I like the backdrop.. Gillette “Flexball” until the 3:20 mark.. Just sayin..
May 3, 2013 at 3:11pm
Now I may be wrong, but didn’t the proposed legislation also include bans on certain types of firearms, limits to magazine sizes, background checks, trafficking measures, conceal carry, etc.. If they just isolated the mental health and expanded background sections then perhaps DD would have a good point.. Too much mud in the water to single out one issue to say you have blood on your hands..
April 24, 2013 at 12:29pm
Question.. I heard they found a 3rd backpack that was unexploded.. I see in the video, 2 brothers, 2 backpacks, who dropped bag number 3?
April 19, 2013 at 12:29pm
Time for an old fasion bounty hunt.. WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE – Reward $1,000,000…
January 29, 2013 at 12:21pm
This is why moster trucks have remote kill switches..
January 24, 2013 at 12:37pm
Remeber Police are NOT first responders!! They are secondary responders, you are your own first responder. They say the best offense is a good defense.. That can’t be true right.. The best offense is to hide, call police, wait, and pray nothing happens to you..
January 24, 2013 at 12:28pm
Wait, is this thing carcinogenic?
January 24, 2013 at 12:26pm
Wow.. Look at all the sheep coming to the trough to feed at the new urban farm.. Anyone notice how they all seem to look fully dressed and sharp to line up for the hand out.. Expectations and priorities are out of wack!!
January 23, 2013 at 4:35pm
Well isn’t refreshing to hear some talk with some intelligence on the subject.. Not one reference to a “Weapon” when talking about firearms..
January 21, 2013 at 1:27pm
The video while entertaining is meaningless to people that already understand the difference between firearms.. Unfortunately the media is deliberately misleading the general public to advance their agenda..
January 21, 2013 at 1:13pm
First thing I noticed was the muzzle position as others mentioned and the second was the AR-15 is not an Assult Rifle as noted in the story.. He was carrying around his semi-auto AR-15 firearm.. The media scare tactics are working if we lump in a semi-auto with a cosmetic tactical look as a M-16 fully auto firearm. They should release the AR with a wood stock a 5 mag clip and see if the arse hole still see it as an “Assult Rifle”..
January 18, 2013 at 12:28pm
Bang Bang and he would have been dead!! As he would have deserved!! Remember Police are not first responders a much as they try to tell us, we need to protect ourselves and watch out for our neighbors..
January 11, 2013 at 4:20pm
Again and Again why don’t people being interviewed correct PM by stating that an AR-15 IS NOT AN ASSULT RIFLE!! Assault rifles are fully automatic and already have a total 100% ban to civilians, an AR-15 available to the public is not. I can take a Ruger 10/22 and make it look like a fully auto Assault Rifle but it’s not!! PM’s argument is philosophically obtuse and incorrect on so many levels it’s sickening and frustrating. I bet if you put 10 pics of the same semi auto rifle in front of PM each with a different stock and platform, ol’ numb nuts would say the one dress up with the tactical platform would be the assault weapon..
January 11, 2013 at 12:47pm
If I was to strangle you with a tie.. I just did it with an assult weapon. So much ignorance about “Assult Weapons” and the term Weapon when addressing FIREARMS, HANDGUNS OR RIFLES.
January 9, 2013 at 12:42pm
Again Peirs pushes the AR-15 argument (Probably thinks AR stands for Assult Rifle) when in fact if AR type semi automatic firearms wether it be rifle or handgun are banned it would also ban all semi auto firearms. Then if I assume that isn’t his intent is legislation going to be written to target specific firearms (by name and manufacture) since there is no such thing as an assult weapon. A nut could have a couple of level action rifles like the Marlin 336, Marlin 1894c, Winchester 94, fitted with forearm ammo cuffs, add in a couple of hand guns and get the same results as a AR-15. Slippery slope mister Morgan this is why there is so much passion is protecting a right to own firearms, not weapons.
January 8, 2013 at 4:43pm
Sorry Alex but in my opinion you were offered the golden goose and you started sounding like a cookoo bird. I enjoy your videos, and have spent hours listening to you talk on infowars but man too much too fast on PM.. I would have liked you to slow roll through segment 1, raise your energy for 2 and then clearly state your points and debating skills at the end.
With the knowledge you have and stats you took to the set you would have been great and a provocateur, unfortunately the noise was too loud and strong for PM and the audience. A swing and a miss sir, a swing and a miss..
December 28, 2012 at 2:00pm
@ Bluehen…You are right the access to firearms is way too lax in the Police Station and in the state in NJ. There should be a new law banning all weapons in Police presents. I trust when a fox comes into your hen house you’ll be sure to tell the police during you’re 911 call that they are to show up unarmed..
December 28, 2012 at 1:25pm
I am Canadian.. I am the owner of firearms, in particular semi-auto tactical rifles, these are non restricted with permit and not a prohibited firearm. We are limited to 5 cartridges in the mag except for 10/22′s in which I can have a 25 cartridge mag. We can also with a restricted permit own hand guns and some firearms with a barrel less than 470 mm in length (18″).
So as you can see we have no problem with the right permit and acquisition license (PAL) have the ability to buy, own and transport semi-auto, hand guns, and tactical style firearms. We are a firearm loving country, we are also known as peace makers and not the shot first ask questions later type of people. But get this right, you come in my house to do harm, you will find yourself look down the barrel of a firearm that will kill you dead.
December 28, 2012 at 11:36am
I get sick and tired hearing about “Assault Weapons”. This is a presumption that a FIREARM will be used as a weapon. What is an Assault Weapon anyway? If I grab you by your neck tie a choke you to death with it that would be an assault weapon also. What these dolts are trying to say is semi-auto firearms that have been made to have that police or military tactical look, the action of the firearm is still semi-auto. The tactical look of a firearm is just that, a cosmetic appearance not unlike adding rims to your car. So what are “they” asking for with the ban on “assault weapons”. If I cut through the BS, what the “they” really want is a ban on all semi-auto firearms. This would include pistols, and long guns that would fire one cartridge each time the trigger is pulled. This is not reasonable and is excessive. What I think is logical would be to pass, clip limitations, perhaps calibre size, and additional rules for purchasing, storing and handling firearms. Hey why not limit who can buy ammo and how much they can buy. At the end of the day it’s the responsible firearm owners that will be affected not some crazed nut job. How would the media feel if there was legislation banning the release of any information or reporting about these d-bags? Not too much I think. Oh and any meaningful discussion on gun control has to include all ideas no matter odd. In my opinion to dismiss any idea outright means you are not ready for a serious conversation and you have an agenda.
December 16, 2012 at 10:56pm
Just an FYI.. As a Canadian responsible gun owner I I refer to them as firearms not weapons, in this case the guns were used as weapons. There is some misunderstanding that Canada has some magic sauce around gun control. Well per capita Canadians own more guns that Americans. We can also with the proper permits own semi auto long guns and hand guns. There more to the make up of gun violence than just the guns..