They will die espousing the virtue of abortion, unless enlightened by Christ.
 August 4, 2015 at 3:01pm
After reading your posts on many subjects on the Blaze, I have concluded that if I ever need mindless liberal talking points, you are my go to guy.
“Reproductive rights” and “Choice” are leftist code words for the act of human baby killing, like calling it a rose would make it less horrific.
 August 3, 2015 at 10:34pm
Where is your proof? Talking points from liberal indoctrination centers don’t count!
 August 3, 2015 at 7:09pm
Lets not play the Democrat name game. It’s not choice. The baby get none. It’s not about the mother’s health in most instances, but the indoctrination of mother’s to put convenience above the natural instinct of mothers to protect their children.
So let’s call the Democrat party what it is. It is the party of low morals, divisiveness, corruption, favoritism, and the slaughter of millions of little humans, not to mention the sale of human body parts. Shame, shame shame!
Intense shame...there lies fall flat on anyone with half a brain.....and a conscience, of course...
In the wake of Center for Medical Progress release of videos showing Planned Parenthood’s sale of human baby organs for profit, there has been an outcry that those who protest such organ sales are “attacking women” or “blocking women’s health.” What an outrageous statement.
Physician specialists in women’s health for over 25 years, say categorically that abortion is not “health care.” Medicine and physicians strive to preserve LIFE. Abortion is death. Abortion is the antithesis of life. That is why most physicians do not practice abortion and cringe at the thought.
In my clinical practice seeing women,
There are two victims of abortion: the soul and life of the baby who never had a choice, and the soul and psyche of the woman who chose to have her baby killed. Years later, the abortion takes its toll on women in higher rates of depression, anxiety and even endocrine hormonal problems.
Let’s be correct in terms: Abortion ends the life of a baby. In fact, if it isn’t a baby, then the woman isn’t pregnant.
Planned Parenthood uses benign terms like fetus, tissue, specimen, or “glob of cells,” designed to confuse patients and the public and hide the emotional impact of the reality: This is a human baby whose life is being snuffed out. Now we see that PP is using body parts from this “blob of tissue” to bring in revenue, beyond its $500 million a year in federal funding from taxpayers!
Planned Parenthood abortion practices are even more horrific than anyone knew.
Abortion "on demand" gives too many women the opportunity to "screw around" and then conveniently dispose of the "consequences" of bad behavior. I don't think it was EVER really about a woman's "health." It was about her NOT having to be "punished" with a baby...as obama put it.
Reid is a needle short of a full directional device.
He has immoral compost.
Harry Reid is a FULL ON FILTHY DIRTBAG and, believe me, I’m holding back!!
More baby parts for sale are coming to your country soon... Just like a Meat Market run by Demon-cratics in the What-Haus and Joe Blo-Biden must of been an aftermath of an abortion .
and his mind has always be questionable
Harry Reid uses Satan's compass.
He is an embarrassment to the Mormon Church. They should through him out. Doesn't say much for the Mormon church. I highly respect the Mormons and I hope they call him on this.
So the Democrat party's policy is to protect monsters who cut up babies and sell their parts to the highest bidder? That does not sound like a party that any decent person would want to belong to.
 August 1, 2015 at 5:56pm
What happened to “free” speech and the baby’s choice?
Libs believe in free speech as long as its theirs and choice as long as it doesn’t involve babies, schools, or the decisions of others.
This judge should be ashamed along with the media, and the PP baby killers and body parts merchants.
 August 1, 2015 at 12:43pm
A hint of what a Clinton presidency would be like. Disagree and go to jail. No free speech if it involves criticising her majesty.
 July 25, 2015 at 3:36pm
Silver: Long on naive assumptions and short on facts. Yes DoD is bloated, but in bureaucracy not in troops or equipment.
It was the F-35 not the F-22 Raptor that went against the F-16. Using either the F-22 or the F-35 in a Korean War type dogfight is like issuing the army swords to fight ISIS. Both are stealth aircraft designed to eliminate the enemy before it even knows they are there. While the naive may long to see aviation’s role in warfare as Red Baron like one on one chivalrous engagement from WW I, we don’t win by fighting with previous war tactics.
