead of addressing the issues you’ve shown a marked preference for attacking the opposition. For most of us there is no doubt that your continued leadership will mean more of the same and we’re sick of it.

  • [4] November 10, 2014 at 2:38pm

    Liberals say they want diversity but do they really? Anyone who doesn’t conform to their ideals is villified as a racist, bigot, woman-hater, etc.

    I don’t hate people who have a different world view than mine. I don’t villify them. I just think they’re wrong.

  • [153] November 6, 2014 at 9:47am

    religion – a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith

    Atheism is a religion because you can’t prove there is no God (proving a negative is extremely difficult to begin with and one that broad is simply impossible). Agnosticism, on the other hand, is simply an admission of ignorance.

    Krauss is just stating what the Catholic church stated long ago… give us a child until they are 6 and we have them for life. So yes, if you could indoctrinate all children into atheism you would see a dramatic drop in other world views.

    This is so obviously true that it doesn’t really need to be stated. What I do find surprising, however, is that Krauss seems to think this is a good idea. Most people seem to respect the right of parents to choose how their children should be raised. Krauss seems to suggest that it would be acceptable for the education system to be used to usurp parent’s rights.

    I wonder if he would feel that way if we used the education system to indoctrinate children into a world view dissimilar to his own?

    Responses (21) +
  • [12] November 5, 2014 at 8:34am

    Ron Paul is a libertarian through and through. This means he almost never agrees with the democrats and often disagrees with the republicans. One issue he’s been particularly vocal about is fighting wars where our national security is not truly at risk. Thus, it is no surprise that he’s speaking out on this issue now.

  • [1] November 3, 2014 at 12:39pm

    So let’s just be clear here. They are teaching the tenets of Islam to students and claiming that it’s a simple history lesson?

    Time for private and/or home schooling.

  • [1] October 30, 2014 at 8:47am

    “Mayor Annise Parker said Wednesday that the subpoenas weren’t intended to infringe on anyone’s religious freedoms, but rather to help the city defend itself against a lawsuit challenging the ordinance that the City Council approved in May.”

    You subpeona sermons and it doesn’t occur to you that you might be treading on first amendment rights (which includes both free speech and religious freedom)?!?!? Really?!?!

  • [58] October 29, 2014 at 9:50am

    I do indeed wholeheartedly concurr.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 29, 2014 at 9:48am

    One thing you can count on Barkley for is to give you his honest opinion. Sometimes he’s right. Sometimes he’s wrong. But you know he’s not going to lie to you because the answer is hard to hear or politically incorrect. I respect that.

  • [3] October 29, 2014 at 9:42am

    So Farrow is obviously more concerned with “whether this it the most saavy way to frame this” as opposed to “Is this right or wrong.”

  • [3] October 28, 2014 at 9:15am

    “Uh oh… someone noticed our unconstitutional activity. We’ll curtail it for awhile until we get rid of that whole ‘bill of rights’ thing altogether.” – IRS

  • [6] October 27, 2014 at 10:00am

    A president making up the rules as he goes along, rewriting laws carte blanche and refusing to enforce laws he disagrees with – why shouldn’t impeachment be the first card played?

    Responses (5) +
  • [1] October 27, 2014 at 8:53am

    They’re taking a play from the KGB’s handbook. Tell a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth.

  • [27] October 27, 2014 at 8:49am

    I agree. Kudos to her for helping those people in Africa. Now she needs to help people here and stay quarantined.

  • [1] October 23, 2014 at 8:57am

    I’ve made this point before. It’s not freedom of religion or freedom of speech if they can take away your livelihood and property for expressing yourself or staying truth to your religious beliefs.

  • [1] October 17, 2014 at 10:26am

    You can use the same reasoning for anything illegal. Making it illegal just makes people hide it, and makes it more difficult to trace – putting the public in more danger. So obviously we should just make everything legal and we’d be much safer!

  • [34] October 15, 2014 at 8:53am

    “If someone is speaking from the pulpit and it’s political speech, then it’s not going to be protected.” – Feldman

    I must have missed the part where the first amendment excluded political speech. Pastors who do this risk losing their tax status, they do not forfeit their constitutional rights. But apparently the left knows no bounds in furthering their agenda. As Hillary said “There is only the fight.”

    Responses (2) +
  • October 13, 2014 at 5:25pm

    How can Wells Fargo “not allow” unions?

123 To page: Go