No a liar would have continued the interview and kept lying to make the guest look bad. A man who doesn’t lie would be so insulted that he couldn’t move past a ridiculous accusation and would end the conversation.
The moral? Don’t accept an invitation to share your side, and then make it about the host, or slander him. Just share the facts that you have to support your argument, and try to advance your cause.
Impossible to support any liberal argument in that they are void of logic, reason, common sense and truth. The only way they can 'advance' their cause is by lying and denigrating the opposition.
 June 2, 2015 at 7:27pm
Seems counter-productive to antagonize a drunk. Why were they yelling and pointing fingers in their faces. The cops WERE aggressive, and if he’s too drunk to know who’s yelling at him, he just sees some ******* bossing him around. It’s not until he’s moving straight at the trooper at a close distance that he says he’s a LEO. Are they nor trained on how to handle people under the influence, or is the training to scream commands that they may or may not be able to process?
Second thing, neither of the officers had tazers?
Third thing, drunks are supposed to have a quick reaction time? =/ Unnecessary death, cops could have handled it completely differently.
All a-hole aggressives should use that defense !
It’s hard to point fingers in someone’s face,provoke them,when they don’t even get close enough to point a finger in their face until they were physically attacked ! Did you watch the vid !?
So cops are suppose to appease drunks because The Drunk may not recognize them as Cops ?!
Does that rule apply for those Men That beat The **** out of their Baby Mamas Who May not recognize them as Their Baby Mama Because They Drunk ?
Lefty thinking again….just don’t !
First thing: I don't know what video you watched, but in the one I saw, the one up top, the trooper immediately identifies himself.
Second thing: The officers knew he was drunk, how?
Third thing: Drunk or not, you probably shouldn't attack someone who has a gun.
Fourth thing: You're right in that it was an unnecessary death, just not in the way that you think.
Rules of lethal force are equal between LEO and citizen. Therefore, dose it give me the right to shot a person that assults me? If you REALLY think that way then many people are going to die. As military police, we would NEVER shoot at a drunk who pushed us, that's just stupid.
So cops should just wait to see if the person attacking them has a gun,knife,etc ?
Seems to me,If I'm attacked,it's gonna be fast,and before I know what's what,like it does for most ppl,including cops,except they may be trained what to do When it happens,they are never really prepared as far as knowing what's going to happen at ANY givin time,a routine Pull over can turn into a shootout.
So how does that fare for a cop guessing if a criminal charging him is just using his 300 lbs of mass (can be a lethal weapon alone) or has a shank up his sleeve,a gun,and exactly when in those half seconds does he pull the pepper spray that may blind himself and his partner depending on the wind and the intended targets etc....a lot more goes into this than...just shoot them in the foot,hand or knee,...And just disable them....try shooting a moving target and hit them purposely in the intended "wound shot"but not kill shot,all while not getting killed by the criminal !
Be-cuz that's what these criminals do....They look for the don't hurt a cop Shot....sarc off
Got it, you believe that everyone is a criminal that is out to kill a police officer and that officers are lawful in murdering citizens as THEY see fit, not lawful citizens who "don't know our job, can't understand our profession, and don't know what we go through". Here's a hint for you, bub, the use of lethal force is equal for a reason. You keep thinking that officers have preference because the judge and prosocuter will "have your back" will only last until the trust of the people is gone. Mayby some history lesson (not that your the type to learn) is in order;
"For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:"
 May 17, 2015 at 11:23am
Based on the shock in these kids expressions, they have never had a man stop them from being an idiot. What a great education they are getting about the consequences of acting like a fool in society. We need more of this.
 May 15, 2015 at 7:11pm
When more students realize that they are paying customers, and not subjects of the higher education system, THEN education will change. Until then, the tyranny that we fought and bled to be free from will continue on American college campuses.
By traditional marriage you mean the kind that existed for most of human history where the woman was given away as property, I assume?
 April 30, 2015 at 10:09pm
Except for all the state constitutions defining marriage. Because if there is a Constitutional right to marriage for gays, then all those state constitutions will change.
[-2] April 30, 2015 at 10:07pm
False comparison. Gays have the same rights that you do – to marry someone of the opposite sex. That’s called equal treatment under the law. The same standard applies to both people.
Making “love” the foundation of the redefinition of marriage is a dangerous position. Pedophiles “love” children. People who have sex with animals “love” their animals. What if ten people “love” each other and want to marry? What if a brother and sister “love” each other and want to marry? What concept of law and history do you have to deny these groups if you allow gays to have a right to marriage?
The “right” to marry someone you can’t be attracted to and ruin both your lives is not equal to the right to marry someone you can love as they deserve. If it were, they would still only have equal rights when same sex marriage is legalized, because when they get the right to marry somebody they want to marry, you will have gained the right to marry somebody you can’t want to be with, which, according to you, is equal, so lucky you.
Duddio, I shouldn't have too tell you this.. but when a person brings pedophilia into a conversation concerning what consenting adults do, not only is it disconcerting but it's rather creepy
Pedophilia = FAIL, big time.