If the US is ever foolish enough to give up air superiority, no amount of money will be able to keep you and your feelings safe.
We do not need the entire army that is not naive that is fact. There are a few elements such as the ODA which I personally would not have a problem including into a complete revamped fighting force. Contractors would not be necessary because you would be left with the best of the best. I have no problem doubling or even tripling their salaries since we would be sending 75% less. Interesting you suggest a strategy in warfare that would constantly evolve instead of doing what is proven to work and that somehow is smart? I beg to differ it is ignorant and waste blood and treasure. Not conservative my friend. I would like a mean lean best of the best fighting force and the fat cut. Can be achieved easily provided you pay true professionals.. We would also have to fire all current 01′s and above and completely restructure the entire military. New officers would be trained from a pool of proven enlisted…50 years of losses fighting peasants should clearly show you current configuration just does not work.
Forgot to mention ISIS would not be an issue if you stopped sending your tax dollars to ISIS in the form of weapons,cash and safe haven in Syria..Supporting Neocons isn’t cool any longer my friend not to mention it’s a progressive idea that somehow funding the enemy is good for the country…Might have to write to McCain, Graham, Kerry and Clinton and have them explain to me how sending your tax dollars to ISIS is a good idea? I guess if your in the Glass business, going around breaking windows is good for business right?
 July 25, 2015 at 3:03pm
Obama and Kerry committed suicide for the country and Israel, all for their own self delusional sense of accomplishment!
July 24, 2015 at 5:01pm
Why has congress not called State Department security managers and IS managers to testify if they approved Hillary having her own server and what method was approved for her to handle classified info.
Either they were incompetent in doing their job and clueless as to how to do their job, or they caved into her power and let her do what she wanted.
 July 24, 2015 at 4:57pm
Hillary is more qualified to be in the Big House than the White House.
July 24, 2015 at 4:56pm
Hillary claimed she only used one device and yet had no classified data on it. You mean to tell me the US SoS didn’t handle any sensitive information? A simple question for her would be “how did you handle sensitive information?”
Also it was not classified at the time is a flimsy excuse, like closing the barn door after the cows escaped.
 July 23, 2015 at 5:41pm
I think you hit on the hidden truth. Liberals have a secret agenda to make everyone else as miserable as they have made themselves!
[-2] July 23, 2015 at 5:40pm
So why do Jews, atheists, and the ACLU get so upset that others believe something different than they do? Why the compulsion to attack what others believe? How about instead of suing every time you go out of your way to feel offended or every time you let your feelings be hurt, how about just enjoying your own life without making others as miserable and petty as you seem to be!
drrgb, we could care less what you believe. What is being objected to use the dedication of public land and government resources to the promotion of a single religion. What you do on your own time and dime is your business, but leave the government out of it ..
July 23, 2015 at 5:33pm
Again, whose freedom of religion are they protecting? Not mine. They are only protecting their own selfish interest at the expense of everyone else’s freedom!
July 23, 2015 at 5:30pm
A giant cross is not a law nor does it establish anything. Has anyone been forced to join anything because this cross is on a hill? NO!
Were all liberals born without a logic gene? Your statement makes no logical sense.
 July 23, 2015 at 4:42pm
Which individuals? The ACLU bullies?
The constitution guarantees freedom of religious expression, not sensitivity for ACLU forcing others to do as they do..
July 23, 2015 at 4:38pm
I am glad the cross and the memorial will stand, but that misses the whole point.
The constitution does not prohibit religious expression on government land. In fact it protects free religious expression. The ACLU has perverted the language, the law, and the constitution with their myth about separation of church and state. They have used public school indoctrination centers, a lazy liberal media, and threats of ruinous lawsuits to get their way. The constitution only prohibits the federal government from establishing a federal religion, not endorsing religion.
Time for the selfish ACLU bullies to quit trying to force their agenda on others at the expense of constitutionally protected rights, as opposed to rights they have made up. America is not one bit greater because of ACLU thugs using power and threats to intimidate Americans.