We can cross those other bridges should they come before us. For now, we can stick with two consenting adults wanting the legal ability to marry, or are you more interested in talking about children?
 April 25, 2015 at 4:32pm
Monk, the quote “cloture is the only vote that mattered” is applied to this instance only. Cruz wasn’t speaking about cloture votes in general. He obviously had the whip count, as did Cornyn. When Cornyn approved cloture with his vote, he knew she would be confirmed easily.
Carpenter stated "Leadership wanted her confirmed. It's as simple as that"
I wouldn't call it leadership, they're more like Mafia Capos scrapping to get their hands on the slush fund money...
I actually have more respect for the Mafia than these thieves in congress. At least the Mafia is known for EARNING illegal money. These crooks just steal it from us or are bribed to screw the country.
 April 25, 2015 at 4:30pm
Except for Cruz’s years in private practice, experience before the Supreme Court, years of experience working to reign in regulations at the FTC, and actually managing an office of hundreds of lawyers and employees for 5 1/2 years, for the State of Texas, you’d be almost right.
Except you’re not, and it makes you look ignorant. =/
Salvatore, you’re off your rocker. AND you are insulting millions of people of faith by crapping on Liberty University? Just a clue for you, Sal, there are many classes that are mandatory that have speakers of all kinds come through and speak to the students. That doesn’t diminish the speaker’s message one bit. And the applause? The cheering and clapping and standing ovations? Were those mandatory as well?
You are a moron with an agenda, and I cannot believe that the Blaze actually posted your crap.
No, the author of this article made it pretty clear.....Convocation at Liberty is not optional...Therefore, it was a very poor decision by Cruz to use the mandatory student event as a backdrop to his political rally.
 March 24, 2015 at 2:42pm
I would feel very sad for my friend who obviously is separated from the love of God and has no hope for eternity. Then I would share my heart for this friend to find forgiveness in Jesus and join a relationship with God.
 March 10, 2015 at 4:56pm
Total crap, Chris!! The Congress has been advising Obama not to deal with Iran since they found out these secret talks were underway. The WH has turned a deaf ear to the responsible adults in the room, so they found a way to express to Iran that the things Obama says are not set in stone.
Forget what it makes Obama look like, it is preserving the integrity of the US around the world. If Barry made an agreement that the Senate rejected, who knows what Iran would do with that situation? This is merely keeping things out in the open for everyone to be on the same page.
Duddio, I expect better from the GOP than to lower themselves to Ted Kennedy's level. How is the GOP standing up to Obama by running to Iran's skirts to stand up for them? The GOP couldn't stand up to Obama on the DHS funding fiasco...Iran sees that. Do you think Iran is intimidated by the GOP who can't even stand up to Resident Obama? The solution is to battle him at home, not ask foreign nations to fight Obama.
Hes not wrong in believing the Repubs should be doing something "face to face" to stop obammi!
 March 4, 2015 at 2:56pm
So, Ben, what do you say to the pedophile or beastialist that say they have no choice over their desires or attractions? You tell them they weren’t made that way, it is not natural, and they need to be healed from their aberrant desires.
That is the entire message of the Gospel.
 February 22, 2015 at 8:03pm
I think Walker IS the Establishment’s pick. Jeb is a sideshow, and he will never get past the GOP grassroots. When Jeb crashes and burns, watch how quickly the Establishment will appear behind Walker. He will support some form of amnesty and immigration reform, and he won’t secure the border any more than George W did.
Also, watch for Romney to throw his support and money behind Walker.
Could be, but I have my doubts. Remember how after the election the mainstream media did all sorts of puff pieces on Romney? I really think he's still in the game. And of course Jeb thinks he owns it because of his family, so I'm betting on one of those two, or maybe a ticket with both.
I could see one of them picking Walker as VP though. He'll be in their pocket and ready to throw under the bus when they lose like they did to Ryan. Can't blame it on the big dog after all.
 February 17, 2015 at 10:54pm
I’m of two minds on this. He doesn’t react until she rubs up against his behind. Maybe he felt violated, feeling she had created a hostile work environment for him?
On the other hand, he may just be a racist, feeling that this uppity white chick was over-stepping her place by stepping on his stage and touching him. He obviously held a LOT of disdain for her.
I think the Crips are a black gang and don’t mix with hispanics. Unless they are now joining forces against ‘whitey.’
 January 28, 2015 at 3:06pm
What do Panamanian thugs have against the Dutch? Are they Austin Powers fans? SO bizarre!!
 January 28, 2015 at 1:24pm
That’s AWESOME, Monk!! You win teh internets today! ;)
 January 28, 2015 at 12:36pm
I read that and thought of the video I saw of a woman being repeatedly beaten in her own home by a robber, and she was complying with everything he said. She was brutalized, but she said she was trying to keep him from focusing on her toddler and just hit her instead.
I wish the video had been of her shooting the thug dead. I will NEVER comply with a criminal!!!